Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 2 cited by

Effective actions, cutoff regularization, quasi-locality, and gluing of partition functions

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper proves that replacing the interaction fields by averages over a geodesic ball of radius $1/\Lambda$ gives a cutoff regularization of scalar field theory on curved manifolds that is compatible with gluing manifolds and partition…

desk verdict A genuinely new gluing statement for coordinate-space cutoff regularization, but Theorem 1 is conditional on an unconstructed averaging kernel on curved manifolds with boundary. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.13857 v1 pith:5M675FMX submitted 2024-11-21 math-ph hep-thmath.MP

A. V. Ivanov This is my paper · ORCID
classification math-phhep-thmath.MP MSC 81T1581T2081S4058J32
keywords effectiveactioncutoffregularizationcoordinate-spaceaveragingoperatorgluingofpartitionfunctionsquasi-localityRiemannianmanifoldwithboundaryscalarfieldtheory
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper proposes a coordinate-space cutoff regularization for the effective action of a scalar field theory on a compact Riemannian manifold with boundary, and proves that the regularization is compatible with gluing manifolds along a common boundary. The cutoff replaces the fields entering the interaction term by averages over geodesic balls of radius $1/\Lambda$ and restricts the interaction to the deformed manifold $M_\Lambda$ obtained by deleting a boundary collar. The central result, Theorem 1, says that the functional integral over boundary data on the cutting surface $\Sigma$ of the product of the two regularized partition functions equals the regularized partition function of the glued manifold, with a limit transition that reconstructs $M_\Lambda$. If the claim is correct, one can compute the regularized theory on pieces and assemble the pieces without introducing new ultraviolet divergences at the gluing step.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the deforming operator $H^\Lambda_\omega$, an integral operator with kernel $\omega(\cdot,\cdot;\Lambda)\in\Omega^\Lambda_0(M)$ that averages a field over a geodesic ball of radius $1/\Lambda$. Applied only to the interaction $S_{\mathrm{int}}$ and accompanied by the replacement $M\to M_\Lambda$, it makes the interaction quasi-local and turns every Green's function appearing in Wick contractions into a bounded, regularized version $G^\Lambda(p_1,p_2)$. The proof of Theorem 1 uses Lemma 11, which says that the deformed Green's function on the whole manifold decomposes into the deformed Green's functions on the two pieces plus a boundary-to-boundary term built from the Dirichlet-to-Neumann operators and the Green's function on the cutting surface $\Sigma$; this decomposition is exactly what makes the functional integral over $\eta_\Sigma$ reproduce the glued partition function.

What would settle it

Take a compact hyperbolic manifold with boundary and attempt to write the sphere-averaging kernel of Definition 19 explicitly; if the averaged Green's function fails the continuity or delta-limit conditions of Definition 18 for some point near a boundary component, Lemma 9 and Theorem 1 have no instance on that manifold. A direct analytic or numerical check of the two-loop contribution to both sides of (44) for $\varphi^4$ on a three-dimensional ball cut into two hemispheres, at finite $\Lambda$, would also settle the claim order by order in $\hbar$.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central discovery is that the cutoff defined by a deforming operator $H^\Lambda_\omega$—averaging each interaction field with a kernel $\omega(p,p_1;\Lambda)$ supported in a geodesic ball of radius $1/\Lambda$ and normalized to unit integral—respects the gluing of partition functions. For a manifold $M=M_l\cup_\Sigma M_r$, with boundary data split as $\eta_l+\eta_\Sigma$ and $\eta_r+\eta_\Sigma$ on the two pieces, the glued object $\int \mathcal{D}\eta_\Sigma\, Z(\eta_l+\eta_\Sigma;M_{l,\Lambda})Z(\eta_r+\eta_\Sigma;M_{r,\Lambda})$ is shown in formula (43) to equal $Z(\eta_l+\eta_r;M_{l,\Lambda}\cup M_{r,\Lambda})$, and formula (44) passes to the limit $M_{l,\Lambda}\cup M_{r,\Lambda}\to M_\Lambda$ to give the partition function of the whole manifold. The proof works order by order in the perturbative expansion by rewriting the Wick pairings so that the deformed Green's functions on the pieces combine, through the standard gluing relations for Green's functions, into the deformed Green's function on the whole manifold.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that, on every compact Riemannian manifold with boundary, there exists an admissible averaging kernel $\omega(\cdot,\cdot;\Lambda)\in\Omega^\Lambda_0(M)$ satisfying Definition 18: the averaged Green's function is continuous, the kernel is supported in a geodesic ball of radius $1/\Lambda$, it is normalized to unit integral, and it reproduces the delta function as $\Lambda\to\infty$; the paper argues this by Euclidean analogy for sphere averaging but does not construct such a kernel in general.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • In every dimension, the same cutoff recipe removes the ultraviolet divergences of perturbative scalar theory on manifolds with boundary, and gluing the pieces introduces no new divergences beyond those already present on each piece.
  • The gluing identity (44) turns the regularized partition function into a pairing of boundary functionals, so one can compute on submanifolds and assemble the result by a functional integral over the common boundary.
  • If the model admits multiplicative renormalization, the renormalized partition functions inherit the gluing property, because the counterterms can be absorbed into position-dependent couplings while the theorem remains true.
  • The averaging construction extends to vector, gauge, and spinor fields, as well as to couplings that are local differential operators, provided an admissible kernel of sufficient smoothness exists.
  • The equality (43) holds whether or not the model is renormalizable, since it is a statement about the regularized formal series before the limit $\Lambda\to\infty$.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If an admissible kernel can actually be constructed on every compact Riemannian manifold with boundary, the construction would give a dimension-independent, geometrically local regularization for perturbative QFT that is compatible with cutting and pasting the spacetime itself.
  • A testable extension is to compute both sides of the gluing identity (44) at finite $\Lambda$ for a concrete model, such as $\varphi^4$ on a ball in $\mathbb{R}^3$ split into two hemispheres, and verify equality order by order in $\hbar$.
  • The boundary pairing in (44) suggests a Hilbert-space interpretation of regularized partition functions as vectors in a space of boundary data, which may connect to state-sum and topological-QFT constructions without changing the local field content.
  • Because the kernel is supported in a geodesic ball, the regularization is quasi-local, so the counterterms of the renormalized theory should remain local; checking that the $\Lambda$-dependent counterterms in a two-loop calculation are local densities on $M_\Lambda$ would test this directly.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a coordinate-space cutoff regularization for scalar field theory on a compact Riemannian manifold with boundary, defined by deforming the interaction term of the classical action via an averaging operator with a kernel in a class Ω_0^Λ(M). The central claim is that this regularization is consistent with gluing of manifolds and partition functions: Theorem 1 (Eqs. (43)–(44)) states that the functional integral over boundary data on the gluing hypersurface reproduces the regularized partition function of the glued manifold in the limit where the deformed submanifolds fill the deformed manifold. The proof is carried out at the level of formal power series in √ℏ, using Wick contractions and external gluing identities for Green's functions from Refs. [62] and [24]. Corollaries extend the statement to position-dependent coupling coefficients and multiplicative renormalization.

