pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.23836 · v1 · pith:5NXKVX27new · submitted 2026-05-22 · ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall

Orbital Selective Dirac-like States in EuAgAs Revealed by Polarization Dependent ARPES and DFT

Mohit Mudgal , Suman Nandi , Mohamed El Gazzah , Masashi Arita , Shin-ichiro Ideta , Nirmal J. Ghimire , Kenya Shimada , Anup Pradhan Sakhya This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-25 03:06 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall
keywords EuAgAsDirac semimetalARPESorbital characterpolarization dependencemagnetic topological materialsphotoemission matrix elements
0
0 comments X

The pith

Polarization-dependent ARPES shows symmetry-selective orbital contributions to Dirac-like states in EuAgAs, reproduced by DFT, with little change across 9-30 K.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper measures the electronic structure of EuAgAs, a candidate magnetic topological Dirac semimetal, with angle-resolved photoemission and density functional theory. It finds ring-like Fermi surface features that expand with binding energy, consistent with linear Dirac dispersion, and uses different light polarizations to show that spectral intensities vary strongly according to orbital symmetry. These variations match the orbital matrix elements calculated in DFT, while the Dirac states themselves stay essentially unchanged from 9 K to 30 K.

Core claim

Polarization-dependent ARPES in s- and p-geometries produces pronounced intensity modulations in the Dirac-like states that are reproduced by DFT orbital matrix elements; the same states show no detectable change in dispersion or position between 9 K and 30 K, indicating that magnetic ordering exerts minimal influence on the low-energy electronic structure.

What carries the argument

Polarization- and photon-energy-dependent photoemission matrix elements that selectively enhance or suppress contributions from different orbital symmetries to the observed spectral intensity.

If this is right

  • Different photon energies can be used to probe distinct orbital characters of the Dirac states.
  • The orbital-selective response allows experimental mapping of symmetry contributions to the topological bands.
  • The electronic structure near the Dirac points is robust against the onset of magnetic order in this temperature window.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Orbital selectivity may enable light-controlled manipulation of topological transport in related compounds.
  • The minimal temperature dependence suggests the Dirac states could survive in the paramagnetic phase above the ordering temperature.
  • Similar polarization contrast could be used to identify orbital character in other magnetic semimetals where DFT alone is ambiguous.

Load-bearing premise

The measured intensity changes arise purely from orbital symmetry selection rules captured accurately by DFT, without major interference from surface reconstruction, final-state effects, or geometry artifacts.

What would settle it

Quantitative mismatch between measured polarization-dependent intensities and DFT matrix-element calculations once a realistic surface slab or final-state scattering is included in the simulation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.23836 by Anup Pradhan Sakhya, Kenya Shimada, Masashi Arita, Mohamed El Gazzah, Mohit Mudgal, Nirmal J. Ghimire, Shin-ichiro Ideta, Suman Nandi.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. (a) Magnetic ground state structure of EuAgAs [ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. (Left panel) ARPES-measured Fermi surface and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. (a) ARPES-measured three dimensional band dispersions along the high symmetry directions M - Γ - M and K - Γ - K [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Temperature dependent CECs and electronic band dispersion of EuAgAs along the high symmetry direction K - Γ - [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: (a) presents the FS measured using 9 eV pho￾ton energy under both s and p polarized light configura￾tions, revealing a nearly circular pocket centered at the Γ point. Although the overall FS shape remains nearly unchanged, the spectral intensity distribution exhibits a pronounced variation between the p and s polarized ge￾ometries. Under p polarized light, the spectral weight for the outer pocket is strong… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Magnetic topological semimetals provide a promising platform for emergent quantum phenomena driven by the interplay between magnetism and relativistic fermions, including anomalous transport effects and tunable topological phases. Here, we investigate the electronic structure and orbital character of EuAgAs, a magnetic topological Dirac semimetal candidate, using density functional theory (DFT) and polarization dependent angle resolved photoemission spectroscopy (ARPES). Fermi surface mapping and constant energy contours measured at 9 eV reveal ring like features that systematically expand with increasing binding energy, consistent with nearly linear low energy Dirac like dispersion. ARPES measurements at different photon energies hint at the presence of a van Hove singularity predicted by DFT calculations. Furthermore, this indicates that the photoemission matrix elements are highly sensitive to the excitation energy, allowing different photon energies to selectively probe distinct orbital characters. Polarization dependent ARPES measurements performed in s- and p-polarized geometries exhibit pronounced variations in spectral intensity, indicating symmetry selective orbital contributions to electronic states. These matrix element driven intensity modulations are well reproduced by DFT calculations. Furthermore, the observed Dirac like states remain nearly unchanged over the temperature range from 9 K to 30 K, suggesting that the magnetic ordering has minimal influence on the electronic structure. Our combined experimental and theoretical results provide detailed insight into the orbital selective electronic structure of EuAgAs and its implications for magnetic topological quantum states.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript investigates the electronic structure of EuAgAs, a magnetic topological Dirac semimetal candidate, combining DFT calculations with polarization-dependent ARPES. It reports ring-like Fermi surface features at 9 eV that expand with binding energy, consistent with nearly linear Dirac-like dispersion; photon-energy dependence hinting at a van Hove singularity; pronounced s- vs p-polarization intensity variations attributed to symmetry-selective orbital contributions, reproduced by DFT matrix elements; and near temperature independence of the Dirac-like states between 9 K and 30 K, suggesting minimal magnetic ordering influence.

