Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Efficient Redundancy Techniques for Latency Reduction in Cloud Systems

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1508.03599 v3 pith:5KSMF7CY submitted 2015-08-14 cs.DC cs.ITmath.IT

Efficient Redundancy Techniques for Latency Reduction in Cloud Systems

classification cs.DC cs.ITmath.IT
keywords redundancytimelatencyserviceaddingdistributiontaskwhen
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

In cloud computing systems, assigning a task to multiple servers and waiting for the earliest copy to finish is an effective method to combat the variability in response time of individual servers, and reduce latency. But adding redundancy may result in higher cost of computing resources, as well as an increase in queueing delay due to higher traffic load. This work helps understand when and how redundancy gives a cost-efficient reduction in latency. For a general task service time distribution, we compare different redundancy strategies in terms of the number of redundant tasks, and time when they are issued and canceled. We get the insight that the log-concavity of the task service time creates a dichotomy of when adding redundancy helps. If the service time distribution is log-convex (i.e. log of the tail probability is convex) then adding maximum redundancy reduces both latency and cost. And if it is log-concave (i.e. log of the tail probability is concave), then less redundancy, and early cancellation of redundant tasks is more effective. Using these insights, we design a general redundancy strategy that achieves a good latency-cost trade-off for an arbitrary service time distribution. This work also generalizes and extends some results in the analysis of fork-join queues.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.