The category of weight modules for symplectic oscillator Lie algebras

Genqiang Liu; Kaiming Zhao

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 25 references

The category of weight modules for symplectic oscillator Lie algebras

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read At any nonzero central charge, the BGG category for the symplectic oscillator algebra is equivalent to that of sp(2n), and all simple Harish-Chandra modules fall into three explicit families.

desk verdict A genuinely new category equivalence and classification for symplectic oscillator algebras, with a real proof gap in Lemma 5 that is likely fixable. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.04534 v1 pith:5U6ZS7EC submitted 2019-08-13 math.RT math-phmath.MPmath.RA

Genqiang Liu , Kaiming Zhao This is my paper · ORCID

classification math.RTmath-phmath.MPmath.RA MSC 17B1017B8122E60

keywords symplecticoscillatorLiealgebraJacobiBGGcategoryOHarish-ChandramodulesweightShale-WeilrepresentationWeylgeneralizedhighest

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper proves that, at any fixed nonzero value $\dot z$ of the central element, the representation theory of the rank-$n$ symplectic oscillator algebra $\mathfrak{g}_n$ reduces to that of the symplectic Lie algebra $\mathfrak{sp}_{2n}$. Concretely, the full subcategory $\mathcal{O}_{\mathfrak{g}_n}[\dot z]$ of the BGG category consisting of modules on which $z$ acts as $\dot z$ is equivalent to the BGG category $\mathcal{O}_{\mathfrak{sp}_{2n}}$, by tensoring with a fixed simple module $S$ for the algebra of polynomial differential operators (the Shale-Weil module). The paper also classifies all simple Harish-Chandra modules (weight modules with finite-dimensional weight spaces): with zero central charge they are exactly the simple Harish-Chandra modules for $\mathfrak{sp}_{2n}$, and with nonzero central charge they fall into three explicit families, one of which has no analogue for finite-dimensional simple Lie algebras. The payoff is that a large, physically motivated family of Lie algebras can be studied using classical semisimple Lie theory plus Weyl-algebra combinatorics.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the Weyl algebra $D_n$ of polynomial differential operators in $n$ variables, together with the isomorphism $\varphi_{\dot z}: U(\mathfrak{g}_n)/\langle z-\dot z\rangle \to U(\mathfrak{sp}_{2n})\otimes D_n$ that sends the Heisenberg generators to $\sqrt{\dot z}\,t_i$ and $-\sqrt{\dot z}\,\partial_i$ and shifts the $\mathfrak{sp}_{2n}$ Cartan elements by Euler operators. Through this isomorphism, any $\mathfrak{sp}_{2n}$-module $V$ and $D_n$-module $N$ form a $\mathfrak{g}_n$-module $V\otimes_{\dot z} N$. The simple $D_n$-module $S=(\mathbb{C}[t_1^{\pm 1}]/\mathbb{C}[t_1])\otimes\cdots\otimes(\mathbb{C}[t_n^{\pm 1}]/\mathbb{C}[t_n])$ serves as a fixed coefficient module: tensoring with $S$ over $\dot z$ implements the category equivalence, while the modules $F(a)$ and $G(a)$ record the weight-support data in the classification.

What would settle it

Take two highest weight modules for $\mathfrak{sp}_{2n}$, tensor each with the Shale-Weil module at $\dot z=1$, and compute the space of $\mathfrak{g}_n$-module maps between the results; Theorem 7 predicts that this equals the corresponding $\mathfrak{sp}_{2n}$ intertwiner space. A map that is not of the form $f\otimes 1$ would falsify the equivalence. Alternatively, find a category-O module with nonzero central charge whose Weyl-algebra submodule generated by some weight vector has infinitely many composition factors; Lemma 5 says none exists.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central discovery is a category equivalence at nonzero central charge: the functor $-\otimes_{\dot z} S$ is an equivalence from $\mathcal{O}_{\mathfrak{sp}_{2n}}$ to $\mathcal{O}_{\mathfrak{g}_n}[\dot z]$ (Theorem 7), where $S$ is the simple Shale-Weil module for the Weyl algebra $D_n$. Every object in $\mathcal{O}_{\mathfrak{g}_n}[\dot z]$ is shown to be isomorphic to $N\otimes_{\dot z} S$ for a unique $N$ in $\mathcal{O}_{\mathfrak{sp}_{2n}}$ (Proposition 6). The companion classification theorem (Theorem 15) states that every simple Harish-Chandra module with nonzero central charge is, up to an inner automorphism twist, one of three types: (a) a module $N\otimes_{\dot z} F(a)$ with $N$ a finite-dimensional simple $\mathfrak{sp}_{2n}$-module and all coordinates of $a$ nonintegral; (b) a generalized highest weight module $L(\dot z, V)$ for a simple Harish-Chandra $\mathfrak{gl}_n$-module $V$; or (c) a mixed module $L_{\mathfrak{sp}_{2n}}(V)\otimes_{\dot z} G(a)$ indexed by a proper nonempty set of injective long-root directions. For zero central charge, the classification (Theorem 14) says the simple Harish-Chandra modules are exactly the simple Harish-Chandra $\mathfrak{sp}_{2n}$-modules, because the Heisenberg ideal acts trivially.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is an unproved finiteness statement: in a category-O module with nonzero central charge, the submodule generated by any weight vector under the polynomial differential operators must have finite composition length. The paper asserts this follows from finite-dimensional weight spaces without supplying the argument, and the decomposition into Shale-Weil factors, hence the whole category equivalence, depends on it.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

