Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 45 references

Microscopic study of topological phase transitions: Percolation point of view

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-04 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Decoherence-induced topological phase transitions are percolation events, and a new quasi-local negativity (QLTEN) makes this visible at the microscopic scale.

desk verdict QLTEN is a genuinely useful new probe and the color-code/toric-code contrast under explosive percolation is real, but the labeling rule that defines QLTEN regions is heuristic and needs proof before the extracted thresholds are trusted. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.26707 v2 pith:5I677F5J submitted 2026-07-29 quant-ph cond-mat.othercond-mat.stat-mechcond-mat.str-el

Keisuke Kataoka , Ikuo Ichinose This is my paper · ORCID
classification quant-phcond-mat.othercond-mat.stat-mechcond-mat.str-el
keywords topologicalphasetransitiondecoherenceentanglementnegativitycolorcodetoric1-formsymmetrypercolationexplosive
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper tries to establish a microscopic, spatially resolved picture of decoherence-driven topological phase transitions: as random noise eats away a stabilizer state, regions of the new topological order grow, merge, and percolate, much like droplets in an Ising magnet. Its central object is QLTEN, a quasi-local topological entanglement negativity computed on 7-plaquette hexagonal subsystems, whose snapshots show γ_N=1 'toric-code regions' nucleating inside the γ_N=2 color-code state. The authors read TEN as a first-homology quantity—a (quasi-)closed loop of merged stabilizer generators—and the 1-form-symmetry disorder parameter as a zeroth-homology quantity—a connected cluster—which explains why the two indicators behave differently in the critical regime. Under biased 'explosive' decoherence, the color-code transition is insensitive to the bias while the toric-code transition is delayed; the authors conclude that a universal microscopic description is challenging even for closely related codes. They flag that the QLTEN identification is a heuristic checked on selected configurations and that a satisfactory finite-size scaling of the TEN variance was not achieved.

What carries the argument

QLTEN: the topological entanglement negativity computed locally on adjacent 7-plaquette hexagonal subsystems (A,B,C) via γ_N = −N_A − N_B − N_C − N_ABC + N_AB + N_BC + N_AC; γ_N=1 marks a toric-code-like region, γ_N=0 a Higgs region. The homological reading: TEN answers to (quasi-)closed loops of merged S^Z stabilizers (first simplicial homology), while the 1-form disorder parameter D_X(Γ) answers to connected clusters of merged stabilizers (zeroth homology). The explosive-percolation decoherence schedule selects, at each step, the bond whose attached clusters have the smallest size product, so large decohered clusters are suppressed.

What would settle it

Enumerate all decoherence patterns on a small patch of the triangular lattice, and for each 7-plaquette hexagon in each pattern compute both the exact QLTEN value and whether a (quasi-)closed loop of merged S^Z stabilizers encircles it; find one pattern with QLTEN=1 but no encircling loop, or the reverse, and the heuristic rule is refuted. A coarser check: in many decoherence realizations, compare the percolation threshold read from QLTEN clusters with the threshold read from the exact global TEN; if the two transitions drift apart, QLTEN is not faithfully representing the global topological t

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms: the decoherence-induced transition from the color code to the toric code is a percolation transition in the space of anyon-proliferation events. Each red-link XX-decoherence merges two red plaquette stabilizers, so the state's evolution is a growing bond network on a triangular lattice; when a (quasi-)closed loop of merged S^Z stabilizers surrounds a 7-plaquette hexagon, the local TEN drops from 2 to 1, marking a 'TC region.' QLTEN snapshots reveal these regions, and their largest cluster percolates at p≈0.22, earlier than the 1-form disorder parameter's critical point p_s≈0.31. In the toric code under Z-decoherence, QLTEN shows γ_N=0 Higgs regions, and the death of

