Non-Hermitian Bloch Oscillations
Pith reviewed 2026-06-26 05:15 UTC · model grok-4.3
The pith
Non-Hermitian lattices under constant force produce wave packets with anomalous group velocities and non-smooth oscillations.
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
Core claim
By investigating wave-packet dynamics in one-dimensional non-Hermitian lattices driven by a dc force, equations of motion are derived for the momentum, center of mass, and group velocity, identifying an anomalous group velocity due to non-Hermiticity. This framework shows that nonreciprocal non-smooth Bloch oscillations with periodic jumps in group velocity can emerge, and analyzes finite-size effects. In lattices with unidirectional hopping under open boundary conditions, periodic temporal Goos-Hänchen shifts appear together with anomalous wave propagation along the vanishing hopping direction.
What carries the argument
Semiclassical equations of motion for wave-packet momentum, center of mass, and group velocity that incorporate an anomalous velocity contribution from non-Hermiticity.
If this is right
- Nonreciprocal non-smooth Bloch oscillations emerge with periodic jumps in group velocity.
- Finite-size effects influence the wave-packet dynamics in these systems.
- Periodic temporal Goos-Hänchen shifts occur in unidirectional hopping lattices under open boundary conditions.
- Anomalous wave propagation takes place along the direction where hopping vanishes.
Where Pith is reading between the lines
- The anomalous group velocity could provide a new handle for directing wave propagation in engineered non-Hermitian media.
- Similar effects might appear in two-dimensional or higher non-Hermitian lattices under driving forces.
- These dynamics could connect to the non-Hermitian skin effect observed in open systems.
Load-bearing premise
The semiclassical wave-packet approximation remains valid in non-Hermitian lattices under a constant force without major corrections from imaginary potentials or boundaries.
What would settle it
Direct measurement of periodic jumps in the group velocity of a propagating wave packet in a non-Hermitian lattice array driven by a constant force would confirm the framework, while their absence would falsify it.
Figures
read the original abstract
We establish a general framework for non-Hermitian Bloch oscillations by investigating the wave-packet dynamics in one-dimensional non-Hermitian lattices driven by a dc force. The equations of motion for the momentum, center of mass, and group velocity of a wave packet are derived, where an anomalous group velocity due to the non-Hermiticity is identified. We show that nonreciprocal non-smooth Bloch oscillations, characterized by periodic jumps in group velocity, can emerge, and we analyze the role of finite-size effects. In non-Hermitian lattices with unidirectional hopping under open boundary conditions, we further uncover the emergence of periodic temporal Goos--H\"anchen shifts together with an anomalous wave propagation along the direction of vanishing hopping.
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. The paper claims to establish a general framework for non-Hermitian Bloch oscillations by deriving equations of motion for the momentum, center of mass, and group velocity of wave packets in one-dimensional non-Hermitian lattices under a dc force. It identifies an anomalous group velocity due to non-Hermiticity, shows nonreciprocal non-smooth Bloch oscillations with periodic jumps in group velocity, analyzes finite-size effects, and in unidirectional hopping under open boundary conditions, uncovers periodic temporal Goos-Hänchen shifts together with anomalous wave propagation along the direction of vanishing hopping.
Significance. If the semiclassical derivations hold without significant corrections from non-unitary evolution, the work extends Bloch oscillation theory to non-Hermitian systems and identifies new phenomena (anomalous velocity, nonreciprocal jumps, temporal Goos-Hänchen shifts) that could be relevant for photonic or atomic lattice experiments with gain/loss. The direct derivation from the non-Hermitian Schrödinger equation with linear potential is a strength, as is the focus on both periodic and open-boundary cases.
major comments (1)
- [Derivation of equations of motion (abstract and main text sections presenting the EOM)] The derivations of the momentum, center-of-mass, and group-velocity equations (including the anomalous velocity term) rest on the semiclassical wave-packet approximation remaining valid. No explicit regime of validity is supplied (e.g., bounds on non-Hermitian strength relative to force strength, or checks against rapid spreading/exponential growth from the imaginary potential), which is load-bearing for the claim of a 'general framework' and the reported phenomena.
