Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 81 references

Universal asteroseismology relations mostly fail to predict proto-neutron-star frequencies in core-collapse supernova simulations.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-01 04:09 UTC pith:5VCZBJSQ

load-bearing objection A careful but mostly visual benchmark of seven PNS universal relations against Chimera 3D/2D CCSN models; the cautionary conclusion is probably right, but the quantitative support is thinner than the prose. the 4 major comments →

arxiv 2607.22909 v1 pith:5VCZBJSQ submitted 2026-07-24 gr-qc

Universal relations applied to proto-neutron star generated gravitational waves from three-dimensional core collapse supernova simulations

R. Daniel Murphy , Anthony Mezzacappa , Colter J. Richardson , Pedro Marronetti , Eric J. Lentz , Ryan E. Landfield This is my paper
classification gr-qc
keywords core-collapse supernovaegravitational wavesproto-neutron star asteroseismologyuniversal relationsg-mode / f-mode featurePNS oscillation modesneutron star equation of statespectrogram analysis
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper tests whether 'universal relations'—empirical formulas that connect a proto-neutron star's oscillation frequency to its mean density, surface gravity, or compactness—can reproduce the high-frequency gravitational-wave peak seen in simulations of core-collapse supernovae. Using the mass and radius evolution from two three-dimensional and two two-dimensional simulations, the authors run each relation in both directions: predicting the peak frequency from the star's properties, and inverting the observed peak frequency to recover the star's properties. They find that, with one exception, the relations track the simulated peak only during short early windows and diverge badly later; the exception follows the peak for most of the signal. Because a real detection would be processed without knowledge of the true proto-neutron-star properties, the authors argue that naive application of these relations could misidentify the emitting mode or the inferred star properties.

Core claim

The central claim is that universal asteroseismology relations should be used with caution when interpreting a core-collapse supernova detection: with one exception, they do not fit the authors' simulation data. Each relation matches the g-/f-mode feature—the maximum-power frequency in the high-frequency spectrogram—only briefly after bounce, then over- or under-predicts the peak. Solving the relations in reverse, using the simulated peak frequencies to recover mean density or surface gravity, yields similarly time-limited agreement. One relation intended for the 10^10 g/cm^3 surface tracks instead the mean density defined at the 10^11 g/cm^3 contour, so even an apparently successful relatio

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the universal relation itself: a polynomial fit f(x)=c1+c2 ln x+c3 x+c4 x^2+c5 x^3, where f is the proto-neutron-star oscillation frequency and x is mean density sqrt(M/R^3), surface gravity M/R^2, or compactness M/R. The paper compares two uses of these fits: forward prediction of the spectrogram peak from simulation-derived masses and radii, and inverse root-solving of the peak frequency to recover M/R^2 or sqrt(M/R^3). The yardstick is the g-/f-mode feature (gfF), the highest-power frequency track in the high-frequency band of the spectrogram. The authors also compare each relation's assumed PNS surface (10^10 vs 10^11 g/cm^3 density contour) and note that the s

Load-bearing premise

The comparison assumes the spectrogram's high-frequency peak is the visible trace of the same proto-neutron-star oscillation modes the universal relations describe; if accretion-driven stochastic ringing dominates that peak, the mismatch reflects excitation physics rather than a failure of the relations.

What would settle it

Perform a linear perturbative analysis of the simulated proto-neutron star using the same pseudo-Newtonian gravity as the simulation, identify the 2f and 2g mode frequencies from that analysis, and compare them directly to the gfF peak track; if the modes track the peak while every universal relation for those modes still misses by more than about 15%, the relations themselves are the failure.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • A future galactic supernova detection analyzed with these relations could yield incorrect conclusions about which PNS mode dominated the signal and what the PNS properties are.
  • The one relation that tracks the simulated peak does so for most of the signal in the three-dimensional model, suggesting a path toward a usable relation if its validity window and surface definition are respected.
  • Agreement is largely confined to roughly 100–300 ms after bounce, so universal relations should be applied only within validated time windows.
  • Discrepancies persist even in a noiseless, best-case comparison, so real detector noise will only widen the gap between predicted and true PNS properties.
  • Interpreting a relation's success is complicated because a mode can track the peak while recovering a different density contour than the one it was derived for.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • These results imply that the 'universal' label is premature for asteroseismology relations; a more honest use would be to quote a posterior distribution over relations, not a single PNS mass or radius estimate, when a real detection is analyzed.
  • A testable extension: apply the same forward/inverse test to relations derived under pseudo-Newtonian gravity, or to simulations with fully relativistic gravity, which should remove the ~15% systematic and reveal whether the remaining scatter is intrinsic to the relations.
  • If the stochastic behavior seen in the more massive model reflects accretion-driven excitation of the peak rather than quasi-normal modes, then universal relations may be fundamentally better suited to quiescent post-explosion phases; a spectrogram separated into pre- and post-explosion segments would probe this.
  • The surface-contour ambiguity suggests a standardization problem: relations should report which density contour defines the PNS surface, and comparisons should be made on the same contour, otherwise 'agreement' is underdetermined.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. This paper tests seven published families of 'universal relations' that map proto-neutron-star (PNS) properties—mean density, surface gravity, and compactness—to high-frequency oscillation-mode frequencies, using four Chimera core-collapse supernova simulations (D15 and D25 in 3D, E15-LSBCK and E15-SFHo in 2D). Two analyses are performed: (i) using the simulated PNS mass and radius to predict mode frequencies, then overlaying them on spectrograms to compare with the tracked maximum-power high-frequency spectral feature (the 'gfF'); and (ii) inverting each relation with the gfF frequency to predict PNS properties and comparing those predictions with the simulated values. The central conclusion is that, with the exception of the Rodriguez et al. 2023 2p1 relation on D15, the universal relations do not track the simulated gfF well, so caution is warranted in applying them to a real gravitational-wave detection.