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that a 7-plaquette hexagon has γ_N=1 (the toric-code value) exactly when a (quasi-)closed loop of merged S^Z stabilizers encircles it; the paper checks this rule for selected configurations and explicitly says general cases are difficult to analyze analytically, so if other configurations violate it, QLTEN's snapshots mislabel the local topological order and the conclusions built on those labels weaken.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • QLTEN configurations can be assembled from the stabilizer syndrome on a classical computer, making the percolation of TC or Higgs regions observable as an early warning that logical qubits are about to fail.
  • The non-coincidence of the 1-form critical point (p_s≈0.31, ν≈1.2, close to bond percolation) and the TEN-variance peak (p≈0.22) is explained by their different homological character: cluster vs loop.
  • In the toric code, the moment the largest QLTEN 'Higgs' cluster spans the system is the moment the logical qubit disappears; QLTEN is precocious relative to the non-contractible-loop order.
  • Biased decoherence results imply that fault-tolerance thresholds and noise-bias strategies are code-specific and will not transfer between the color code and the toric code.
  • The operator ∏_{⟨i,j⟩∈loop}(λ+X_i X_j) is introduced as a second-homology probe for the emergence of the Z2 gauge theory in the color-code-to-toric-code transition.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because QLTEN uses a fixed 7-plaquette resolution, its cluster statistics (thresholds, exponents) may drift as the subsystem size changes; a natural test is to repeat the percolation analysis with larger and smaller hexagonal subsystems and check convergence.
  • The color code's insensitivity to explosive percolation hints that its transition is driven by local anyon-pair creation rather than by the growth of global decohered clusters; this could be tested in other stabilizer codes, such as the surface code with different boundary conditions.
  • If QLTEN is a genuine percolation order parameter, its cluster-size distribution should obey standard percolation scaling; comparing its cluster-size exponent with bond percolation on the triangular lattice would be a quantitative check.
  • The paper leaves open whether the second-homology loop operator restores a universal description; a direct test is to measure its expectation value in both codes under the same explosive-percolation schedule and see whether it tracks a common threshold.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies decoherence-induced transitions from the color code to an emergent toric code, and from the toric code to a Higgs-like phase, using the stabilizer formalism on lattices of up to a few hundred qubits. It introduces QLTEN, the topological entanglement negativity of a 7-plaquette hexagon, as a local probe, and interprets global TEN and the 1-form disorder parameter as first- and zeroth-homology observables. Under uniform and n-trial explosive-percolation (EP) biased decoherence, the authors report that in the color code the QLTEN clusters and global observables are nearly EP-insensitive, while in the toric code QLTEN clusters, TEN, and logical loop operators show clear n-dependence. The central claim is that QLTEN clusters react before the 1-form symmetry and logical-order parameters, and that the two models' different responses to EP indicate the absence of a simple universal microscopic description of these transitions.

