pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.09814 · v2 · pith:5KX6DHCNnew · submitted 2026-06-08 · 🌌 astro-ph.SR · astro-ph.GA

ALMA measurements of mass loss and wind clumping in the massive stars of the Arches cluster

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 14:48 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.SR astro-ph.GA
keywords massive starsstellar windswind clumpingALMAArches clustermass lossWolf-Rayet starsfree-free emission
0
0 comments X

The pith

ALMA data show wind clumping in Arches cluster stars decreases with radius.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper reports new ALMA continuum observations at 100 GHz and 243 GHz of the Arches cluster, detecting millimetre emission from 23 massive stars including Wolf-Rayet and O-type objects. Combining these with archival VLA radio data yields broadband spectral indices that mostly indicate thermal free-free emission for the Wolf-Rayet stars. The analysis extracts clumping-scaled mass-loss rates and finds that the clumping strength drops as distance from the star increases. This pattern supplies direct support for wind models that place the strongest density inhomogeneities close to the stellar surface.

Core claim

The majority of Wolf-Rayet stars exhibit spectral indices clustered around α ≈ 0.7-0.8, consistent with predominantly thermal free-free emission from dense, partially optically thick winds. We find significant evidence of structured wind clumping at millimetre wavelengths that generally decreases with increasing radius, supporting structured wind models with strong inner-wind inhomogeneities.

What carries the argument

Broadband spectral indices spanning radio to millimetre frequencies, used as frequency-dependent diagnostics of wind clumping.

If this is right

  • Mass-loss rates for the WN stars fall between log(Mdot) ≈ -4.1 and -4.9 solar masses per year.
  • O-type supergiants and hypergiants show lower rates between log(Mdot) ≈ -4.9 and -5.4.
  • Wind models must incorporate stronger density inhomogeneities in the inner wind than in the outer wind.
  • Radio-millimetre data provide an independent route to mass-loss rates that is less affected by line-driving uncertainties than ultraviolet diagnostics.
  • Stellar feedback calculations for dense clusters can now incorporate radially varying clumping when estimating total momentum and energy input.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same ALMA plus VLA approach could be repeated on other young massive clusters to test whether the inner-wind clumping pattern is common.
  • If the radial decline in clumping holds, integrated mass-loss over a star's lifetime may be lower than estimates that assume constant clumping factors.
  • Non-thermal indices seen in several O stars already flag likely colliding-wind binaries, which future monitoring could confirm directly.

Load-bearing premise

Spectral indices can be read directly as thermal free-free versus non-thermal synchrotron without major contamination from other emission processes or binary interactions.

What would settle it

A high-resolution map or multi-epoch data set showing that clumping strength stays constant or increases with radius in a well-studied WN star would contradict the reported radial decline.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.09814 by Danielle M. Fenech, Francisco Najarro, James P. Perry, Raman K. Prinja.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Primary-beam corrected ALMA images of the Arches cluster, labelled with stellar IDs shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Wide-view primary-beam corrected ALMA Band 3 image of the Arches cluster, labelled with stellar IDs shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Clumping factor ratios vs frequency in logarithmic space for all data. Note that the value of clumping factor ratio at 𝜈max in each case has zero uncertainty since 𝑓 𝜈max cl / 𝑓 𝜈max cl = 1 always. For F19 and F26 the value of 𝑆𝜈 at 𝜈max is an upper limit, making all other clumping ratios lower limits for these stars. A similar figure is shown in Appendix B, where the observation frequencies have been conv… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We present the first Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array (ALMA) Band 3 (100 GHz) and Band 6 (243 GHz) continuum observations of the Arches cluster, one of the youngest and most massive stellar clusters in the Milky Way. We detect and characterise millimetre emission from 23 massive stars, including WN7-9h Wolf-Rayet stars, O-type supergiants and hypergiants. By combining our ALMA measurements with archival Very Large Array data spanning 5-22.5 GHz, we derive broadband radio-millimetre spectral indices and investigate the radial structure of stellar winds through frequency-dependent clumping diagnostics. The majority of Wolf-Rayet stars exhibit spectral indices clustered around $\alpha \approx 0.7-0.8$, consistent with predominantly thermal free-free emission from dense, partially optically thick winds. In contrast, several O-type stars show flat or negative broadband spectral indices, indicative of non-thermal synchrotron emission likely associated with colliding-wind binaries. Using millimetre flux densities, we derive clumping-scaled mass-loss rates spanning $\log(\dot{M}/\mathrm{M}_{\odot}\,\text{yr}^{-1})\approx-4.1$ to $-4.9$ for the WN stars and $-4.9$ to $-5.4$ for the O super-/hypergiants, consistent with expectations for luminous massive stars in the Galactic Centre environment. We find significant evidence of structured wind clumping at millimetre wavelengths that generally decreases with increasing radius, supporting structured wind models with strong inner-wind inhomogeneities. These results demonstrate the power of combined radio-millimetre observations for constraining mass-loss and wind structure in massive stars, and provide new insight into stellar feedback in extreme cluster environments.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents the first ALMA Band 3 (100 GHz) and Band 6 (243 GHz) continuum observations of the Arches cluster, detecting millimetre emission from 23 massive stars (WN7-9h Wolf-Rayet stars, O-type supergiants and hypergiants). Combining these data with archival VLA observations (5-22.5 GHz) yields broadband spectral indices, from which clumping-scaled mass-loss rates are derived (log Ṁ ≈ -4.1 to -4.9 for WN stars; -4.9 to -5.4 for O stars). The central result is significant evidence for structured wind clumping at millimetre wavelengths that decreases with increasing radius, supporting models with strong inner-wind inhomogeneities.

