M. Kontsevich's graph complexes and universal structures on graded symplectic manifolds

Kevin Morand

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 120 references

M. Kontsevich's graph complexes and universal structures on graded symplectic manifolds

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper extends the injective graph-complex morphism from polyvector fields to every graded symplectic manifold, with $d=n+1$.

desk verdict Interesting generalization with a load-bearing sign error: the central representation as written does not reproduce the Poisson bracket, so the main theorem is unproven. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.08253 v2 pith:5UC7ZLJ7 submitted 2019-08-22 math.QA hep-thmath-phmath.MP

Kevin Morand This is my paper · ORCID

classification math.QAhep-thmath-phmath.MP MSC 17B5518D5053D1758A50

keywords graphcomplexesgradedsymplecticmanifoldsL-infinityautomorphismsSchoutenalgebraGrothendieck-TeichmuellerCourantalgebroidsAKSZsigma-modelsuniversaldeformations

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that the full graph complex $\mathsf{fGC}_d$ embeds injectively into the Chevalley–Eilenberg complex of the $n$-Schouten algebra $T^{(n)}_{\mathrm{poly}}$ for every $d=n+1\ge 2$, where $n$ is the degree of a graded symplectic (NP) manifold. If correct, this makes the cohomology of graph complexes a classification tool for universal structures on all graded symplectic manifolds, not only on Poisson manifolds. In particular, $\exp(H^0(\mathsf{fGC}_d))$ acts by $\mathrm{Lie}_\infty$-automorphisms on the $n$-Schouten algebra, generalizing the known action of the Grothendieck–Teichmüller Lie algebra on polyvector fields. The paper works out the case of Courant algebroids: a unique triangle-graph flow deforms Courant–Dorfman structures, and trivalent graphs modulo IHX produce conformal Hamiltonian flows.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the tower of representations $\mathrm{Rep}^{(d)}:\mathsf{Gra}_d \hookrightarrow \mathrm{End}_{C^\infty(V)}$ that turns graphs into differential operators. Vertices are decorated by functions on the NP-manifold and each edge $(i,j)$ is read as the second-order operator $\Delta_{ij}$ of (5.10) for $d$ even or (5.11) for $d$ odd; these operators carry degree $1-d$ and obey the edge-permutation and orientation-flip signs of the graph operad. Passing through the orientation morphism $\mathsf{Gra}_d \hookrightarrow d\mathsf{Gra}_d$ and taking Chevalley–Eilenberg cochains, the same data produces the injection $\mathsf{fGC}_d \hookrightarrow \mathsf{CE}(T^{(n)}_{\mathrm{poly}})$, so cohomology classes in the graph complex become universal infinitesimal deformations and automorphisms.

What would settle it

Compute the image of the triangle graph under $\mathrm{Rep}^{(3)}$ for one Hamiltonian on a degree-2 NP-manifold in two overlapping graded Darboux charts. If the two local expressions for $\dot{\rho}^a{}_\mu$ and $\dot{T}_{abc}$ in (6.11)–(6.12) do not coincide on the overlap, the operad representation is not global and the injection $\mathsf{fGC}_3 \hookrightarrow \mathsf{CE}(T^{(2)}_{\mathrm{poly}})$ fails on nontrivial manifolds.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is an injective morphism of dg Lie algebras $\mathsf{fGC}_d \hookrightarrow \mathsf{CE}(T^{(n)}_{\mathrm{poly}})$ for every $d\ge 2$, with $T^{(n)}_{\mathrm{poly}} = C^\infty(V)[n]$ the $n$-Schouten algebra of an NP-manifold of degree $n$ and $d=n+1$. The injection is induced by a tower of operad morphisms $\mathrm{Rep}^{(d)}:\mathsf{Gra}_d \hookrightarrow \mathrm{End}_{C^\infty(V)}$, where each graph edge acts by the bidifferential operator $\Delta_{ij}$ written in local graded Darboux coordinates. From this, the paper derives that $\exp(H^0(\mathsf{fGC}_d))$ acts via $\mathrm{Lie}_\infty$-automorphisms, that stable universal deformations of the $n$-Schouten algebra are generated by loop cocycles, and that for $d=3$ the loop $L_3$ gives the unique universal deformation flow for Courant algebroids, with explicit components displayed for the anchor and the three-form.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the local differential operators (5.10)–(5.11) piece together into a single well-defined representation of the graph operad on every NP-manifold, invariant under changes of graded Darboux coordinates; the paper gives local formulas but no global coordinate-invariance proof.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

For $d\ne 2$, stable universal structures on graded symplectic manifolds come only from loop cocycles: degree $n=4j+2$ admits the unique $\mathrm{Lie}_\infty$-automorphism from $L_{4j+3}$, and degree $n=4j+3$ admits the unique formal deformation from $L_{4j+5}$.
In dimension $d=3$, the vanishing $H^1(\mathsf{fGC}_3)=0$ removes stable obstructions to a universal formality morphism for Courant algebroids, while $H^0(\mathsf{fGC}_3)=\mathbb{K}$ predicts a one-parameter family of stable universal quantization maps.
The triangle cocycle $L_3$ produces an explicit universal flow on the space of Courant–Dorfman structures, given in components by equations (6.11)–(6.12), with deformed anchor and three-form.
Trivalent graphs modulo the IHX relation produce conformal Hamiltonian flows on Courant algebroids, with conformal factors such as $\Omega_\Theta = T_{abc}T^{abc}+6\,\partial_\nu\rho^a{}_\lambda\,\partial^\lambda\rho_a{}^\nu$.
For $d=1$ the same machinery reproduces the Groenewold–Moyal product, and for $d=2$ it recovers the Grothendieck–Teichmüller group action and the tetrahedral flow on Poisson bivectors.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The paper states the representation formulas in local graded Darboux coordinates and does not prove that they glue to a global representation under changes of coordinates; if coordinate invariance fails, the classification would hold only locally or for a restricted class of NP-manifolds.
A natural testable extension is to compute the triangle flow (6.11)–(6.12) on a nontrivial Courant algebroid beyond the local split form, or to compare it with the perturbative expansion of the Courant $\sigma$-model; a match would anchor the algebraic graph complex in AKSZ field theory.
The absence of $\mathfrak{grt}_1$ in stable higher-dimensional structures suggests that any incarnation of the Grothendieck–Teichmüller algebra in Courant-type deformation theory has to come from oriented or multi-oriented graph complexes, as the paper announces for a companion paper.
If the one-dimensional $H^0(\mathsf{fGC}_3)$ result is read as a rigidity statement, it implies that universal deformation theory for Courant algebroids is much more constrained than for Poisson manifolds, so new phenomena must be sought either in non-stable cochains or in additional geometric data such as the anchor and three-form.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

What you should know: this paper tries to extend Kontsevich's graph-complex machinery to graded symplectic manifolds of arbitrary degree, and it contains genuinely new explicit formulas, especially the Courant algebroid flows. But the central representation has a sign problem: the single-edge graph does not map to the graded Poisson bracket. That breaks the main morphism claim before the harder globalization question is even reached.