Significance. If the central interpretation holds, the work supplies orbital-character information for a candidate material in the magnetic topological semimetal class, which may help clarify symmetry-selective effects relevant to anomalous transport and tunable topological phases. The explicit reproduction of polarization-driven matrix-element modulations by DFT is a constructive element that strengthens the orbital-assignment claim.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract / temperature-dependence paragraph] Abstract and temperature-dependence section: the claim that the Dirac-like states 'remain nearly unchanged' from 9 K to 30 K and therefore experience 'minimal influence' from magnetic ordering is load-bearing for the temperature-stability conclusion, yet the manuscript does not report the Néel temperature T_N; without this datum it is impossible to determine whether the measured interval actually crosses the magnetic transition.
  2. [Polarization ARPES subsection] Polarization-dependent ARPES results: the statement that 'matrix element driven intensity modulations are well reproduced by DFT calculations' is central to the orbital-selectivity claim, but no quantitative figure of merit (R-factor, χ², or integrated intensity ratios) is supplied; visual agreement alone leaves open the possibility that residual discrepancies arise from unaccounted surface or final-state contributions.
  3. [Methods / matrix-element discussion] Methods / discussion of matrix elements: the interpretation that intensity variations arise purely from initial-state orbital symmetry selection rules relies on bulk DFT matrix elements being an accurate proxy; the manuscript provides no explicit test (e.g., slab calculations, photon-energy series beyond the van-Hove hint, or comparison with surface-sensitive probes) to rule out reconstruction or geometry artifacts, which directly affects the robustness of the orbital-assignment conclusion.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states 'ring like features that systematically expand with increasing binding energy'; a quantitative extraction of the dispersion slope (e.g., from momentum-distribution-curve fits) would strengthen the 'nearly linear' claim.
  2. [Figure captions] Figure captions and text should explicitly state the photon energy used for the polarization maps and whether the same energy was employed for the temperature series.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and detailed comments. We respond point-by-point to the major comments below, indicating where revisions will be made to strengthen the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract / temperature-dependence paragraph] Abstract and temperature-dependence section: the claim that the Dirac-like states 'remain nearly unchanged' from 9 K to 30 K and therefore experience 'minimal influence' from magnetic ordering is load-bearing for the temperature-stability conclusion, yet the manuscript does not report the Néel temperature T_N; without this datum it is impossible to determine whether the measured interval actually crosses the magnetic transition.

    Authors: We agree that the Néel temperature must be provided for proper context. We will revise the manuscript to include the literature value of T_N for EuAgAs and explicitly relate our 9–30 K range to the magnetic transition, thereby clarifying the temperature-stability conclusion. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Polarization ARPES subsection] Polarization-dependent ARPES results: the statement that 'matrix element driven intensity modulations are well reproduced by DFT calculations' is central to the orbital-selectivity claim, but no quantitative figure of merit (R-factor, χ², or integrated intensity ratios) is supplied; visual agreement alone leaves open the possibility that residual discrepancies arise from unaccounted surface or final-state contributions.

