Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

No Train Still Gain. Unleash Mathematical Reasoning of Large Language Models with Monte Carlo Tree Search Guided by Energy Function

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2309.03224 v3 pith:5HEMZWZL submitted 2023-09-01 cs.AI cs.LG

classification cs.AIcs.LG
keywords reasoningenergymathematicalfunctionlanguagellmsfine-tunedsearch
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large language models (LLMs) demonstrate impressive language understanding and contextual learning abilities, making them suitable for natural language processing (NLP) tasks and complex mathematical reasoning. However, when applied to mathematical reasoning tasks, LLMs often struggle to generate correct reasoning steps and answers despite having high probabilities for the solutions. To overcome this limitation and enhance the mathematical reasoning capabilities of fine-tuned LLMs without additional fine-tuning steps, we propose a method that incorporates Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) and a lightweight energy function to rank decision steps and enable immediate reaction and precise reasoning. Specifically, we re-formulate the fine-tuned LLMs into a Residual-based Energy Model (Residual-EBM) and employ noise contrastive estimation to estimate the energy function's parameters. We then utilize MCTS with the energy function as a path verifier to search the output space and evaluate the reasoning path. Through extensive experiments on two mathematical reasoning benchmarks, GSM8k and AQUA-RAT, we demonstrate the exceptional capabilities of our method, which significantly improves the pass@1 metric of the fine-tuned model without requiring additional fine-tuning or reinforcement learning with human feedback alignment.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. RedStar: Does Scaling Long-CoT Data Unlock Better Slow-Reasoning Systems?

    cs.LG 2025-01 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    Long-CoT fine-tuning with QwQ-generated traces improves math and geometry benchmarks, and RedStar-DPO surpasses QwQ on AIME24, but several reported numbers conflict with the paper's own tables.

  2. Evolution of Thought: Diverse and High-Quality Reasoning via Multi-Objective Optimization

    cs.NE 2024-11 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    EoT applies multi-objective evolutionary search with crossover, mutation, and clustering to MLLM reasoning and reports improved Pass@K accuracy on MathVista, Math-Vision, and GSM8K.

  3. MC-NEST: Enhancing Mathematical Reasoning in Large Language Models leveraging a Monte Carlo Self-Refine Tree

    cs.LG 2024-11 reject novelty 2.0 of 10

    MC-NEST adds a constant probability term to MCTSr's node selection and reports improved AIME pass@1 for GPT-4o, but the numbers are weakened by test-set rollout tuning and internal inconsistencies.

Pith tools