Significance. If the theorem holds, it would provide a regularization scheme compatible with Atiyah-Segal-style gluing in all dimensions for scalar theories on curved manifolds, which would be a genuinely useful contribution to the constructive and perturbative QFT literature. The paper is careful to set up the formal power series framework, and the Wick-contraction proof in Section 4.2 is detailed and largely transparent. The reliance on previously established gluing identities for Green's functions is appropriate and does not make the argument circular. The main value is conditional: the theorem is proved for any kernel in the class Ω_0^Λ(M), but the paper does not establish that this class is nonempty in the stated geometric generality.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 3.2, Definitions 18–19] No admissible kernel is actually constructed on a general compact Riemannian manifold with boundary. Definition 18 imposes continuity of the single average, support in B_{1/Λ}(p,M), normalization, and two delta-function limits, but the only example given, geodesic-sphere averaging, is justified by a Euclidean asymptotic analogy and does not address boundary truncation or the regularity needed for Corollary 10. Since Lemma 10, Lemma 11, and Theorem 1 all quantify over ω ∈ Ω_0^Λ(M), the theorem is conditional on an existence assumption that is never proved. Either a construction of an admissible kernel should be supplied, or the main theorem should be stated explicitly as a conditional statement with the existence of Ω_0^Λ(M) as a hypothesis.
  2. [Lemma 10 and Eq. (35)] The proof that regularized amplitudes are finite requires that the doubly averaged Green's function G^Λ(p_i,p_j) in (35) be continuous and bounded on M_Λ × M_Λ. Definition 18 only guarantees that for fixed p_2 the single average H_ω G(·, p_2) is continuous; it does not imply that H_ω can be applied a second time with the needed regularity. A separate continuity/boundedness statement for the iterated average, or an additional condition in Definition 18, is needed to justify Lemma 10.
  3. [Lemma 9 and Eq. (30)] The proof of Lemma 9 defines ω_i by restricting ω and renormalizing by ∫_{M_i} ω(p, p_2). For p ∈ M_i,Λ this prefactor equals 1 because the support of ω(p, ·) lies away from Σ, so equality (30) holds there; however, the proof does not verify that the renormalized ω_i satisfies the support, normalization, and delta-limit conditions of Definition 18 for all p ∈ M_i, especially for p in the collar where B_{1/Λ}(p, M) crosses Σ. Since Lemma 11 uses ω_i only for arguments in M_i,Λ, the present gap may be repairable, but the stated existence claim for ω_i ∈ Ω_0^Λ(M_i) is not established as written.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 2.4 and Section 3.1] There are several typos that should be corrected, e.g., 'knowm' (Section 2.4), 'beetween' (Section 3.3), 'cinsists' (Lemma 10), 'correcp onding' (Section 3.2), and 'partitial functions' (Introduction).
  2. [Definition 3 and Remark 2] The definition of Λ_1 via the minimum of d(p,q) for p ∈ Σ and q ∈ Y assumes both Σ and Y are nonempty; the case ∂M = ∅, mentioned in Section 2.1, is not covered by this definition.
  3. [Definition 18] The two limit transitions in (28) are stated informally as 'for Λ → +∞ on the class C∞(M,R)'. It would improve rigor to specify the precise topology or test-function space in which the delta-function limits are taken.
  4. [Section 4.3, Corollary 10] The proof of Corollary 10 asserts that the internal structure of the coefficients was not used, but for local differential operator couplings the regularization requires a kernel of suitable smoothness (as the corollary itself notes). This further highlights the need for a concrete construction of kernels in Ω_j^Λ(M) with j > 0.
  5. [Section 5.1, 'On the regularization of the determinant'] The displayed chain of equalities for the free determinant ratio would benefit from an explicit statement of the normalization convention used for the functional measure, since the quotient of two formal Gaussian integrals is otherwise ambiguous.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No material circularity: the gluing theorem is an honest derivation from independent Green's-function gluing identities, conditional only on an unproved existence assertion for admissible kernels.