For any nonzero central charge, every question about $\mathcal{O}_{\mathfrak{g}_n}[\dot z]$ can be translated into a question about $\mathcal{O}_{\mathfrak{sp}_{2n}}$, so the full BGG machinery for symplectic Lie algebras applies.
Verma modules and generalized Verma modules with nonzero central charge factor as $M_{\mathfrak{sp}_{2n}}(\lambda')\otimes_{\dot z} S$ and $M_{\mathfrak{sp}_{2n}}(V)\otimes_{\dot z} S$, so their irreducibility is governed by $\mathfrak{sp}_{2n}$ and ultimately $\mathfrak{gl}_n$ data.
The three-family classification of Theorem 15 is exhaustive, so any future simple Harish-Chandra module with nonzero central charge must be one of the cuspidal, generalized highest weight, or mixed families listed there.
The mixed family $L_{\mathfrak{sp}_{2n}}(V)\otimes_{\dot z} G(a)$ has no counterpart for finite-dimensional simple Lie algebras, indicating a genuinely new phenomenon in this class of algebras.
For zero central charge, simple Harish-Chandra modules over $\mathfrak{g}_n$ coincide with simple Harish-Chandra modules over $\mathfrak{sp}_{2n}$, since the Heisenberg factor acts trivially.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Editorial inference: because the equivalence in Theorem 7 is a functor, structural features of the $\mathfrak{sp}_{2n}$ BGG category that are preserved under equivalence, such as projective covers, BGG-style resolutions, or grading, should transfer to $\mathcal{O}_{\mathfrak{g}_n}[\dot z]$, giving a homological theory the paper does not spell out.
Beyond the paper: the same isomorphism $\varphi_{\dot z}$ identifies modules with central charge $\dot z$ with modules for $U(\mathfrak{sp}_{2n})\otimes D_n$, so the classification likely extends from the BGG category to all Harish-Chandra modules with nonzero central charge by combining the classical $\mathfrak{sp}_{2n}$ classification with the known classification of irreducible weight modules o
Testable consequence: for $n=1$, the symplectic oscillator algebra is the Schr\"odinger algebra, and the three families of Theorem 15 should reproduce the known simple weight modules for that algebra; a case-by-case check would serve as an independent test of the classification.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

You should know this paper does something real: it proves the category equivalence O_g_n[ẑ] ≅ O_sp_{2n} for every n, and classifies simple Harish-Chandra modules with nonzero central charge into three explicit families. The explicit algebra isomorphism in Proposition 3 is direct and checks out, and using only the long roots ±2ε_i to organize the classification is a clean idea that genuinely extends the n=1 Schrödinger algebra results.

The good parts are solid. The paper gives concrete formulas, takes the Weyl algebra structure seriously, and the external classifications it leans on (Mathieu, Futorny–Grantcharov–Mazorchuk) are standard and independent. The three-part taxonomy in Theorem 15, especially the third class in (c), is a real step beyond what was known.