What is good: the overall idea is the right one—using the full graph complex fGC_d on NP-manifolds of degree n=d−1 is natural, and the paper gives a clear review of the needed graded geometry and graph complex background. The explicit operators (5.10)-(5.11), the triangle flow (6.11)-(6.12), and the conformal flow construction are concrete and checkable. If the sign issue is repairable, the classification of universal structures on higher Courant algebroids would be a real contribution. The loop-induced actions and the conformal Hamiltonian flows are also novel and worth taking seriously.

The soft spots are serious. First, the local formulas are inconsistent with the paper's own bracket conventions. For d=2, the bracket in (3.8) is {f,g} = (-1)^{deg f} ∂_x f ∂_p g + ∂_p f ∂_x g, while (5.10) gives the symmetric expression without the sign. Testing on f=α(x)p and g=β(x)p gives p(αβ'−α'β) for the bracket but p(α'β+αβ') for the representation. The same issue appears in d=3 with the ξ-term. Since Proposition 5.3 and Corollary 5.6 hinge on s^*Rep(d)(Γ) = [·,·]_S, the main injective morphism (1.4) does not follow as written. This is not a minor typo; it is load-bearing. Second, the paper claims a complete low-degree cohomology classification in Lemma 5.7 for all d≠2, but the supporting bounds in Section 4.3 are only stated for d=2 and d=3. That lemma is unsupported. Third, the representation is defined in local Darboux coordinates and no argument shows it patches globally; this is secondary to the sign problem but still needs addressing.

Who is this for? Anyone working on deformation theory of Courant algebroids or on universal graph complexes will want to know about the ideas here, but they should not rely on the formulas without checking the signs first. The paper deserves a serious referee—the flaws look fixable and the framework is valuable—but it needs major revision. I would recommend sending it to peer review and asking the authors to correct the sign conventions, prove coordinate independence, and either prove or weaken Lemma 5.7.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a generalization of Kontsevich's graph-complex construction from polyvector fields (n = 1) to graded symplectic manifolds of arbitrary degree n. The central object is a claimed tower of operad morphisms Rep(d): Grad -> End_{C^∞(V)}, where V is any NP-manifold of degree n and d = n + 1, defined by explicit local Darboux-coordinate formulas. From this the paper derives an injective morphism of dg Lie algebras fGC_d -> CE(T_poly^(n)), an action of exp(H^0(fGC_d)) by Lie-infinity automorphisms of the n-Schouten algebra, a classification of universal structures, universal Hamiltonian deformations and flows, and applications to Courant algebroids. The paper also proposes explicit new flow equations for Courant algebroids and conformal Hamiltonian flows from trivalent graph cohomology.

Significance. If the central representation were correct and globally well defined, the paper would provide a valuable unifying framework extending the Grothendieck-Teichmueller action on polyvector fields to higher graded symplectic manifolds, with concrete and checkable formulas for Courant algebroids. The explicit expressions (6.11)-(6.12) and the conformal factors (6.13)-(6.14) are useful and nontrivial. The paper draws on substantial external results on graph cohomology and does not provide machine-checked proofs; its value depends on the correctness of the local representation and on the completeness of the cohomological classification. As written, the central claim is not established because of the sign inconsistencies, missing globalization argument, and unsupported classification lemma discussed below.

major comments (3)

[Section 5, eqs. (5.10), (5.13) and Proposition 5.2] The local sign conventions are inconsistent with the Poisson bracket (3.8). For d = 2, eq. (5.10) gives Delta_12(f⊗g) = ∂_x f ∂_p g + ∂_p f ∂_x g, whereas the bracket in (3.8) is {f,g}_ω = (-1)^{deg f} ∂_x f ∂_p g + ∂_p f ∂_x g. On T*[1]R, with f = α(x)p and g = β(x)p, both of degree 1, one obtains {f,g}_ω = p(αβ' - α'β), while Delta_12(f⊗g) = p(α'β + αβ'). These are different, so eq. (5.13) fails and Rep(d) is not the asserted operad morphism; consequently Proposition 5.3, the injective morphism (1.4), and Corollary 5.6 do not follow as written. The proof of Proposition 5.1 only states that properties 1-3 'can be checked' and does not address the Koszul signs that would be needed in the graded S_N-action (5.8). A similar problem occurs for odd d with the ξ-term, which cancels under the orientation morphism when κ is symmetric.
[Section 5, Proposition 5.1] The representation is defined by local Darboux-coordinate formulas (5.5)-(5.11), but no proof is given that these operators are independent of the chosen graded Darboux chart or that they define global differential operators on an arbitrary NP-manifold. The claimed morphism Rep(d): Grad -> End_{C^∞(V)} and the induced morphism (5.15) are asserted for every NP-manifold, and all subsequent classification and action statements depend on this global well-definedness. For the case n = 1, the literature shows that a globalization argument is needed (see [66]); the paper does not provide the analogous argument for n > 1.
[Section 5, Lemma 5.7] Lemma 5.7 states a complete low-degree cohomology classification of fGC_d^con for all d ≠ 2, but Section 4.3 only reports cohomological information for d = 2 and d = 3. The 'various bounds collected in Section 4.3' do not include the vanishing statements for H^0, H^1, and H^2 of GC_d for general d that the lemma requires. Consequently, Proposition 5.8's uniqueness claims — the unique universal automorphism for n = 4j+2 and the unique universal deformation for n = 4j+3 — are not supported by the cited material. The authors should either prove Lemma 5.7 or provide precise references for every vanishing result entering the classification.

minor comments (3)