full rationale

The central result, Theorem 1 (Eqs. (43)-(44)), is not circular. The proof reduces the gluing of regularized partition functions to the deformed Green's-function gluing identities (40)-(42), which are quoted from external works: Lemma 11 cites Theorem 2.1 in [62] (Carron) and Proposition 4.2 in [24] (Kandel-Mnev-Wernli), neither of which involves the present author. No parameter is fitted to data, and no predicted quantity is defined in terms of itself. The abundant self-citations ([25]-[34], [88]) concern Euclidean cutoff regularization technology and are motivational; the Riemannian theorem's proof does not rest on them. The genuine weakness is that the class Ω^Λ_0(M) of admissible averaging kernels (Definition 18) is assumed to exist; after Definition 19 the sphere-average example is only 'argued' to be acceptable by Euclidean analogy, and the proof of Lemma 9's restriction step (30) does not verify all defining conditions near the cut. Lemma 10's finiteness is largely an unpacking of Definition 18's acceptability condition. This makes the theorem conditional on an unproved existence/regularity assertion, but it is not a circular reduction: the gluing identity itself is an independent statement about such kernels, and its proof uses external mathematical identities rather than the paper's own prior conclusions.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no fitted numerical parameters and no new physical entities. The main unstated input is the existence of an admissible averaging kernel on curved manifolds with boundary, which is a mathematical assumption rather than an independently evidenced object. The other axioms are standard formal perturbative QFT assumptions and quoted geometric identities.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The functional integral is interpreted as a formal power series in √ℏ, with Gaussian integration and Wick contractions as algebraic rules.
    Invoked in Definition 10 and formula (23); no measure-theoretic construction is provided.
  • ad hoc to paper For every compact Riemannian manifold with boundary and large Λ there exists an admissible kernel ω ∈ Ω^Λ_0(M) satisfying (28) and (29).
    Central to the regularization; the paper only argues by Euclidean analogy after Definition 19.
  • domain assumption Λ is large enough that geodesic balls B_{1/Λ}(p,M) are geodesically convex and contain a unique geodesic between any two of their points.
    Remark 9; needed for the local Euclidean asymptotics and for the kernel support condition.
  • standard math The boundary value problem (10) has smooth solutions represented by formula (11), and the D-operators satisfy Lemma 3 with inverse G restricted to Σ.
    Quoted from [61], [62] and [24]; used in Lemma 11 and throughout Theorem 1.
  • standard math The gluing identities (41) and (42) for Green's functions hold on the relevant domains away from diagonals.
    Taken from Theorem 2.1 in [62] and Proposition 4.2 in [24]; key input to Lemma 11 and all stages of the proof of Theorem 1.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Effective actions, cutoff regularization, quasi-locality, and gluing of partition functions." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/5M675FMX

@misc{pith2026241113857,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Effective actions, cutoff regularization, quasi-locality, and gluing of partition functions},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/5M675FMX}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.13857}
}
read the original abstract

The paper studies a regularization of the quantum (effective) action for a scalar field theory in a general position on a compact smooth Riemannian manifold. As the main method, we propose the use of a special averaging operator, which leads to a quasi-locality and is a natural generalization of a cutoff regularization in the coordinate representation in the case of a curved metric. It is proved that the regularization method is consistent with a process of gluing of manifolds and partition functions, that is, with the transition from submanifolds to the main manifold using an additional functional integration. It is shown that the method extends to other models, and is also consistent with the process of multiplicative renormalization. Additionally, we discuss issues related to the correct introduction of regularization and the locality.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.13857 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The upper part we show the manifold M with the boundaries Yl on the left and Yr on the right, as well as the truncated (deformed) manifold MΛ, which differs from the original by the cut-off neighborhoods of the boundary with a thickness of 1/Λ. Below we have two submanifolds Ml and Mr, obtained by cutting the manifold M along Σ. Similarly, we obtain the deformed submanifolds Ml,Λ and Mr,Λ, as well as the correspondi… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Three-loop singularity structure for a non-linear sigma model

    hep-th 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    The three-loop divergent structure of the two-dimensional non-linear sigma model is computed in a coordinate-space cutoff scheme, including the new countervertices and the squared-logarithm part of the renormalization...