The soft spot is exactly where the reader and stress-test point: Lemma 5. The proof that D_n v has finite composition length is not justified in the text. Finite-dimensionality of the C[t_i∂_i] orbit does not, by itself, imply the cyclic module has finite length, and the vector-space decomposition D_n = (C[t]+C[∂])⊗C[t∂] is asserted without proof. On sitting down with the paper, though, the stress-test goes too far in saying Theorem 7 collapses. The lemma is very likely true, and the gap is fillable: one can invoke the finite filtration from Lemma 2 and Proposition 4, which already shows each highest weight module is a direct sum of copies of S over D_n. The missing 'Proposition 5' in Theorem 7 is just a typo for the Hom-space calculation, which is standard once Lemma 5 holds. Prop 8(a) being omitted is minor. A referee should ask for a rigorous proof of Lemma 5, but this is a repair, not a fatal flaw.

Citation pattern looks fine: self-citation is not an issue, and the external dependencies are appropriate.

This paper deserves a serious referee. It is important within the representation theory of non-semisimple Lie algebras, and the transferable category equivalence is worth having in the literature even if the classification proofs need tightening. If you are close to this area, bring it to a reading group and cite it; if the authors clean up Lemma 5, it will be a solid paper.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies weight modules with finite-dimensional weight spaces (Harish-Chandra modules) for the symplectic oscillator Lie algebra g_n = sp_{2n} ⋉ H_n. The main structural result is an explicit isomorphism between U(g_n)/⟨z − ẑ⟩ and U(sp_{2n}) ⊗ D_n for ẑ ≠ 0 (Proposition 3), from which the authors derive an equivalence between the subcategory O_{g_n}[ẑ] and the BGG category O_{sp_{2n}} (Theorem 7). The second half of the paper uses this and additional localization arguments to classify simple Harish-Chandra g_n-modules: for zero central charge they reduce to sp_{2n}-modules (Theorem 14), and for nonzero central charge they claim three families (cuspidal, parabolically induced, and a mixed type) in Theorem 15.

Significance. If the proofs are completed, this would be a substantial contribution: it gives a transparent functorial bridge between the category O for a semidirect product algebra and the well-understood category O for sp_{2n}, and it extends the Mathieu-style classification of simple weight modules to a new infinite-dimensional family. The explicit isomorphism in Proposition 3 is a clean and useful computation, and the strategy of using the Weyl-algebra classification [15] is sensible. However, several load-bearing arguments are only sketched or incorrect as written, so the claims should not be accepted without revision.

major comments (4)

[§3.4, Lemma 5] The sentence 'Thus the D_n-module D_n v has finite composition length k' does not follow from the previous statements. Finite-dimensionality of C[t∂]v and the vector-space decomposition D_n = (C[t]+C[∂])⊗C[t∂] do not bound the composition length of the cyclic module D_n v; the factors in C[t] and C[∂] can produce infinite filtrations even when the Euler-operator part is finite-dimensional. The subsequent induction is on k, the very quantity the proof is supposed to establish, so the argument is circular. Since Lemma 5 is the foundation for the decomposition M ≅ N⊗S in Proposition 6 and hence for the equivalence in Theorem 7, a complete proof or a precise reference is required.
[Theorem 7, proof] The proof cites 'Proposition 5', but no such result exists; the preceding results are Proposition 4, Lemma 5, and Proposition 6. Moreover, the full faithfulness of the functor is not proved: the statement that automorphisms of S form C* is not enough. One needs an explicit argument that Hom_g(V⊗S, W⊗S) ≅ Hom_sp(V,W), for instance by identifying V with Hom_{D_n}(S, V⊗S) and using the simplicity of S. As written, the proof of the equivalence is incomplete.
[Theorem 15(a) and (c)] The steps 'we must have M ≅ N ⊗ F(a)' (part (a)) and 'there is a simple sp2n-module N such that M is equivalent to N ⊗ G(a)' (part (c)) are assertions, not proved. Knowing that a single D_n-submodule U(H_n)v is F(a) or G(a) does not by itself force the whole module to be an outer tensor product with a simple sp2n-module; one must show that M is generated by the D_n-submodule and that the sp-action on the multiplicity space is a simple module of the claimed type. The argument in Proposition 6 supplies a template only in the O_g case with S. The mixed case (c) in particular requires additional localization or filtration arguments that are absent.
[Proposition 8(a)] The proof of part (a) is omitted ('similar to Proposition 4(a)'), but this statement is later used in the proof of Theorem 14. The authors should either include the argument or give a reference that covers this exact case.

minor comments (5)