Simulated Author's Rebuttal
We thank the referee for the detailed reading and constructive feedback on our manuscript. The major comment raises a valid point about the need for an explicit regime of validity for the semiclassical approximation. We address this below and outline the revisions we will make.
read point-by-point responses
-
Referee: [Derivation of equations of motion (abstract and main text sections presenting the EOM)] The derivations of the momentum, center-of-mass, and group-velocity equations (including the anomalous velocity term) rest on the semiclassical wave-packet approximation remaining valid. No explicit regime of validity is supplied (e.g., bounds on non-Hermitian strength relative to force strength, or checks against rapid spreading/exponential growth from the imaginary potential), which is load-bearing for the claim of a 'general framework' and the reported phenomena.
Authors: We agree that an explicit discussion of the validity regime strengthens the presentation of the general framework. The derivations extend the standard semiclassical wave-packet approach to the non-Hermitian Schrödinger equation with a linear potential, but the manuscript does not currently delineate the parameter bounds. In the revised version, we will insert a new paragraph immediately following the derivation of the equations of motion. This paragraph will (i) state the conditions under which the wave-packet ansatz remains valid (specifically, requiring the non-Hermitian strength to be smaller than the force-induced energy scale to suppress rapid exponential growth), (ii) provide a quantitative estimate relating the imaginary potential amplitude to the Bloch period and lattice spacing, and (iii) report direct numerical comparisons between the semiclassical trajectories and exact integration of the full non-Hermitian Schrödinger equation for representative parameter sets, confirming that the anomalous velocity, non-smooth jumps, and temporal Goos-Hänchen shifts survive without qualitative corrections from non-unitary spreading. revision: yes
Circularity Check
Derivations of wave-packet equations are independent of inputs
full rationale
The paper states that equations of motion for momentum, center of mass, and group velocity (including anomalous velocity) are derived from the non-Hermitian Schrödinger equation with dc force. No evidence appears of self-definitional loops, fitted parameters relabeled as predictions, load-bearing self-citations, or ansatzes smuggled via prior work. The framework is therefore self-contained against its stated starting point; the semiclassical validity question raised by the skeptic is an assumption check, not a circularity reduction.
Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[1]
Bloch, Über die quantenmechanik der elektronen in kristallgittern, Zeitschrift für physik52, 555 (1929)
F. Bloch, Über die quantenmechanik der elektronen in kristallgittern, Zeitschrift für physik52, 555 (1929)
1929
-
[2]
Zener, A theory of the electrical breakdown of solid dielectrics, Proc
C. Zener, A theory of the electrical breakdown of solid dielectrics, Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. A145, 523 (1934)
1934
-
[3]
Hartmann, F
T. Hartmann, F. Keck, H. Korsch, and S. Mossmann, Dynamics of Bloch oscillations, New J. Phys.6, 2 (2004)
2004
-
[4]
Esaki and R
L. Esaki and R. Tsu, Superlattice and negative differ- ential conductivity in semiconductors, IBM J. Res. Dev. 14, 61 (1970)
1970
-
[5]