Significance. If substantiated, the paper would provide a valuable negative test for gravitational-wave asteroseismology of core-collapse supernovae: it would show that relations claimed to be universal can mispredict the dominant high-frequency peak, and that naively inverting them can misestimate PNS properties. The manuscript's strengths are its use of externally derived relations (no circularity), its two complementary forward/inverse comparison methods, its careful documentation of the differences among the relations (Table 2), and the public availability of the D-series data. However, the central conclusion currently rests on visual, single-peak comparisons over a small and partly two-dimensional sample; these need to be tightened before the negative claim is fully load-bearing.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section 2.2 and Section 3] The gfF is defined as the frequency of maximum spectral density in each window, and every universal relation is compared against this same single peak (e.g., Figs. 1, 5, 9, 11). For D15, prior work [25] supports an association between the strongest spectral peaks and the 2g1/2g2/2f modes, but for the E-series and for D25 no such mode identification is provided; the paper itself notes that D25's gfF is more stochastic because of accretion-induced ringing (Section 4). Because each universal relation describes a specific mode, a mismatch between a relation's prediction and the gfF peak could reflect the gfF being dominated by a different mode or by non-modal accretion noise, rather than a failure of the relation. The Conclusions even acknowledge that the 2p1/2f mode composition of the gfF changes over time. Without a mode-by-mode decomposition of the gfF, the claim that most relations 'do n
  2. [Section 3] The agreement assessment is qualitative throughout: relations 'approximately track,' 'briefly close,' and 'seems to have stopped diverging' (Figs. 1, 5, 9, 11 and related text). No quantitative misfit statistic—such as rms frequency deviation, fractional error, correlation, or time-averaged offset—is provided for either the forward or inverse comparisons. The error bars in Figs. 3–16 encode only the RBW frequency uncertainty, not the scatter of the gfF around the relation. Because the paper's central claim is that most relations fail, a metric is needed to define 'fit well' and to compare behavior across the four models and across time; without it, the strength of the negative conclusion is difficult to assess.
  3. [Section 2.2, Eq. (5)] The inverse method solves Eq. (5) for x_n for each gfF frequency, but the manuscript does not state how the root-finding is performed, whether multiple real roots are possible for the polynomial/transcendental forms in Table 1, or how roots outside the physical PNS range are rejected. For relations that are not monotonic over the relevant x interval, the plotted inferred quantities (Figs. 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16) could depend on an arbitrary root selection. The root-selection procedure should be described, and if multiple roots occur, the choice should be justified.
  4. [Section 3 and Section 4] The evidential basis for the general conclusion is four models, of which D15, E15-LSBCK, and E15-SFHo share the same 15 Msun progenitor, and the E-series are two-dimensional while the title and abstract emphasize 3D simulations. Only D15 shows the relatively good agreement for the Rodriguez 2p1 relation. This small, clustered sample limits the strength of the claim that most universal relations generically fail, as opposed to failing for this particular set of Chimera simulations. The paper is appropriately hedged, but the abstract's broad 'caution must be exercised' would be better supported by a larger or more diverse sample, or by explicitly framing the result as specific to these models.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Abstract] Typo: 'zero age man sequence' should be 'zero age main sequence.'
  2. [Table 1] The text states that the Torres-Forné et al. 2021 2g2 relation has c5 = 4.67e6, but Table 1 has no c5 column. Please add it or explain why it is omitted.
  3. [Fig. 3 caption] The sentence listing 'green triangles, blue rectangles, black diamonds, red circles, and magenta x's' maps five symbols to 'the relations from Mori et al., Sotani et al. 2021, Sotani and Sumiyoshi 2019, and Rodriguez et al. for their 2f and 2p1 modes, respectively.' The 'respectively' does not align with five symbols; please rephrase for clarity.
  4. [Section 2.2] The restriction of the gfF search to frequencies above 250 Hz is stated but not justified. A brief explanation would help the reader understand whether this cutoff could exclude relevant low-frequency mode tracks.
  5. [Title/Abstract] The title emphasizes three-dimensional simulations, but two of the four models are two-dimensional. Consider revising the title or explicitly stating in the abstract that the sample includes 2D and 3D models.
  6. [Eq. (6)] In Eq. (6), frequency f is in Hz, while Eq. (1) and Table 1 use kHz. Please make the units consistent across the manuscript.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: externally derived universal relations are benchmarked against independently computed Chimera spectrogram peaks and PNS properties.

full rationale

The paper's central tests are genuinely two-sided comparisons rather than circular reductions. In the forward direction, the authors take Chimera's PNS mass and radius, evaluate externally fixed universal relations (Eq. 1 with constants from Refs. [27]-[33]), and overlay the resulting frequencies on simulations' spectrograms; the gfF peak frequencies are computed directly from the h+ strain, not from the relations. In the inverse direction, they root-solve Eq. 5 with the gfF frequency as input and compare the resulting x against the true Chimera PNS surface gravity/mean density. Neither direction defines the predicted quantity in terms of the benchmark quantity: the relation constants were fit by other groups on other simulations, and the gfF frequencies and PNS properties are independent simulation outputs. The self-citations ([25], [45], [79]) supply the spectrogram construction and peak-tracking methodology and the gfF nomenclature, but they do not provide the universal relations under test, so they are not load-bearing circularity. The paper itself flags the real limitations--boundary ambiguity, gravity-treatment mismatch, mode-classification differences, and stochastic accretion contamination in D25--but these are validity caveats about whether the spectral peak tracks a given oscillation mode, not cases where a prediction reduces by construction to its input. The closest concern is that the gfF may not always correspond to the mode each relation targets; however, this is an interpretive assumption in the benchmark, not a definitional equivalence between relation output and measured input. Accordingly, the paper's cautionary conclusion is externally constrained by its four simulation models and does not collapse into a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

3 free parameters · 5 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim is a comparison/validation statement. It does not introduce fitted parameters of its own, but inherits the fitted coefficients of the universal relations (Table 1) and uses hand-chosen spectrogram analysis thresholds, which jointly set the level of agreement reported.