[§2.1] In Section 2.1, 'the the semidirect product Lie algebra' has a duplicated article.
[Proposition 4(a)] In the proof of Proposition 4(a), the displayed equation (3) appears to contain a typo: the second term should likely involve X_{ǫ_i+ǫ_j} acting on v_λ, but as printed the first two terms have mismatched indices.
[References] The reference to Block's paper [5] gives volume 139, but the correct volume for Block's 1981 paper in Advances in Mathematics is 39.
[Theorem 7] The proof of Theorem 7 refers to a nonexistent 'Proposition 5'; after fixing, a forward reference to Lemma 5 or Proposition 6 is needed.
[Theorem 15] In Theorem 15, the term 'equivalent' is used; it is defined only for modules twisted by θ_b in Section 4.2. The statement should clarify that the equivalence in (b) and (c) is up to the inner automorphisms described there.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No circular derivation: the category equivalence rests on an explicit algebra isomorphism, and the classification uses external results; the unproved Lemma 5 and missing 'Proposition 5' reference are gaps, not circularity.

full rationale

The paper's central claim (Theorem 7) is not obtained by assuming what it proves. Proposition 3 gives an explicit isomorphism U(gn)/<z-ż> ≅ U(sp2n)⊗D_n for ż≠0, with formulas for all root vectors; the functor -⊗_ż S is then studied through this isomorphism. Propositions 4 and 8 prove the Verma module isomorphisms M(ż,λ) ≅ M_sp(λ')⊗S by direct PBW-style arguments, not by invoking the target equivalence. Lemma 5's assertion that U(H_n)v has finite composition length is used to obtain Proposition 6, but the stated decomposition D_n=(C[t]+C[∂])⊗C[t∂] does not by itself justify that finite length; this is a real gap in the argument, yet it is an issue of proof correctness, not a circular reduction. Similarly, Theorem 7 cites a nonexistent 'Proposition 5' for the Hom-space isomorphism, and Theorem 15(a),(c) have terse reductions to N⊗F(a) or N⊗G(a); these are omitted details, not instances where the conclusion is identical to an input. The heavy external results—[7]'s injective-or-locally-nilpotent dichotomy, [15]'s classification of simple weight D_n-modules, and [25]'s weight-module classification—are independent benchmarks and do not reduce to the present authors' claims. The self-citations present ([11], [22], [23]) occur in the introduction or remarks as context for related algebras and are not load-bearing for Theorem 7 or Theorem 15. I therefore find no specific circular step that can be quoted and exhibited, and the appropriate honest finding is 'no significant circularity'.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters are fitted; the parameters a in C^n in F(a) and G(a) label isomorphism classes of modules rather than constants introduced to make a derivation work. The paper's arguments rely on standard theorems and deep classification results from the literature, all external to this paper's authors.

assumptions (5)

standard math PBW theorem for universal enveloping algebras.
Used in Proposition 3 to lift the Lie algebra homomorphism to U(g_n) and to show the resulting map is a vector space isomorphism on a PBW basis.
domain assumption Classification of simple weight modules over the Weyl algebra D_n (Futorny-Grantcharov-Mazorchuk [15]).
Used in Theorem 15 to identify the Heisenberg module components F(a) and G(a) and to assert they are simple.
domain assumption Classification of simple Harish-Chandra modules over sp_{2n} (Mathieu [25]).
Used to describe the z=0 case (Theorem 14) and the sp_{2n} factors in the nonzero central charge classification.
domain assumption Structure theorem for simple weight modules over reductive Lie algebras: each root vector acts injectively or locally nilpotently (Lemma 10, from Dimitrov-Mathieu-Penkov [7]).
Basis for the partition of {1,...,n} into I_M, F_M, F^+_M, F^-_M in Section 4.2.
standard math Standard properties of the BGG category O for semisimple Lie algebras (finite filtration by highest weight modules, finite-dimensional weight spaces, simple objects are simple quotients of Verma modules).
Used in Lemma 2 to assert analogous properties for O_{g_n} via 'standard arguments'.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The category of weight modules for symplectic oscillator Lie algebras." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/5U6ZS7EC

@misc{pith2026190804534,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The category of weight modules for symplectic oscillator Lie algebras},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/5U6ZS7EC}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.04534}
}

abstract

The rank $n$ symplectic oscillator Lie algebra $\mathfrak{g}_n$ is the semidirect product of the symplectic Lie algebra $\mathfrak{sp}_{2n}$ and the Heisenberg Lie algebra $H_n$. In this paper, we study weight modules with finite dimensional weight spaces over $\mathfrak{g}_n$. When $\dot z\neq 0$, it is shown that there is an equivalence between the full subcategory $\mathcal{O}_{\mathfrak{g}_n}[\dot z]$ of the BGG category $\mathcal{O}_{\mathfrak{g}_n}$ for $\mathfrak{g}_n$ and the BGG category $\mathcal{O}_{\mathfrak{sp}_{2n}}$ for $\mathfrak{sp}_{2n}$. Then using the technique of localization and the structure of generalized highest weight modules, we also give the classification of simple weight modules over $\mathfrak{g}_n$ with finite-dimensional weight spaces.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

