REVIEW 1 cited by
Detecting Subtle Differences between Human and Model Languages Using Spectrum of Relative Likelihood
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Human and model-generated texts can be distinguished by examining the magnitude of likelihood in language. However, it is becoming increasingly difficult as language model's capabilities of generating human-like texts keep evolving. This study provides a new perspective by using the relative likelihood values instead of absolute ones, and extracting useful features from the spectrum-view of likelihood for the human-model text detection task. We propose a detection procedure with two classification methods, supervised and heuristic-based, respectively, which results in competitive performances with previous zero-shot detection methods and a new state-of-the-art on short-text detection. Our method can also reveal subtle differences between human and model languages, which find theoretical roots in psycholinguistics studies. Our code is available at https://github.com/CLCS-SUSTech/FourierGPT
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Glimpse: Enabling White-Box Methods to Use Proprietary Models for Zero-Shot LLM-Generated Text Detection
Glimpse estimates full token distributions from top-K API probabilities, enabling white-box detectors like Fast-DetectGPT to reach about 0.95 AUROC on GPT-4, Claude-3, and Gemini-1.5 text.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.