Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 56 references

DeblurGAN-v2: Deblurring (Orders-of-Magnitude) Faster and Better

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper claims that one GAN architecture, built around an FPN generator with swappable backbones and a double-scale relativistic discriminator, matches or beats the best prior deblurring models in quality while running 10-100 times…

desk verdict DeblurGAN-v2 is a solid engineering contribution—FPN generator plus flexible backbones and a genuinely fast lightweight variant—but Table 1's undefined 'linear image subset' and unspecified timing protocol keep the headline quantitative claims conditional. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.03826 v1 pith:5TE7UJN2 submitted 2019-08-10 cs.CV cs.LG

Orest Kupyn , Tetiana Martyniuk , Junru Wu , Zhangyang Wang This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.CVcs.LG MSC 68T0768T45
keywords single-imagedeblurringgenerativeadversarialnetworkfeaturepyramidrelativisticGANleast-squaresreal-timevideomobilevisionimagerestoration
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

DeblurGAN-v2 is a generative adversarial network for removing motion blur from a single image. The paper claims it produces images as sharp as the best prior deblurring models, matching or beating them on PSNR, SSIM, and human preference, while being far cheaper to run. With a heavy backbone it competes with the strongest published methods; with a light backbone it runs 10-100 times faster than its nearest rivals, at 0.04 seconds per 1280x720 image and a 4 MB model, which the authors say makes real-time video deblurring feasible. The source of the gain is a Feature Pyramid Network in the generator, which aggregates multi-scale features in one pass instead of feeding multiple image scales through separate streams, plus a double-scale relativistic discriminator and a hybrid loss.

What carries the argument

The central object is the Feature Pyramid Network (FPN) inserted as the generator's core: a bottom-up convolutional backbone produces features at five scales, a top-down pathway up-samples the semantically rich low-resolution features, lateral connections add high-resolution detail, and the resulting multi-scale maps are up-sampled and concatenated into one tensor. This replaces the multi-stream, multi-scale input pyramids used by prior deblurring CNNs with a single forward pass, which is what yields the efficiency gain. Around it sits a double-scale discriminator with one global branch on the full image and one local patch branch, using a relativistic least-squares (RaGAN-LS) loss that estimates how much more realistic a real image is than a fake one, and a generator loss $L_G = 0.5 L_p + 0.006 L_X + 0.01 L_{adv}$ combining MSE, VGG19 perceptual, and adversarial terms. The backbone is swappable; the paper demonstrates Inception-ResNet-v2, MobileNet, and a depthwise-separable-convolution MobileNet variant.

What would settle it

Re-run SRN, DeepDeblur, and DeblurGAN on the exact same linear GoPro subset using the same GPU and timing protocol and compare wall-clock times and PSNR or SSIM; if DeblurGAN-v2 with MobileNet-DSC is less than 10 times faster or its quality gap widens beyond the reported margin, the central efficiency claim fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the discovery is that an FPN-based generator turns deblurring into a plug-and-play trade-off: the same adversarial training recipe, with a relativistic least-squares discriminator that looks at both whole images and local patches, yields top-tier quality when the backbone is powerful and near-real-time speed when the backbone is a compact MobileNet. The authors report that the Inception-ResNet-v2 variant ranks at the top of GoPro SSIM and beats competitors in subjective tests on real blurry photos, while the MobileNet-DSC variant keeps SSIM close to DeblurGAN and DeepDeblur while running over one hundred times faster than the slower baselines and eleven times faster than DeblurGAN. They state that MobileNet-DSC is, to their knowledge, the only deblurring method that simultaneously delivers reasonably high performance and that level of inference efficiency, and they show the same generator improves a joint restoration benchmark as well.