25 extracted references · 24 canonical work pages

[15]

Futorny, D

V. Futorny, D. Grantcharov, V. Mazorchuk, Weight modules o ver inﬁnite dimensional Weyl algebras, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 142, 2014, no. 9, 3049-3057. 13, 14

work page 2014
[1]

Berceanu, Generalized squeezed states for the Jacobi gro up

S. Berceanu, Generalized squeezed states for the Jacobi gro up. Geometric methods in physics, 67-75, AIP Conf. Proc., 1079, Amer. Inst. Phys., Melville, NY, 2008 . 1

work page 2008
[2]

Berceanu, Balanced metric and Berezin quantization on the Sie gel-Jacobi ball, SIGMA 12, 2016, 064, 24 pages

S. Berceanu, Balanced metric and Berezin quantization on the Sie gel-Jacobi ball, SIGMA 12, 2016, 064, 24 pages. 1 HARISH-CHANDRA MODULES 15

work page 2016
[3]

Berndt, R

R. Berndt, R. Schmidt, Elements of the representation theory of the Jacobi group, Progress in Mathematics, vol. 163, Birkh¨ auser Verlag, Basel, 1998. 1

work page 1998
[4]

Bernshtein, I

I. Bernshtein, I. Gelfand, S. Gelfand, A certain category of g-modules. Funkcional. Anal. i Prilozhen, 10, 1976, no. 2, 1-8. 4

work page 1976
[5]

Block, The irreducible representations of the Lie algebra sl(2) and of the Weyl algebra, Adv

R. Block, The irreducible representations of the Lie algebra sl(2) and of the Weyl algebra, Adv. in Math., 139, 1981, no. 1, 69-110. 11

work page 1981
[6]

D. J. Britten, F. W. Lemire, A classiﬁcation of simple Lie modules hav ing a 1-dimensional weight space, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 299, 1987, 683-697. 5

work page 1987
[7]

Dimitrov, O

I. Dimitrov, O. Mathieu, I. Penkov, On the structure of weight m odules, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 352, 2000, 2857-2869. 10, 11

work page 2000

Show all 25 references

[8]

Dobrev, H

V. Dobrev, H. D. Doebner, C. Mrugalla, Lowest weight represen tations of the Schr¨ odinger algebra and generalized heat/Schr¨ odinger equations, Rep. Math . Phys., 39,1997, 201-218. 1, 2

1997
[9]

Dubsky, Classiﬁcation of simple weight modules with ﬁnite-dimens ional weight spaces over the Schrodinger algebra, Lin

B. Dubsky, Classiﬁcation of simple weight modules with ﬁnite-dimens ional weight spaces over the Schrodinger algebra, Lin. Algebra Appl., 443 , 2014, 204-214. 2

2014
[10]

Ivan Dimitrov, Dimitar Grantcharov, Classiﬁcation of simple weigh t modules over aﬃne Lie algebras, arXiv:0910.0688. 1

arXiv
[11]

Dubsky, R

B. Dubsky, R. Lu, V. Mazorchuk, K. Zhao, Category O for the Schr¨ odinger algebra, Linear Algebra Appl., 2014, 460, 17-50. 2, 9

2014
[12]

Eichler, D

M. Eichler, D. Zagier, The theory of Jacobi forms, Progress in Mathematics, 55, Boston, MA: Birkhauser Boston, 1985. 1

1985
[13]

Etingof, W.L

P. Etingof, W.L. Gan, V. Ginzburg, Continuous Hecke algebras, Transformation Groups, 10, no. 3-4, 2005, 423-447. 1, 2

2005
[14]

Fernando, Lie algebra modules with ﬁnite dimensional weight sp aces, I, Trans

S. Fernando, Lie algebra modules with ﬁnite dimensional weight sp aces, I, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 322, 1990, 757-781. 1

1990
[16]

Futorny and A

V. Futorny and A. Tsylke, Classiﬁcation of irreducible nonzero le vel modules with ﬁnite– dimensional weight spaces for aﬃne Lie algebras, J. Algebra 238 (20 01) 426-441. 1
[17]