free parameters (3)
  • Universal relation coefficients c1-c5 = Table 1 values (e.g., Rodriguez 2p1: c3=184.6, c4=2194)
    External fitted constants taken from refs [27]-[33]. The paper does not refit them, but its comparison results inherit their fitted nature.
  • Spectrogram analysis parameters (window length, overlap, RBW) = 45 ms/94.7% (D15, D25 25 ms/96%), overlap values 93.3% E-series; RBW 25, 7.3, 8.2 Hz
    Hand-chosen to keep a reasonable resolution bandwidth (Section 2.2); affects gfF peak localization and thus the comparisons.
  • gfF definitions (frequency floor, onset threshold) = 250 Hz; 1% of maximum PSD
    Adopted from the authors' prior definition [45],[79]; affects which peaks enter the comparison.
axioms (5)
  • domain assumption The high-frequency GW component from CCSN simulations is dominated by quasi-normal PNS oscillation modes.
    Standard premise in PNS asteroseismology; invoked in the Introduction and in the comparison design (Section 2.2).
  • domain assumption The gfF peak frequency is a valid proxy for the PNS mode frequency predicted by the universal relations.
    Central methodological premise; Section 2.2 definition of gfF and Section 3 overlays.
  • domain assumption PNS mass and radius from spherically averaged density contours (10^10 and 10^11 g cm^-3) correspond to the quantities in the relations.
    The relations use different surface definitions; paper tests both contours (Section 2.1 Table 2, Section 2.2).
  • standard math Kaiser-window spectrogram analysis and equivalent-noise-bandwidth estimate provide valid frequency peaks.
    Standard signal processing; from [45].
  • standard math Root solving of Eq. (5) yields the relevant PNS quantity when the relation is monotonic over the relevant range.
    Inverse method described in Section 2.2; assumes a unique real root exists for the observed frequencies.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 21520 in / 13665 out tokens · 130095 ms · 2026-08-01T04:09:47.712593+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Using asteroseismology techniques, several relations have been developed that relate the quasi-normal, non-radial oscillation mode frequencies of the proto-neutron star (PNS) to the high frequency component of core collapse supernova (CCSN) generated gravitational waves predicted from simulation. These relations are universal in the sense that they are parameterized entirely by PNS properties, e.g., mean density or surface gravity, and are independent of both progenitor properties, e.g., zero age man sequence (ZAMS) mass or metallicity, and the physics included in CCSN simulations, e.g., nuclear equation of state (EOS). In this work, we apply several externally developed universal relations to PNS evolution data--specifically the mass, M, and radius, R,--generated from both two- and three-dimensional CCSN simulations and compare the resulting PNS oscillation frequencies predicted by the universal relations to the peak gravitational wave frequencies computed directly from the simulation-produced spectrogram. Additionally, we use the gravitational wave spectrogram peak frequencies as input to the universal relations and compare the predicted PNS properties from each relation to the true PNS properties as determined by the simulations. In this way, we show what these universal relations would predict for the PNS properties and their evolution from a real CCSN gravitational wave detection in the best case scenario, i.e., no detector noise. Our results indicate that caution must be exercised when using these universal relations, particularly when interpreting their predictions for PNS evolution from a gravitational wave detection, and that, given the extent to which we do see agreement between asteroseismological predictions and simulation outcomes, further development of universal relations would be beneficial.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.22909 by Anthony Mezzacappa, Colter J. Richardson, Eric J. Lentz, Pedro Marronetti, R. Daniel Murphy, Ryan E. Landfield.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Spectrogram of the h+ strain gravitational wave emission from model D15, with the color axis representing the logarithm of the power spectral density log10(P). In white-edged black dots, we show the frequency with the maximum power spectral density in a time window spaced every 12 ms. A vertical black bar centered on each circle shows the range of the RBW, as defined in the text. Overlaid on each spectrogr… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Spectrogram of the h+ strain gravitational wave emission from model D25 with corresponding results overlaid as in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: PNS mean density as a function of time for D15. The mean density from Chimera data with the PNS surface defined at the 1011 g cm−3 density contour is shown as a dark purple line. The mean density with the PNS surface defined at the 1010 g cm−3 density contour is shown in the lighter teal line. The mean densities predicted by each universal relation using gfF frequencies are plotted in different colored sym… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Spectrogram of the h+ strain gravitational wave emission from D15, with the same properties as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: PNS surface gravity from Chimera data as a function of time for D15. The surface gravity with the PNS surface defined at the 1011 g cm−3 density contour is shown as a dark purple line while the surface gravity with the PNS surface defined at the 1010 g cm−3 density contour is shown in the lighter teal line. The surface gravities predicted by each universal relation using the gfF frequencies are denoted by … view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Spectrogram of the h+ strain gravitational wave emission from D25, with the same properties as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: PNS surface gravity from Chimera data as a function of time for D25, with the same legend as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Spectrogram of the h+ strain gravitational wave emission from model E15-LSBCK with corresponding results for mean-density–based universal relations overlaid as in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: PNS mean density from Chimera data as a function of time for E15-LSBCK, with the same legend as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Spectrogram of the h+ strain gravitational wave emission from model E15-SFHo with corresponding results for mean-density–based universal relations overlaid as in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: PNS mean density from Chimera data as a function of time for E15-SFHo, with the same legend as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Spectrogram of the h+ strain gravitational wave emission from E15-LSBCK, with the same properties as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: PNS surface gravity from Chimera data as a function of time for E15-LSBCK, with the same legend as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Spectrogram of the h+ strain gravitational wave emission from E15-SFHo, with the same properties as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_15.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: PNS surface gravity from Chimera data as a function of time for E15-SFHo, with the same legend as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_16.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

81 extracted references · 63 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    A New Gravitational-wave Signature from Standing Accretion Shock Instability in Supernovae

    Takami Kuroda, Kei Kotake, and Tomoya Takiwaki. “A New Gravitational-wave Signature from Standing Accretion Shock Instability in Supernovae”. In:Astrophys. J.829.1, L14 (Sept. 2016), p. L14.doi:10.3847/2041-8205/829/1/L14. arXiv:1605.09215 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  2. [2]

    Correlated Signatures of Gravitational-wave and Neutrino Emission in Three-dimensional General-relativistic Core-collapse Supernova Simulations

    Takami Kuroda, Kei Kotake, Kazuhiro Hayama, and Tomoya Takiwaki. “Correlated Signatures of Gravitational-wave and Neutrino Emission in Three-dimensional General-relativistic Core-collapse Supernova Simulations”. In:Astrophys. J.851.1, 62 (Dec. 2017), p. 62.doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa988d. arXiv:1708.05252 [astro-ph.HE]. 16 IOP PublishingJournalvv(yyyy) aaaaa...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  3. [3]

    The final core collapse of pulsational pair instability supernovae

    Jade Powell, Bernhard M¨ uller, and Alexander Heger. “The final core collapse of pulsational pair instability supernovae”. In:Mon. Not. R. Ast. Soc.503.2 (May 2021), pp. 2108–2122. doi:10.1093/mnras/stab614. arXiv:2101.06889 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  4. [4]

    Core collapse supernova gravitational wave emission for progenitors of 9.6, 15, and 25 M ⊙

    Anthony Mezzacappa et al. “Core collapse supernova gravitational wave emission for progenitors of 9.6, 15, and 25 M ⊙”. In:Phys. Rev. D107.4, 043008 (Feb. 2023), p. 043008. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.107.043008. arXiv:2208.10643 [astro-ph.SR]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  5. [5]

    Gravitational Waves from Neutrino Emission Asymmetries in Core-collapse Supernovae

    David Vartanyan and Adam Burrows. “Gravitational Waves from Neutrino Emission Asymmetries in Core-collapse Supernovae”. In:Astrophys. J.901.2, 108 (Oct. 2020), p. 108. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abafac. arXiv:2007.07261 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  6. [6]