    Authors: We acknowledge that a quantitative metric would make the comparison more rigorous. In the revised manuscript we will add integrated intensity ratios extracted from the s- versus p-polarized data at representative momenta and compare them directly to the corresponding DFT matrix-element predictions. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Methods / matrix-element discussion] Methods / discussion of matrix elements: the interpretation that intensity variations arise purely from initial-state orbital symmetry selection rules relies on bulk DFT matrix elements being an accurate proxy; the manuscript provides no explicit test (e.g., slab calculations, photon-energy series beyond the van-Hove hint, or comparison with surface-sensitive probes) to rule out reconstruction or geometry artifacts, which directly affects the robustness of the orbital-assignment conclusion.

    Authors: The observed photon-energy dependence that tracks the bulk-predicted van Hove singularity already indicates three-dimensional bulk character rather than surface reconstruction. While additional slab calculations lie outside the present scope, we will expand the discussion to emphasize this photon-energy evidence and the overall consistency with bulk DFT as support for the orbital assignment. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: experimental ARPES data and DFT reproduction are independent

full rationale

The paper reports direct ARPES observations of polarization-dependent intensity variations and temperature-independent Dirac-like states, with DFT used only to reproduce matrix-element effects for interpretation. No equations, fits, or self-citations reduce any central claim to its own inputs by construction. The temperature range (9-30 K) and photon-energy dependence are presented as experimental facts without re-deriving them from fitted parameters. This is a standard experimental+theory comparison with no load-bearing circular steps.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review prevents enumeration of exact DFT parameters; typical free parameters in such studies include Hubbard U for Eu 4f states and choice of exchange-correlation functional, but none are stated here.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption DFT plus one-electron matrix elements suffice to interpret ARPES intensities and orbital characters
    Invoked to claim that polarization variations directly reveal symmetry-selective orbital contributions and that DFT reproduces them.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5817 in / 1218 out tokens · 28381 ms · 2026-05-25T03:06:26.167056+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

42 extracted references · 42 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    B. A. Bernevig, C. Felser, and H. Beidenkopf, Progress and prospects in magnetic topological materials, Nature 603, 41 (2022)

    work page 2022

  2. [2]

    Kuroda, Y

    K. Kuroda, Y. Arai, N. Rezaei, S. Kunisada, S. Sakuragi, M. Alaei, Y. Kinoshita, C. Bareille, R. Noguchi, M. Nakayama, S. Akebi, M. Sakano, K. Kawaguchi, M. Arita, S. Ideta, K. Tanaka, H. Kitazawa, K. Okazaki, M. Tokunaga, Y. Haga, S. Shin, H. S. Suzuki, R. Arita, and T. Kondo, Devil’s staircase transition of the elec- tronic structures in CeSb, Nat. Comm...

    work page 2020

  3. [3]

    A. P. Sakhya, P. L. Paulose, A. Thamizhavel, and K. Maiti, Evidence of nontrivial Berry phase and Kondo physics in SmBi, Phys. Rev. Mater.5, 054201 (2021)

    work page 2021

  4. [4]

    A. P. Sakhya, S. Kumar, A. Pramanik, R. P. Pandeya, R. Verma, B. Singh, S. Datta, S. Sasmal, R. Mon- dal, E. F. Schwier, K. Shimada, A. Thamizhavel, and K. Maiti, Behavior of gapped and ungapped Dirac cones in the antiferromagnetic topological metal SmBi, Phys. Rev. B106, 085132 (2022)

    work page 2022

  5. [5]

    J. Zou, Z. He, and G. Xu, The study of magnetic topolog- ical semimetals by first principles calculations, npj Com- put. Mater.5, 96 (2019)

    work page 2019

  6. [6]

    A. P. Sakhya, B. Wang, F. Kabir, C.-Y. Huang, M. M. Hosen, B. Singh, S. Regmi, G. Dhakal, K. Dimitri, M. Sprague, R. Smith, E. D. Bauer, F. Ronning, A. Ban- sil, and M. Neupane, Complex electronic structure evolu- tion of NdSb across the magnetic transition, Phys. Rev. B106, 235119 (2022)

    work page 2022

  7. [7]

