Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Design Principles of Robust Multi-Armed Bandit Framework in Video Recommendations

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2310.01419 v1 pith:5OB3E3KA submitted 2023-09-24 cs.IR cs.LG

Design Principles of Robust Multi-Armed Bandit Framework in Video Recommendations

classification cs.IR cs.LG
keywords banditdesignrobustprinciplesaddressingcannibalizationchallengeschanges
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Current multi-armed bandit approaches in recommender systems (RS) have focused more on devising effective exploration techniques, while not adequately addressing common exploitation challenges related to distributional changes and item cannibalization. Little work exists to guide the design of robust bandit frameworks that can address these frequent challenges in RS. In this paper, we propose a new design principles to (i) make bandit models robust to time-variant metadata signals, (ii) less prone to item cannibalization, and (iii) prevent their weights fluctuating due to data sparsity. Through a series of experiments, we systematically examine the influence of several important bandit design choices. We demonstrate the advantage of our proposed design principles at making bandit models robust to dynamic behavioral changes through in-depth analyses. Noticeably, we show improved relative gain compared to a baseline bandit model not incorporating our design choices of up to $11.88\%$ and $44.85\%$, respectively in ROC-AUC and PR-AUC. Case studies about fairness in recommending specific popular and unpopular titles are presented, to demonstrate the robustness of our proposed design at addressing popularity biases.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.