AdS$_3\times$S$^3$ magnons in the symmetric orbifold

Beat Nairz; Dennis Kempel; Matthias R. Gaberdiel

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 3 cited by

AdS$_3\times$S$^3$ magnons in the symmetric orbifold

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper argues that long collective eigenmodes of the deformed symmetric orbifold are in one-to-one correspondence with the AdS3×S3 BMN string excitations, and that their dispersion relation matches the BMN result to second order.

desk verdict A careful numerical identification of AdS3 x S3 BMN modes as 'long' collective eigenstates in the symmetric orbifold, with the main caveat the uncontrolled large-w extrapolation and an unexplained ad hoc prescription. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.02741 v1 pith:5WPYFGYR submitted 2024-12-03 hep-th

Matthias R. Gaberdiel , Dennis Kempel , Beat Nairz This is my paper · ORCID

classification hep-th

keywords AdS3/CFT2dualitysymmetricorbifoldBMNlimitanomalousdimensionslongcollectivemodesfractionalN=4generatorstwistedsectormagnons

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that the massive string excitations along AdS3 and S3, which appear in the BMN limit of the dual spacetime, are already present in the symmetric orbifold CFT, and that perturbation lifts the degeneracy enough to identify them unambiguously. The authors study the eigenvalues of the anomalous-dimension matrix in the large-w twisted sector of the deformed orbifold and find two classes of eigenstates: 'short' states built from a few fractional torus modes, and one 'long' collective state per momentum built from O(w) products of fractional torus modes. They show that the long states are deformations of the fractional N=4 generators, reduce to those generators for integer momentum, and carry the same second-order anomalous dimension as a single torus magnon. Matching the momentum map and the dispersion relation to O($p^{2}$), they argue that the long modes are in one-to-one correspondence with the BMN oscillators of AdS3 and S3, and that no such mode exists in the positive sectors where none is expected. If correct, this settles whether the AdS3×S3 modes are independent of the torus modes in the dual CFT: they become independent once the theory is deformed.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the long collective eigenmode $\Xi^{-}_{n/w}|w\rangle$, defined as a sum over $O(w)$ products of two fractional torus fermions with coefficients $\xi(n/w;a/w)$, together with its supercharge-generated partners $\Gamma^-$, $\Gamma'^-$, and $\Lambda^-$. The calculation is carried by the large-w anomalous-dimension mixing matrix obtained from the supercharge commutation relations of the companion paper, keeping only two-magnon (or three-magnon) intermediate states; the paper distinguishes short from long eigenstates by the scaling of the $L^1$-norm of the normalised state, $O(1)$ versus $O(w^{1/2})$. The key identity is that the long state's second-order anomalous dimension equals $\epsilon_2(p)=\frac{\sin^2(\pi p)}{1-p}$, the same function as a single torus magnon, and that under the identification in eq. (5.6) this reproduces the BMN dispersion relation to $O(p^2)$.

What would settle it

Diagonalise the full anomalous-dimension matrix with all higher-magnon channels included for a moderately large w, for example w=20, in the negative bilinear sector: if the long eigenstate's eigenvalue deviates from $\epsilon_2(n/w)$ at leading order, or if a spurious long state survives in the $G^-$/L sectors when one anticommutator is used, the identification would fail.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that the fractional N=4 modes, which were proposed years ago as the AdS3×S3 excitations, are not themselves the eigenstates for non-integer momentum. Instead, the true large-w eigenstates are long collective modes such as $\Xi^{-}_{n/w}|w\rangle = -\frac{1}{\sqrt{w+1-n}}\sum_{a=n}^{w}\xi(n/w;a/w)\, \bar\psi^{-}_{1/2+n/w-a/w}\psi^{-}_{-1/2+a/w}|w\rangle$, with coefficients $\xi$ converging to a continuous function of $a/w$ and reducing to a constant when $n/w$ is an integer. Acting with supercharges generates the partner long states $\Gamma^-$, $\Gamma'^-$, and $\Lambda^-$, all of which share the second-order dispersion $\epsilon_2(p)=\frac{\sin^2(\pi p)}{1-p}$. The paper then identifies these modes with the BMN oscillators $a^{S}(n)$, $b^{S}(n)$, $a^{\mathrm{AdS}}(n)$, and $b^{\mathrm{AdS}}(n)$ through the dictionary in eq. (5.6), using the momentum map $p(n)=\frac{n}{\alpha' p_+(1+4\pi^2 g^2)}$ and reproducing the mixed-flux BMN dispersion $\sqrt{\sin^2\alpha + (\cos\alpha \pm n/(\alpha' p_+))^2}$ to $O(p^2)$. Because long modes appear only in the negative sectors and in the physical three-fermion sector, the correspondence is claimed to be exact: these are the AdS3×S3 excitations of the dual string.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing assumption is that the truncated anomalous-dimension matrix, computed from the large-w supercharge commutation relations with only two- or three-magnon intermediate states and the unexplained sum-of-anticommutators prescription, gives the correct large-w eigenstates; the authors checked this against the full higher-magnon calculation only at small w.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