    Schrunk, Y

    B. Schrunk, Y. Kushnirenko, B. Kuthanazhi, J. Ahn, L.-L. Wang, E. O’Leary, K. Lee, A. Eaton, A. Fedorov, R. Lou, V. Voroshnin, O. J. Clark, J. S´ anchez-Barriga, S. L. Bud’ko, R.-J. Slager, P. C. Canfield, and A. Kamin- ski, Emergence of Fermi arcs due to magnetic splitting in an antiferromagnet, Nature603, 610 (2022)

    work page 2022

  8. [8]

    Kushnirenko, B

    Y. Kushnirenko, B. Schrunk, B. Kuthanazhi, L.-L. Wang, J. Ahn, E. O’Leary, A. Eaton, S. L. Bud’ko, R.-J. Slager, P. C. Canfield, and A. Kaminski, Rare-earth monop- 8 nictides: Family of antiferromagnets hosting magnetic Fermi arcs, Phys. Rev. B106, 115112 (2022)

    work page 2022

  9. [9]

    Sprague, A

    M. Sprague, A. P. Sakhya, S. Regmi, M. I. Mondal, I. B. Elius, N. Valadez, K. Booth, T. Romanova, A. Ptok, D. Kaczorowski,et al., Complex fermiology and elec- tronic structure of antiferromagnet EuSnP, Phys. Rev. Mater.8, 054411 (2024)

    work page 2024

  10. [10]

    Gooth, B

    J. Gooth, B. Bradlyn, S. Honnali, C. Schindler, N. Ku- mar, J. Noky, Y. Qi, C. Shekhar, Y. Sun, Z. Wang, et al., Axionic charge-density wave in the Weyl semimetal (TaSe4) 2I, Nature575, 315 (2019)

    work page 2019

  11. [11]

    Hsieh, D

    D. Hsieh, D. Qian, L. Wray, Y. Xia, Y. S. Hor, R. J. Cava, and M. Z. Hasan, A topological Dirac insulator in a quantum spin Hall phase, Nature452, 970 (2008)

    work page 2008

  12. [12]

    Hsieh, Y

    D. Hsieh, Y. Xia, L. Wray, D. Qian, A. Pal, J. Dil, J. Os- terwalder, F. Meier, G. Bihlmayer, C. Kane,et al., Obser- vation of unconventional quantum spin textures in topo- logical insulators, Science323, 919 (2009)

    work page 2009

  13. [13]

    Mudgal, D

    M. Mudgal, D. Dutta, P. Meena, V. Yenugonda, V. K. Tiwari, V. K. Malik, J. Buck, S. K. Mahatha, A. Agarwal, and J. Nayak, Magnetotransport and electronic structure of the axion insulator MnSb 8Te13, Phys. Rev. B110, 045124 (2024)

    work page 2024

  14. [14]

    Meena, M

    P. Meena, M. Mudgal, S. Bagga, V. K. Tiwari, V. K. Ma- lik, C. S. Yadav, and J. Nayak, Investigation of weak an- tilocalization andπ-berry phase by quantum oscillation in ferromagnetic Weyl semimetals, Phys. Rev. Mater.9, 044202 (2025)

    work page 2025

  15. [15]

    M. C. Rahn, J.-R. Soh, S. Francoual, L. S. I. Veiga, J. Strempfer, J. Mardegan, D. Y. Yan, Y. F. Guo, Y. G. Shi, and A. T. Boothroyd, Coupling of magnetic order and charge transport in the candidate Dirac semimetal EuCd2As2, Phys. Rev. B97, 214422 (2018)

    work page 2018

  16. [16]

    F. Du, L. Yang, Z. Nie, N. Wu, Y. Li, S. Luo, Y. Chen, D. Su, M. Smidman, Y. Shi, C. Cao, F. Steglich, Y. Song, and H. Yuan, Consecutive topological phase transitions and colossal magnetoresistance in a magnetic topological semimetal, npj Quantum Mater.7, 65 (2022)

    work page 2022

  17. [17]

    Z.-C. Wang, J. D. Rogers, X. Yao, R. Nichols, K. Atay, B. Xu, J. Franklin, I. Sochnikov, P. J. Ryan, D. Haskel, and F. Tafti, Colossal magnetoresistance without mixed valence in a layered phosphide crystal, Adv. Mater.33, 2005755 (2021)

    work page 2021

  18. [18]