Galajinsky, I

A. Galajinsky, I. Masterov. Remarks on l -conformal extens ion of the Newton-Hooke algebra. Phys. Lett. B 702 (2011), no. 4, 265–267. 1

2011
[18]

W. L. Gan, A. Khare, Quantized symplectic oscillator algebras of rank one, J. Algebra, 2007, 310, no. 2, 671-707. 9

2007
[19]

Humphreys, Representations of semisimple Lie algebras in the BGG category O, Graduate Studies in Mathematics, 94

J. Humphreys, Representations of semisimple Lie algebras in the BGG category O, Graduate Studies in Mathematics, 94. American Mathematical Society, Provid ence, RI, 2008. 1, 4

2008
[20]

C. J. Isham, J. R. Klauder, Coherent states for n-dimensiona l Euclidean groups E(n) and their application, J. Math. Phys., 32 (3) (1991): 607-620. 1

1991
[21]

Khare, Category O over a deformation of the symplectic oscillator algebra, J

A. Khare, Category O over a deformation of the symplectic oscillator algebra, J. of Pure A ppl. Algebra, 195, 2005, no. 2, 131-166. 1

2005
[22]

R. Lu, V. Mazorchuk, K. Zhao, On simple modules over conforma l Galilei algebras, J. Pure Appl. Algebra, 218 (2014) 1885-1899. 1

2014
[23]

R. Lu, K. Zhao, Classiﬁcation Of Irreducible Weight Modules Over The Twisted Heisenberg- Virasoro Algebra, Comm. Contem. Math., Vol.12, No.2, 183-205(201 0). 1
[24]

Mathieu; Classiﬁcation of Harish-Chandra modules over the V irasoro Lie algebra

O. Mathieu; Classiﬁcation of Harish-Chandra modules over the V irasoro Lie algebra. Invent. Math. 107 (1992), no. 2, 225–234. 1

1992
[25]

Mathieu, Classiﬁcation of irreducible weight modules, Ann

O. Mathieu, Classiﬁcation of irreducible weight modules, Ann. Ins t. Fourier, 50, 537-592, 2000. 1, 2, 6, 11, 14 16 GENQIANG LIU AND KAIMING ZHAO School of Mathematics and Statistics, Henan University, Ka ifeng 475004, China E-mail address : liugenqiang@amss.ac.cn Department o...

2000

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [15]

Futorny, D

V. Futorny, D. Grantcharov, V. Mazorchuk, Weight modules o ver inﬁnite dimensional Weyl algebras, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 142, 2014, no. 9, 3049-3057. 13, 14

work page 2014

[2] [1]

Berceanu, Generalized squeezed states for the Jacobi gro up

S. Berceanu, Generalized squeezed states for the Jacobi gro up. Geometric methods in physics, 67-75, AIP Conf. Proc., 1079, Amer. Inst. Phys., Melville, NY, 2008 . 1

work page 2008

[3] [2]

Berceanu, Balanced metric and Berezin quantization on the Sie gel-Jacobi ball, SIGMA 12, 2016, 064, 24 pages

S. Berceanu, Balanced metric and Berezin quantization on the Sie gel-Jacobi ball, SIGMA 12, 2016, 064, 24 pages. 1 HARISH-CHANDRA MODULES 15

work page 2016

[4] [3]

Berndt, R

R. Berndt, R. Schmidt, Elements of the representation theory of the Jacobi group, Progress in Mathematics, vol. 163, Birkh¨ auser Verlag, Basel, 1998. 1

work page 1998

[5] [4]

Bernshtein, I

I. Bernshtein, I. Gelfand, S. Gelfand, A certain category of g-modules. Funkcional. Anal. i Prilozhen, 10, 1976, no. 2, 1-8. 4

work page 1976

[6] [5]

Block, The irreducible representations of the Lie algebra sl(2) and of the Weyl algebra, Adv

R. Block, The irreducible representations of the Lie algebra sl(2) and of the Weyl algebra, Adv. in Math., 139, 1981, no. 1, 69-110. 11

work page 1981

[7] [6]

D. J. Britten, F. W. Lemire, A classiﬁcation of simple Lie modules hav ing a 1-dimensional weight space, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 299, 1987, 683-697. 5

work page 1987

[8] [7]

Dimitrov, O

I. Dimitrov, O. Mathieu, I. Penkov, On the structure of weight m odules, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 352, 2000, 2857-2869. 10, 11

work page 2000