REVIEW 2 cited by
Quantifying Conversation Drift in MCP via Latent Polytope
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Quantifying Conversation Drift in MCP via Latent Polytope
read the original abstract
The Model Context Protocol (MCP) enhances large language models (LLMs) by integrating external tools, enabling dynamic aggregation of real-time data to improve task execution. However, its non-isolated execution context introduces critical security and privacy risks. In particular, adversarially crafted content can induce tool poisoning or indirect prompt injection, leading to conversation hijacking, misinformation propagation, or data exfiltration. Existing defenses, such as rule-based filters or LLM-driven detection, remain inadequate due to their reliance on static signatures, computational inefficiency, and inability to quantify conversational hijacking. To address these limitations, we propose SecMCP, a secure framework that detects and quantifies conversation drift, deviations in latent space trajectories induced by adversarial external knowledge. By modeling LLM activation vectors within a latent polytope space, SecMCP identifies anomalous shifts in conversational dynamics, enabling proactive detection of hijacking, misleading, and data exfiltration. We evaluate SecMCP on three state-of-the-art LLMs (Llama3, Vicuna, Mistral) across benchmark datasets (MS MARCO, HotpotQA, FinQA), demonstrating robust detection with AUROC scores exceeding 0.915 while maintaining system usability. Our contributions include a systematic categorization of MCP security threats, a novel latent polytope-based methodology for quantifying conversation drift, and empirical validation of SecMCP's efficacy.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Rethinking MCP Security: A Large-Scale Study of Runtime MCP Servers and Security Scanner Reliability
MCP security scanners flag almost all runtime MCP servers as risky, yet manual and CVE validation show those alerts are inconsistent and often wrong.
-
ShareLock: A Stealthy Multi-Tool Threshold Poisoning Attack Against MCP
ShareLock applies Shamir's threshold scheme to distribute poisoning payloads across multiple MCP tool descriptions, achieving information-theoretic secrecy and over 90% average attack success rate in multi-tool scenarios.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.