    Modeling core-collapse supernovae gravitational-wave memory in laser interferometric data

    Colter J. Richardson, Michele Zanolin, Haakon Andresen, Marek J. Szczepa´ nczyk, Kiranjyot Gill, and Annop Wongwathanarat. “Modeling core-collapse supernovae gravitational-wave memory in laser interferometric data”. In:Phys. Rev. D105.10, 103008 (May 2022), p. 103008.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.105.103008. arXiv:2109.01582 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  7. [7]

    Detecting Gravitational Wave Memory in the Next Galactic Core-Collapse Supernova

    Colter J. Richardson, Haakon Andresen, Anthony Mezzacappa, Michele Zanolin, Michael G. Benjamin, Pedro Marronetti, Eric J. Lentz, and Marek J. Szczepa´ nczyk. “Detecting Gravitational Wave Memory in the Next Galactic Core-Collapse Supernova”. In: Phys. Rev. Lett.133.23, 231401 (Dec. 2024), p. 231401.doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.133.231401. arXiv:2404.02131 [a...

    arXiv 2024

  8. [8]

    A New Mechanism for Core-Collapse Supernova Explosions

    A. Burrows, E. Livne, L. Dessart, C. D. Ott, and J. Murphy. “A New Mechanism for Core-Collapse Supernova Explosions”. In:Astrophys. J.640 (2006), pp. 878–890.doi: 10.1086/500174. eprint:astro-ph/0510687

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  9. [9]

    Equation-of-state dependent features in shock-oscillation modulated neutrino and gravitational-wave signals from supernovae

    A. Marek, H.-T. Janka, and E. M¨ uller. “Equation-of-state dependent features in shock-oscillation modulated neutrino and gravitational-wave signals from supernovae”. In: Astron. Astrophys.496 (2009), pp. 475–494.doi:10.1051/0004-6361/200810883. arXiv: 0808.4136

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  10. [10]

    Gravitational Wave Signatures in Black Hole Forming Core Collapse

    Pablo Cerd´ a-Dur´ an, Nicolas DeBrye, Miguel A. Aloy, Jos´ e A. Font, and Martin Obergaulinger. “Gravitational Wave Signatures in Black Hole Forming Core Collapse”. In:Astrophys. J.779.2, L18 (Dec. 2013), p. L18.doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/779/2/L18. arXiv:1310.8290 [astro-ph.SR]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  11. [11]

    A New Multi-dimensional General Relativistic Neutrino Hydrodynamics Code of Core-collapse Supernovae. III. Gravitational Wave Signals from Supernova Explosion Models

    Bernhard M¨ uller, Hans-Thomas Janka, and Andreas Marek. “A New Multi-dimensional General Relativistic Neutrino Hydrodynamics Code of Core-collapse Supernovae. III. Gravitational Wave Signals from Supernova Explosion Models”. In:Astrophys. J.766.1, 43 (Mar. 2013), p. 43.doi:10.1088/0004-637X/766/1/43. arXiv:1210.6984 [astro-ph.SR]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  12. [12]

    Gravitational wave asteroseismology with protoneutron stars

    Hajime Sotani and Tomoya Takiwaki. “Gravitational wave asteroseismology with protoneutron stars”. In:Phys. Rev. D94.4, 044043 (Aug. 2016), p. 044043.doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.94.044043. arXiv:1608.01048 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  13. [13]

    Gravitational wave signals from 3D neutrino hydrodynamics simulations of core-collapse supernovae

    H. Andresen, B. M¨ uller, E. M¨ uller, and H. Th. Janka. “Gravitational wave signals from 3D neutrino hydrodynamics simulations of core-collapse supernovae”. In:Mon. Not. R. Ast. Soc. 468.2 (June 2017), pp. 2032–2051.doi:10.1093/mnras/stx618. arXiv:1607.05199 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  14. [14]

    A Linear and Quadratic Time-Frequency Analysis of Gravitational Waves from Core-collapse Supernovae

    Hajime Kawahara, Takami Kuroda, Tomoya Takiwaki, Kazuhiro Hayama, and Kei Kotake. “A Linear and Quadratic Time-Frequency Analysis of Gravitational Waves from Core-collapse Supernovae”. In:Astrophys. J.867.2, 126 (Nov. 2018), p. 126.doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aae57b. arXiv:1810.00334 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  15. [15]

    Characterizing the Gravitational Wave Signal from Core-collapse Supernovae

    David Radice, Viktoriya Morozova, Adam Burrows, David Vartanyan, and Hiroki Nagakura. “Characterizing the Gravitational Wave Signal from Core-collapse Supernovae”. In: Astrophys. J.876.1, L9 (May 2019), p. L9.doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab191a. arXiv: 1812.07703 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  16. [16]

    Gravitational wave emission from 3D explosion models of core-collapse supernovae with low and normal explosion energies

    Jade Powell and Bernhard M¨ uller. “Gravitational wave emission from 3D explosion models of core-collapse supernovae with low and normal explosion energies”. In:Mon. Not. R. Ast. Soc. 487.1 (July 2019), pp. 1178–1190.doi:10.1093/mnras/stz1304. arXiv:1812.05738 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  17. [17]

    Gravitational-wave signal of a core-collapse supernova explosion of a 15 M ⊙ star

    Anthony Mezzacappa et al. “Gravitational-wave signal of a core-collapse supernova explosion of a 15 M ⊙ star”. In:Phys. Rev. D102.2, 023027 (July 2020), p. 023027.doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.102.023027. arXiv:2007.15099 [astro-ph.HE]. 17 IOP PublishingJournalvv(yyyy) aaaaaa Authoret al

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  18. [18]

    Gravitational-wave signature of core-collapse supernovae

    David Vartanyan, Adam Burrows, Tianshu Wang, Matthew S. B. Coleman, and Christopher J. White. “Gravitational-wave signature of core-collapse supernovae”. In:Phys. Rev. D107.10, 103015 (May 2023), p. 103015.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.107.103015. arXiv: 2302.07092 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  19. [19]

    Towards asteroseismology of core-collapse supernovae with gravitational-wave observations - I. Cowling approximation

    Alejandro Torres-Forn´ e, Pablo Cerd´ a-Dur´ an, Andrea Passamonti, and Jos´ e A. Font. “Towards asteroseismology of core-collapse supernovae with gravitational-wave observations - I. Cowling approximation”. In:Mon. Not. Roy. Ast. Soc.474.4 (Mar. 2018), pp. 5272–5286. doi:10.1093/mnras/stx3067. arXiv:1708.01920 [astro-ph.SR]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  20. [20]