Load-bearing premise

The comparison is fair: every method's speed and quality numbers come from the same 'linear image subset' of GoPro under the same timing protocol, but the paper does not specify what that subset is or whether the prior published numbers were recomputed on it.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • With the Inception-ResNet-v2 backbone, DeblurGAN-v2 matches or beats the strongest published deblurring methods on quality metrics, achieving top SSIM on GoPro, a near-tie with SRN on Kohler, and the best subjective score on Lai, while using about one-fifth of SRN's inference time.
  • With the MobileNet backbone, DeblurGAN-v2 outperforms the video-deblurring baselines WFA and DVD in the single-frame setting on the DVD dataset while running at least 17 times faster.
  • With MobileNet-DSC, the model reaches 0.04 seconds per image and a 4 MB size, which the authors state enables near-real-time deblurring of 25-fps video frames; they claim it is the only method so far combining reasonably high quality with that efficiency.
  • The ablation shows each component, FPN, global discriminator, RaGAN-LS, and MSE loss, adds measurable PSNR and SSIM gains, with FPN contributing the most, so the design choices reinforce one another.
  • Because the architecture is backbone-agnostic, the same framework extends to general image restoration: on a synthetic dataset with blur, noise, compression, and upscaling artifacts, the Inception-ResNet-v2 variant outperforms DeblurGAN on PSNR and SSIM.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same FPN generator could be dropped into other image-to-image restoration problems such as denoising, deraining, or super-resolution, where multi-scale aggregation is currently done with pyramid inputs; the speed advantage suggests similar orders-of-magnitude gains there, though the paper only sketches this extension.
  • If the 0.04 seconds per frame figure holds end-to-end, deblurring moves from an offline batch operation to a mobile or embedded camera pipeline, which would make blur-robust preview, video stabilization, and real-time correction viable in consumer devices.
  • The unspecified 'linear image subset' of GoPro leaves a concrete open task: a standardized re-benchmark of all methods on the full test set with a common timing protocol would determine whether the reported speed-quality frontier is robust or partly an artifact of the evaluation subset.
  • Because perceptual quality improves even where PSNR does not, the relativistic GAN training suggests that human-perceived sharpness and standard fidelity metrics can diverge for real-world motion blur, so a perceptual metric tailored to blur may better capture what users actually see.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper introduces DeblurGAN-v2, a GAN-based single-image motion deblurring architecture whose generator incorporates a Feature Pyramid Network (FPN) for multi-scale feature aggregation and can be paired with different backbones (Inception-ResNet-v2, MobileNet, MobileNet-DSC) to trade off quality against efficiency. The discriminator is a double-scale relativistic LSGAN. The authors report PSNR/SSIM, inference time, and FLOPs on GoPro, Kohler, DVD, and Lai datasets, an ablation study, and an extension to general image restoration. The central claims are that the Inception-ResNet-v2 variant reaches state-of-the-art or close-to-state-of-the-art quality while being faster than prior deep deblurring methods, and that the MobileNet-DSC variant is 10-100x faster than nearest competitors while maintaining competitive quality, enabling near real-time video deblurring.