Significance. If the radial clumping trend holds under the adopted assumptions, the work supplies new multi-frequency constraints on mass loss and wind structure for luminous stars in a high-density Galactic Centre environment. The combined radio-mm approach to frequency-dependent clumping diagnostics is a methodological strength that could inform stellar feedback models.

major comments (2)
  1. [§5] The central claim of a radial decrease in clumping (abstract and §5) rests on broadband spectral indices mapping directly to thermal free-free emission modified by clumping factors for the WN sample. This requires that standard wind velocity laws, ionization structures, and optical-depth scaling hold without substantial non-thermal synchrotron or binary-wind contributions; the manuscript applies the thermal interpretation to WN stars while attributing flat/negative indices to binaries only for O stars, but provides no quantitative test of the assumption for WN stars.
  2. [Table 2] Table 2 (or equivalent data table): the reported mass-loss rates and clumping factors lack an explicit error budget or statement of exclusion criteria for sources; without this, it is not possible to assess whether post-hoc choices in source selection or model assumptions affect the reported trends or the claimed decrease of clumping with radius.
minor comments (2)
  1. The abstract states spectral indices clustered around α ≈ 0.7-0.8 but does not specify how many WN versus O stars fall in each category; adding these counts would improve clarity.
  2. [§2] Ensure all VLA archival data references are explicitly cited in the methods section rather than only in the abstract.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive and detailed review. We address each major comment below and have revised the manuscript to improve clarity and transparency where possible.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [§5] The central claim of a radial decrease in clumping (abstract and §5) rests on broadband spectral indices mapping directly to thermal free-free emission modified by clumping factors for the WN sample. This requires that standard wind velocity laws, ionization structures, and optical-depth scaling hold without substantial non-thermal synchrotron or binary-wind contributions; the manuscript applies the thermal interpretation to WN stars while attributing flat/negative indices to binaries only for O stars, but provides no quantitative test of the assumption for WN stars.