[Section 5, Proposition 5.13] The symbol Γ is used both for the edge graph in (4.8) and for the one-vertex graph with no edges in the proof of Proposition 5.13; the assertion 'δ Γ = Γ' is therefore confusing and should be clarified with distinct notation.
[Section 5, Proposition 5.2] The proof of Proposition 5.2 consists of the single equality (5.13); given the sign issue in eq. (5.10), a full verification of the operad identities is needed rather than a one-line assertion.
[Section 6.2] The introduction and Section 6.2 speak of deformations of Courant algebroids, but the constructed flows deform the Courant-Dorfman structure while leaving the fiber metric fixed; this should be stated more prominently to avoid overstatement.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the representation is constructed explicitly from local data and the classification uses independent external graph cohomology results.

full rationale

The paper's main claim (1.4) is the construction of an injective dg Lie algebra morphism fGC_d into CE(T_poly^(n)) induced by the explicit representation Rep(d): Grad -> End_{C^∞(V)}. This is a direct construction: the differential operators Delta_{ij} are written down from the local Darboux presentation of the NP-manifold, and the Poisson bracket is an input geometric datum, not an output derived from graph cohomology. The subsequent classification of universal structures (Proposition 5.8, Corollary 5.6) is obtained by feeding external cohomology computations of fGC_d (Kontsevich, Willwacher, Khoroshkin-Willwacher-Zivkovic, Bar-Natan) through this fixed morphism; no fitted parameter or target-dependent quantity is used to define the map. The only self-citation is the companion paper [93], which is invoked for promised generalizations and is explicitly not used as evidence for the present results. The proof of Proposition 5.1 does assert rather than fully demonstrate the relevant properties and the global coordinate-independence of the local formulas; this is a missing-support or correctness issue, not a circular reduction. The reviewer's sign objection about Proposition 5.2 is likewise a mathematical correctness issue (whether the explicit Delta operators reproduce the graded Poisson bracket) rather than a circularity: it does not exhibit a reduction of a claimed output to an input by definition or by a self-citation chain. Under the circularity standard of this pass, the derivation chain is self-contained and no step is forced by its own inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on known graph cohomology theorems, on an asserted cohomology vanishing lemma for all d, and on the unproven global well-definedness of the local representation. No free parameters are fitted to data, and the paper introduces no new physical entities.

assumptions (3)

standard math External cohomology theorems for graph complexes, in particular Willwacher's H^0(GC_2) isomorphic to grt_1 and the loop decomposition of H^bullet(fGC_d).
Used without proof in Section 4.3 and relied on for the classification in Section 5. These are cited theorems from [113], [70], [10].
domain assumption The low-degree cohomology classification in Lemma 5.7 for all d different from 2.
This lemma claims H^0, H^1, H^2 of fGC_d are spanned solely by loop classes for all d, but the paper does not provide a derivation or a complete citation. It is load-bearing for Proposition 5.8.
ad hoc to paper The local Darboux-coordinate formulas (5.10)-(5.11) define a well-defined global representation of Grad on any NP-manifold.
No proof of coordinate-independence or patching is given. The existence of the tower of representations is the foundation of the paper.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of M. Kontsevich's graph complexes and universal structures on graded symplectic manifolds." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/5UC7ZLJ7

@misc{pith2026190808253,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: M. Kontsevich's graph complexes and universal structures on graded symplectic manifolds},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/5UC7ZLJ7}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.08253}
}

abstract

In the formulation of his celebrated Formality conjecture, M. Kontsevich introduced a universal version of the deformation theory for the Schouten algebra of polyvector fields on affine manifolds. This universal deformation complex takes the form of a differential graded Lie algebra of graphs, denoted $\mathsf{fGC}_2$, together with an injective morphism towards the Chevalley-Eilenberg complex associated with the Schouten algebra. The latter morphism is given by explicit local formulas making implicit use of the supergeometric interpretation of the Schouten algebra as the algebra of functions on a graded symplectic manifold of degree $1$. The ambition of the present work is to generalise Kontsevich's construction to graded symplectic manifolds of arbitrary degree $n\geq1$. The corresponding graph model is given by the full Kontsevich graph complex $\mathsf{fGC}_d$ where $d=n+1$ stands for the dimension of the associated AKSZ type $\sigma$-model. This generalisation is instrumental to classify universal structures on graded symplectic manifolds. In particular, the zeroth cohomology of the full graph complex $\mathsf{fGC}_{d}$ is shown to act via $\mathsf{Lie}_\infty$-automorphisms on the algebra of functions on graded symplectic manifolds of degree $n$. This generalises the known action of the Grothendieck-Teichm\"{u}ller algebra $\mathfrak{grt}_1\simeq H^0(\mathsf{fGC}_2)$ on the space of polyvector fields. This extended action can in turn be used to generate new universal deformations of Hamiltonian functions, generalising Kontsevich flows on the space of Poisson manifolds to differential graded manifolds of higher degrees. As an application of the general formalism, universal deformations of Courant algebroids via trivalent graphs are presented.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.08253 by the authors.

**Figure 1.** Example of graph in gra5,6 There is a natural right-action of the semi-direct product Sk n S×k 2 on elements of graN,k by permutation of the ordering (Sk) and flipping of the directions of the edges (S ×k 2 ). We will consider the 1-dimensional signature representation sgnk (resp. sgn⊗k 2 ) as a left K [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_1.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Example of partial composition Grad(3) ◦2 Grad(2) → Grad(4) The partial composition operations ◦i on Grad preserve the number of edges and thus have zero intrinsic degree. Further, they can be checked to satisfy the following properties for all γm ∈ Grad(m): • Sequential composition: (γm ◦j γn) ◦i γp = γm ◦j (γn ◦i−j+1 γp) for all j 6 i 6 j + n − 1. (4.6) • Parallel composition: (γm ◦j γn) ◦i γp = (−1)|γn||γp| (γm ◦… view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Example of graph in fGCd Example 4.6. • The graph 2 3 is a cocycle in the even and odd graph complexes. • The tadpole graph 1 is a cocycle in the even graph complex and a zero graph in the odd graph complex. • The multi-arrows graph 2 3 – sometimes referred to as the “Θ-graph” – is a cocycle in the odd graph complex and a zero graph in the even graph complex. 36In retrospect, it can be checked that the choices made … view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (4 more)

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: Loop graphs Lk for k ∈ {1, . . . , 5} It follows from Proposition 4.7 that the cohomology of fGCcon d is located in GCd, up to some known (loop) classes. We now focus on the cohomology of GCd, for d = 2, 3 (see e.g. [70, 45] for summary and [11, 70] for computer genera…

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: Wheel graphs for j ∈ {1, 2, 3} Regarding higher degrees, it is a difficult open conjecture (Drinfel’d, Kontsevich) that H1 (GC2) = 0 while computer experiments have exhibited sporadic classes in H≥3 (GC2). Cohomology of GC3 The cohomology of the odd graph complex can b…