Significance. If the reported comparisons hold up, the contribution is practically significant: it brings FPN into image restoration, demonstrates a flexible quality-efficiency trade-off through interchangeable backbones, and provides a compact model (about 4 MB for MobileNet-DSC) with large inference speedups. The release of code, models, and data is a concrete strength that increases reproducibility. The ablation study in Table 5 consistently shows improvements from each added component, which supports the internal design choices. However, the quantitative significance is currently bounded by an under-specified comparison protocol in Table 1 and the absence of uncertainty estimates, so the headline claims are not yet fully verifiable from the manuscript alone.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. 4.2, Table 1] The caption states that all models were tested on the 'linear image subset' of GoPro, but this subset is never defined, and the paper does not state whether the numbers for prior methods were recomputed on this subset or taken from the original publications. This ambiguity is load-bearing for the central speed and quality claims, because a non-representative subset or inconsistent preprocessing would invalidate the comparisons. Please define the subset, its size and selection rule, and state exactly how each baseline's PSNR/SSIM and timing numbers were obtained.
  2. [Sec. 4.2, Table 1] The inference-time comparison reports 'averaged running time per image measured on a single GPU' without naming the GPU model, the image resolution, the batch size, or whether all timings were re-measured under identical conditions. Since the paper's headline contribution is the 10-100x speedup, these details are essential; please specify the hardware and protocol, and ideally report the timing variance across runs.
  3. [Sec. 4.2, Tables 1 and 2] No error bars, multiple-run statistics, or significance tests are reported, and small metric differences are used to support ranking claims (e.g., SSIM 0.934 vs 0.932 for DeblurGAN-v2 (Inception-ResNet-v2) vs SRN on GoPro, and the 'almost tie' on Kohler). Please add variance information or clearly restrict the claims to differences that exceed noise, especially because the paper states that DeblurGAN-v2 (Inception-ResNet-v2) 'outperforms SRN in SSIM' on GoPro by only 0.002.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Sec. 4.4] The text refers to 'Table 6' when presenting the DVD results, but the DVD comparison is actually Table 3; the reference should be corrected.
  2. [Sec. 3.3 and Table 5] The ablation row 'Removing perceptual loss (replace 0.5 with 0 in LG)' is inconsistent with the loss definition LG = 0.5*Lp + 0.006*LX + 0.01*Ladv; the text should say that the perceptual-loss coefficient 0.006 is set to zero. Additionally, the surrounding text says that adding either MSE or perceptual loss benefits training, but only the removal of perceptual loss is shown in the table; consider adding the corresponding MSE-removal row or rephrasing.
  3. [Sec. 1, bullet list] The claim that MobileNet-DSC is 'over 100 times faster than [33, 45]' is not supported by Table 1: compared with SRN, the speedup is 1.6s / 0.04s = 40x. Please adjust the wording to distinguish the 100x speedup relative to DeepDeblur from the 40x speedup relative to SRN.
  4. [Sec. 3.4 and Sec. 4.7] There are several typos: 'The author then generated' should be 'The authors then generated', 'join enhancement' should be 'joint enhancement', 'atural images' should be 'natural images', and Table 1 uses 'FLOPS' while the text uses 'FLOPs' elsewhere; these should be corrected.
  5. [Sec. 4.2] The phrase 'near real-time video frame deblurring, for 25-fps videos' based on 0.04s per image assumes that per-frame processing time is the only bottleneck; please state that other video-level costs are not accounted for, or remove the real-time implication if it is not measured.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the paper is an empirical architecture and efficiency study whose claims rest on direct benchmark comparisons, not on fitted inputs or self-referential derivations.

full rationale

This is an empirical systems paper, not a derivation, and no load-bearing step reduces to its own inputs. The main claims—FPN improves deblurring quality and lightweight backbones yield large speedups with competitive results—are supported by experiments on external benchmarks (GoPro, Kohler, DVD, Lai) against independently published methods. The self-citation to DeblurGAN [21] is used as a baseline and as the starting point for the ablation study in Table 5; that is a natural experimental control rather than a fitted input or a prediction. The loss function in Sec. 3.3 is a fixed weighted combination of pixel, perceptual, and adversarial terms, and the reported PSNR/SSIM and timing numbers are measurements, not predictions derived from that loss by construction. The main weakness is an experimental-reporting gap: Table 1 says 'All models were tested on the linear image subset' without defining that subset or specifying the timing protocol, so the fairness of the speed/quality comparison is unverified. That is a correctness or reproducibility concern, not circularity. The paper does not import a uniqueness theorem, rename a known result, or smuggle an ansatz via self-citation. Therefore the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central empirical claims rest on assumptions about the realism of synthetic blur, the transferability of pretrained backbones, the generality of FPN features, and the validity of benchmark metrics. None of these are proven by the paper, though the ablations partially support them.