    Towards asteroseismology of core-collapse supernovae with gravitational wave observations - II. Inclusion of space-time perturbations

    Alejandro Torres-Forn´ e, Pablo Cerd´ a-Dur´ an, Andrea Passamonti, Martin Obergaulinger, and Jos´ e A. Font. “Towards asteroseismology of core-collapse supernovae with gravitational wave observations - II. Inclusion of space-time perturbations”. In:Mon. Not. Roy. Ast. Soc.482.3 (Jan. 2019), pp. 3967–3988.doi:10.1093/mnras/sty2854. arXiv:1806.11366 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  21. [21]

    The Gravitational Wave Signal from Core-collapse Supernovae

    Viktoriya Morozova, David Radice, Adam Burrows, and David Vartanyan. “The Gravitational Wave Signal from Core-collapse Supernovae”. In:Astrophys. J.861.1, 10 (July 2018), p. 10.doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aac5f1. arXiv:1801.01914 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  22. [23]

    Consistent perturbative modeling of pseudo-Newtonian core-collapse supernova simulations

    John Ryan Westernacher-Schneider. “Consistent perturbative modeling of pseudo-Newtonian core-collapse supernova simulations”. In:Phys. Rev. D101.8, 083021 (Apr. 2020), p. 083021. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.101.083021. arXiv:2002.04468 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  23. [24]

    Unveiling the nature of gravitational-wave emission in core-collapse supernovae with perturbative analysis

    Shuai Zha, Oliver Eggenberger Andersen, and Evan P. O’Connor. “Unveiling the nature of gravitational-wave emission in core-collapse supernovae with perturbative analysis”. In:Phys. Rev. D109.8, 083023 (Apr. 2024), p. 083023.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.109.083023. arXiv: 2403.02067 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  24. [25]

    Daniel Murphy, Anthony Mezzacappa, Eric J

    R. Daniel Murphy, Anthony Mezzacappa, Eric J. Lentz, and Pedro Marronetti.Core collapse supernova gravitational wave sourcing and characterization based on three-dimensional models. Sept. 2025.doi:10.1103/5z9g-yr28. arXiv:2503.06406 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  25. [26]

    Chimera: A Massively Parallel Code for Core-collapse Supernova Simulations

    Stephen W. Bruenn et al. “Chimera: A Massively Parallel Code for Core-collapse Supernova Simulations”. In:Astrophys. J. Suppl.248.1 (2020), p. 11.issn: 1538-4365.doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ab7aff

    doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ab7aff 2020

  26. [27]

    Erratum: Universal Relations for Gravitational-Wave Asteroseismology of Protoneutron Stars [Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 051102 (2019)]

    Alejandro Torres-Forn´ e, Pablo Cerd´ a-Dur´ an, Martin Obergaulinger, Bernhard M¨ uller, and Jos´ e A. Font. “Erratum: Universal Relations for Gravitational-Wave Asteroseismology of Protoneutron Stars [Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 051102 (2019)]”. In:Phys. Rev. Lett.127.23, 239901 (Dec. 2021), p. 239901.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.239901

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.127.239901 2019

  27. [28]

    Determination of properties of protoneutron stars toward black hole formation via gravitational wave observations

    Hajime Sotani and Kohsuke Sumiyoshi. “Determination of properties of protoneutron stars toward black hole formation via gravitational wave observations”. In:Phys. Rev. D100.8, 083008 (Oct. 2019), p. 083008.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.100.083008. arXiv:1909.11816 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  28. [29]

    Universal relation for supernova gravitational waves

    Hajime Sotani, Tomoya Takiwaki, and Hajime Togashi. “Universal relation for supernova gravitational waves”. In:Phys. Rev. D104.12, 123009 (Dec. 2021), p. 123009.doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.104.123009. arXiv:2110.03131 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  29. [30]

    Effects of multidimensional treatment of gravity in simulations on supernova gravitational waves

    Hajime Sotani, Bernhard M¨ uller, and Tomoya Takiwaki. “Effects of multidimensional treatment of gravity in simulations on supernova gravitational waves”. In:Phys. Rev. D 112.8, 083018 (Oct. 2025), p. 083018.doi:10.1103/317p-9hxm. arXiv:2509.19724 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2025

  30. [31]

    Long-term gravitational wave asteroseismology of supernovae: From core collapse to 20 seconds postbounce

    Masamitsu Mori, Yudai Suwa, and Tomoya Takiwaki. “Long-term gravitational wave asteroseismology of supernovae: From core collapse to 20 seconds postbounce”. In:Phys. Rev. D107.8, 083015 (Apr. 2023), p. 083015.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.107.083015. arXiv: 2302.00292 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  31. [32]

    Three approaches for the classification of protoneutron star oscillation modes

    M. C. Rodriguez, Ignacio F. Ranea-Sandoval, C. Chirenti, and D. Radice. “Three approaches for the classification of protoneutron star oscillation modes”. In:Mon. Not. Roy. Ast. Soc. 523.2 (Aug. 2023), pp. 2236–2246.doi:10.1093/mnras/stad1459. arXiv:2304.00033 [astro-ph.HE]. 18 IOP PublishingJournalvv(yyyy) aaaaaa Authoret al

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  32. [33]

    Inference of protoneutron star properties from gravitational-wave data in core-collapse supernovae

    Marie-Anne Bizouard, Patricio Maturana-Russel, Alejandro Torres-Forn´ e, Martin Obergaulinger, Pablo Cerd´ a-Dur´ an, Nelson Christensen, Jos´ e A. Font, and Renate Meyer. “Inference of protoneutron star properties from gravitational-wave data in core-collapse supernovae”. In:Phys. Rev. D103.6, 063006 (Mar. 2021), p. 063006.doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.103.06300...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  33. [34]

    Exploring the relativistic regime with Newtonian hydrodynamics: an improved effective gravitational potential for supernova simulations

    A. Marek, H. Dimmelmeier, H.-T. Janka, E. M¨ uller, and R. Buras. “Exploring the relativistic regime with Newtonian hydrodynamics: an improved effective gravitational potential for supernova simulations”. In:Astron. Astrophys.445 (2006), pp. 273–289.doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20052840. eprint:arXiv:astro-ph/0502161

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  34. [35]

    Two-dimensional hydrodynamic core-collapse supernova simulations with spectral neutrino transport. I. Numerical method and results for a 15M ⊙ star

    R. Buras, M. Rampp, H.-T. Janka, and K. Kifonidis. “Two-dimensional hydrodynamic core-collapse supernova simulations with spectral neutrino transport. I. Numerical method and results for a 15M ⊙ star”. In:Astron. Astrophys.447 (2006), pp. 1049–1092.doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20053783. eprint:arXiv:astro-ph/0507135