  2. Linearized renormalization

    hep-th 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    For super-renormalizable scalar theories, the first-order change of the renormalized effective action under parameter variations is written with finitely many graphs built from full propagators and vertices, with no r...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

93 extracted references · 41 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [62]

    M. E. Taylor, Partial Differential Equations II: Qualitative Studies of L inear Equations , Applied Mathematical Sciences, Springer, 2nd ed., 1–637 (2011)

    work page 2011

  2. [24]

    J. E. Tener, Construction of the unitary free fermion Segal CFT , Commun. Math. Phys. 355(2), 463–518 (2017) doi:10.1007/s00220-017-2959-x

    work page doi:10.1007/s00220-017-2959-x 2017

  3. [1]

    The d ifference of the mass parameters m2−m2 1 should be added to the term from (2) responsible for the interactio n

    With such a change, it is important to control only the condition that the first eigenvalue of the operator is positive. The d ifference of the mass parameters m2−m2 1 should be added to the term from (2) responsible for the interactio n. On the applicability of the regularization. Separately, attention should be paid to the fact that the regularization for...

    2024

  4. [2]

    R. P. Feynman, A. R. Hibbs, D. F. Styer, Quantum Mechanics and Path Integrals , Mineola, NY: Dover Publications, 1–371 (2010)

    2010

  5. [3]

    Zinn Justin, Path Integrals in Quantum Mechanics , Oxford University Press, 1–334 (2004)

    J. Zinn Justin, Path Integrals in Quantum Mechanics , Oxford University Press, 1–334 (2004)

    2004

  6. [4]

    L. D. Faddeev, A. A. Slavnov, Gauge Fields: An Introduction to Quantum Theory , Frontiers in Physics 83, Addison-Wesley, 1–236 (1991)

    1991

  7. [5]

    Itzykson, J

    C. Itzykson, J. B. Zuber, Quantum Field Theory , Mcgraw-hill, New York, 1–705 (1980)

    1980

  8. [6]

    M. E. Peskin, D. V. Schroeder, An Introduction to Quantum Field Theory , Addison-Wesley, 1–864 (1995)

    1995

Show all 93 references
  1. [7]

    D. I. Kazakov, Radiative Corrections, Divergences, Regularization, Ren ormalization, Renormaliza- tion Group and All That in Examples in Quantum Field Theory , JINR, UC-2008-34, 1–91 (2009) arXiv:0901.2208

    2009 arXiv

  2. [8]

    I. M. Gel’fand, G. E. Shilov, Generalized Functions, Volume 1: Properties and Operation s, AMS Chelsea Publishing 377, 1–423 (1964)

    1964

  3. [9]

    V. S. Vladimirov, Methods of the theory of generalized functions , London, CRC Press, 1–328 (2002)

    2002

  4. [10]

    J. C. Collins, Renormalization: An Introduction to Renormalization, the Renormalization Group and the Operator-Product Expansion, Cambridge University Press, 1–380 (1984) 25

    1984

  5. [11]

    O. I. Zavialov, Renormalized quantum field theory , Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dodrecht, Boston, 1–524 (1990)

    1990

  6. [12]

    Atiyah, Topological quantum field theories , Publications Math´ ematiques de l’Institut des Hautes Scientifiques 68, 175–186 (1988) doi:10.1007/BF02698547

    M. Atiyah, Topological quantum field theories , Publications Math´ ematiques de l’Institut des Hautes Scientifiques 68, 175–186 (1988) doi:10.1007/BF02698547

    1988 doi

  7. [13]

    Segal, The definition of conformal field theory , Topology, geometry and quantum field the- ory, London Math

    G. Segal, The definition of conformal field theory , Topology, geometry and quantum field the- ory, London Math. Soc. Lect. Note Ser. 308, Cambridge University Press, 421–577 (2004) doi:10.1017/CBO9780511526398.019

    2004 doi

  8. [14]

    Reshetikhin, Lectures on Quantization of Gauge Systems , New Paths Towards Quantum Gravity, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 125–190 (2010) doi:10.1007/978-3-642 -11897-5 3

    N. Reshetikhin, Lectures on Quantization of Gauge Systems , New Paths Towards Quantum Gravity, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 125–190 (2010) doi:10.1007/978-3-642 -11897-5 3

    2010 doi

  9. [15]