K. Leo, P. H. Bolivar, F. Brüggemann, R. Schwedler, and K. Köhler, Observationof Bloch oscillationsin a semicon- ductor superlattice, Solid State Commun.84, 943 (1992)
1992
-
[6]
Feldmann, K
J. Feldmann, K. Leo, J. Shah, D. A. Miller, J. Cunning- ham, T. Meier, G. Von Plessen, A. Schulze, P. Thomas, and S. Schmitt-Rink, Optical investigation of Bloch os- cillations in a semiconductor superlattice, Phys. Rev. B 46, 7252 (1992)
1992
-
[7]
Waschke, H
C. Waschke, H. G. Roskos, R. Schwedler, K. Leo, H. Kurz, and K. Köhler, Coherent submillimeter-wave emission from Bloch oscillations in a semiconductor su- perlattice, Phys. Rev. Lett.70, 3319 (1993)
1993
-
[8]
M. B. Dahan, E. Peik, J. Reichel, Y. Castin, and C. Sa- lomon, Bloch oscillations of atoms in an optical potential, Phys. Rev. Lett.76, 4508 (1996)
1996
-
[9]
Wilkinson, C
S. Wilkinson, C. Bharucha, K. Madison, Q. Niu, and M. Raizen, Observation of atomic Wannier-Stark ladders in an accelerating optical potential, Phys. Rev. Lett.76, 4512 (1996)
1996
-
[10]
Ferrari, N
G. Ferrari, N. Poli, F. Sorrentino, and G. Tino, Long- lived Bloch oscillations with bosonic Sr atoms and appli- cation to gravity measurement at the micrometer scale, Phys. Rev. Lett.97, 060402 (2006)
2006
-
[11]
Gustavsson, E
M. Gustavsson, E. Haller, M. Mark, J. G. Danzl, G. Rojas-Kopeinig, and H.-C. Nägerl, Control of interaction-induced dephasing of Bloch oscillations, Phys. Rev. Lett.100, 080404 (2008)
2008
-
[12]
Morandotti, U
R. Morandotti, U. Peschel, J. Aitchison, H. Eisenberg, and Y. Silberberg, Experimental observation of linear and nonlinear optical Bloch oscillations, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 4756 (1999)
1999
-
[13]
Pertsch, P
T. Pertsch, P. Dannberg, W. Elflein, A. Bräuer, and F. Lederer, Optical Bloch oscillations in temperature tuned waveguide arrays, Phys. Rev. Lett.83, 4752 (1999)
1999
-
[14]
Chiodo, G
N. Chiodo, G. Della Valle, R. Osellame, S. Longhi, G. Cerullo, R. Ramponi, P. Laporta, and U. Morgner, Imaging of Bloch oscillations in erbium-doped curved waveguide arrays, Opt. Lett.31, 1651 (2006)
2006
-
[15]
Sapienza, P
R. Sapienza, P. Costantino, D. Wiersma, M. Ghulinyan, C. J. Oton, and L. Pavesi, Optical analogue of electronic Bloch oscillations, Phys. Rev. Lett.91, 263902 (2003)
2003
-
[16]
Sanchis-Alepuz, Y
H. Sanchis-Alepuz, Y. A. Kosevich, and J. Sánchez- Dehesa,AcousticanalogueofelectronicBlochoscillations and resonant Zener tunneling in ultrasonic superlattices, Phys. Rev. Lett.98, 134301 (2007)
2007
-
[17]
H. Chen, N. Yang, C. Qin, W. Li, B. Wang, T. Han, C. Zhang, W. Liu, K. Wang, H. Long,et al., Real-time observationoffrequencyBlochoscillationswithfibreloop modulation, Light Sci. Appl.10, 48 (2021)
2021
-
[18]
Oliver, A
C. Oliver, A. Smith, T. Easton, G. Salerno, V. Guarrera, N. Goldman, G. Barontini, and H. M. Price, Bloch oscil- lations along a synthetic dimension of atomic trap states, Phys. Rev. Res.5, 033001 (2023)
2023
-
[19]
Z. Xie, L. Wang, J. Qiu, L. Zhang, Y. Zhou, Z. Tao, W. Huang, Y. Liang, J. Zhang, Y. Chen,et al., Quantum dynamics of microwave photons in a synthetic frequency dimension, Phys. Rev. Appl.25, 064058 (2026)
2026
-
[20]
C. M. Bender, Making sense of non-Hermitian Hamilto- nians, Rep. Prog. Phys.70, 947 (2007)
2007
-
[21]
Ashida, Z
Y. Ashida, Z. Gong, and M. Ueda, Non-Hermitian physics, Adv. Phys.69, 249 (2020)
2020
-
[22]
E. J. Bergholtz, J. C. Budich, and F. K. Kunst, Ex- ceptional topology of non-Hermitian systems, Rev. Mod. Phys.93, 015005 (2021)
2021
-
