Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

On-Device LLMs for SMEs: Challenges and Opportunities

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.16070 v2 pith:5QOBB6N4 submitted 2024-10-21 cs.AI cs.CL

classification cs.AIcs.CL
keywords llmssmeschallengeshardwareon-devicereviewsoftwaredeploying
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

This paper presents a systematic review of the infrastructure requirements for deploying Large Language Models (LLMs) on-device within the context of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), focusing on both hardware and software perspectives. From the hardware viewpoint, we discuss the utilization of processing units like GPUs and TPUs, efficient memory and storage solutions, and strategies for effective deployment, addressing the challenges of limited computational resources typical in SME settings. From the software perspective, we explore framework compatibility, operating system optimization, and the use of specialized libraries tailored for resource-constrained environments. The review is structured to first identify the unique challenges faced by SMEs in deploying LLMs on-device, followed by an exploration of the opportunities that both hardware innovations and software adaptations offer to overcome these obstacles. Such a structured review provides practical insights, contributing significantly to the community by enhancing the technological resilience of SMEs in integrating LLMs.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Suggesting Code Edits in Interactive Machine Learning Notebooks Using Large Language Models

    cs.SE 2025-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A new dataset of 48,398 real Jupyter notebook editing events from GitHub shows that LLMs predict code edits poorly, with improved but still limited performance after fine-tuning.

Pith tools