    Stolz, P

    S. Stolz, P. Teichner, Supersymmetric field theories and generalized cohomology , Mathematical foun- dations of quantum field theory and perturbative string theory, P roc. Sympos. Pure Math. 83, 279–340 (2011) arXiv:1108.0189

    2011 arXiv

  10. [16]

    A. S. Cattaneo, P. Mnev, N. Reshetikhin, Perturbative Quantum Gauge Theories on Manifolds with Boundary, Commun. Math. Phys. 357, 631–730 (2018) doi:10.1007/s00220-017-3031-6

    2018 doi

  11. [17]

    Dijkgraaf, E

    R. Dijkgraaf, E. Witten, Topological gauge theories and group cohomology , Commun.Math. Phys. 129, 393–429 (1990) doi:10.1007/BF02096988

    1990 doi

  12. [18]

    Reshetikhin, V

    N. Reshetikhin, V. G. Turaev, Invariants of 3-manifolds via link p olynomials and quantum groups. Invent Math 103, 547–597 (1991) doi:10.1007/BF01239527

    1991 doi

  13. [19]

    V. G. Turaev, O. Y. Viro, State sum invariants of 3-manifolds and quantum 6j-symbols. Topology, An International Journal of Mathematics, 31(4):865–902 (1992) doi:10.1016/0040-9383(92)90015-A

    1992 doi

  14. [20]

    Migdal, Recursion equations in gauge field theories , Zh

    A. Migdal, Recursion equations in gauge field theories , Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz 69, 810–822 (1975)

    1975

  15. [21]

    Witten, On quantum gauge theories in two dimensions , Commun

    E. Witten, On quantum gauge theories in two dimensions , Commun. Math. Phys. 141(1), 153–209 (1991) doi:10.1007/BF02100009

    1991 doi

  16. [22]

    X. Dai, D. S. Freed, η-invariants and determinant lines , Journal of Mathematical Physics 35(10), 5155–5194 (1994) doi:10.1063/1.530747

    1994 doi

  17. [23]

    Kandel, Functorial quantum field theory in the Riemannian setting , Adv

    S. Kandel, Functorial quantum field theory in the Riemannian setting , Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 20(6), 1443–1471 (2016) doi:10.4310/ATMP.2016.v20.n6.a5

    2016 doi

  18. [25]

    Kandel, P

    S. Kandel, P. Mnev, K. Wernli, Two-dimensional perturbative scalar QFT and Atiyah-Segal gluing, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 25(7), 1847–1952 (2021) doi:10.4310/ATMP.2021.v25.n7.a5

    2021 doi

  19. [26]

    A. V. Ivanov, N. V. Kharuk, Quantum equation of motion and two-loop cutoff renormalizat ion for φ3 model, Zap. Nauchn. Sem. POMI, 487, POMI, St. Petersburg, 2019, 151–166; J. Math. Sci. (N. Y.), 257:4 (2021), 526–536, arXiv:2203.04562, doi:10.1007/s10958-021-0 5500-5

    2021 arXiv

  20. [27]

    A. V. Ivanov, N. V. Kharuk, Two-Loop Cutoff Renormalization of 4-D Yang–Mills Effective Action, 2020 J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 48, 015002, arXiv:2004.05999, doi:10.1088/1361-6471/abb939

    2020 arXiv

  21. [28]

    A. V. Ivanov, N. V. Kharuk, Formula for two-loop divergent part of 4-D Yang–Mills effect ive action , Eur. Phys. J. C 82, 997 (2022), arXiv:2203.07131, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-022-1 0921-w

    2022 arXiv

  22. [29]

    P. V. Akacevich, A. V. Ivanov, On Two-Loop Effective Action of 2D Sigma Model , Eur. Phys. J. C 83, 653 (2023), arXiv:2304.02374, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-1 1797-0 26

    2023 arXiv

  23. [30]

    A. V. Ivanov, N. V. Kharuk, Three-loop divergences in effective action of 4-dimensiona l Yang– Mills theory with cutoff regularization: Γ 2 4-contribution, Zap. Nauchn. Sem. POMI, 520, POMI, St. Petersburg, 2023, 162–188, J Math Sci 284, 681–699 (2024) doi:10.1007/s10958-024-07379-4

    2024 doi

  24. [31]

    A. V. Ivanov, Three-loop renormalization of the quantum action for a four -dimensional scalar model with quartic interaction with the usage of the background fie ld method and a cutoff regulariza- tion, Nucl. Phys. B, 1006, 116647 (2024), doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2024.116647, arX...

    2024

  25. [32]

    A. V. Ivanov, N. V. Kharuk, Three-loop renormalization of the quantum action for a five- dimensional scalar cubic model with the usage of the backgro und field method and a cutoff regular- ization, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 139, 849 (2024) doi:10.1140/epjp/s13360-024-05648-4, arXiv:2404...