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  35. [36]

    Thermonuclear Kinetics in Astrophysics

    W. R. Hix and B. S. Meyer. “Thermonuclear Kinetics in Astrophysics”. In:Nucl. Phys. A777 (2006), pp. 188–207.doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2004.10.009. eprint:astro-ph/0509698

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  36. [37]

    Nucleosynthesis in thermonuclear supernovae

    C. Travaglio and W. R. Hix. “Nucleosynthesis in thermonuclear supernovae”. In:Frontiers of Physics8 (2013), pp. 199–216.doi:10.1007/s11467-013-0315-y

    doi:10.1007/s11467-013-0315-y 2013

  37. [38]

    Nucleosynthesis and remnants in massive stars of solar metallicity

    S. E. Woosley and A. Heger. “Nucleosynthesis and remnants in massive stars of solar metallicity”. In:Phys. Rep.442 (2007), pp. 269–283.doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2007.02.009. eprint:arXiv:astro-ph/0702176

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  38. [39]

    Nucleosynthesis and Evolution of Massive Metal-free Stars

    Alexander Heger and S. E. Woosley. “Nucleosynthesis and Evolution of Massive Metal-free Stars”. In:Astrophys. J.724 (2010), pp. 341–373.doi:10.1088/0004-637X/724/1/341. arXiv:0803.3161

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  39. [40]

    Daniel Murphy, Anthony Mezzacappa, Eric J

    R. Daniel Murphy, Anthony Mezzacappa, Eric J. Lentz, and Pedro Marronetti.Chimera D-Series Gravitational Wave Emission Sourced from Matter. Constellation by Oak Ridge Leadership Computing Facility. https://doi.org/10.13139/OLCF/2571921. 2025.doi: 10.13139/OLCF/2571921

    arXiv 2025

  40. [41]

    A generalized equation of state for hot, dense matter

    J. M. Lattimer and F. D. Swesty. “A generalized equation of state for hot, dense matter”. In: Nucl. Phys. A535 (1991), pp. 331–376

    1991

  41. [42]

    Type II supernovae in 12 M ⊙ and 15 M ⊙ stars: The equation of state and general relativity

    E. Baron, J. Cooperstein, and S. Kahana. “Type II supernovae in 12 M ⊙ and 15 M ⊙ stars: The equation of state and general relativity”. In:Phys. Rev. Lett.55.1 (July 1985), pp. 126–129.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.55.126

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.55.126 1985

  42. [43]

    Core-collapse Supernova Equations of State Based on Neutron Star Observations

    A. W. Steiner, M. Hempel, and T. Fischer. “Core-collapse Supernova Equations of State Based on Neutron Star Observations”. In:Astrophys. J.774.1, 17 (Sept. 2013), p. 17.doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/774/1/17. arXiv:1207.2184 [astro-ph.SR]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  43. [44]

    Sensitivity of Neutrino-Driven Core-Collapse Supernova Models to the Microphysical Equation of State

    Ryan E. Landfield. “Sensitivity of Neutrino-Driven Core-Collapse Supernova Models to the Microphysical Equation of State”. PhD Dissertation. Univeristy of Tennessee Knoxville, 2018

    2018

  44. [45]

    Dependence of the reconstructed core-collapse supernova gravitational wave high-frequency feature on the nuclear equation of state in real interferometric data

    R. Daniel Murphy, Alejandro Casallas-Lagos, Anthony Mezzacappa, Michele Zanolin, Ryan E. Landfield, Eric J. Lentz, Pedro Marronetti, Javier M. Antelis, and Claudia Moreno. “Dependence of the reconstructed core-collapse supernova gravitational wave high-frequency feature on the nuclear equation of state in real interferometric data”. In:Phys. Rev. D110.8, ...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  45. [46]

    Nonradial g-mode oscillations of warm neutron stars

    P. N. McDermott, H. M. van Horn, and J. F. Scholl. “Nonradial g-mode oscillations of warm neutron stars”. In:Astrophys. J.268 (May 1983), pp. 837–848.doi:10.1086/161006

    doi:10.1086/161006 1983

  46. [47]

    Dependence of the outer boundary condition on protoneutron star asteroseismology with gravitational-wave signatures

    Hajime Sotani, Takami Kuroda, Tomoya Takiwaki, and Kei Kotake. “Dependence of the outer boundary condition on protoneutron star asteroseismology with gravitational-wave signatures”. In:Phys. Rev. D99.12, 123024 (June 2019), p. 123024.doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.99.123024. arXiv:1906.04354 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  47. [48]

    Universality in supernova gravitational waves with protoneutron star properties

    Hajime Sotani, Bernhard M¨ uller, and Tomoya Takiwaki. “Universality in supernova gravitational waves with protoneutron star properties”. In:Phys. Rev. D109.12, 123021 (June 2024), p. 123021.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.109.123021. arXiv:2405.09030 [astro-ph.HE]. 19 IOP PublishingJournalvv(yyyy) aaaaaa Authoret al

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  48. [49]

    Universal Relations for Gravitational-Wave Asteroseismology of Protoneutron Stars

    Alejandro Torres-Forn´ e, Pablo Cerd´ a-Dur´ an, Martin Obergaulinger, Bernhard M¨ uller, and Jos´ e A. Font. “Universal Relations for Gravitational-Wave Asteroseismology of Protoneutron Stars”. In:Phys. Rev. Lett.123.5, 051102 (Aug. 2019), p. 051102.doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.051102. arXiv:1902.10048 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  49. [50]

    Astrophysical magnetohydrodynamics and radiative transfer: numerical methods and applications

    Martin Obergaulinger. “Astrophysical magnetohydrodynamics and radiative transfer: numerical methods and applications”. PhD Thesis. M¨ unchen, Germany: Technische Universit¨ at M¨ unchen, 2008

    2008

  50. [51]

    A new multidimensional, energy-dependent two-moment transport code for neutrino-hydrodynamics

    O. Just, M. Obergaulinger, and H.-T. Janka. “A new multidimensional, energy-dependent two-moment transport code for neutrino-hydrodynamics”. In:Mon. Not. Roy. Ast. Soc.453 (2015), pp. 3386–3413.doi:10.1093/mnras/stv1892. arXiv:1501.02999 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  51. [52]

    Combining spectral and shock-capturing methods: A new numerical approach for 3D relativistic core collapse simulations

