Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Do Vision-Language Models Understand Compound Nouns?

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2404.00419 v1 pith:5P7LY5ZV submitted 2024-03-30 cs.CV cs.CL

classification cs.CVcs.CL
keywords compunnounsbenchmarkmodelsunderstandvlmsclipcompound
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Open-vocabulary vision-language models (VLMs) like CLIP, trained using contrastive loss, have emerged as a promising new paradigm for text-to-image retrieval. However, do VLMs understand compound nouns (CNs) (e.g., lab coat) as well as they understand nouns (e.g., lab)? We curate Compun, a novel benchmark with 400 unique and commonly used CNs, to evaluate the effectiveness of VLMs in interpreting CNs. The Compun benchmark challenges a VLM for text-to-image retrieval where, given a text prompt with a CN, the task is to select the correct image that shows the CN among a pair of distractor images that show the constituent nouns that make up the CN. Next, we perform an in-depth analysis to highlight CLIPs' limited understanding of certain types of CNs. Finally, we present an alternative framework that moves beyond hand-written templates for text prompts widely used by CLIP-like models. We employ a Large Language Model to generate multiple diverse captions that include the CN as an object in the scene described by the caption. Our proposed method improves CN understanding of CLIP by 8.25% on Compun. Code and benchmark are available at: https://github.com/sonalkum/Compun

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Seeing Syntax: Uncovering Syntactic Learning Limitations in Vision-Language Models

    cs.CV 2024-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Vision-language text encoders encode less syntactic structure than text-only encoders, and contrastive pre-training rather than model size or data volume accounts for most of the deficit.

  2. How Vision-Language Tasks Benefit from Large Pre-trained Models: A Survey

    cs.CV 2024-12 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A survey that categorizes pre-trained-model-based vision-language methods into four challenge-driven paradigms, with performance tables and a discussion of risks.

Pith tools