Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Continual Gradient Low-Rank Projection Fine-Tuning for LLMs

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2507.02503 v1 pith:5LQVLBY2 submitted 2025-07-03 cs.LG cs.AIcs.CE

classification cs.LGcs.AIcs.CE
keywords low-rankcontinualgorpefficiencygradientfine-tuninglearningllms
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Continual fine-tuning of Large Language Models (LLMs) is hampered by the trade-off between efficiency and expressiveness. Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) offers efficiency but constrains the model's ability to learn new tasks and transfer knowledge due to its low-rank nature and reliance on explicit parameter constraints. We propose GORP (Gradient LOw Rank Projection) for Continual Learning, a novel training strategy that overcomes these limitations by synergistically combining full and low-rank parameters and jointly updating within a unified low-rank gradient subspace. GORP expands the optimization space while preserving efficiency and mitigating catastrophic forgetting. Extensive experiments on continual learning benchmarks demonstrate GORP's superior performance compared to existing state-of-the-art approaches. Code is available at https://github.com/Wcxwcxw/GORP.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Rotation-Preserving Supervised Fine-Tuning

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    RPSFT improves the in-domain versus out-of-domain performance trade-off during LLM supervised fine-tuning by penalizing rotations in pretrained singular subspaces as a proxy for loss-sensitive directions.

  2. Collaborative Parameter Learning: Mitigating Forgetting via Parameter-Level Gradient Analysis

    cs.LG 2026-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Collaborative Parameter Learning freezes 50-75% of parameters whose updates cause forgetting and updates only the 25-50% that mitigate it, allowing LLMs to learn 20-48% more new questions with negligible forgetting an...

Pith tools