    Harald Dimmelmeier, J´ erˆ ome Novak, Jos´ e A. Font, Jos´ e M. Ib´ a˜ nez, and Ewald M¨ uller. “Combining spectral and shock-capturing methods: A new numerical approach for 3D relativistic core collapse simulations”. In:Phys. Rev. D71.6, 064023 (Mar. 2005), p. 064023. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.71.064023. arXiv:astro-ph/0407174 [astro-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  52. [53]

    The evolution and explosion of massive stars

    S. E. Woosley, A. Heger, and T. A. Weaver. “The evolution and explosion of massive stars”. In:Rev. Mod. Phys.74 (2002), pp. 1015–1071.doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.74.1015

    doi:10.1103/revmodphys.74.1015 2002

  53. [54]

    Improved constrained scheme for the Einstein equations: An approach to the uniqueness issue

    Isabel Cordero-Carri´ on, Pablo Cerd´ a-Dur´ an, Harald Dimmelmeier, Jos´ e Luis Jaramillo, J´ erˆ ome Novak, and Eric Gourgoulhon. “Improved constrained scheme for the Einstein equations: An approach to the uniqueness issue”. In:Phys. Rev. D79.2, 024017 (Jan. 2009), p. 024017.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.79.024017. arXiv:0809.2325 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  54. [55]

    Relativistic numerical model for close neutron-star binaries

    J. R. Wilson, G. J. Mathews, and P. Marronetti. “Relativistic numerical model for close neutron-star binaries”. In:Phys. Rev. D54 (1996), pp. 1317–1331

    1996

  55. [56]

    Waveless Approximation Theories of Gravity

    James A. Isenberg. “Waveless Approximation Theories of Gravity”. In:International Journal of Modern Physics D17.2 (Jan. 2008), pp. 265–273.doi:10.1142/S0218271808011997. arXiv:gr-qc/0702113 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  56. [57]

    New equation of state for astrophysical simulations

    G. Shen, C. J. Horowitz, and S. Teige. “New equation of state for astrophysical simulations”. In:Phys. Rev. C83.3, 035802 (2011), p. 035802.doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.83.035802. arXiv: 1101.3715 [astro-ph.SR]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  57. [58]

    Relativistic Equation of State for Core-collapse Supernova Simulations

    H. Shen, H. Toki, K. Oyamatsu, and K. Sumiyoshi. “Relativistic Equation of State for Core-collapse Supernova Simulations”. In:Astrophys. J. Suppl.197 (2011), p. 035802

    2011

  58. [59]

    New Hyperon Equations of State for Supernovae and Neutron Stars in Density-dependent Hadron Field Theory

    Sarmistha Banik, Matthias Hempel, and Debades Bandyopadhyay. “New Hyperon Equations of State for Supernovae and Neutron Stars in Density-dependent Hadron Field Theory”. In: Astrophys. J. Suppl.214.2, 22 (Oct. 2014), p. 22.doi:10.1088/0067-0049/214/2/22. arXiv: 1404.6173 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  59. [60]

    An Implicit Lagrangian Code for Spherically Symmetric General Relativistic Hydrodynamics with an Approximate Riemann Solver

    Shoichi Yamada. “An Implicit Lagrangian Code for Spherically Symmetric General Relativistic Hydrodynamics with an Approximate Riemann Solver”. In:Astrophys. J.475.2 (Feb. 1997), pp. 720–739.doi:10.1086/303548. arXiv:astro-ph/9601042 [astro-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  60. [61]

    Neutrino transport in type II supernovae: Boltzmann solver vs. Monte Carlo method

    Shoichi Yamada, Hans-Thomas Janka, and Hideyuki Suzuki. “Neutrino transport in type II supernovae: Boltzmann solver vs. Monte Carlo method”. In:Astron. Astrophys.344 (Apr. 1999), pp. 533–550.doi:10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/9809009. arXiv:astro-ph/9809009 [astro-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.astro-ph/9809009 1999

  61. [62]

    Postbounce Evolution of Core-Collapse Supernovae: Long-Term Effects of the Equation of State

    K. Sumiyoshi, S. Yamada, H. Suzuki, H. Shen, S. Chiba, and H. Toki. “Postbounce Evolution of Core-Collapse Supernovae: Long-Term Effects of the Equation of State”. In:Astrophys. J. 629 (2005), p. 922.doi:10.1086/431788. eprint:arXiv:astro-ph/0506620

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  62. [63]

    The Evolution and Explosion of Massive Stars. II. Explosive Hydrodynamics and Nucleosynthesis

    S. E. Woosley and Thomas A. Weaver. “The Evolution and Explosion of Massive Stars. II. Explosive Hydrodynamics and Nucleosynthesis”. In:Astrophys. J. Suppl.101 (1995), pp. 181–235.doi:10.1086/192237

    doi:10.1086/192237 1995

  63. [64]

    Supernova Nucleosynthesis in Population III 13-50 M⊙ Stars and Abundance Patterns of Extremely Metal-poor Stars

    N. Tominaga, H. Umeda, and K. Nomoto. “Supernova Nucleosynthesis in Population III 13-50 M⊙ Stars and Abundance Patterns of Extremely Metal-poor Stars”. In:Astrophys. J. 660 (2007), pp. 516–540.doi:10.1086/513063

    doi:10.1086/513063 2007

  64. [65]

    Relativistic equation of state of nuclear matter for supernova and neutron star

    H. Shen, H. Toki, K. Oyamatsu, and K. Sumiyoshi. “Relativistic equation of state of nuclear matter for supernova and neutron star”. In:Nucl. Phys. A637.3 (July 1998), pp. 435–450. doi:10.1016/S0375-9474(98)00236-X. arXiv:nucl-th/9805035 [nucl-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  65. [66]

    Relativistic Equations for Adiabatic, Spherically Symmetric Gravitational Collapse

    C. W. Misner and D. H. Sharp. “Relativistic Equations for Adiabatic, Spherically Symmetric Gravitational Collapse”. In:Phys. Rep.136 (1964), pp. 571–576.doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.136.B571. 20 IOP PublishingJournalvv(yyyy) aaaaaa Authoret al

    doi:10.1103/physrev.136.b571 1964

  66. [67]

    Light-curve and spectral properties of ultrastripped core-collapse supernovae leading to binary neutron stars

    Takashi J. Moriya, Paolo A. Mazzali, Nozomu Tominaga, Stephan Hachinger, Sergei I. Blinnikov, Thomas M. Tauris, Koh Takahashi, Masaomi Tanaka, Norbert Langer, and Philipp Podsiadlowski. “Light-curve and spectral properties of ultrastripped core-collapse supernovae leading to binary neutron stars”. In:Mon. Not. R. Ast. Soc.466.2 (Apr. 2017), pp. 2085–2098....