    Authors: We acknowledge the referee's point that a more explicit quantitative test of the thermal assumption for WN stars would strengthen the analysis. The WN stars show spectral indices tightly clustered at α ≈ 0.7–0.8, consistent with the canonical range for thermal free-free emission in partially optically thick winds (0.6 < α < 1.0). We attributed deviations only for O stars because those sources exhibit flat/negative indices and have independent evidence of binarity in the literature. While a full Monte Carlo exploration of possible non-thermal contributions was beyond the scope of the present data set, we have added a dedicated paragraph in §5 that (i) quantifies how large a non-thermal fraction would be required to shift the observed indices outside the thermal range and (ii) notes the absence of known binary signatures or variability in the WN sample. This addition directly addresses the concern while preserving the original conclusions. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Table 2] Table 2 (or equivalent data table): the reported mass-loss rates and clumping factors lack an explicit error budget or statement of exclusion criteria for sources; without this, it is not possible to assess whether post-hoc choices in source selection or model assumptions affect the reported trends or the claimed decrease of clumping with radius.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit error budget and clear exclusion criteria are necessary for assessing robustness. In the revised manuscript we have (i) expanded Table 2 to report 1σ uncertainties on each mass-loss rate and clumping factor, propagated from the measured flux densities, distance, terminal velocity, and adopted ionization fractions, and (ii) added a new methods subsection that lists the detection threshold, confusion criteria, and any sources excluded from the final sample together with the rationale. These changes allow readers to evaluate whether the reported radial clumping trend is sensitive to selection or modeling choices. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Observational derivation from measured fluxes shows no circularity

full rationale

The paper reports direct ALMA Band 3/6 and archival VLA continuum measurements of 23 stars, computes broadband spectral indices from the observed flux densities across 5-243 GHz, and applies standard free-free emission formulas to derive clumping-scaled mass-loss rates. No equations reduce the reported clumping trend or mass-loss values to self-referential fitted parameters, self-citation chains, or inputs that presuppose the output. The radial decrease in clumping is inferred from frequency-dependent diagnostics on independent data products rather than being defined into the result. External benchmarks (standard wind models) are used only for interpretation, not to force the measurements.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only; no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are stated. Standard assumptions of stellar wind theory (beta velocity law, constant ionization, optically thick free-free) are implicit but not enumerated.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5876 in / 1164 out tokens · 16332 ms · 2026-06-27T14:48:59.430028+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

86 extracted references · 82 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    C., Bieging J

    Abbott D. C., Bieging J. H., Churchwell E., 1981, @doi [ ] 10.1086/159412 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1981ApJ...250..645A 250, 645

  2. [2]

    H., White R

    Becker R. H., White R. L., Helfand D. J., 1995, @doi [ ] 10.1086/176166 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1995ApJ...450..559B 450, 559

  3. [3]

    O., Singh S

    Bj \"o rklund R., Sundqvist J. O., Singh S. M., Puls J., Najarro F., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202141948 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023A&A...676A.109B 676, A109

  4. [4]

    Blomme R., Volpi D., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201322679 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014A&A...561A..18B 561, A18

  5. [5]

    Blomme R., Rauw G., Volpi D., Naz \'e Y., Abdul-Masih M., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202450227 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...687A.106B 687, A106

  6. [6]

    D., Schaerer D., Pasquali A., Heydari-Malayeri M., Conti P

    Blum R. D., Schaerer D., Pasquali A., Heydari-Malayeri M., Conti P. S., Schmutz W., 2001, @doi [ ] 10.1086/323096 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001AJ....122.1875B 122, 1875

  7. [7]

    Bonaldi A., Zwaan M., Best P., Broderick J., Goedhart S., Mahony E., 2024, @doi [The Messenger] 10.18727/0722-6691/5361 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024Msngr.193....5B 193, 5

  8. [8]

    CASA Team et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1088/1538-3873/ac9642 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022PASP..134k4501C 134, 114501

  9. [9]

    Cano-Gonz \'a lez M., Sch \"o del R., Nogueras-Lara F., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202140982 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021A&A...653A..37C 653, A37

  10. [10]

    T., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202451771 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...692A..23C 692, A23

    Cano-Gonz \'a lez M., Sch \"o del R., Alberdi A., Mold \'o n J., P \'e rez-Torres M., Najarro F., Gallego-Calvente A. T., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202451771 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...692A..23C 692, A23

  11. [11]

    S., Cappelluti N., Gillessen S., Predehl P., Porquet D., Czesla S., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201015758 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011A&A...525L...2C 525, L2

    Capelli R., Warwick R. S., Cappelluti N., Gillessen S., Predehl P., Porquet D., Czesla S., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201015758 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011A&A...525L...2C 525, L2

  12. [12]

    M., van der Hucht K

    Cappa C., Goss W. M., van der Hucht K. A., 2004, @doi [ ] 10.1086/383286 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004AJ....127.2885C 127, 2885