[23]
K. Ding, C. Fang, and G. Ma, Non-Hermitian topology and exceptional-point geometries, Nat. Rev. Phy.4, 745 (2022)
2022
-
[24]
Okuma and M
N. Okuma and M. Sato, Non-Hermitian topological phe- nomena: A review, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 14, 83 (2023)
2023
-
[25]
L. Xiao, K. Wang, D. Qu, H. Gao, Q. Lin, Z. Bian, X. Zhan, and P. Xue, Non-Hermitian physics in photonic systems, Photonics Insights4, R09 (2025)
2025
-
[26]
Z. Lin, H. Ramezani, T. Eichelkraut, T. Kottos, H. Cao, and D. N. Christodoulides, Unidirectional invisibility in- duced by PT-symmetric periodic structures, Phys. Rev. Lett.106, 213901 (2011)
2011
-
[27]
Regensburger, C
A. Regensburger, C. Bersch, M.-A. Miri, G. On- ishchukov, D.N.Christodoulides,andU.Peschel,Parity– time synthetic photonic lattices, Nature488, 167 (2012)
2012
-
[28]
Longhi, Bloch oscillations in complex crystals with PT symmetry, Phys
S. Longhi, Bloch oscillations in complex crystals with PT symmetry, Phys. Rev. Lett.103, 123601 (2009)
2009
-
[29]
Wimmer, M.-A
M. Wimmer, M.-A. Miri, D. Christodoulides, and U. Peschel, Observation of Bloch oscillations in com- plex PT-symmetric photonic lattices, Sci. Rep.5, 17760 (2015)
2015
-
[30]
Y.-L. Xu, W. S. Fegadolli, L. Gan, M.-H. Lu, X.-P. Liu, Z.-Y. Li, A. Scherer, and Y.-F. Chen, Experimental re- alization of Bloch oscillations in a parity-time synthetic silicon photonic lattice, Nat. Commun.7, 11319 (2016)
2016
-
[31]
Z. Gong, Y. Ashida, K. Kawabata, K. Takasan, S. Hi- gashikawa, and M. Ueda, Topological phases of non- Hermitian systems, Phys. Rev. X8, 031079 (2018)
2018
-
[32]
Zhang, Z
K. Zhang, Z. Yang, and C. Fang, Correspondence be- tweenwindingnumbersandskinmodesinnon-Hermitian systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 126402 (2020)
2020
-
[33]
Okuma, K
N. Okuma, K. Kawabata, K. Shiozaki, and M. Sato, Topological origin of non-Hermitian skin effects, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 086801 (2020)
2020
-
[34]
Zhang, T
X. Zhang, T. Zhang, M.-H. Lu, and Y.-F. Chen, A review on non-Hermitian skin effect, Adv. Phys. X7, 2109431 (2022)
2022
-
[35]
R. Lin, T. Tai, L. Li, and C. H. Lee, Topological non- Hermitian skin effect, Front. Phys.18, 53605 (2023)
2023
-
[36]
J. T. Gohsrich, A. Banerjee, and F. K. Kunst, The non- Hermitian skin effect: A perspective, Europhys. Lett. 150, 60001 (2025)
2025
-
[37]
T. E. Lee, Anomalous edge state in a non-Hermitian lat- tice, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 133903 (2016)
2016
-
[38]
V. M. Alvarez, J. B. Vargas, and L. F. Torres, Non- Hermitian robust edge states in one dimension: Anoma- lous localization and eigenspace condensation at excep- tional points, Phys. Rev. B97, 121401 (2018)
2018
-
[39]
Yao and Z
S. Yao and Z. Wang, Edge states and topological invari- ants of non-Hermitian systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 086803 (2018)
2018
-
[40]
F. K. Kunst, E. Edvardsson, J. C. Budich, and E. J. Bergholtz, Biorthogonal bulk-boundary correspondence 7 in non-Hermitian systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 026808 (2018)
2018
-
[41]
C. H. Lee and R. Thomale, Anatomy of skin modes and topology in non-Hermitian systems, Phys. Rev. B99, 201103 (2019)
2019
-
[42]
Yokomizo and S
K. Yokomizo and S. Murakami, Non-Bloch band theory of non-Hermitian systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 066404 (2019)
2019
-
[43]
Brandenbourger, X
M. Brandenbourger, X. Locsin, E. Lerner, and C. Coulais, Non-reciprocal robotic metamaterials, Nat. Commun.10, 4608 (2019)
