Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Risk Averse Robust Adversarial Reinforcement Learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1904.00511 v1 pith:5MNNHGM2 submitted 2019-03-31 cs.LG cs.AIcs.RO

classification cs.LGcs.AIcs.RO
keywords learningreinforcementadversaryadversarialriskrisk-averserobustagents
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Deep reinforcement learning has recently made significant progress in solving computer games and robotic control tasks. A known problem, though, is that policies overfit to the training environment and may not avoid rare, catastrophic events such as automotive accidents. A classical technique for improving the robustness of reinforcement learning algorithms is to train on a set of randomized environments, but this approach only guards against common situations. Recently, robust adversarial reinforcement learning (RARL) was developed, which allows efficient applications of random and systematic perturbations by a trained adversary. A limitation of RARL is that only the expected control objective is optimized; there is no explicit modeling or optimization of risk. Thus the agents do not consider the probability of catastrophic events (i.e., those inducing abnormally large negative reward), except through their effect on the expected objective. In this paper we introduce risk-averse robust adversarial reinforcement learning (RARARL), using a risk-averse protagonist and a risk-seeking adversary. We test our approach on a self-driving vehicle controller. We use an ensemble of policy networks to model risk as the variance of value functions. We show through experiments that a risk-averse agent is better equipped to handle a risk-seeking adversary, and experiences substantially fewer crashes compared to agents trained without an adversary.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. CRASH: Challenging Reinforcement-Learning Based Adversarial Scenarios For Safety Hardening

    cs.LG 2024-11 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    An adversarial RL framework that both finds collision-inducing scenarios and retrains a motion planner against them, cutting crash rates in a two-vehicle highway simulator.

Pith tools