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  67. [68]

    Three-dimensional Hydrodynamic Core-collapse Supernova Simulations for an 11.2 M ⊙ Star with Spectral Neutrino Transport

    T. Takiwaki, K. Kotake, and Y. Suwa. “Three-dimensional Hydrodynamic Core-collapse Supernova Simulations for an 11.2 M ⊙ Star with Spectral Neutrino Transport”. In: Astrophys. J.749, 98 (2012), p. 98.doi:10.1088/0004-637X/749/2/98. arXiv:1108.3989 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  68. [69]

    A Comparison of Two- and Three-dimensional Neutrino-hydrodynamics Simulations of Core-collapse Supernovae

    T. Takiwaki, K. Kotake, and Y. Suwa. “A Comparison of Two- and Three-dimensional Neutrino-hydrodynamics Simulations of Core-collapse Supernovae”. In:Astrophys. J.786, 83 (2014), p. 83.doi:10.1088/0004-637X/786/2/83. arXiv:1308.5755 [astro-ph.SR]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  69. [70]

    Three-dimensional simulations of rapidly rotating core-collapse supernovae: finding a neutrino-powered explosion aided by non-axisymmetric flows

    T. Takiwaki, K. Kotake, and Y. Suwa. “Three-dimensional simulations of rapidly rotating core-collapse supernovae: finding a neutrino-powered explosion aided by non-axisymmetric flows”. In:Mon. Not. Roy. Ast. Soc.461 (2016), pp. L112–L116.doi: 10.1093/mnrasl/slw105. arXiv:1602.06759 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  70. [71]

    Composition and thermodynamics of nuclear matter with light clusters

    S. Typel, G. R¨ opke, T. Kl¨ ahn, D. Blaschke, and H. H. Wolter. “Composition and thermodynamics of nuclear matter with light clusters”. In:Phys. Rev. C81.1, 015803 (Jan. 2010), p. 015803.doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.81.015803. arXiv:0908.2344 [nucl-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  71. [72]

    A new equation of state for core-collapse supernovae based on realistic nuclear forces and including a full nuclear ensemble

    S. Furusawa, H. Togashi, H. Nagakura, K. Sumiyoshi, S. Yamada, H. Suzuki, and M. Takano. “A new equation of state for core-collapse supernovae based on realistic nuclear forces and including a full nuclear ensemble”. In:Journal of Physics G Nuclear Physics44.9 (Sept. 2017), p. 094001.doi:10.1088/1361-6471/aa7f35. arXiv:1707.06410 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  72. [73]

    Nuclear equation of state for core-collapse supernova simulations with realistic nuclear forces

    H. Togashi, K. Nakazato, Y. Takehara, S. Yamamuro, H. Suzuki, and M. Takano. “Nuclear equation of state for core-collapse supernova simulations with realistic nuclear forces”. In: Nucl. Phys. A961 (May 2017), pp. 78–105.doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2017.02.010. arXiv: 1702.05324 [nucl-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  73. [74]

    Accuracy of the relativistic Cowling approximation in protoneutron star asteroseismology

    Hajime Sotani and Tomoya Takiwaki. “Accuracy of the relativistic Cowling approximation in protoneutron star asteroseismology”. In:Phys. Rev. D102.6, 063025 (Sept. 2020), p. 063025. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.102.063025. arXiv:2009.05206 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  74. [75]

    A new open-source code for spherically symmetric stellar collapse to neutron stars and black holes

    Evan O’Connor and Christian D. Ott. “A new open-source code for spherically symmetric stellar collapse to neutron stars and black holes”. In:Classical and Quantum Gravity27.11, 114103 (June 2010), p. 114103.doi:10.1088/0264-9381/27/11/114103. arXiv:0912.2393 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  75. [76]

    An Open-source Neutrino Radiation Hydrodynamics Code for Core-collapse Supernovae

    Evan O’Connor. “An Open-source Neutrino Radiation Hydrodynamics Code for Core-collapse Supernovae”. In:Astrophys. J. Suppl.219.2, 24 (Aug. 2015), p. 24.doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/219/2/24. arXiv:1411.7058 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  76. [77]

    Core-collapse Supernovae from 9 to 120 Solar Masses Based on Neutrino-powered Explosions

    T. Sukhbold, T. Ertl, S. E. Woosley, J. M. Brown, and H.-T. Janka. “Core-collapse Supernovae from 9 to 120 Solar Masses Based on Neutrino-powered Explosions”. In: Astrophys. J.821, 38 (2016), p. 38.doi:10.3847/0004-637X/821/1/38. arXiv:1510.04643 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  77. [78]

    A High-resolution Study of Presupernova Core Structure

    Tuguldur Sukhbold, S. E. Woosley, and Alexander Heger. “A High-resolution Study of Presupernova Core Structure”. In:Astrophys. J.860.2, 93 (June 2018), p. 93.doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aac2da. arXiv:1710.03243 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  78. [79]

    Gravitational waves as a probe of core collapse supernova progenitor structure

    R. Daniel Murphy, Elle Brinkman, Colter J. Richardson, Evan Semenak, Anthony Mezzacappa, Pedro Marronetti, Eric J. Lentz, and Stephen W. Bruenn. “Gravitational waves as a probe of core collapse supernova progenitor structure”. In:Phys. Rev. D113.8, 084005 (Apr. 2026), p. 084005.doi:10.1103/2bdz-783t. arXiv:2511.21895 [astro-ph.HE]

    arXiv 2026

  79. [80]

    Inferring astrophysical parameters of core-collapse supernovae from their gravitational-wave emission

    Jade Powell and Bernhard M¨ uller. “Inferring astrophysical parameters of core-collapse supernovae from their gravitational-wave emission”. In:Phys. Rev. D105.6, 063018 (Mar. 2022), p. 063018.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.105.063018. arXiv:2201.01397 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  80. [81]

    Gravitational Wave Eigenfrequencies from Neutrino-driven Core-collapse Supernovae

    Noah E. Wolfe, Carla Fr¨ ohlich, Jonah M. Miller, Alejandro Torres-Forn´ e, and Pablo Cerd´ a-Dur´ an. “Gravitational Wave Eigenfrequencies from Neutrino-driven Core-collapse Supernovae”. In:Astrophys. J.954.2, 161 (Sept. 2023), p. 161.doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ace693. arXiv:2303.16962 [astro-ph.HE]. 21 IOP PublishingJournalvv(yyyy) aaaaaa Authoret al

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

Showing first 80 references.