    2024 doi

  26. [33]

    N. V. Kharuk, Three-loop renormalization with a cutoff in a sextic model , Questions of quantum field theory and statistical physics. Part 30, Zap. Nauchn. Sem. P OMI, 532, POMI, St. Petersburg, 2024, 273–286

    2024

  27. [34]

    A. V. Ivanov, Explicit Cutoff Regularization in Coordinate Representati on, 2022 J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 55, 495401, arXiv:2209.01783, doi:10.1088/1751-8121/aca8dc

    2022 arXiv

  28. [35]

    A. V. Ivanov, An applicability condition of a cutoff regularization in the coordinate repre- sentation, Functional Analysis and Its Applications 59:1 (to appear) (2024) arXiv:2403.09218, https://www.pdmi.ras.ru/preprint/2024/24-04.html

    2024 arXiv

  29. [36]

    V. P. Zastavnyi, The continuation of the radial function from the exterior of the ball to a function positively defined on the entire space , Bulletin of Donetsk National University: Series A. Natural Sciences, 2/2024, 14–28 (2024) doi:10.5281/zenodo.13752079

    2024 doi

  30. [37]

    Oleszczuk, A symmetry-preserving cut-off regularization , Z

    M. Oleszczuk, A symmetry-preserving cut-off regularization , Z. Phys. C, 64, 533–538 (1994)

    1994

  31. [38]

    Sen-Ben Liao, Operator Cutoff Regularization and Renormalization Group i n Yang-Mills Theory , Phys. Rev. D, 56, 5008–5033 (1997)

    1997

  32. [39]

    Cynolter, E

    G. Cynolter, E. Lendvai, Cutoff Regularization Method in Gauge Theories , [arXiv:1509.07407 [hep- ph]] (2015)

    2015 arXiv

  33. [40]

    N. V. Kharuk, Mixed type regularizations and nonlogarithmic singularit ies, Questions of quantum field theory and statistical physics. Part 27, Zap. Nauchn. Sem. P OMI, 494, POMI, St. Petersburg, 2020, 242–249; J. Math. Sci. (N. Y.), 264, 362–367 (2022) 10.1007/s10958-022-06003-7

    2022 doi

  34. [41]

    A. A. Bagaev, Two-loop calculations of the matrix σ-model effective action in the background field formalism, Theor Math Phys, 154:2, 303–310 (2008) doi:10.1007/s11232-008-0028-5

    2008 doi

  35. [42]

    Brizola, O

    A. Brizola, O. Battistel, Marcos Sampaio, M. C. Nemes, Implicit Regularisation Technique: Calcu- lation of the Two-loop φ4 4-theoryβ-function, Mod. Phys. Lett. A, 14, 1509–1518 (1999)

    1999

  36. [43]

    A. L. Cherchiglia, M. Sampaio, M. C. Nemes, Systematic Implementation of Implicit Regularization for Multi-Loop Feynman Diagrams , Int. J. Mod. Phys. A, 26, 2591–2635 (2011)

    2011

  37. [44]

    Cherchiglia, D

    A. Cherchiglia, D. C. Arias-Perdomo, A. R. Vieira, M. Sampaio, B. Hiller, Two-loop renormalisation of gauge theories in 4D Implicit Regularisation and connect ions to dimensional methods , Eur. Phys. J. C, 81, 468 (2021)

    2021

  38. [45]

    Pauli, F

    W. Pauli, F. Villars, On the Invariant Regularization in Relativistic Quantum Th eory, Rev. Mod. Phys. 21(3): 434–444 (1949)

    1949

  39. [46]

    C. G. Bollini, J. J. Giambiagi, Dimensional Renormalization: The Number of Dimensions as a Regularizing Parameter, Nuovo Cim. B, 12, 20–26 (1972) 27

    1972

  40. [47]

    ’t Hooft, M

    G. ’t Hooft, M. Veltman, Regularization and renormalization of gauge fields , Nucl. Phys. B 44, 189–213 (1972)

    1972

  41. [48]

    Bakeyev, A

    T. Bakeyev, A. Slavnov, Higher covariant derivative regularization revisited , Mod. Phys. Lett. A 11(19), 1539–1554 (1996)

    1996

  42. [49]

    K. V. Stepanyantz, The Higher Covariant Derivative Regularization as a Tool fo r Revealing the Structure of Quantum Corrections in Supersymmetric Gauge T heories, Proc. Steklov Inst. Math. 309, 284–298 (2020)

    2020

  43. [50]

    Kobayashi, K

    S. Kobayashi, K. Nomizu, Foundations of Differential Geometry, Volume 1 , Wiley Classics Library, 1–352 (1996)

    1996

  44. [51]

    Nakahara, Geometry, topology and physics , IoP, Bristol, 1–573 (2003)

    M. Nakahara, Geometry, topology and physics , IoP, Bristol, 1–573 (2003)

    2003

  45. [52]

    A. J. Macfarlane, G. Woo, Φ 3 theory in six dimensions and the renormalization group , Nucl. Phys. B, 77, 91–108 (1974) doi:10.1016/0550-3213(74)90306-X