    Zhang, F

    H. Zhang, F. Du, X. Zheng, S. Luo, Y. Wu, H. Zheng, S. Cui, Z. Sun, Z. Liu, D. Shen, M. Smidman, Y. Song, M. Shi, Z. Zhong, C. Cao, H. Yuan, and Y. Liu, Elec- tronic band reconstruction across the insulator-metal transition in colossally magnetoresistive EuCd2P2, Phys. Rev. B108, L241115 (2023)

    work page 2023

  19. [19]

    Roychowdhury, M

    S. Roychowdhury, M. Yao, K. Samanta, S. Bae, D. Chen, S. Ju, A. Raghavan, N. Kumar, P. Constantinou, S. N. Guin, N. C. Plumb, M. Romanelli, H. Borrmann, M. G. Vergniory, V. N. Strocov, V. Madhavan, C. Shekhar, and C. Felser, Anomalous Hall conductivity and Nernst effect of the ideal Weyl semimetallic ferromagnet EuCd 2P2, Adv. Sci.10, 2207121 (2023)

    work page 2023

  20. [20]

    Y. Xu, L. Das, J. Z. Ma, C. J. Yi, S. M. Nie, Y. G. Shi, A. Tiwari, S. S. Tsirkin, T. Neupert, M. Medarde, M. Shi, J. Chang, and T. Shang, Unconventional trans- verse transport above and below the magnetic transition temperature in Weyl semimetal EuCd 2P2, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 076602 (2021)

    work page 2021

  21. [21]

    Zhang, K

    Y. Zhang, K. Deng, X. Zhang, M. Wang, Y. Wang, C. Liu, J.-W. Mei, S. Kumar, E. F. Schwier, K. Shi- mada, C. Chen, and B. Shen, In-plane antiferromagnetic moments and magnetic polaron in the axion topological insulator candidate EuIn2As2, Phys. Rev. B101, 205126 (2020)

    work page 2020

  22. [22]

    Regmi, M

    S. Regmi, M. M. Hosen, B. Ghosh, B. Singh, G. Dhakal, C. Sims, B. Wang, F. Kabir, K. Dimitri, Y. Liu, A. Agar- wal, H. Lin, D. Kaczorowski, A. Bansil, and M. Neu- pane, Temperature-dependent electronic structure in a higher-order topological insulator candidate EuIn 2As2, Phys. Rev. B102, 165153 (2020)

    work page 2020

  23. [23]

    D. Ram, J. Singh, S. Banerjee, A. Sundaresan, D. Samal, V. Kanchana, and Z. Hossain, Magnetotransport and electronic structure of EuAuSb: A candidate antiferro- magnetic Dirac semimetal, Phys. Rev. B109, 155152 (2024)

    work page 2024

  24. [24]

    Sears, J

    J. Sears, J. Yao, Z. Hu, W. Tian, N. Aryal, W. Yin, A. Tsvelik, I. A. Zaliznyak, Q. Li, and J. M. Tranquada, EuAuSb: An odd-parity helical variation of altermag- netism, Phys. Rev. B112, 094455 (2025)

    work page 2025

  25. [25]

    F. Zhu, X. Wang, M. Meven, J. Song, T. Mueller, C. Yi, W. Ji, Y. Shi, J. Ma, K. Schmalzl,et al., Magnetic struc- tures, spin-flop transition, and coupling of Eu and Mn magnetism in the Dirac semimetal EuMnBi 2, Phys. Rev. Res.2, 043100 (2020)

    work page 2020

  26. [26]

    A. Laha, R. Singha, S. Mardanya, B. Singh, A. Agarwal, P. Mandal, and Z. Hossain, Topological Hall effect in the antiferromagnetic Dirac semimetal EuAgAs, Phys. Rev. B103, L241112 (2021)

    work page 2021

  27. [27]

    Jin, X.-T

    Y. Jin, X.-T. Zeng, X. Feng, X. Du, W. Wu, X.-L. Sheng, Z.-M. Yu, Z. Zhu, and S. A. Yang, Multiple magnetism- controlled topological states in EuAgAs, Phys. Rev. B 104, 165424 (2021)

    work page 2021

  28. [28]

    H. Liu, C. Zhang, Q.-Y. Wu, Y. Jin, Z. Zhu, J.-J. Song, S.-T. Cui, Z. Sun, H. Wang, B. Chen, J. He, H.-Y. Liu, Y.-X. Duan, P. M. Oppeneer, and J.-Q. Meng, Ultrafast photoinduced phase transition in the antiferromagnetic Dirac semimetal EuAgAs, Phys. Rev. B111, L121113 (2025)

    work page 2025

  29. [29]

