Pith. sign in

REVIEW

CAE-Transformer: Transformer-based Model to Predict Invasiveness of Lung Adenocarcinoma Subsolid Nodules from Non-thin Section 3D CT Scans

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2110.08721 v3 pith:5PCHCNDE submitted 2021-10-17 eess.IV cs.CVcs.LG

classification eess.IVcs.CVcs.LG
keywords cae-transformerlungaccuracycancernodulesadenocarcinomaapproachdataset
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Lung cancer is the leading cause of mortality from cancer worldwide and has various histologic types, among which Lung Adenocarcinoma (LUAC) has recently been the most prevalent one. The current approach to determine the invasiveness of LUACs is surgical resection, which is not a viable solution to fight lung cancer in a timely fashion. An alternative approach is to analyze chest Computed Tomography (CT) scans. The radiologists' analysis based on CT images, however, is subjective and might result in a low accuracy. In this paper, a transformer-based framework, referred to as the "CAE-Transformer", is developed to efficiently classify LUACs using whole CT images instead of finely annotated nodules. The proposed CAE-Transformer can achieve high accuracy over a small dataset and requires minor supervision from radiologists. The CAE Transformer utilizes an encoder to automatically extract informative features from CT slices, which are then fed to a modified transformer to capture global inter-slice relations and provide classification labels. Experimental results on our in-house dataset of 114 pathologically proven Sub-Solid Nodules (SSNs) demonstrate the superiority of the CAE-Transformer over its counterparts, achieving an accuracy of 87.73%, sensitivity of 88.67%, specificity of 86.33%, and AUC of 0.913, using a 10-fold cross-validation.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools