Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Ancient Script Image Recognition and Processing: A Review

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2506.19208 v1 pith:5IRMG7YS submitted 2025-06-24 cs.CV

Ancient Script Image Recognition and Processing: A Review

classification cs.CV
keywords ancientrecognitionscriptsimagescriptchallengesmethodsincluding
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Ancient scripts, e.g., Egyptian hieroglyphs, Oracle Bone Inscriptions, and Ancient Greek inscriptions, serve as vital carriers of human civilization, embedding invaluable historical and cultural information. Automating ancient script image recognition has gained importance, enabling large-scale interpretation and advancing research in archaeology and digital humanities. With the rise of deep learning, this field has progressed rapidly, with numerous script-specific datasets and models proposed. While these scripts vary widely, spanning phonographic systems with limited glyphs to logographic systems with thousands of complex symbols, they share common challenges and methodological overlaps. Moreover, ancient scripts face unique challenges, including imbalanced data distribution and image degradation, which have driven the development of various dedicated methods. This survey provides a comprehensive review of ancient script image recognition methods. We begin by categorizing existing studies based on script types and analyzing respective recognition methods, highlighting both their differences and shared strategies. We then focus on challenges unique to ancient scripts, systematically examining their impact and reviewing recent solutions, including few-shot learning and noise-robust techniques. Finally, we summarize current limitations and outline promising future directions. Our goal is to offer a structured, forward-looking perspective to support ongoing advancements in the recognition, interpretation, and decipherment of ancient scripts.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. GlotOCR Bench: OCR Models Still Struggle Beyond a Handful of Unicode Scripts

    cs.CL 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    GlotOCR Bench shows that OCR models perform well on fewer than 10 scripts and fail to generalize beyond about 30, with results tracking pretraining coverage and models hallucinating from known scripts on unfamiliar ones.

  2. EpiSAM: Character Segmentation in Challenging Stone Inscriptions

    cs.CV 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    EpiSAM introduces neighbor-aware prediction in a prompt-guided transformer for character segmentation on challenging stone inscriptions, plus an expanded annotated dataset.