Significance. The paper's exact stabilizer-formalism numerics are a strength, as are the multiple independent observables (TEN, string operator, logical loops, QLTEN cluster statistics) and the explicit finite-size scaling with data collapse for the disorder parameter. The percolation/homology analogy is appealing and the QLTEN proposal is a natural way to visualize spatial structure in a topological transition. If the interpretation is substantiated, the work could provide a practical diagnostic for quantum error mitigation in topological codes. However, the central interpretive step—identifying QLTEN γ_N=1 regions with quasi-closed loops—is only heuristic, and the extracted event-based thresholds are quoted without uncertainties. These issues are fixable and do not undermine the exactness of the computed QLTEN values, but they must be addressed before the microscopic claims can be regarded as established.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. III.C, Fig. 8] The identification of QLTEN γ_N=1 with 'at least one of A,B,C is encircled by a (quasi-)closed loop' is verified only for selected configurations; the text concedes that 'general cases are rather difficult to examine analytically' and calls the consideration a 'heuristic reflection.' This is load-bearing because the percolation interpretation, the extraction of p_QL/p_UF, and the claimed color-code/toric-code contrast all use QLTEN clusters as TC/Higgs regions. Since the QLTEN values themselves are computed exactly, the gap is testable: for random decoherence configurations in both codes and a range of p and L, compare the loop-encirclement criterion with the directly computed 7-plaquette TEN and report false-positive/false-negative rates. If the rule has exceptions, the homology-based interpretation and the thresholds must be qualified accordingly.
  2. [Sec. IV.A, IV.D, Fig. 13] The thresholds p_QL and p_UF are reported as point values (e.g., p_QL=0.22 for n=1 and 96; p_UF=0.29 and 0.54) without error bars or finite-size analysis. The event-based ensemble estimator (peak of Δ(t)=C_1(t+1)-C_1(t)) is nonstandard, and no distribution of t_max or sample-to-sample spread is shown. Because the paper uses the difference between p_QL and p_UF to argue that QLTEN 'reacts to decoherence faster than the 1-form symmetry and the non-contractible logical orders,' statistical uncertainties and system-size dependence are needed. Please provide bootstrap or similar errors, the t_max distribution, and a scaling test for at least two additional system sizes.
  3. [Sec. V, Figs. 15-19] The qualitative contrast between the color code (QLTEN insensitive to n-trial EP) and the toric code (clearly n-dependent) is central to the conclusion that a universal microscopic description is challenging. However, the two simulations use different system sizes (color code (12,8), toric code (12,12)) and different maximal n (96 versus 120). Please confirm the contrast at matched system sizes and n, or explain quantitatively why the mismatch cannot affect the comparison. This is particularly relevant to the 'precocious QLTEN' claim in Sec. V, which relies on the timing of QLTEN-cluster growth relative to logical-order disappearance.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Sec. III.C, Eq. (21)] The proposed operator with arbitrary λ is not used anywhere in the paper. If it is only an outlook remark, say so explicitly; otherwise its presence introduces an unused free parameter and distracts from the main results.
  2. [Sec. VI] Typos: 'holomogical' should be 'homological'; 'extra-ordinary' is nonstandard. The manuscript would also benefit from a careful pass for minor grammatical errors.
  3. [Figs. 5, 12, 13] Several variance/largest-cluster panels would be easier to read if the legend explicitly identified the subsystem size or n value inside the panel; currently some identification is only in the caption. Also state in captions whether error bars represent standard error or standard deviation.
  4. [Sec. II.C.1, Eq. (13)] The disorder parameter D_X(Γ) is defined with ρ_D in both the numerator and denominator; this is clear enough, but for reproducibility please specify the string shape and boundary conditions more explicitly than 'details are specified in the practical calculation.'
  5. [Data Availability] The statement 'available from the authors on reasonable request' is acceptable, but for a numerical paper of this type, providing the stabilizer-formalism code (or a minimal example) would strengthen reproducibility. This is a suggestion, not a requirement.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: QLTEN is a direct local observable, and the paper's correlations are numerical, not fitted into themselves.

full rationale

The paper's central new quantity, QLTEN, is not defined in terms of the global quantities it is compared with. It is computed directly from the stabilizer-rank negativity formula, Eq. (15), via the TEN combination, Eq. (18), applied to 7-plaquette subsystems. The paper explicitly notes that the spatial rule linking gamma_N=1 to (quasi-)closed loops of merged stabilizers is heuristic ('General cases are rather difficult to examine analytically, but the above consideration provides us with a heuristic reflection'), which is an unproven-lemma limitation rather than a reduction of the result to its inputs. The claimed correlations between QLTEN clusters, string operators, 1-form disorder parameters, and logical-qubit survival are numerical observations made on independently generated decoherence configurations; no parameter is fitted to one of these observables and then renamed as another. Self-citations, including Refs. [6], [20], and [26], provide previously established stabilizer-rank methods and the disorder-parameter construction, but the paper's new results—the EP behavior, the QLTEN snapshots, and the toric-code logical-qubit timing—are generated by direct simulation and not forced by those citations alone. The absence of a machine-checked proof of the QLTEN labeling rule is a correctness risk, not circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on two external pillars (negativity rank formula, TEN area-law conjecture), one standard structural equivalence (color code = two toric codes), and one paper-specific rule (quasi-closed loop => γ_N=1) that is only partially proven. The fragile ingredient is the paper-specific rule; QLTEN's spatial interpretation collapses if it fails. No new physical entities are postulated.