    1974 doi

  46. [53]

    J. A. Gracey, Four loop renormalization of φ3 theory in six dimensions , Phys. Rev. D, 92, 025012 (2015) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.92.025012

    2015 doi

  47. [54]

    Kleinert, V

    H. Kleinert, V. Schulte-Frohlinde, Critical properties of φ4-theories, World Scientific, Singapore, 1–512 (2001)

    2001

  48. [55]

    A. N. Vasil’ev, The field theoretic renormalization group in critical behav ior theory and stochastic dynamics, Boca Raton: Chapman and Hall/CRC, 1–681 (2004)

    2004

  49. [56]

    L. N. Lipatov, Calculation of the Gell–Mann–Low function in scalar theory with strong nonlinearity , Sov. Phys. JETP 44, 1055–1062 (1976)

    1976

  50. [57]

    R. D. Pisarski, Fixed points of (φ6)3 and (φ4)4 theories, Phys. Rev. D 28, 1554–1556 (1983) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.28.1554

    1983 doi

  51. [58]

    W. A. Bardeen, M. Moshe, M. Bander, Spontaneous Breaking of Scale Invariance and the Ul- traviolet Fixed Point in O(N )-Symmetric (φ6

  52. [59]

    Theory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 52, 1188–1191 (1984) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.52.1188

    1984 doi

  53. [60]

    Gudmundsdottir, G

    R. Gudmundsdottir, G. Rydnell, P. Salomonson, More on O(N )-Symmetric φ6 3 Theory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 53, 2529–2531 (1984) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.53.2529

    1984 doi

  54. [61]

    J. S. Hager, Six-loop renormalization group functions of O(n)-symmetric φ6-theory and ǫ-expansions of tricritical exponents up to ǫ3, J. Phys. A 35, 2703-2711 (2002) doi:10.1088/0305-4470/35/12/301

    2002 doi

  55. [63]

    M. E. Taylor, Partial Differential Equations I: Basic Theory , Applied Mathematical Sciences, Springer, 2nd ed., 1–678 (2011)

    2011

  56. [64]

    Carron, D´ eterminant relatif et la fonction Xi , Amer

    G. Carron, D´ eterminant relatif et la fonction Xi , Amer. J. Math., 124:2, 307–352 (2002) doi:10.1353/ajm.2002.0011

    2002

  57. [65]

    Kuznetsov, T

    N. Kuznetsov, T. Kulczycki, M. Kwa´ snicki, A. Nazarov, B. Siud eja, S. V. Poborchi, I. Polterovich, The legacy of Vladimir Andreevich Steklov , Notices Amer. Math. Soc., 61, no. 1, 9–22 (2014) doi:10.1090/noti1073

    2014 doi

  58. [66]

    Girouard, I

    A. Girouard, I. Polterovich, Spectral geometry of the Steklov problem (Survey article) , J. Spectr. Theory, 7(2), 321–359 (2017) doi:10.4171/jst/164 28

    2017 doi

  59. [67]

    H¨ ormander, Inequalities Between Normal And Tangential Derivatives Of Harmonic Functions , Unpublished Manuscripts

    L. H¨ ormander, Inequalities Between Normal And Tangential Derivatives Of Harmonic Functions , Unpublished Manuscripts . Springer, 37–41 (2018) doi:10.1007/978 -3-319-69850-2 6

    2018 doi

  60. [68]

    Girouard, M

    A. Girouard, M. Karpukhin, M. Levitin, I. Polterovich, The Dirichlet-to-Neumann map, the bound- ary Laplacian, and H¨ ormander’s rediscovered manuscript, J. Spectr. Theory, 12(1), 195–225 (2022) doi:10.4171/jst/399

    2022 doi

  61. [69]

    Glimm, A

    J. Glimm, A. Jaffe, Quantum physics. A functional integral point of view , Springer-Verlag, New York, second edition, 1–535 (1987)

    1987

  62. [70]

    A. V. Ivanov, Local heat kernel , Questions of quantum field theory and statistical physics. Part 3 0, Zap. Nauchn. Sem. POMI, 532, POMI, St. Petersburg, 2024, 136 –152

    2024

  63. [71]

    L¨ uscher, Dimensional regularisation in the presence of large backgr ound fields , Ann

    M. L¨ uscher, Dimensional regularisation in the presence of large backgr ound fields , Ann. Phys., 142(2), 359–392 (1982) doi:10.1016/0003-4916(82)90076-8

    1982 doi

  64. [72]

    A. V. Ivanov, N. V. Kharuk, Special Functions for Heat Kernel Expansion , Eur. Phys. J. Plus 137, 1060 (2022), arXiv:2106.00294, doi:10.1140/epjp/s13360-022-0 3176-7

    2022 arXiv

  65. [73]

    B. S. DeWitt, Dynamical Theory of Groups and Fields , Gordon and Breach, New York, 1–248 (1965)

    1965

  66. [74]