free parameters (3)
  • Pixel loss weight (Lp) = 0.5
    Chosen empirically in the total loss LG = 0.5*Lp + 0.006*LX + 0.01*Ladv; affects the trade-off between pixel accuracy and perceptual sharpness.
  • Perceptual loss weight (LX) = 0.006
    Chosen empirically; the ablation shows removing perceptual loss lowers PSNR/SSIM (Table 5), so this weight is load-bearing for the reported quality.
  • Adversarial loss weight (Ladv) = 0.01
    Chosen empirically; balances GAN training against content losses and affects final visual quality.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Averaging high-frame-rate frames (with video interpolation) produces realistic synthetic motion blur for training.
    Used in Sec 3.4 for GoPro, DVD, and NFS training data; real-world blur may differ, and the paper only partially validates on Lai real images subjectively.
  • domain assumption ImageNet-pretrained backbones transfer to the deblurring task.
    Sec 3.2 relies on pretrained Inception-ResNet-v2 and MobileNet; no ablation on randomly initialized backbones is provided.
  • domain assumption Feature Pyramid Network features from object detection generalize to image restoration.
    The core architectural innovation, FPN (Sec 3.1), is borrowed from detection; the paper assumes multi-scale features help restoration, supported by ablation but not mechanistically proven.
  • domain assumption Benchmark metrics (PSNR/SSIM) and the chosen benchmarks reflect deblurring quality.
    The paper uses PSNR/SSIM on GoPro, Kohler, DVD, plus a subjective study on Lai, but these metrics and datasets are imperfect proxies for real-world perceptual quality.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of DeblurGAN-v2: Deblurring (Orders-of-Magnitude) Faster and Better." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/5TE7UJN2

@misc{pith2026190803826,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: DeblurGAN-v2: Deblurring (Orders-of-Magnitude) Faster and Better},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/5TE7UJN2}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.03826}
}
read the original abstract

We present a new end-to-end generative adversarial network (GAN) for single image motion deblurring, named DeblurGAN-v2, which considerably boosts state-of-the-art deblurring efficiency, quality, and flexibility. DeblurGAN-v2 is based on a relativistic conditional GAN with a double-scale discriminator. For the first time, we introduce the Feature Pyramid Network into deblurring, as a core building block in the generator of DeblurGAN-v2. It can flexibly work with a wide range of backbones, to navigate the balance between performance and efficiency. The plug-in of sophisticated backbones (e.g., Inception-ResNet-v2) can lead to solid state-of-the-art deblurring. Meanwhile, with light-weight backbones (e.g., MobileNet and its variants), DeblurGAN-v2 reaches 10-100 times faster than the nearest competitors, while maintaining close to state-of-the-art results, implying the option of real-time video deblurring. We demonstrate that DeblurGAN-v2 obtains very competitive performance on several popular benchmarks, in terms of deblurring quality (both objective and subjective), as well as efficiency. Besides, we show the architecture to be effective for general image restoration tasks too. Our codes, models and data are available at: https://github.com/KupynOrest/DeblurGANv2

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.03826 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The SSIM-FLOPs trade-off plot on the GoPRO [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. DeblurGAN-v2 pipeline architecture. data in the mini-batch is fake. The relativistic discriminators show more stable and computationally efficient training in comparison to other GAN types, including WGAN-GP [10] that was used in DeblurGAN-v1. 3. DeblurGAN-v2 Architecture The overview of DeblurGAN-v2 architecture is illus￾trated in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Visual comparison of synthesized blurry images, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Visual comparison on the Kohler dataset. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Qualitative comparison on the “face2” test image of the Lai dataset [22]. DeblurGAN-v2 models are artifact-free, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Visual comparison example on the Restore Dataset. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

56 extracted references · 37 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    http://pytorch.org

    PyTorch. http://pytorch.org

  2. [2]

    Wasserstein gan

    Martin Arjovsky, Soumith Chintala, and L ´eon Bottou. Wasserstein gan. arXiv preprint arXiv:1701.07875, 2017

    arXiv 2017

  3. [3]

    Rank analysis of incomplete block designs: I

    Ralph Allan Bradley and Milton E Terry. Rank analysis of incomplete block designs: I. the method of paired compar- isons. Biometrika, 39(3/4):324–345, 1952

    work page 1952

  4. [4]