free parameters (6)
  • n-trial EP trial count n = 1, 2, 4, 96, 120, 384
    Chosen by hand to define biased decoherence; central comparison of color-code vs toric-code response to EP depends on varying n.
  • QLTEN subsystem size = 7-plaquette hexagon
    Spatial resolution of the QLTEN map; mean QLTEN equals the TEN of this subsystem, so all QLTEN claims inherit this choice; the authors note in Sec. VI that other sizes should be tested.
  • event-based and Union-Find thresholds p_QL, p_UF = p_QL≈0.22 (n=1 and 96), p_UF≈0.29 (n=1), 0.54 (n=96)
    Extracted from largest-cluster statistics (Sec. IV.D); used to demonstrate that QLTEN thresholds are close to the TEN-variance peak and insensitive to n in the color code.
  • EP pseudo-critical p_max = ⟨p_max⟩≈0.320 (n=1), 0.365 (n=4), 0.652 (n=384)
    Measured from Union-Find bond-growth simulation (Sec. IV.A); used to show EP shifts the decoherence-cluster threshold.
  • disorder-parameter critical point and exponent = p_s≈0.31, ν≈1.2 (n=1); p_s≈0.32, ν≈1.19 (n=384)
    Fitted by FSS to D_X(Γ) via Eq. (A1); used as evidence that the 1-form symmetry transition lies near the bond-percolation value.
  • λ in proposed loop operator Eq. (21) = unspecified positive real
    Proposed for a second-homology probe but not used in the numerical study; included for completeness.
assumptions (5)
  • standard math Rank formula for negativity of stabilizer states (Eqs. 15-16)
    Invoked without proof in Sec. II.C.2; a failure here invalidates all TEN and QLTEN values.
  • domain assumption Area-law scaling N_A = c|∂A| − γ_N (Eq. 17) with universal TEN
    Attributed to a conjecture in [31] and numerical verification in the authors' own previous paper [6]; assumed for 7-plaquette subsystems.
  • ad hoc to paper A 7-plaquette subsystem has γ_N=1 iff one of A,B,C is encircled by a (quasi-)closed loop of merged S^Z stabilizers
    Sec. III.C: verified for selected configurations (Fig. 8), then 'General cases are rather difficult to examine analytically'; this rule labels QLTEN 'TC regions'.
  • domain assumption Color code is equivalent to two toric codes; red XX decoherence at p=1 yields a TC on the red triangular lattice
    Standard result [13,17-19] used in Sec. II.B to interpret the transition and link qubits.
  • standard math Triangular-lattice bond percolation threshold ~0.3473 and EP cluster statistics
    Used in Sec. III.A/IV.A for comparison; percolation threshold is standard, EP values come from the authors' own simulations.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Microscopic study of topological phase transitions: Percolation point of view." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/5I677F5J

@misc{pith2026260726707,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Microscopic study of topological phase transitions: Percolation point of view},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/5I677F5J}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.26707}
}
read the original abstract

We investigate microscopic mechanisms underlying decoherence-induced transitions between topologically ordered states. As a first case study, we analyze the color code using topological entanglement negativity (TEN) and a disorder parameter associated with 1-form symmetry. We interpret these quantities as first- and zeroth-dimensional simplicial homological objects, respectively, and show that the transition can be understood in terms of decoherence percolation. To resolve its local structure, we introduce quasi-local TEN (QLTEN), which visualizes the spatial distribution of local topological properties and the growth of decohered regions. We further introduce explosive percolation (EP), corresponding here to biased decoherence that suppresses the formation of large decohered clusters. As a second case study, we consider the toric code on a triangular lattice under external-field-type decoherence. Numerical results show that QLTEN faithfully captures the emergence of Higgs regions and the survival of logical qubits. Although global TEN, QLTEN clusters, and string operators are strongly correlated in both models, the color code and toric code respond differently to EP patterns. This difference indicates that a universal microscopic description of decoherence-induced topological phase transitions remains challenging even for closely related systems.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.26707 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. (a) Schematics of the color code Hamiltonian. (b) By the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. (a) Schematics of emergent triangular lattice by red [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. (a) Schematics of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (15 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Schematics of calculation of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Upper panels [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Red [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_7.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Schematics of the disorder parameter of the 1-form symme [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Snapshots of QLTEN. The top panel explains the map from honeycomb lattice to square lattice, which is used in the display of QLTEN. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: displays how large clusters of the percolated re￾gion evolve as p increases in various EP processes, which are produced using Union Find for the triangular lattice. Although the threshold is less sensitive to the percolation method (i.e., the value of n) than expected…
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11. Cluster size distributions of decoherence for various EP. For [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12. Upper panels:TENs and their variances for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13. Largest cluster sizes of the color code as a function of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_13.png]
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: FIG. 14. Schematics of the toric code Hamiltonian. Wilson string [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_14.png]
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: FIG. 15. Various observables of the toric code under various types of EP decoherence. (a) and (b): TEN and its variance, which have very [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_15.png]
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: FIG. 16. Largest clusters of regions with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_16.png]
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: FIG. 17. Cluster-size distributions of TC ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_17.png]
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: FIG. 18. Snapshots of EP, QLTEN and surviving logical qubit for various values of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_18.png]
Figure 19
Figure 19. Figure 19: FIG. 19. Snapshots of EP, QLTEN and surviving logical qubit for various values of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_19.png]

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

45 extracted references · 3 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Explicitly, W rX (γc)≡ Y ℓ∈γc (XX) ℓ,(9) whereγ c is a closed loop on red links and(XX) ℓ stands for theXXoperator on the red linkℓ

    Disorder parameter of 1-form symmetry We first consider the 1-form symmetry [3, 4], in particular the redX-1-form symmetry, whose charge is an arbitrary loop composite of redXXoperators. Explicitly, W rX (γc)≡ Y ℓ∈γc (XX) ℓ,(9) whereγ c is a closed loop on red links and(XX) ℓ stands for theXXoperator on the red linkℓ. It is not difficult to show thatW rX ...

  2. [2]

    For pure systems, TEE is believed to be a good measure, whereas it includes classical correlation as well for mixed states

    Topological entanglement negativity Moving on, let us discuss the quantum entanglement prop- erty of the system. For pure systems, TEE is believed to be a good measure, whereas it includes classical correlation as well for mixed states. TEN was proposed as a measure of quantum entanglement, and recent studies indicate its utility. We employ TEN for the pr...

    2026

  3. [3]

    As explained in the main text, we have to specify the shapes of the subsystemsA, B.C

    Prescription of TEN and QLTEN We show the protocol for calculating TEN and QLTEN. As explained in the main text, we have to specify the shapes of the subsystemsA, B.C. Essential points are the same for the color code and the TC, whereas the color code (TC) is defined on the honeycomb (triangular) lattice. The first step is to construct a hexagonal complex...

  4. [4]

    5 and 12 [5, 20]

    the finite-size scaling analysis In this subsection, we explain the finite-size scaling (FSS) analysis for the string data in Figs. 5 and 12 [5, 20]. We employ the following Ansatz, DX (Γ) =ℓ −ζF((p−p c)ℓ1/ν),(A1) whereℓ=|Γ|=length ofΓ,Fis a scaling function andνis the critical exponent. We tried to apply FSS to the variance of DX (Γ), but could not obtai...

  5. [5]

    Levin and X.-G

    M. Levin and X.-G. Wen, Detecting topological order in a ground state wave function, Phys. Rev. Lett.96, 110405 (2006)

    2006

  6. [6]

    Kitaev and J

    A. Kitaev and J. Preskill, Topological entanglement entropy, Phys. Rev. Lett.96, 110404 (2006)

    2006

  7. [7]

    Gaiotto, A

    D. Gaiotto, A. Kapustin, N. Seiberg, and B. Willett, General- ized global symmetries, Journal of High Energy Physics2015, 10.1007/jhep02(2015)172 (2015)

    doi:10.1007/jhep02(2015)172 2015

  8. [8]

    McGreevy, Generalized symmetries in condensed matter, An- nual Review of Condensed Matter Physics14, 57–82 (2023)

    J. McGreevy, Generalized symmetries in condensed matter, An- nual Review of Condensed Matter Physics14, 57–82 (2023)

    2023

Show all 45 references
  1. [9]