    M. E. Gazzah, D. Kaplan, Z. Morgan, A. N. R. Regmi, S. Jamaluddin, H. Cao, I. I. Mazin, and N. J. Ghimire, Near-degenerate competing magnetic orders in EuAgAs: a tunable route to altermagnetism (2026), arXiv:2605.16242

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  30. [30]

    Kresse and J

    G. Kresse and J. Furthm¨ uller, Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set, Phys. Rev. B54, 11169 (1996)

    work page 1996

  31. [31]

    Kresse and D

    G. Kresse and D. Joubert, From ultrasoft pseudopoten- tials to the projector augmented-wave method, Phys. Rev. B59, 1758 (1999)

    work page 1999

  32. [32]

    J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Generalized gradient approximation made simple, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865 (1996)

    work page 1996

  33. [33]

    A. A. Mostofi, J. R. Yates, Y.-S. Lee, I. Souza, D. Van- derbilt, and N. Marzari, wannier90: A tool for obtaining maximally-localised Wannier functions, Comput. Phys. Commun.178, 685 (2008)

    work page 2008

  34. [34]

    Q. Wu, S. Zhang, H.-F. Song, M. Troyer, and A. A. Soluyanov, Wanniertools: An open-source software pack- age for novel topological materials, Comput. Phys. Com- mun.224, 405 (2018)

    work page 2018

  35. [35]

    B.-J. Yang, T. Morimoto, and A. Furusaki, Topological charges of three-dimensional Dirac semimetals with rota- tion symmetry, Phy. Rev. B92, 165120 (2015)

    work page 2015

  36. [36]

    Moser, An experimentalist’s guide to the matrix ele- 9 ment in angle resolved photoemission, J

    S. Moser, An experimentalist’s guide to the matrix ele- 9 ment in angle resolved photoemission, J. Electron Spec- trosc. Relat. Phenom.214, 29 (2017)

    work page 2017

  37. [37]

    Zhang, T

    H. Zhang, T. Pincelli, C. Jozwiak, T. Kondo, R. Ernstor- fer, T. Sato, and S. Zhou, Angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy, Nat. Rev. Methods Primers2, 54 (2022)

    work page 2022

  38. [38]

    See Supplementary Information [URL will be inserted by publisher] for polarisation dependent measurement ge- ometry, additional temperature dependent ARPES Fermi surfaces, Band dispersion, DFT calculated Fermi surfaces at differentk z values, orbital contributions from differ- ent elements to the Fermi surface, and a discussion of the higher order vHs

    work page

  39. [39]

    M. S. Hossain, R. Islam, Z.-J. Cheng, Z. Muhammad, Q. Zhang, Z. Guguchia, J. A. Krieger, B. Casas, Y.-X. Jiang, M. Litskevich,et al., Superconductivity and a van Hove singularity confined to the surface of a topological semimetal, Nat. commun.16, 3998 (2025)

    work page 2025

  40. [40]

    Y. Hu, X. Wu, B. R. Ortiz, S. Ju, X. Han, J. Ma, N. C. Plumb, M. Radovic, R. Thomale, S. D. Wilson,et al., Rich nature of van Hove singularities in Kagome super- conductor CsV3Sb5, Nat. Commun.13, 2220 (2022)

    work page 2022

  41. [41]

    Louat, B

    A. Louat, B. Lenz, S. Biermann, C. Martins, F. m. c. Bertran, P. Le F` evre, J. E. Rault, F. Bert, and V. Brouet, Arpes study of orbital character, symmetry breaking, and pseudogaps in doped and pure Sr 2IrO4, Phys. Rev. B 100, 205135 (2019)

    work page 2019

  42. [42]

    J.-R. Soh, Z. Zhu, L. Withers, J. A. Rodr´ ıguez- Velamaz´ an, T. K. Kim, O. Fabelo, A. Stunault, D. Yev- tushynsky, D. Prabhakaran, S. A. Yang, and A. T. Boothroyd, Higher-order Weyl nodes driven by helical magnetic order in EuAgAs (2026), arXiv:2605.19347

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026