The reviewed record of science sign in
Pith

arxiv: 2410.16658 · v4 · pith:5PW5I2CU · submitted 2024-10-22 · cs.CL · cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Adsorb-Agent: Autonomous Identification of Stable Adsorption Configurations via Large Language Model Agent

Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel pith:5PW5I2CUrecord.jsonopen to challenge →

classification cs.CL cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords adsorb-agentadsorptionenergyconfigurationssystemsenergieslargeagent
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Adsorption energy is a key reactivity descriptor in catalysis. Determining adsorption energy requires evaluating numerous adsorbate-catalyst configurations, making it computationally intensive. Current methods rely on exhaustive sampling, which does not guarantee the identification of the global minimum energy. To address this, we introduce Adsorb-Agent, a Large Language Model (LLM) agent designed to efficiently identify stable adsorption configurations corresponding to the global minimum energy. Adsorb-Agent leverages its built-in knowledge and reasoning to strategically explore configurations, significantly reducing the number of initial setups required while improving energy prediction accuracy. In this study, we also evaluated the performance of different LLMs, including GPT-4o, GPT-4o-mini, Claude-3.7-Sonnet, and DeepSeek-Chat, as the reasoning engine for Adsorb-Agent, with GPT-4o showing the strongest overall performance. Tested on twenty diverse systems, Adsorb-Agent identifies comparable adsorption energies for 84% of cases and achieves lower energies for 35%, particularly excelling in complex systems. It identifies lower energies in 47% of intermetallic systems and 67% of systems with large adsorbates. These findings demonstrate Adsorb-Agent's potential to accelerate catalyst discovery by reducing computational costs and enhancing prediction reliability compared to exhaustive search methods.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Reasoning4Sciences: Bridging Reasoning Language Models to All Scientific Branches

    cs.AI 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Survey of RLM adoption in 28 disciplines reveals maturity disparities via a new assessment framework, with focus on development, evaluation, and public resources.

  2. Reasoning4Sciences: Bridging Reasoning Language Models to All Scientific Branches

    cs.AI 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A survey of RLM use in 28 disciplines reveals uneven adoption and introduces a maturity assessment framework showing larger gaps when limited to public resources.