2019
-
[44]
L. Xiao, T. Deng, K. Wang, G. Zhu, Z. Wang, W. Yi, and P. Xue, Non-Hermitian bulk–boundary correspondence in quantum dynamics, Nat. Phys.16, 761 (2020)
2020
-
[45]
Weidemann, M
S. Weidemann, M. Kremer, T. Helbig, T. Hofmann, A. Stegmaier, M. Greiter, R. Thomale, and A. Szameit, Topological funneling of light, Science368, 311 (2020)
2020
-
[46]
Helbig, T
T. Helbig, T. Hofmann, S. Imhof, M. Abdelghany, T. Kiessling, L. Molenkamp, C. Lee, A. Szameit, M. Gre- iter, and R. Thomale, Generalized bulk–boundary corre- spondence in non-Hermitian topolectrical circuits, Nat. Phys.16, 747 (2020)
2020
-
[47]
Ghatak, M
A. Ghatak, M. Brandenbourger, J. Van Wezel, and C. Coulais, Observation of non-Hermitian topology and its bulk–edge correspondence in an active mechanical metamaterial, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.117, 29561 (2020)
2020
-
[48]
S. Liu, R. Shao, S. Ma, L. Zhang, O. You, H. Wu, Y. J. Xiang, T.J.Cui,andS.Zhang,Non-Hermitianskineffect in a non-Hermitian electrical circuit, Research2021, 1 (2021)
2021
-
[49]
Y. G. Liu, Y. Wei, O. Hemmatyar, G. G. Pyrialakos, P. S. Jung, D. N. Christodoulides, and M. Khajavikhan, Com- plex skin modes in non-Hermitian coupled laser arrays, Light Sci. Appl.11, 336 (2022)
2022
-
[50]
Z. Li, R. Cai, X. Wang, K. Shimomura, C. Lu, Z. Yang, M. Sato, and G. Ma, Exceptional deficiency of non- Hermitian systems, Nat. Phys.22, 962 (2026)
2026
-
[51]
Longhi, D
S. Longhi, D. Gatti, and G. D. Valle, Robust light trans- port in non-Hermitian photonic lattices, Sci. Rep.5, 13376 (2015)
2015
-
[52]
Longhi, Non-Hermitian skin effect and self- acceleration, Phys
S. Longhi, Non-Hermitian skin effect and self- acceleration, Phys. Rev. B105, 245143 (2022)
2022
-
[53]
P. Xue, Q. Lin, K. Wang, L. Xiao, S. Longhi, and W. Yi, Self acceleration from spectral geometry in dissipative quantum-walkdynamics,Nat.Commun.15,4381(2024)
2024
-
[54]
Li and S
H. Li and S. Wan, Dynamic skin effects in non-Hermitian systems, Phys. Rev. B106, L241112 (2022)
2022
-
[55]
S. Guo, C. Dong, F. Zhang, J. Hu, and Z. Yang, Theoreti- cal prediction of a non-Hermitian skin effect in ultracold- atom systems, Phys. Rev. A106, L061302 (2022)
2022
-
[56]
Li, L.-W
Z. Li, L.-W. Wang, X. Wang, Z.-K. Lin, G. Ma, and J.-H. Jiang, Observation of dynamic non-Hermitian skin effects, Nat. Commun.15, 6544 (2024)
2024
-
[57]
Y. He and T. Ozawa, Anomalous wave-packet dynam- ics in one-dimensional non-Hermitian lattices, arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.07484 (2025)
Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025
-
[58]
Beck and M
A. Beck and M. Goldstein, Wavepacket dynamics in pseudo-Hermitian lattices: Coexistence of Hermitian and non-Hermitian wavefronts, Phys. Rev. B113, 224301 (2026)
2026
-
[59]
S. Jana, B. M. Manda, V. Achilleos, D. J. Frantzeskakis, and L. Sirota, Solution of wave acceleration and non- Hermitian jump in nonreciprocal lattices, arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.18287 (2025)
arXiv 2025
-
[60]
N. K. Efremidis and D. N. Christodoulides, Bloch oscil- lations in optical dissipative lattices, Opt. lett.29, 2485 (2004)
2004
-
[61]
Longhi, Exceptional points and Bloch oscillations in non-Hermitian lattices with unidirectional hopping, Eu- rophys
S. Longhi, Exceptional points and Bloch oscillations in non-Hermitian lattices with unidirectional hopping, Eu- rophys. Lett.106, 34001 (2014)
2014
-
[62]