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: Non-trivial connected trivalent graphs in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_6.png]

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: Orientation morphism The following result was shown by T. Willwacher in [113], cf. also [36]. Theorem 4.10. The morphism s ∗O~r : fGCcon d ,→ dfGCcon d is a quasi-isomorphism of dg Lie algebras. Theorem 4.10 implies that the study of the cohomology of the directed grap…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

120 extracted references · 52 canonical work pages

[1]

Drinfeld associators, braid groups and explicit so- lutions of the Kashiwara-Vergne equations

A. Alekseev, B. Enriquez and C. Torossian “Drinfeld associators, braid groups and explicit so- lutions of the Kashiwara-Vergne equations” Publications Mathématiques de l’IHÉS112 143-189 (2010) arXiv:0903.4067

arXiv 2010
[66]

Globalizing L-infinity automorphisms of the Schouten algebra of polyvector fields

C. Jost “Globalizing Lie∞automorphisms of the Schouten algebra of polyvector ﬁelds” Diﬀerential Ge- ometry and its Applications31 2 239-247 (2013) arXiv:1201.1392

work page Pith review arXiv 2013
[2]

On the Kashiwara Vergne conjecture

A. Alekseev, E. Meinrenken “On the Kashiwara Vergne conjecture” Inventiones mathematicae164 3 615-634 (2006) arXiv:math/0506499

arXiv 2006
[3]

Logarithms and deformation quan- tization

A. Alekseev, C. A. Rossi, C. Torossian and T. Will w acher “Logarithms and deformation quan- tization” Invent. math.206 1 1-28 (2016) arXiv:1401.3200

arXiv 2016
[4]

The Kashiwara-Vergne conjecture and Drinfeld’s associators

A. Alekseev, C. Torossian “The Kashiwara-Vergne conjecture and Drinfeld’s associators” Annals of mathematics 175 2 415-463 (2012) arXiv:0802.4300

arXiv 2012
[5]

Kontsevich Deformation Quantization and Flat Connections

A. Alekseev, C. Torossian “Kontsevich Deformation Quantization and Flat Connections” C. Com- mun. Math. Phys.300 1 47-64 (2010) arXiv:0906.0187

arXiv 2010
[6]

The Geometry of the master equation and topological quantum ﬁeld theory

M. Alexandrov, A. Schw arz, O. Zaboronsky and M. Kontsevich “The Geometry of the master equation and topological quantum ﬁeld theory” Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 12 1405 (1997) arXiv:hep-th/9502010

arXiv 1997
[7]

Universal algebraic structures on polyvector ﬁelds

J. Alm “Universal algebraic structures on polyvector ﬁelds” Ph.D. thesis Stockholm university (2013)

2013

Show all 120 references

[8]

Grothendieck-Teichmueller group and Poisson cohomologies

J. Alm, S. Merkulov “Grothendieck-Teichmueller group and Poisson cohomologies” Journal of Non- commutative Geometry9 1 185-214 (2015) arXiv:1203.5933

2015 arXiv
[9]

Cohomology of Good Graphs and Kontsevich Linear State Products

D. Arnal, N. B. Amar and M. Masmoudi “Cohomology of Good Graphs and Kontsevich Linear State Products” Letters in Mathematical Physics48 4 291-306 (1999)

1999
[10]

On the Vassiliev knot invariants

D. Bar-Natan “On the Vassiliev knot invariants” Topology34 2 423-472 (1995)

1995
[11]

Graph cohomology-an overview and some computations

D. Bar-Natan and B. McKay “Graph cohomology-an overview and some computations” Unpublished
[12]

Gauge Algebra and Quantization

I. A. Batalin and G. A. Vilkovisky “Gauge Algebra and Quantization” Phys. Lett.102B 27 (1981)

1981
[13]

Deformation Theory and Quantization. 1. Deformations of Symplectic Structures

F. Bayen, M. Flato, C. Fronsdal, A. Lichnerowicz and D. Sternheimer “Deformation Theory and Quantization. 1. Deformations of Symplectic Structures” Annals Phys.111 1 61-110 (1978)

1978
[14]

General concept of quantization

F. A. Berezin “General concept of quantization” Comm. Math. Phys.40 2 153-174 (1975)

1975
[15]

The Kontsevich tetrahedral ﬂow revisited

A. Bouisaghouane, R. Buring and A. V. Kiselev “The Kontsevich tetrahedral ﬂow revisited” J. Geom. Phys.119 272-285 (2017) arXiv:1608.01710

2017 arXiv
[16]

Do the Kontsevich tetrahedral ﬂows preserve or destroy the space of Poisson bi-vectors?

A. Bouisaghouane, A. V. Kiselev “Do the Kontsevich tetrahedral ﬂows preserve or destroy the space of Poisson bi-vectors?” Journal of Physics: Conf.Series804 Paper 012008 (2017) arXiv:1609.06677

2017 arXiv
[17]

The ﬁrst Pontryagin class

P. Bressler “The ﬁrst Pontryagin class” Compositio Mathematica 143 5 1127-1163 (2007) arXiv:math/0509563

2007 arXiv
[18]

Mixed Tate motives overZ

F. Brown “Mixed Tate motives overZ” Annals of mathematics175 2 949-976 (2012)arXiv:1102.1312

2012 arXiv
[19]

The orientation morphism: from graph cocycles to deformations of Poisson structures

R. Buring, A. V. Kiselev “The orientation morphism: from graph cocycles to deformations of Poisson structures” Journal of Physics: Conference Series1194 Paper 012017 1-10 (2019)arXiv:1811.07878

2019 arXiv
[20]

The heptagon-wheel cocycle in the Kontsevich graph complex

R. Buring, A. V. Kiselev and N. J. Rutten “The heptagon-wheel cocycle in the Kontsevich graph complex” J. Nonlin. Math. Phys.24 Suppl.1 157-173 (2017) arXiv:1710.00658 37

2017 arXiv
[21]

Inﬁnitesimal deformations of Poisson bi-vectors using the Kontsevich graph calculus

R. Buring, A. V. Kiselev and N. J. Rutten “Inﬁnitesimal deformations of Poisson bi-vectors using the Kontsevich graph calculus ” Journal of Physics: Conf. Series 965 Paper 012010 (2018) arXiv:1710.02405

2018 arXiv
[22]

