Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Meta Prompting for AI Systems

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2311.11482 v10 pith:5NA65LYG submitted 2023-11-20 cs.AI cs.CL

classification cs.AIcs.CL
keywords modelmetapromptpromptingtaskaccuracyeditedits
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We introduce Meta Prompting (MP), a framework that emphasizes the formal structure of a task rather than content-specific worked examples. We give a categorical formalization in which a functor maps typed task transformations to typed prompt transformations. Functoriality encodes preservation of identities and composition, but it does not by itself guarantee semantic correctness. We extend MP to Recursive Meta Prompting (RMP), in which a proposer model generates candidate prompt edits, a validator enforces the edit schema, and an executor model uses the resulting prompt. We model the accumulation of valid edit scripts with the Writer monad and their application by a monoid action on prompts. This construction makes accumulated edits independent of parenthesization; it does not guarantee convergence or improved task accuracy. Empirically, a Qwen-72B base model guided by example-free meta-prompts attains 46.3% pass@1 on MATH and 83.5% accuracy on GSM8K. Separately, an MP-CR agent synthesizes a tool-executed Game of 24 solver; the original experiment reports 100% success on 1,362 instances, subject to exact re-verification from the corresponding input and per-instance outputs. The batch amortizes one LLM response across all puzzles, so its token accounting is not protocol-matched to per-instance few-shot or search-based methods.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. OpenAlex reports about 5 citations worldwide. Full citation record

  1. Question Answering under Temporal Conflict: Evaluating and Organizing Evolving Knowledge with LLMs

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    New temporal benchmarks show LLMs struggle with outdated facts, and a structured knowledge-organization memory improves accuracy over ICL and RAG.

  2. Large Language Models for Next-Generation Wireless Network Management: A Survey and Tutorial

    cs.NI 2025-09 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A survey and tutorial that organizes LLM-enabled wireless network optimization into formulation, solution, and verification stages, with case studies drawn from the authors' own prior papers.

  3. Cognitive Load-Aware Inference: A Neuro-Symbolic Framework for Optimizing the Token Economy of Large Language Models

    cs.LG 2025-07 reject novelty 3.0 of 10

    The paper claims that framing LLM inference as cognitive load management reduces token consumption without accuracy loss, but the evidence is under-powered and the 'emergent' decomposition is directly trained.

Pith tools