    Albumenta- tions: fast and flexible image augmentations

    Alexander Buslaev, Alex Parinov, Eugene Khvedchenya, Vladimir I Iglovikov, and Alexandr A Kalinin. Albumenta- tions: fast and flexible image augmentations. arXiv preprint arXiv:1809.06839, 2018

    arXiv 2018

  5. [5]

    A new single image deblurring algorithm using hyper laplacian priors

    Chia-Feng Chang and Jiunn-Lin Wu. A new single image deblurring algorithm using hyper laplacian priors. In ICS, pages 1015–1022, 2014

    work page 2014

  6. [6]

    Xception: Deep learning with depthwise separable convolutions

    Franc ¸ois Chollet. Xception: Deep learning with depthwise separable convolutions. In Proceedings of the IEEE con- ference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pages 1251–1258, 2017

    2017

  7. [7]

    Burst deblurring: Removing camera shake through fourier burst accumulation

    Mauricio Delbracio and Guillermo Sapiro. Burst deblurring: Removing camera shake through fourier burst accumulation. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 2385–2393, 2015

    work page 2015

  8. [8]

    From Motion Blur to Motion Flow: a Deep Learning Solution for Removing Heterogeneous Motion Blur

    Dong Gong, Jie Yang, Lingqiao Liu, Yanning Zhang, Ian Reid, Chunhua Shen, Anton Van Den Hengel, and Qinfeng Shi. From Motion Blur to Motion Flow: a Deep Learning Solution for Removing Heterogeneous Motion Blur. 2016

    work page 2016

Show all 56 references
  1. [9]

    Goodfellow, Jean Pouget-Abadie, Mehdi Mirza, Bing Xu, David Warde-Farley, Sherjil Ozair, Aaron Courville, and Yoshua Bengio

    Ian J. Goodfellow, Jean Pouget-Abadie, Mehdi Mirza, Bing Xu, David Warde-Farley, Sherjil Ozair, Aaron Courville, and Yoshua Bengio. Generative Adversarial Networks. June 2014

    2014

  2. [10]

    Improved training of wasserstein gans

    Ishaan Gulrajani, Faruk Ahmed, Martin Arjovsky, Vincent Dumoulin, and Aaron C Courville. Improved training of wasserstein gans. In Advances in neural information pro- cessing systems, pages 5767–5777, 2017

    2017

  3. [11]

    Channel pruning for accelerating very deep neural networks

    Yihui He, Xiangyu Zhang, and Jian Sun. Channel pruning for accelerating very deep neural networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision , pages 1389–1397, 2017

    2017

  4. [12]

    Squeeze-and-excitation net- works

    Jie Hu, Li Shen, and Gang Sun. Squeeze-and-excitation net- works. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 7132–7141, 2018

    2018

  5. [13]

    Image-to-image translation with conditional adver- sarial networks

    Phillip Isola, Jun-Yan Zhu, Tinghui Zhou, and Alexei A Efros. Image-to-image translation with conditional adver- sarial networks. arxiv, 2016

    2016

  6. [14]

    Enlightengan: Deep light enhancement without paired supervision

    Yifan Jiang, Xinyu Gong, Ding Liu, Yu Cheng, Chen Fang, Xiaohui Shen, Jianchao Yang, Pan Zhou, and Zhangyang Wang. Enlightengan: Deep light enhancement without paired supervision. arXiv preprint arXiv:1906.06972, 2019

    1906 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Perceptual losses for real-time style transfer and super-resolution

    Justin Johnson, Alexandre Alahi, and Li Fei-Fei. Perceptual losses for real-time style transfer and super-resolution. In European Conference on Computer Vision, 2016

    2016

  8. [16]

    The relativistic discriminator: a key element missing from standard gan

    Alexia Jolicoeur-Martineau. The relativistic discriminator: a key element missing from standard gan. arXiv preprint arXiv:1807.00734, 2018