Poisson Brackets Symmetry from the Pentagon-Wheel Cocycle in the Graph Complex

R. Buring, A. V. Kiselev and N. J. Rutten “Poisson Brackets Symmetry from the Pentagon-Wheel Cocycle in the Graph Complex” Physics of Particles and Nuclei49 5 924-928 (2018) arXiv:1712.05259

2018 arXiv
[23]

Morita equivalence and characteristic classes of star products

H. Bursztyn, V. A. Dolgushev and S. W aldmann “Morita equivalence and characteristic classes of star products” Journal für die reine und angewandte Mathematik2012 662 95-163 (2012) arXiv:0909.4259

2012 arXiv
[24]

A Path integral approach to the Kontsevich quantization formula

A. S. Cattaneo, G. Felder “A Path integral approach to the Kontsevich quantization formula” Com- mun. Math. Phys.212 591 (2000) arXiv:math/9902090

2000 arXiv
[25]

On the AKSZ formulation of the Poisson sigma model

A. S. Cattaneo, G. Felder “On the AKSZ formulation of the Poisson sigma model” Lett. Math. Phys. 56 163 (2001) arXiv:math/0102108

2001 arXiv
[26]

Déformation, Quantiﬁcation, Théorie de Lie

A. Cattaneo, B. Keller, C. Torossian, A. Bruguières “Déformation, Quantiﬁcation, Théorie de Lie” Panoramas et Synthèses SMF20 (2005)

2005
[27]

On a theorem of Kontsevich

J. Conant, K. Vogtmann “On a theorem of Kontsevich” Algebr. Geom. Topol.3 1167-1224 (2003) arXiv:math/0208169

2003 arXiv
[28]

Beyond Poisson structures

T. Courant, A. Weinstein “Beyond Poisson structures” in Actions hamiltoniennes de groupes. Troisième théorème de Lie (Lyon), Travaux en Cours 27 Hermann Paris 39-49 (1986) T. Courant “Dirac manifolds” Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 319 631-661 (1990)

1986
[29]

Moduli of graphs and automorphisms of free groups

M. Culler, K. Vogtmann “Moduli of graphs and automorphisms of free groups” Invent Math84 1 91-119 (1986)

1986
[30]

Kontsevich star-product on the dual of a Lie algebra

G. Dito “Kontsevich star-product on the dual of a Lie algebra” Letters in Mathematical Physics48 4 307-322 (1999) arXiv:math/9905080

1999 arXiv
[31]

Erratum to: “A Proof of Tsygan’s Formality Conjecture for an Arbitrary Smooth Manifold

V. A. Dolgushev “Erratum to: “A Proof of Tsygan’s Formality Conjecture for an Arbitrary Smooth Manifold””arXiv:math/0703113

arXiv
[32]

Stable Formality Quasi-isomorphisms for Hochschild Cochains

V. A. Dolgushev “Stable Formality Quasi-isomorphisms for Hochschild Cochains”arXiv:1109.6031

arXiv
[33]

A Formality quasi-isomorphism for Hochschild cochains over rationals can be constructed recursively

V. A. Dolgushev “A Formality quasi-isomorphism for Hochschild cochains over rationals can be constructed recursively” International Mathematics Research Notices 2018 18 5729-5785 (2018) arXiv:1306.6733

2018 arXiv
[34]

Tamarkin’s construction is equivariant with respect to the action of the Grothendieck-Teichmueller group

V. A. Dolgushev, B. Paljug “Tamarkin’s construction is equivariant with respect to the action of the Grothendieck-Teichmueller group” Journal of Homotopy and Related Structures11 3 503-552 (2016) arXiv:1402.7356

2016 arXiv
[35]

Notes on Algebraic Operads, Graph Complexes, and Willwacher’s Construction

V. A. Dolgushev, C. L. Rogers “Notes on Algebraic Operads, Graph Complexes, and Willwacher’s Construction” Contemporary Mathematics 583 “Mathematical Aspects of Quantization” (2012) arXiv:1202.2937

2012 arXiv
[36]

The cohomology of the full directed graph complex

V. A. Dolgushev, C. L. Rogers “The cohomology of the full directed graph complex” Algebras and Representation Theory 1-45 (2019)arXiv:1711.04701

2019 arXiv
[37]

Kontsevich’s graph complex, GRT, and the deformation complex of the sheaf of polyvector ﬁelds

V. A. Dolgushev, C. L. Rogers and T. Will w acher “Kontsevich’s graph complex, GRT, and the deformation complex of the sheaf of polyvector ﬁelds” Annals of Mathematics Second Series182 3 855-943 (2015) arXiv:1211.4230 38

2015 arXiv
[38]

When can a formality quasi-isomorphism over rationals be con- structed recursively?

V. A. Dolgushev, G. E. Schneider “When can a formality quasi-isomorphism over rationals be con- structed recursively?” Journal of Pure and Applied Algebra223 5 2145-2172 (2019) arXiv:1610.04879

2019 arXiv
[39]

Dirac structures of integrable evolution equations

I. Y. Dorfman “Dirac structures of integrable evolution equations” Physics Letters A125 5 240-246 (1987) “Dirac structures and integrability of nonlinear evolution equations”Nonlinear science : theory and applicationsJohn Wiley & Sons Ltd., Chichester (1993)

1987
[40]

On quasitriangular quasi-Hopf algebras and on a group that is closely connected with Gal(Q/Q)

V. G. Drinfel’d “On quasitriangular quasi-Hopf algebras and on a group that is closely connected with Gal(Q/Q)” Algebra i Analiz2 4 149-181 ; Leningrad Math. J.2 4 829-860 (1990)

1990
[41]

Convergence of the Gutt Star Product

C. Esposito, P. Stapor and S. W aldmann “Convergence of the Gutt Star Product” Journal of Lie Theory 27 2 579-622 (2017) arXiv:1509.09160

2017 arXiv
[42]

Quantization of Lie bialgebras, I

P. Etingof, D. Kazhdan “Quantization of Lie bialgebras, I” Selecta Mathematica2 1 1-41 (1996) arXiv:q-alg/9506005

1996 arXiv
[43]

On the (ir)rationality of Kontsevich weights

G. Felder, T. Will w acher “On the (ir)rationality of Kontsevich weights” International Mathematics Research Notices2010 4 701-716 (2010) arXiv:0808.2762

2010 arXiv
[44]

Homotopy of operads & Grothendieck-Teichmüller groups

B. Fresse “Homotopy of operads & Grothendieck-Teichmüller groups” Mathematical Surveys and Mono- graphs 217 1236pp (2017)