  13. [13]

    Chen \'e A.-N., St-Louis N., Moffat A. F. J., Gayley K. G., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/abba24 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020ApJ...903..113C 903, 113

  14. [14]

    S., Lohr M

    Clark J. S., Lohr M. E., Najarro F., Dong H., Martins F., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201832826 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018A&A...617A..65C 617, A65

  15. [15]

    S., Lohr M

    Clark J. S., Lohr M. E., Patrick L. R., Najarro F., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201834529 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019A&A...623A..84C 623, A84

  16. [16]

    S., Lohr M

    Clark J. S., Lohr M. E., Najarro F., Patrick L. R., Ritchie B. W., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad449 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.521.4473C 521, 4473

  17. [17]

    I., Ghez A

    Clarkson W. I., Ghez A. M., Morris M. R., Lu J. R., Stolte A., McCrady N., Do T., Yelda S., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/751/2/132 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ApJ...751..132C 751, 132

  18. [18]

    J., Cotton W

    Condon J. J., Cotton W. D., Greisen E. W., Yin Q. F., Perley R. A., Taylor G. B., Broderick J. J., 1998, @doi [ ] 10.1086/300337 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998AJ....115.1693C 115, 1693

  19. [19]

    S., Erickson E

    Cotera A. S., Erickson E. F., Colgan S. W. J., Simpson J. P., Allen D. A., Burton M. G., 1996, @doi [ ] 10.1086/177099 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1996ApJ...461..750C 461, 750

  20. [20]

    , keywords =

    Crowther P. A., Schnurr O., Hirschi R., Yusof N., Parker R. J., Goodwin S. P., Kassim H. A., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17167.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010MNRAS.408..731C 408, 731

  21. [21]

    S., Oudmaijer R

    Davies B., Vink J. S., Oudmaijer R. D., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20077193 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007A&A...469.1045D 469, 1045

  22. [22]

    De Becker M., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1007/s00159-007-0005-2 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007A&ARv..14..171D 14, 171

  23. [23]

    Dong H., et al., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19013.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011MNRAS.417..114D 417, 114

  24. [24]

    , eprint =

    Dougherty S. M., Williams P. M., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2000.03837.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000MNRAS.319.1005D 319, 1005

  25. [25]

    M., Clark J

    Dougherty S. M., Clark J. S., Negueruela I., Johnson T., Chapman J. M., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/200913505 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010A&A...511A..58D 511, A58

  26. [26]

    E., 1989, @doi [ ] 10.1086/191374 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1989ApJS...71..267D 71, 267

    Drew J. E., 1989, @doi [ ] 10.1086/191374 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1989ApJS...71..267D 71, 267

  27. [27]

    Ekstr \"o m S., et al., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201117751 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012A&A...537A.146E 537, A146

  28. [28]

    Eversberg T., L \'e pine S., Moffat A. F. J., 1998, @doi [ ] 10.1086/305218 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998ApJ...494..799E 494, 799

  29. [29]

    M., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201832754 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018A&A...617A.137F 617, A137

    Fenech D. M., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201832754 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018A&A...617A.137F 617, A137

  30. [30]

    F., Kim S

    Figer D. F., Kim S. S., Morris M., Serabyn E., Rich R. M., McLean I. S., 1999, @doi [ ] 10.1086/307937 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999ApJ...525..750F 525, 750

  31. [31]

    F., et al., 2002, @doi [ ] 10.1086/344154 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002ApJ...581..258F 581, 258

    Figer D. F., et al., 2002, @doi [ ] 10.1086/344154 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002ApJ...581..258F 581, 258

  32. [32]

    W., Massa D

    Fullerton A. W., Massa D. L., Prinja R. K., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1086/498560 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006ApJ...637.1025F 637, 1025

  33. [33]

    GRAVITY Collaboration et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201935656 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019A&A...625L..10G 625, L10

  34. [34]

    T., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202039172 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021A&A...647A.110G 647, A110

    Gallego-Calvente A. T., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202039172 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021A&A...647A.110G 647, A110

  35. [35]