    2018 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Need for speed: A benchmark for higher frame rate object tracking

    Hamed Kiani Galoogahi, Ashton Fagg, Chen Huang, Deva Ramanan, and Simon Lucey. Need for speed: A benchmark for higher frame rate object tracking. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision , pages 1125–1134, 2017

    2017

  10. [18]

    Kingma and Jimmy Ba

    Diederik P. Kingma and Jimmy Ba. Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. CoRR, abs/1412.6980, 2014

    2014 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Recording and playback of camera shake: Benchmarking blind deconvolution with a real-world database

    Rolf K ¨ohler, Michael Hirsch, Betty Mohler, Bernhard Sch¨olkopf, and Stefan Harmeling. Recording and playback of camera shake: Benchmarking blind deconvolution with a real-world database. In Proceedings of the 12th Euro- pean Conference on Computer Vision - Volume Part VII , ...

    2012

  12. [20]

    Blind de- convolution using a normalized sparsity measure

    Dilip Krishnan, Terence Tay, and Rob Fergus. Blind de- convolution using a normalized sparsity measure. In CVPR 2011, pages 233–240. IEEE, 2011

    2011

  13. [21]

    Deblurgan: Blind motion deblurring using conditional adversarial networks

    Orest Kupyn, V olodymyr Budzan, Mykola Mykhailych, Dmytro Mishkin, and Ji ˇr´ı Matas. Deblurgan: Blind motion deblurring using conditional adversarial networks. In Pro- ceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 8183–8192, 2018

    2018

  14. [22]

    A comparative study for single im- age blind deblurring

    Wei-Sheng Lai, Jia-Bin Huang, Zhe Hu, Narendra Ahuja, and Ming-Hsuan Yang. A comparative study for single im- age blind deblurring. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages 1701– 1709, 2016

    2016

  15. [23]

    Photo- realistic single image super-resolution using a generative ad- versarial network

    Christian Ledig, Lucas Theis, Ferenc Husz´ar, Jose Caballero, Andrew Cunningham, Alejandro Acosta, Andrew Aitken, Alykhan Tejani, Johannes Totz, Zehan Wang, et al. Photo- realistic single image super-resolution using a generative ad- versarial network. In Proceedings of the IE...

    2017

  16. [24]

    Benchmarking single- image dehazing and beyond

    Boyi Li, Wenqi Ren, Dengpan Fu, Dacheng Tao, Dan Feng, Wenjun Zeng, and Zhangyang Wang. Benchmarking single- image dehazing and beyond. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 28(1):492–505, 2019

    2019

  17. [25]

    Learning a discrimina- tive prior for blind image deblurring

    Lerenhan Li, Jinshan Pan, Wei-Sheng Lai, Changxin Gao, Nong Sang, and Ming-Hsuan Yang. Learning a discrimina- tive prior for blind image deblurring. In The IEEE Confer- ence on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) , June 2018

    2018

  18. [26]

    Sin- gle image deraining: A comprehensive benchmark analysis

    Siyuan Li, Iago Breno Araujo, Wenqi Ren, Zhangyang Wang, Eric K Tokuda, Roberto Hirata Junior, Roberto Cesar- Junior, Jiawan Zhang, Xiaojie Guo, and Xiaochun Cao. Sin- gle image deraining: A comprehensive benchmark analysis. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vi...

    2019

  19. [27]

    Feature pyramid networks for object detection

    Tsung-Yi Lin, Piotr Doll ´ar, Ross Girshick, Kaiming He, Bharath Hariharan, and Serge Belongie. Feature pyramid networks for object detection. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages 2117–2125, 2017

    2017

  20. [28]

    Robust video super-resolution with learned temporal dynamics

    Ding Liu, Zhaowen Wang, Yuchen Fan, Xianming Liu, Zhangyang Wang, Shiyu Chang, and Thomas Huang. Robust video super-resolution with learned temporal dynamics. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Com- puter Vision, pages 2507–2515, 2017