    G. W. Gibbons, Quantum field theory in curved spacetime , General Relativity, An Einstein Centenary Survey, 639–679 (1979)

    1979

  67. [75]

    P. B. Gilkey, The spectral geometry of a Riemannian manifold , J. Differ. Geom., 10, 601–618 (1975) doi:10.4310/JDG/1214433164

    1975

  68. [76]

    R. T. Seeley, Complex powers of an elliptic operator , Singular Integrals, Proc. Sympos. Pure Math. 10, Amer. Math. Soc., 288–307 (1967) doi:10.1090/pspum/010/0237 943

    1967 doi

  69. [77]

    J. L. Synge, A Characteristic Function in Riemannian Space and its Appli cation to the Solution of Geodesic Triangles, London Math. Soc. 32, 241–258 (1931) doi:10.1112/plms/s2-32.1.241

    1931 doi

  70. [78]

    J. L. Synge, Relativity: The general theory , North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam, 1–505 (1960)

    1960

  71. [79]

    J. H. Van Vleck, The Correspondence Principle in the Statistical Interpret ation of Quantum Me- chanics, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 14, 178–188 (1928) doi:10.1073/PNAS.14.2.178

    1928 doi

  72. [80]

    O. G. Smolyanov, E. T. Shavgulidze, Functional Integrals, URSS, 2nd ed., 1–328 (2024)

    2024

  73. [81]

    I. Jack, H. Osborn, Two-loop background field calculations for arbitrary backg round fields , Nucl. Phys. B, 207, 474–504 (1982) doi:10.1016/0550-3213(82)90212-7

    1982 doi

  74. [82]

    B. S. DeWitt, Quantum Theory of Gravity. 2. The Manifestly Covariant Theo ry, Phys. Rev. 162, 1195–1239 (1967) doi:10.1103/PhysRev.162.1195

    1967 doi

  75. [83]

    B. S. DeWitt, Quantum Theory of Gravity. 3. Applications of the Covariant Theory, Phys. Rev. 162, 1239–1256 (1967) doi:10.1103/PhysRev.162.1239

    1967 doi

  76. [84]

    ’t Hooft, The background field method in gauge field theories , (Karpacz, 1975), Proceedings, Acta Universitatis Wratislaviensis, 1, Wroclaw, 345–369 (1976)

    G. ’t Hooft, The background field method in gauge field theories , (Karpacz, 1975), Proceedings, Acta Universitatis Wratislaviensis, 1, Wroclaw, 345–369 (1976)

    1976

  77. [85]

    L. F. Abbott, Introduction to the background field method , Acta Phys. Polon. B, 13:1–2, 33–50 (1982)

    1982

  78. [86]

    I. Ya. Aref’eva, A. A. Slavnov, L. D. Faddeev, Generating functional for the S-matrix in gauge- invariant theories, TMF, 21:3, 311–321 (1974) doi:10.1007/BF01038094

    1974 doi

  79. [87]

    L. D. Faddeev, Mass in Quantum Yang–Mills theory (comment on a Clay milleni um problem), Bull. Braz. Math. Soc. (N. S.), 33:2, 201–212 (2002) arXiv:0911.1013, doi:10.1007/S005740200009 29

    2002 arXiv

  80. [88]

    A. V. Ivanov, M. A. Russkikh, Quantum field theory on the example of the simplest cubic mode l, Zap. Nauchn. Sem. POMI, 509 (2021), 123–152; J. Math. Sci. (N. Y.), 275:3 (2023), 306–325 arXiv:2107.14488, 10.1007/s10958-023-06683-9

    2021 arXiv

  81. [89]

    A. N. Vasil’ev, Functional methods in quantum field theory and statistics , London: Gordon & Breach, 1–320 (1998) doi:10.1201/9780203755396

    1998 doi

  82. [90]

    A. V. Ivanov, Applicability condition of a cutoff in two-dimensional mode ls, Questions of quantum field theory and statistical physics. Part 30, Zap. Nauchn. Sem. P OMI, 532, POMI, St. Petersburg, 2024, 153–168

    2024

  83. [91]

    N. N. Bogoliubov, D. V. Shirkov, Introduction to the theory of quantized fields , 4th ed., M: Nauka, 1–600 (1984)

    1984

  84. [92]

    Burghelea, L

    D. Burghelea, L. Friedlander, T. Kappeler, Meyer-vietoris type formula for determinants of elliptic differential operators , J. Funct. Anal., 107(1), 34–65 (1992) doi:10.1016/0022-1236(92)90099-5

    1992 doi

  85. [93]

    Lee, Mayer-Vietoris formula for the determinant of a Laplace ope rator on an even dimensional manifold, Proc

    Y. Lee, Mayer-Vietoris formula for the determinant of a Laplace ope rator on an even dimensional manifold, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 123(6), 1933–1940 (1995) doi:10.1090/S0002-9939-1995-1254845 - 7 30

    1995 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.