Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Guarding the Gate: ConceptGuard Battles Concept-Level Backdoors in Concept Bottleneck Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2411.16512 v1 pith:5Q4IH5NS submitted 2024-11-25 cs.CR cs.CV

classification cs.CRcs.CV
keywords conceptguardcbmsmodelsattacksconceptconcept-levelbackdooraddress
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The increasing complexity of AI models, especially in deep learning, has raised concerns about transparency and accountability, particularly in high-stakes applications like medical diagnostics, where opaque models can undermine trust. Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) aims to address these issues by providing clear, interpretable models. Among XAI techniques, Concept Bottleneck Models (CBMs) enhance transparency by using high-level semantic concepts. However, CBMs are vulnerable to concept-level backdoor attacks, which inject hidden triggers into these concepts, leading to undetectable anomalous behavior. To address this critical security gap, we introduce ConceptGuard, a novel defense framework specifically designed to protect CBMs from concept-level backdoor attacks. ConceptGuard employs a multi-stage approach, including concept clustering based on text distance measurements and a voting mechanism among classifiers trained on different concept subgroups, to isolate and mitigate potential triggers. Our contributions are threefold: (i) we present ConceptGuard as the first defense mechanism tailored for concept-level backdoor attacks in CBMs; (ii) we provide theoretical guarantees that ConceptGuard can effectively defend against such attacks within a certain trigger size threshold, ensuring robustness; and (iii) we demonstrate that ConceptGuard maintains the high performance and interpretability of CBMs, crucial for trustworthiness. Through comprehensive experiments and theoretical proofs, we show that ConceptGuard significantly enhances the security and trustworthiness of CBMs, paving the way for their secure deployment in critical applications.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. When Efficiency Becomes Fragility: Exploiting Dynamic Routing Vulnerabilities in Adaptive UAV Tracking

    cs.AI 2026-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    The paper claims that hard layer-skipping decisions in adaptive trackers create discontinuities (unbounded local Lipschitz constants) that an attacker can exploit by flipping gating decisions with imperceptible perturbations.

  2. A Comprehensive Survey on the Risks and Limitations of Concept-based Models

    cs.LG 2025-05 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A survey cataloging the main vulnerabilities of supervised and unsupervised concept-based models, including concept leakage, spurious correlations, and intervention failures.

  3. Robust Anomaly Detection in Network Traffic: Evaluating Machine Learning Models on CICIDS2017

    cs.CR 2025-06 reject novelty 3.0 of 10

    A benchmark finds supervised MLP and CNN detect known attacks almost perfectly but miss most novel attacks, while OCSVM generalizes better to unseen threats.

Pith tools