    2017

  21. [29]

    When image denoising meets high-level vision tasks: a deep learning approach

    Ding Liu, Bihan Wen, Xianming Liu, Zhangyang Wang, and Thomas S Huang. When image denoising meets high-level vision tasks: a deep learning approach. In Proceedings of the 27th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelli- gence, pages 842–848. AAAI Press, 2018

    2018

  22. [30]

    Xudong Mao, Qing Li, Haoran Xie, Raymond Y . K. Lau, and Zhen Wang. Least squares generative adversarial networks,

  23. [31]

    Conditional generative adversarial nets

    Mehdi Mirza and Simon Osindero. Conditional generative adversarial nets. CoRR, abs/1411.1784, 2014

    2014 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Lsd 2 - joint denoising and deblurring of short and long exposure images with convolutional neural networks

    Janne Mustaniemi, Juho Kannala, Jiri Matas, Simo S ¨arkk¨a, and Janne Heikkil ¨a. Lsd 2 - joint denoising and deblurring of short and long exposure images with convolutional neural networks. CoRR, abs/1811.09485, 2018

    2018 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Deep Multi-scale Convolutional Neural Network for Dy- namic Scene Deblurring

    Seungjun Nah, Tae Hyun, Kim Kyoung, and Mu Lee. Deep Multi-scale Convolutional Neural Network for Dy- namic Scene Deblurring. 2016

    2016

  26. [34]

    Video frame inter- polation via adaptive separable convolution

    Simon Niklaus, Long Mai, and Feng Liu. Video frame inter- polation via adaptive separable convolution. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision , pages 261–270, 2017

    2017

  27. [35]

    Motion Deblurring in the Wild

    Mehdi Noroozi, Paramanand Chandramouli, and Paolo Favaro. Motion Deblurring in the Wild. 2017

    2017

  28. [36]

    Blind image deblurring using dark channel prior

    Jinshan Pan, Deqing Sun, Hanspeter Pfister, and Ming- Hsuan Yang. Blind image deblurring using dark channel prior. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 1628–1636, 2016

    2016

  29. [37]

    Deep genera- tive filter for motion deblurring

    Sainandan Ramakrishnan, Shubham Pachori, Aalok Gan- gopadhyay, and Shanmuganathan Raman. Deep genera- tive filter for motion deblurring. 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision Workshops (ICCVW), pages 2993–3000, 2017

    2017

  30. [38]

    Yolov3: An incremental improvement

    Joseph Redmon and Ali Farhadi. Yolov3: An incremental improvement. arXiv preprint arXiv:1804.02767, 2018

    2018 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Deep non-blind deconvolution via generalized low-rank approxi- mation

    Wenqi Ren, Jiawei Zhang, Lin Ma, Jinshan Pan, Xiaochun Cao, Wangmeng Zuo, Wei Liu, and Ming-Hsuan Yang. Deep non-blind deconvolution via generalized low-rank approxi- mation. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Sys- tems, pages 295–305, 2018

    2018

  32. [40]

    MobileNetV2: Inverted Residuals and Linear Bottlenecks

    Mark Sandler, Andrew Howard, Menglong Zhu, Andrey Zh- moginov, and Liang-Chieh Chen. MobileNetV2: Inverted Residuals and Linear Bottlenecks. arXiv e-prints , page arXiv:1801.04381, Jan 2018

    2018 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Very deep convo- lutional networks for large-scale image recognition

    Karen Simonyan and Andrew Zisserman. Very deep convo- lutional networks for large-scale image recognition. arXiv preprint arXiv:1409.1556, 2014

    2014 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Deep video deblurring for hand-held cameras

    Shuochen Su, Mauricio Delbracio, Jue Wang, Guillermo Sapiro, Wolfgang Heidrich, and Oliver Wang. Deep video deblurring for hand-held cameras. In CVPR, 2017

    2017

  35. [43]