Longhi, Bloch oscillations in non-Hermitian lattices with trajectories in the complex plane, Phys
S. Longhi, Bloch oscillations in non-Hermitian lattices with trajectories in the complex plane, Phys. Rev. A92, 042116 (2015)
2015
-
[63]
Graefe, H
E.-M. Graefe, H. Korsch, and A. Rush, Quasiclassical analysis of Bloch oscillations in non-Hermitian tight- binding lattices, New J. Phys.18, 075009 (2016)
2016
-
[64]
C. Qin, B. Wang, Z. J. Wong, S. Longhi, and P. Lu, Dis- crete diffraction and Bloch oscillations in non-Hermitian frequency lattices induced by complex photonic gauge fields, Phys. Rev. B101, 064303 (2020)
2020
-
[65]
Y. Peng, J. Jie, D. Yu, and Y. Wang, Manipulating the non-Hermitian skin effect via electric fields, Phys. Rev. B106, L161402 (2022)
2022
-
[66]
Y. Qin, K. Zhang, and L. Li, Geometry-dependent skin effect and anisotropic Bloch oscillations in a non- Hermitian optical lattice, Phys. Rev. A109, 023317 (2024)
2024
-
[67]
Zhang, K
H. Zhang, K. Zhang, and Z. Song, Dynamics of non- Hermitian Floquet Wannier–Stark system, New J. Phys. 26, 123020 (2024)
2024
-
[68]
G. S. Fahara-Ojeda, L. A. Tapia-Alarcón, B. M. Villegas- Martínez, G. K. Thiruvathukal, A. F. Neto, S. Gesing, T. Battelle, V. Stankovski, I. A. Bocanegra-Garay, A. Venegas-Gomez,et al., Exact dynamics and Bloch os- cillations in a non-Hermitian zigzag glauber–fock lattice, Physica A Stat. Mech. Appl.675, 130811 (2025)
2025
-
[69]
C. Qin, S. Wang, B. Wang, X. Hu, C. Liu, Y. Li, L. Zhao, H. Ye, S. Longhi, and P. Lu, Temporal Goos-Hänchen shift in synthetic discrete-time heterolattices, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 083802 (2024)
2024
-
[70]
See Supplemental Material for detailed derivations, the- oretical analysis, and additional numerical simulations
-
[71]
Hatano and D
N. Hatano and D. R. Nelson, Localization transitions in non-Hermitian quantum mechanics, Phys. Rev. Lett.77, 570 (1996)
1996
-
[72]
Muschietti and C
L. Muschietti and C. Dum, Real group velocity in a medium with dissipation, Physics of Fluids B: Plasma Physics5, 1383 (1993)
1993
-
[73]
Silberstein, J
N. Silberstein, J. Behrends, M. Goldstein, and R. Ilan, Berry connection induced anomalous wave-packet dy- namics in non-Hermitian systems, Phys. Rev. B102, 245147 (2020)
2020
-
[74]
J. Tao, E. Mercado-Gutierrez, M. Zhao, and I. Spiel- man, Imaginary gauge potentials in a non-Hermitian spin-orbit coupled quantum gas, Phys. Rev. Lett.136, 113401 (2026)
2026
-
[75]
Breid, D
B. Breid, D. Witthaut, and H. Korsch, Bloch–Zener os- cillations, New J. Phys.8, 110 (2006)
2006
-
[76]
Trompeter, T
H. Trompeter, T. Pertsch, F. Lederer, D. Michaelis, U. Streppel, A. Bräuer, and U. Peschel, Visual obser- vation of Zener tunneling, Phys. Rev. Lett.96, 023901 (2006)
2006
-
[77]
D. Cai, A. Bishop, N. Grønbech-Jensen, and M. Salerno, Electric-field-induced nonlinear Bloch oscillations and dynamical localization, Phys. Rev. Lett.74, 1186 (1995)
1995
-
[78]
Weidemann, M
S. Weidemann, M. Kremer, S. Longhi, and A. Szameit, Coexistence of dynamical delocalization and spectral lo- 8 calization through stochastic dissipation, Nat. Photonics 15, 576 (2021)
2021
-
[79]
Leventis, K
A. Leventis, K. Makris, and E. Economou, Non- Hermitian jumps in disordered lattices, Phys. Rev. B 106, 064205 (2022)
2022
-
[80]
Y.-M. R. Hu, E. A. Ostrovskaya, and E. Estrecho, Quan- tum geometric tensor and wavepacket dynamics in two- dimensional non-Hermitian systems, Phys. Rev. Res.7, L012067 (2025)
2025
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.