2017
[45]

The rational homotopy of mapping spaces of En operads

B. Fresse, V. Turchin and T. Will w acher“The rational homotopy of mapping spaces of En operads” arXiv:1703.06123

arXiv
[46]

Double shuﬄe relation for associators

H. Furusho “Double shuﬄe relation for associators” Annals of mathematics174 1 341-360 (2011) arXiv:0808.0319

2011 arXiv
[47]

The Cohomology Structure of an Associative Ring

M. Gerstenhaber “The Cohomology Structure of an Associative Ring” Annals of Mathematics Second Series 78 2 267-288 (1963)

1963
[48]

Modular operads

E. Getzler, M. M. Kapranov “Modular operads” Compositio Mathematica110 1 65-125 (1998) arXiv:dg-ga/9408003

1998 arXiv
[49]

The deformation theory of representations of fundamental groups of compact Kähler manifolds

W. M. Goldman, J. J. Millson “The deformation theory of representations of fundamental groups of compact Kähler manifolds” Publications Mathématiques de l’IHÉS67 43-96 (1988)

1988
[50]

Gerbes of chiral diﬀerential operators. II

V. Gorbounov, F. Malikov and V. Schechtman “Gerbes of chiral diﬀerential operators. II” arXiv:math/0003170

arXiv
[51]

Gerbes of chiral diﬀerential operators. III

V. Gorbounov, F. Malikov and V. Schechtman “Gerbes of chiral diﬀerential operators. III” arXiv:math/0005201

arXiv
[52]

On the Principles of elementary quantum mechanics

H. J. Groenewold “On the Principles of elementary quantum mechanics” Physica12 7 405-460 (1946)

1946
[53]

Esquisse d’un Programme

A. Grothendieck “Esquisse d’un Programme” London Math. Soc. Lect. Note Ser.1 7-48 (1984)

1984
[54]

H-twisted Lie algebroids

M. Grützmann “H-twisted Lie algebroids” Journal of Geometry and Physics61 2 476-484 (2011) arXiv:1005.5680

2011 arXiv
[55]

Generalized complex geometry

M. Gualtieri “Generalized complex geometry”arXiv:math/0401221

arXiv
[56]

An explicit∗-product on the cotangent bundle of a Lie group

S. Gutt “An explicit∗-product on the cotangent bundle of a Lie group” Letters in Mathematical Physics 7 3 249-258 (1983)

1983
[57]

Tamarkin’s proof of Kontsevich formality theorem

V. Hinich “Tamarkin’s proof of Kontsevich formality theorem” Forum Mathematicum15 4 591-614 (2003) arXiv:math/0003052 39

2003 arXiv
[58]

Generalized Calabi-Yau manifolds

N. Hitchin “Generalized Calabi-Yau manifolds” Quarterly Journal of Mathematics 54 3 (2003) arXiv:math/0209099

2003 arXiv
[59]

Topological open membranes

C. Hofman, J. S. Park “Topological open membranes”arXiv:hep-th/0209148

arXiv
[60]

BV quantization of topological open membranes

C. Hofman, J. S. Park “BV quantization of topological open membranes” Commun. Math. Phys.249 2 249-271 (2004) arXiv:hep-th/0209214

2004 arXiv
[61]

Two-dimensional gravity and nonlinear gauge theory

N. Ikeda “Two-dimensional gravity and nonlinear gauge theory ” Annals Phys. 235 435 (1994) arXiv:hep-th/9312059

1994 arXiv
[62]

Deformation of BF theories, topological open membrane and a generalization of the star deformation

N. Ikeda “Deformation of BF theories, topological open membrane and a generalization of the star deformation” JHEP0107 037 (2001) arXiv:hep-th/0105286

2001 arXiv
[63]

Chern–Simons gauge theory coupled with BF theory

N. Ikeda “Chern–Simons gauge theory coupled with BF theory” Int. J. Mod. Phys. A18 2689 (2003) arXiv:hep-th/0203043

2003 arXiv
[64]

General form of dilaton gravity and nonlinear gauge theory

N. Ikeda, K. I. Iza w a “General form of dilaton gravity and nonlinear gauge theory” Prog. Theor. Phys. 90 237 (1993) arXiv:hep-th/9304012

1993 arXiv
[65]

QP-Structures of Degree 3 and 4D Topological Field Theory

N. Ikeda, K. Uchino “QP-Structures of Degree 3 and 4D Topological Field Theory” Commun. Math. Phys. 303 317 (2011) arXiv:1004.0601

2011 arXiv
[67]

Courant Algebroid Connections and String Eﬀective Actions

B. Jurco, J. Vysoky “Courant Algebroid Connections and String Eﬀective Actions” Noncommutative Geometry and Physics4 211-265 (2017) arXiv:1612.01540

2017 arXiv
[68]

Kontsevich’s Universal Formula for Deformation Quantization and the Campbell-Baker- Hausdorﬀ Formula, I

V. Kathotia “Kontsevich’s Universal Formula for Deformation Quantization and the Campbell-Baker- Hausdorﬀ Formula, I” International Journal of Mathematics11 04 523-551 (2000)arXiv:math/9811174

2000 arXiv
[69]

Deformation Theory of Courant Algebroids via the Rothstein Algebra

F. Keller, S. W aldmann “Deformation Theory of Courant Algebroids via the Rothstein Algebra” Journal of Pure and Applied Algebra219 8 3391-3426 (2015) arXiv:0807.0584

2015 arXiv
[70]

Diﬀerentials on graph complexes

A. Khoroshkin, T. Will w acher and M. Živković “Diﬀerentials on graph complexes” Advances in Mathematics 307 1184-1214 (2017) arXiv:1411.2369

2017 arXiv
[71]

The Kontsevich graph orientation morphism revisited

A. V. Kiselev, R. Buring “The Kontsevich graph orientation morphism revisited”arXiv:1904.13293

1904 arXiv
[72]

WZW - Poisson manifolds

C. Klimčik and T. Strobl “WZW - Poisson manifolds ” J. Geom. Phys. 43 341 (2002) arXiv:math/0104189

2002 arXiv
[73]

On spaces of connected graphs I: Properties of Ladders

J. Kneissler “On spaces of connected graphs I: Properties of Ladders” Proc. Internat. Conf. “Knots in Hellas ’98”, Series on Knots and Everything24 252-273 (2003) arXiv:math/0301018

2003 arXiv
[74]