    Learn- ing a Convolutional Neural Network for Non-uniform Mo- tion Blur Removal

    Jian Sun, Wenfei Cao, Zongben Xu, and Jean Ponce. Learn- ing a Convolutional Neural Network for Non-uniform Mo- tion Blur Removal. 2015

    2015

  36. [44]

    Inception-v4, inception-resnet and the impact of residual connections on learning

    Christian Szegedy, Sergey Ioffe, Vincent Vanhoucke, and Alexander A Alemi. Inception-v4, inception-resnet and the impact of residual connections on learning. In Thirty-First AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2017

    2017

  37. [45]

    Scale-recurrent network for deep image deblurring

    Xin Tao, Hongyun Gao, Xiaoyong Shen, Jue Wang, and Ji- aya Jia. Scale-recurrent network for deep image deblurring. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 8174–8182, 2018

    2018

  38. [46]

    Synthetic shutter speed imaging

    Jacob Telleen, Anne Sullivan, Jerry Yee, Oliver Wang, Pra- bath Gunawardane, Ian Collins, and James Davis. Synthetic shutter speed imaging. In Computer Graphics Forum, 2007

    2007

  39. [47]

    Energynet: Energy- efficient dynamic inference

    Yue Wang, Tan Nguyen, Yang Zhao, Zhangyang Wang, Yingyan Lin, and Richard Baraniuk. Energynet: Energy- efficient dynamic inference. NeurIPS CDNNRIA Workshop, 2018

    2018

  40. [48]

    D3: Deep dual- domain based fast restoration of jpeg-compressed images

    Zhangyang Wang, Ding Liu, Shiyu Chang, Qing Ling, Yingzhen Yang, and Thomas S Huang. D3: Deep dual- domain based fast restoration of jpeg-compressed images. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 2764–2772, 2016

    2016

  41. [49]

    Non-uniform deblurring for shaken images

    Oliver Whyte, Josef Sivic, Andrew Zisserman, and Jean Ponce. Non-uniform deblurring for shaken images. In 2010 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 491–498. IEEE, 2010

    2010

  42. [50]

    Deep k-means: Re- training and parameter sharing with harder cluster assign- ments for compressing deep convolutions

    Junru Wu, Yue Wang, Zhenyu Wu, Zhangyang Wang, Ashok Veeraraghavan, and Yingyan Lin. Deep k-means: Re- training and parameter sharing with harder cluster assign- ments for compressing deep convolutions. In International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 5359–5368, 2018

    2018

  43. [51]

    Unnatural L0 Sparse Representation for Natural Image Deblurring

    Li Xu, Shicheng Zheng, and Jiaya Jia. Unnatural L0 Sparse Representation for Natural Image Deblurring. 2013

    2013

  44. [52]

    Motion blur kernel estimation via deep learning.IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 27(1):194–205, 2018

    Xiangyu Xu, Jinshan Pan, Yu-Jin Zhang, and Ming-Hsuan Yang. Motion blur kernel estimation via deep learning.IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 27(1):194–205, 2018

    2018

  45. [53]

    Yeh, Chen Chen, Teck-Yian Lim, Mark Hasegawa-Johnson, and Minh N

    Raymond A. Yeh, Chen Chen, Teck-Yian Lim, Mark Hasegawa-Johnson, and Minh N. Do. Semantic image inpainting with perceptual and contextual losses. CoRR, abs/1607.07539, 2016

    2016 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Craft- ing a toolchain for image restoration by deep reinforce- ment learning

    Ke Yu, Chao Dong, Liang Lin, and Chen Change Loy. Craft- ing a toolchain for image restoration by deep reinforce- ment learning. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 2443–2452, 2018

    2018

  47. [55]

    Gated fusion network for joint image deblurring and super-resolution

    Xinyi Zhang, Hang Dong, Zhe Hu, Wei-Sheng Lai, Fei Wang, and Ming-Hsuan Yang. Gated fusion network for joint image deblurring and super-resolution. In BMVC, 2018

    2018

  48. [2016]

    cite arxiv:1611.04076

    arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.