    Kataoka, Y

    K. Kataoka, Y . Kuno, T. Orito, and I. Ichinose, Measurement- only circuit of perturbed toric code on triangular lattice: Topo- logical entanglement, 1-form symmetry, and logical qubits, Physical Review B113, 024111 (2026)

    2026

  2. [10]

    Kataoka, Y

    K. Kataoka, Y . Kuno, T. Orito, and I. Ichinose, Decohered color code and emerging mixed toric code by anyon prolifer- ation: Topological entanglement negativity perspective, arXiv preprint arXiv:2604.22521 (2026)

    2026 arXiv

  3. [11]

    A. Y . Kitaev, Quantum computations: algorithms and error cor- rection, Russian Mathematical Surveys52, 1191 (1997)

    1997

  4. [12]

    Kitaev, Fault-tolerant quantum computation by anyons, An- nals of Physics303, 2–30 (2003)

    A. Kitaev, Fault-tolerant quantum computation by anyons, An- nals of Physics303, 2–30 (2003)

    2003

  5. [13]

    Bombin and M

    H. Bombin and M. A. Martin-Delgado, Topological quantum distillation, Phys. Rev. Lett.97, 180501 (2006)

    2006

  6. [14]

    Bombin, R

    H. Bombin, R. S. Andrist, M. Ohzeki, H. G. Katzgraber, and M. A. Martin-Delgado, Strong resilience of topological codes to depolarization, Phys. Rev. X2, 021004 (2012)

    2012

  7. [15]

    Bomb ´ın, Gauge color codes: optimal transversal gates and gauge fixing in topological stabilizer codes, New Journal of Physics17, 083002 (2015)

    H. Bomb ´ın, Gauge color codes: optimal transversal gates and gauge fixing in topological stabilizer codes, New Journal of Physics17, 083002 (2015)

    2015

  8. [16]

    Yoshida, Topological color code and symmetry-protected topological phases, Phys

    B. Yoshida, Topological color code and symmetry-protected topological phases, Phys. Rev. B91, 245131 (2015)

    2015

  9. [17]

    Kubica, B

    A. Kubica, B. Yoshida, and F. Pastawski, Unfolding the color code, New Journal of Physics17, 083026 (2015)

    2015

  10. [18]

    M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang, Quantum Computation and Quantum Information, 10th ed. (Cambridge University Press, USA, 2011)

    2011

  11. [19]

    Z. Wang, Z. Wu, and Z. Wang, Intrinsic mixed-state topological order, PRX Quantum6, 010314 (2025)

    2025

  12. [20]

    Sohal and A

    R. Sohal and A. Prem, Noisy approach to intrinsically mixed- state topological order, PRX Quantum6, 010313 (2025)

    2025

  13. [21]

    Bombin, G

    H. Bombin, G. Duclos-Cianci, and D. Poulin, Universal topo- logical phase of two-dimensional stabilizer codes, New Journal of Physics14, 073048 (2012)

    2012

  14. [22]

    A. B. Aloshious and P. K. Sarvepalli, Local equivalence of qudit color codes and toric codes, Phys. Rev. A100, 012348 (2019)

    2019

  15. [23]

    M. S. Kesselring, J. C. Magdalena de la Fuente, F. Thomsen, J. Eisert, S. D. Bartlett, and B. J. Brown, Anyon condensation and the color code, PRX Quantum5, 010342 (2024)

    2024

  16. [24]

    Y . Kuno, T. Orito, and I. Ichinose, Intrinsic mixed-state topolog- ical order in a stabilizer system under stochastic decoherence: Strong-to-weak spontaneous symmetry breaking from a perco- lation point of view, Physical Review B111, 064111 (2025)

    2025

  17. [25]

    Bu ˇca and T

    B. Bu ˇca and T. Prosen, A note on symmetry reductions of the lindblad equation: transport in constrained open spin chains, New J. of Phys.14, 073007 (2012)

    2012

  18. [26]

    V . V . Albert and L. Jiang, Symmetries and conserved quantities in lindblad master equations, Phys. Rev. A89, 022118 (2014)