On spaces of connected graphs II: Relations in the algebra Lambda

J. Kneissler “On spaces of connected graphs II: Relations in the algebra Lambda” Journal of Knot Theory and Its Ramiﬁcations10 5 667-674 (2001) arXiv:math/0301019

2001 arXiv
[75]

On spaces of connected graphs III: The Ladder Filtration

J. Kneissler “On spaces of connected graphs III: The Ladder Filtration” Journal of Knot Theory and Its Ramiﬁcations10 5 675-686 (2001) arXiv:math/0301020

2001 arXiv
[76]

Feynman Diagrams and Low-Dimensional Topology

M. Kontsevich “Feynman Diagrams and Low-Dimensional Topology” First European Congress of Mathematics Paris 97-121 (1992)

1992
[77]

Formal (non)-commutative symplectic geometry

M. Kontsevich “Formal (non)-commutative symplectic geometry” The Gelfand Mathematical Seminars 1990-1992 173-187 (1993) 40

1993
[78]

Formality conjecture

M. Kontsevich “Formality conjecture” Deformation Theory and Symplectic Geometry20 139-156 (1997)

1997
[79]

Deformation quantization of Poisson manifolds. I

M. Kontsevich “Deformation quantization of Poisson manifolds. I.” Lett. Math. Phys.66 157-216 (2003) arXiv:q-alg/9709040

2003 arXiv
[80]

Operads and Motives in Deformation Quantization

M. Kontsevich “Operads and Motives in Deformation Quantization” Lett. Math. Phys.48 35-72 (1999) arXiv:math/9904055

1999 arXiv
[81]

Courant Algebroids. A Short History

Y. Kosmann-Schw arzbach “Courant Algebroids. A Short History ” SIGMA 9 014 8p. (2013) arXiv:1212.0559

2013 arXiv
[82]

Kontsevich’s integral for the Kauﬀman polynomial

T. T. Q. Le, J. Murakami “Kontsevich’s integral for the Kauﬀman polynomial” Nagoya Mathematical Journal 142 39-65 (1996)

1996
[83]

QP-structures of degree 3 and CLWX 2-algebroids

J. Liu, Y. Sheng “QP-structures of degree 3 and CLWX 2-algebroids”arXiv:1602.01127

arXiv
[84]

Manin triples for Lie bialgebroids

Z. J. Liu, A. Weinstein and P. Xu “Manin triples for Lie bialgebroids” J. Diﬀ. Geom.45 no.3, 547 (1997) arXiv:dg-ga/9508013

1997 arXiv
[85]

Algebraic Operads

J. L. Loday, B. V allette “Algebraic Operads” Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften346 636p. (2012)

2012
[86]

Cyclic operads and homology of graph complexes

M. Markl “Cyclic operads and homology of graph complexes”arXiv:math/9801095

arXiv
[87]

Supergroupoids, double structures, and equivariant cohomology

R. A. Mehta “Supergroupoids, double structures, and equivariant cohomology”arXiv:math/0605356

arXiv
[88]

Exotic automorphisms of the Schouten algebra of polyvector ﬁelds

S. Merkulov “Exotic automorphisms of the Schouten algebra of polyvector ﬁelds”arXiv:0809.2385

arXiv
[89]

Multi-oriented props and homotopy algebras with branes

S. Merkulov “Multi-oriented props and homotopy algebras with branes”arXiv:1712.09268

arXiv
[90]

Grothendieck-Teichmueller group, operads and graph complexes: a survey

S. Merkulov “Grothendieck-Teichmueller group, operads and graph complexes: a survey ” arXiv:1904.13097

1904 arXiv
[91]

Deformation theory of representations of prop(erad)s

S. Merkulov, B. V allette “Deformation theory of representations of prop(erad)s” Journal für die reine und angewandte Mathematik2009 634 51-106 (2009) arXiv:0707.0889

2009 arXiv
[92]

Grothendieck-Teichmüller and Batalin-Vilkovisky

S. Merkulov, T. Will w acher “Grothendieck-Teichmüller and Batalin-Vilkovisky” Letters in Mathe- matical Physics104 5 625-634 (2014) arXiv:1012.2467

2014 arXiv
[93]

M. Kontsevich’s graph complexes and universal structures on graded manifolds II

K. Morand “M. Kontsevich’s graph complexes and universal structures on graded manifolds II.” (In preparation)
[94]

Quantum mechanics as a statistical theory

J. E. Moyal “Quantum mechanics as a statistical theory” Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society45 1 99-124 (1949)

1949
[95]

The decorated Teichmüller space of punctured surfaces

R. C. Penner “The decorated Teichmüller space of punctured surfaces” Commun.Math. Phys.113 2 299-339 (1987)

1987
[96]

Perturbative series and the moduli space of Riemann surfaces

R. C. Penner “Perturbative series and the moduli space of Riemann surfaces” J. Diﬀerential Geom.27 1 35-53 (1988)

1988
[97]

P. Etingof’s conjecture about Drinfel’d associators

C. A. Rossi, T. Will w acher “P. Etingof’s conjecture about Drinfel’d associators”arXiv:1404.2047

arXiv
[98]

Courant algebroids, derived brackets and even symplectic supermanifolds

D. Roytenberg “Courant algebroids, derived brackets and even symplectic supermanifolds ” arXiv:math/9910078

arXiv
[99]

On the structure of graded symplectic supermanifolds and Courant algebroids

D. Roytenberg “On the structure of graded symplectic supermanifolds and Courant algebroids” Con- temp. Math.315 Amer. Math. Soc. (2002)arXiv:math/0203110 41

2002 arXiv
[100]

AKSZ-BV Formalism and Courant Algebroid-induced Topological Field Theories

D. Roytenberg “AKSZ-BV Formalism and Courant Algebroid-induced Topological Field Theories” Lett. Math. Phys.79 143 (2007) arXiv:hep-th/0608150

2007 arXiv
[101]

The deﬁning properties of the Kontsevich unoriented graph complex

N. J. Rutten, A. V. Kiselev “The deﬁning properties of the Kontsevich unoriented graph complex” Journal of Physics: Conference Series1194 Paper 012095 1-10 (2019)arXiv:1811.10638

2019 arXiv
[102]

Poisson structure induced (topological) ﬁeld theories

P. Schaller, T. Strobl “Poisson structure induced (topological) ﬁeld theories” Mod. Phys. Lett. A9 3129 (1994) arXiv:hep-th/9405110

1994 arXiv
[103]