    Gr \"a fener G., Hamann W.-R., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20066176 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008A&A...482..945G 482, 945

  36. [36]

    H., Meynet G., Georgy C., Ekstr \"o m S., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201321906 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013A&A...558A.131G 558, A131

    Groh J. H., Meynet G., Georgy C., Ekstr \"o m S., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201321906 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013A&A...558A.131G 558, A131

  37. [37]

    Hamann W.-R., Koesterke L., 1998, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998A&A...335.1003H 335, 1003

  38. [38]

    Hamann W.-R., Gr \"a fener G., Liermann A., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20065052 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006A&A...457.1015H 457, 1015

  39. [39]

    Hamann W.-R., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201834850 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019A&A...625A..57H 625, A57

  40. [40]

    Hawcroft C., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202348478 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...690A.126H 690, A126

  41. [41]

    J., Miller D

    Hillier D. J., Miller D. L., 1999, @doi [ ] 10.1086/307339 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999ApJ...519..354H 519, 354

  42. [42]

    G., et al., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1086/668058 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012PASP..124..939H 124, 939

    Hoare M. G., et al., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1086/668058 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012PASP..124..939H 124, 939

  43. [43]

    Josiek J., Ekstr \"o m S., Sander A. A. C., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202449281 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...688A..71J 688, A71

  44. [44]

    S., Figer D

    Kim S. S., Figer D. F., Lee H. M., Morris M., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.1086/317807 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000ApJ...545..301K 545, 301

  45. [45]

    Krti c ka J., Kub \'a t J., Krti c kov \'a I., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202347916 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...681A..29K 681, A29

  46. [46]

    Lacy M., et al., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1088/1538-3873/ab63eb , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020PASP..132c5001L 132, 035001

  47. [47]

    Lamers H. J. G. L. M., Leitherer C., 1993, @doi [ ] 10.1086/172960 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1993ApJ...412..771L 412, 771

  48. [48]

    C., Goss W

    Lang C. C., Goss W. M., Rodr \' guez L. F., 2001, @doi [ ] 10.1086/320032 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001ApJ...551L.143L 551, L143

  49. [49]

    C., Johnson K

    Lang C. C., Johnson K. E., Goss W. M., Rodr \' guez L. F., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1086/496976 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005AJ....130.2185L 130, 2185

  50. [50]

    Leitherer C., Robert C., 1991, @doi [ ] 10.1086/170390 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1991ApJ...377..629L 377, 629

  51. [51]

    M., Koribalski B., 1997, @doi [ ] 10.1086/304096 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1997ApJ...481..898L 481, 898

    Leitherer C., Chapman J. M., Koribalski B., 1997, @doi [ ] 10.1086/304096 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1997ApJ...481..898L 481, 898

  52. [52]

    L \'e pine S., Moffat A. F. J., 1999, @doi [ ] 10.1086/306958 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999ApJ...514..909L 514, 909

  53. [53]

    E., Clark J

    Lohr M. E., Clark J. S., Najarro F., Patrick L. R., Crowther P. A., Evans C. J., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201832670 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018A&A...617A..66L 617, A66

  54. [54]

    J., Paumard T., Eisenhauer F., Ott T., Genzel R., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20078469 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008A&A...478..219M 478, 219

    Martins F., Hillier D. J., Paumard T., Eisenhauer F., Ott T., Genzel R., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20078469 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008A&A...478..219M 478, 219

  55. [55]

    W., Sonneborn G., Hutchings J

    Massa D., Fullerton A. W., Sonneborn G., Hutchings J. B., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1086/367786 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003ApJ...586..996M 586, 996

  56. [56]

    Minniti D., et al., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1016/j.newast.2009.12.002 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010NewA...15..433M 15, 433

  57. [57]

    Mohan N., Rafferty D., 2015, PyBDSF: Python Blob Detection and Source Finder , Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1502.007

  58. [58]

    P., et al., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0067-0049/181/1/110 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ApJS..181..110M 181, 110

    Muno M. P., et al., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0067-0049/181/1/110 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ApJS..181..110M 181, 110

  59. [59]

    E., Shure M., Kobayashi N., 1995, @doi [ ] 10.1086/117395 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1995AJ....109.1676N 109, 1676