    2014

  19. [27]

    de Groot, A

    C. de Groot, A. Turzillo, and N. Schuch, Symmetry protected topological order in open quantum systems, Quantum6, 856 (2022)

    2022

  20. [28]

    This comes from the fact Tr(DrX ρD) = 0for anyp, as the decoherence does not expand stabilizer group

    The strong 1-form symmetry is always SSB. This comes from the fact Tr(DrX ρD) = 0for anyp, as the decoherence does not expand stabilizer group

  21. [29]

    T.-C. Lu, T. H. Hsieh, and T. Grover, Detecting topological or- der at finite temperature using entanglement negativity, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 116801 (2020)

    2020

  22. [30]

    S. Sang, Y . Li, T. Zhou, X. Chen, T. H. Hsieh, and M. P. Fisher, Entanglement negativity at measurement-induced crit- icality, PRX Quantum2, 030313 (2021)

    2021

  23. [31]

    Weinstein, Y

    Z. Weinstein, Y . Bao, and E. Altman, Measurement-induced power-law negativity in an open monitored quantum circuit, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 080501 (2022)

    2022

  24. [32]

    B. Shi, X. Dai, and Y .-M. Lu, Entanglement negativity at the critical point of measurement-driven transition (2021), arXiv:2012.00040 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

    2021 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Sharma, X

    S. Sharma, X. Turkeshi, R. Fazio, and M. Dalmonte, Measurement-induced criticality in extended and long-range unitary circuits, SciPost Phys. Core5, 023 (2022)

    2022

  26. [34]

    Y . Kuno, T. Orito, and I. Ichinose, Phase transition and evi- dence of fast-scrambling phase in measurement-only quantum circuits, Phys. Rev. B108, 094104 (2023)

    2023

  27. [35]

    R. Fan, Y . Bao, E. Altman, and A. Vishwanath, Diagnostics of mixed-state topological order and breakdown of quantum mem- ory, PRX Quantum5, 10.1103/prxquantum.5.020343 (2024)

    2024 doi

  28. [36]

    M. Li, J. Wang, and Y . Deng, Explosive percolation in finite dimensions, Physical Review Research6, 033319 (2024)

    2024

  29. [37]

    Achlioptas, R

    D. Achlioptas, R. M. D’souza, and J. Spencer, Explosive perco- lation in random networks, science323, 1453 (2009)

    2009

  30. [38]

    K. G. Wilson, Confinement of quarks, Phys. Rev. D10, 2445 (1974)

    1974

  31. [39]

    ’t Hooft, On the phase transition towards permanent quark confinement, Nuclear Physics B138, 1 (1978)

    G. ’t Hooft, On the phase transition towards permanent quark confinement, Nuclear Physics B138, 1 (1978)

    1978

  32. [40]

    Botzung, M

    T. Botzung, M. Buchhold, S. Diehl, and M. M ¨uller, Robust- ness and measurement-induced percolation of the surface code, 21 Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical58, 205304 (2025)

    2025

  33. [41]

    F. Ares, S. Murciano, and P. Calabrese, Entanglement asymme- try as a probe of symmetry breaking, Nature Communications 14, 2036 (2023)

  34. [42]

    Benini, P

    F. Benini, P. Calabrese, M. Fossati, A. H. Singh, and M. Venuti, Entanglement asymmetry for higher and noninvertible symme- tries, arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.16311 (2025)

    2025

  35. [43]

    A. G. Lamas, J. Gliozzi, and T. L. Hughes, Higher-form en- tanglement asymmetry and topological order, arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.03967 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Benini, E

    F. Benini, E. Garc ´ıa-Valdecasas, and S. Vitouladitis, Higher- form entanglement asymmetry. part I. the limits of symmetry breaking, Journal of High Energy Physics2026, 202 (2026)

    2026

  37. [45]

    Yang and C

    M. Yang and C. H. Lee, Percolation-inducedPTsymmetry breaking, Phys. Rev. Lett133, 136602 (2024)

    2024

Pith tools

Reviewed August 4, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.