Double Shuﬄe and Kashiwara-Vergne Lie algebras

L. Schneps “Double Shuﬄe and Kashiwara-Vergne Lie algebras” Journal of Algebra367 54-74 (2012) arXiv:1201.5316

2012 arXiv
[104]

Quantization of Poisson families and of twisted Poisson structures

P. Ševera “Quantization of Poisson families and of twisted Poisson structures” Letters in Mathematical Physics 63 2 105-113 (2003) arXiv:math/0205294

2003 arXiv
[105]

Poisson geometry with a 3 form background

P. Ševera and A. Weinstein “Poisson geometry with a 3 form background” Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 144 145 (2001) arXiv:math/0107133

2001 arXiv
[106]

Equivalence of formalities of the little discs operad

P. Ševera, T. Will w acher “Equivalence of formalities of the little discs operad” Duke Math. J.160 1 175-206 (2011) arXiv:0905.1789

2011 arXiv
[107]

On the Kontsevich and the Campbell-Baker-Hausdorﬀ deformation quantizations of a linear Poisson structure

B. Shoikhet “On the Kontsevich and the Campbell-Baker-Hausdorﬀ deformation quantizations of a linear Poisson structure”arXiv:math/9903036

arXiv
[108]

AnL∞ algebra structure on polyvector ﬁelds

B. Shoikhet “AnL∞ algebra structure on polyvector ﬁelds” Selecta Mathematica24 2 1691-1728 (2018) arXiv:0805.3363

2018 arXiv
[109]

Another proof of M. Kontsevich formality theorem forRn

D. E. Tamarkin “Another proof of M. Kontsevich formality theorem forRn”arXiv:math/9803025

arXiv
[110]

Quantization of lie Bialgebras via the Formality of the operad of Little Disks

D. E. Tamarkin “Quantization of lie Bialgebras via the Formality of the operad of Little Disks” GAFA Geometric And Functional Analysis17 2 537-604 (2007)

2007
[111]

Algebraic structures on modules of diagrams

P. Vogel “Algebraic structures on modules of diagrams” Journal of Pure and Applied Algebra215 6 1292-1339 (2011)

2011
[112]

Quantizing Poisson Manifolds

A. A. Voronov “Quantizing Poisson Manifolds”arXiv:q-alg/9701017

arXiv
[113]

M. Kontsevich’s graph complex and the Grothendieck-Teichmueller Lie algebra

T. Will w acher“M. Kontsevich’s graph complex and the Grothendieck-Teichmueller Lie algebra” Invent. math. 200 671-760 (2015) arXiv:1009.1654

2015 arXiv
[114]

Characteristic classes in deformation quantization

T. Will w acher “Characteristic classes in deformation quantization” International Mathematics Re- search Notices2015 6538-6557 (2015) arXiv:1208.4249

2015 arXiv
[115]

The Oriented Graph Complexes

T. Will w acher “The Oriented Graph Complexes” Communications in Mathematical Physics334 3 1649-1666 (2015) arXiv:1308.4006

2015 arXiv
[116]

The Grothendieck–Teichmüller Group

T. Will w acher“The Grothendieck–Teichmüller Group” Unpublished notes
[117]

Multiple edges in M. Kontsevich’s graph complexes and computations of the dimensions and Euler characteristics

T. Will w acher, M.Živković“Multiple edges in M. Kontsevich’s graph complexes and computations of the dimensions and Euler characteristics” Adv. Math.272 553-578 (2015) arXiv:1401.4974

2015 arXiv
[118]

MC Elements in Pronilpotent DG Lie Algebras

A. Yekutieli “MC Elements in Pronilpotent DG Lie Algebras” Journal of Pure and Applied Algebra 216 11 2338-2360 (2012) arXiv:1103.1035

2012 arXiv
[119]

Multi-directed graph complexes and quasi-isomorphisms between them I: oriented graphs

M. Živković “Multi-directed graph complexes and quasi-isomorphisms between them I: oriented graphs” arXiv:1703.09605

arXiv
[120]

Multi-directed graph complexes and quasi-isomorphisms between them II: Sourced graphs

M. Živković “Multi-directed graph complexes and quasi-isomorphisms between them II: Sourced graphs” arXiv:1712.01203 42

arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Drinfeld associators, braid groups and explicit so- lutions of the Kashiwara-Vergne equations

A. Alekseev, B. Enriquez and C. Torossian “Drinfeld associators, braid groups and explicit so- lutions of the Kashiwara-Vergne equations” Publications Mathématiques de l’IHÉS112 143-189 (2010) arXiv:0903.4067

arXiv 2010

[2] [66]

Globalizing L-infinity automorphisms of the Schouten algebra of polyvector fields

C. Jost “Globalizing Lie∞automorphisms of the Schouten algebra of polyvector ﬁelds” Diﬀerential Ge- ometry and its Applications31 2 239-247 (2013) arXiv:1201.1392

work page Pith review arXiv 2013

[3] [2]

On the Kashiwara Vergne conjecture

A. Alekseev, E. Meinrenken “On the Kashiwara Vergne conjecture” Inventiones mathematicae164 3 615-634 (2006) arXiv:math/0506499

arXiv 2006

[4] [3]

Logarithms and deformation quan- tization

A. Alekseev, C. A. Rossi, C. Torossian and T. Will w acher “Logarithms and deformation quan- tization” Invent. math.206 1 1-28 (2016) arXiv:1401.3200

arXiv 2016

[5] [4]

The Kashiwara-Vergne conjecture and Drinfeld’s associators

A. Alekseev, C. Torossian “The Kashiwara-Vergne conjecture and Drinfeld’s associators” Annals of mathematics 175 2 415-463 (2012) arXiv:0802.4300

arXiv 2012

[6] [5]

Kontsevich Deformation Quantization and Flat Connections

A. Alekseev, C. Torossian “Kontsevich Deformation Quantization and Flat Connections” C. Com- mun. Math. Phys.300 1 47-64 (2010) arXiv:0906.0187

arXiv 2010

[7] [6]

The Geometry of the master equation and topological quantum ﬁeld theory

M. Alexandrov, A. Schw arz, O. Zaboronsky and M. Kontsevich “The Geometry of the master equation and topological quantum ﬁeld theory” Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 12 1405 (1997) arXiv:hep-th/9502010

arXiv 1997

[8] [7]

Universal algebraic structures on polyvector ﬁelds

J. Alm “Universal algebraic structures on polyvector ﬁelds” Ph.D. thesis Stockholm university (2013)

2013