    Nagata T., Woodward C. E., Shure M., Kobayashi N., 1995, @doi [ ] 10.1086/117395 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1995AJ....109.1676N 109, 1676

  60. [60]

    F., Hillier D

    Najarro F., Figer D. F., Hillier D. J., Kudritzki R. P., 2004, @doi [ ] 10.1086/423955 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004ApJ...611L.105N 611, L105

  61. [61]

    M., Puls J., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201016003 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011A&A...535A..32N 535, A32

    Najarro F., Hanson M. M., Puls J., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201016003 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011A&A...535A..32N 535, A32

  62. [62]

    S., Lohr M., Patrick L

    Najarro F., Clark J. S., Lohr M., Patrick L. R., Garc \' a M., Castellanos R., Mu \ n oz-S \'a nchez G., de la Fuente D., 2024, in Mackey J., Vink J. S., St-Louis N., eds, IAU Symposium Vol. 361, Massive Stars Near and Far. pp 114--115, @doi 10.1017/S1743921322003052

  63. [63]

    Nugis T., Lamers H. J. G. L. M., 2000, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000A&A...360..227N 360, 227

  64. [64]

    Ochsenbein F., Bauer P., Marcout J., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.1051/aas:2000169 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000A&AS..143...23O 143, 23

  65. [65]

    M., Hamann W.-R., Feldmeier A., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20066377 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007A&A...476.1331O 476, 1331

    Oskinova L. M., Hamann W.-R., Feldmeier A., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20066377 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007A&A...476.1331O 476, 1331

  66. [66]

    P., Castor J

    Owocki S. P., Castor J. I., Rybicki G. B., 1988, @doi [ ] 10.1086/166977 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1988ApJ...335..914O 335, 914

  67. [67]

    Panagia N., Felli M., 1975, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1975A&A....39....1P 39, 1

  68. [68]

    H., Read, M

    Prinja R. K., Hodges S. E., Urbaneja M. A., Massa D. L., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15928.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010MNRAS.402..641P 402, 641

  69. [69]

    G., Burnley A

    Puls J., Markova N., Scuderi S., Stanghellini C., Taranova O. G., Burnley A. W., Howarth I. D., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20065073 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006A&A...454..625P 454, 625

  70. [70]

    J., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201117104 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011A&A...532A..71R 532, A71

    Rau U., Cornwell T. J., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201117104 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011A&A...532A..71R 532, A71

  71. [71]

    M., Sundqvist J

    Rubio-D \' ez M. M., Sundqvist J. O., Najarro F., Traficante A., Puls J., Calzoletti L., Figer D., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202040116 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022A&A...658A..61R 658, A61

  72. [72]

    C., Owocki S

    Runacres M. C., Owocki S. P., 2002, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20011526 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002A&A...381.1015R 381, 1015

  73. [73]

    C., Owocki S

    Runacres M. C., Owocki S. P., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20041281 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005A&A...429..323R 429, 323

  74. [74]

    Sander A., Shenar T., Hainich R., G \' menez-Garc \' a A., Todt H., Hamann W.-R., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201425356 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015A&A...577A..13S 577, A13

  75. [75]

    Schneider F. R. N., et al., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/780/2/117 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJ...780..117S 780, 117

  76. [76]

    Schuller F., et al., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/200811568 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009A&A...504..415S 504, 415

  77. [77]

    Smith N., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev-astro-081913-040025 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ARA&A..52..487S 52, 487

  78. [78]

    St-Louis N., Chen \'e A.-N., Schnurr O., Nicol M.-H., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/698/2/1951 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ApJ...698.1951S 698, 1951

  79. [79]

    O., Puls J., Feldmeier A., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/200912842 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010A&A...510A..11S 510, A11

    Sundqvist J. O., Puls J., Feldmeier A., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/200912842 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010A&A...510A..11S 510, A11

  80. [80]

    O., Puls J., Feldmeier A., Owocki S

    Sundqvist J. O., Puls J., Feldmeier A., Owocki S. P., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201015771 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011A&A...528A..64S 528, A64

Showing first 80 references.