The k=1 symmetric orbifold contains one-to-one counterparts of all massive AdS3 and S3 BMN oscillators, not merely the torus modes.
The AdS3×S3 modes become unambiguous once the orbifold is deformed; at the free point they are hidden among degenerate states.
The BMN dispersion relation with the correct sign choice is reproduced from the CFT side to second order in the momentum.
The absence of long states in the positive sectors explains why the BMN analysis contains no extra oscillators to match.
The long modes are present already at zero coupling, but can only be singled out after perturbation.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the identification is right, the coefficient function $\xi(p;q)$ should be determinable analytically, and a closed form would replace the numerical diagonalisation with a proof of the large-w eigenstate structure.
The unexplained success of the sum-of-anticommutators prescription hints at an exact symmetry in the truncated supercharge algebra; identifying it could turn the numerical long-state construction into an analytic argument.
A natural test is to repeat the analysis starting from the bottom BPS state instead of the top one; symmetry reversal might produce long modes in the positive sectors, which would sharpen the chiral/anti-chiral interpretation.
If the correspondence extends beyond $O(p^2)$, the exact dispersion of the long states would be a direct CFT prediction for the massive AdS3×S3 worldsheet S-matrix at finite coupling.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Let me cut to the chase: this paper gives the most direct evidence so far that the massive AdS3 x S3 BMN modes have concrete counterparts in the symmetric orbifold. The central object is the 'long' eigenstate Ξ− of eq. (2.20), a superposition of O(w) fractional-momentum bilinears with a non-constant coefficient profile ξ(n/w; a/w). The authors show numerically that these states are eigenstates of the anomalous dimension matrix at finite w, and that in the large-w limit their dispersion matches the BMN formula to O(p^2), with the dictionary in eq. (5.6). This goes beyond the old proposals of Lunin-Mathur, Gomis-Motl-Strominger, and Gava-Narain, which identified the modes with fractional N=4 generators but couldn't produce the dispersion; it also directly contradicts Frolov-Sfondrini's claim that such modes are absent.

The paper is careful. There are multiple independent checks: finite-w diagonalization in the bilinear sectors, higher-magnon corrections up to w=12 using the technology of the companion paper [29], a physical three-fermion sector with exact momentum conservation, L1-norm scaling to distinguish short and long states, and counting of the number of long states against the expected BMN oscillators. The authors are transparent about the weak points: they state openly that they do not understand why the sum-of-anticommutators prescription in Sec. 3.2 works, and that the large-w limit is not analytically controlled. They provide the notebooks, so the numerical claims can be checked.

The soft spots are exactly where the stress-test note points. The long states are superpositions of O(w) basis states, so the elementwise O(1/w) errors from the truncated mixing matrix could in principle accumulate to O(1) in the infinite-w limit. The w=12 check with all higher-magnon states, while encouraging, does not control w→∞. The sum-of-anticommutators prescription is genuinely ad hoc: the two anticommutators differ at O(1/w), and the sum is justified only by the fact that it reproduces the full calculation at small w. And the BMN dispersion is matched only to O(p^2), so the dictionary is tested at low momenta.

I don't think these caveats warrant rejection. The identification is concrete, falsifiable, and supported by several independent strands of evidence. But the paper should be honest in the final version that the dictionary is a well-motivated conjecture pinned to a numerical extrapolation, not a proven equality. A good referee should push for either a higher-w check with the full [29] machinery or an analytic argument for the coefficient profile, and for some understanding of the anticommutator-sum rule.

Who is this for? People working on AdS3/CFT2, symmetric orbifolds, and BMN limits. It is not a broad-audience paper, but it answers a specific open question that has been debated in the recent literature. I would send it to review, and I would cite it. I'd also bring it to the group meeting, because it's a nice example of how far numerical diagonalization plus honest caveats can go in a subject where exact methods are scarce.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper studies the spectrum of the symmetric orbifold CFT perturbed away from the tensionless point, working in a large-w twisted sector where the perturbation problem becomes tractable. The authors diagonalize numerically, at finite w, the anomalous-dimension mixing matrices describing two-magnon and three-magnon sectors, and identify a class of 'long' eigenstates that are coherent superpositions of O(w) fractional torus modes. They show that these long states have dispersion relations matching ϵ2(p) = sin²(πp)/(1−p), that they appear only in the expected sectors, and that they are absent from the positive sectors where no AdS3×S3 states are expected. On this basis they propose in eq. (5.6) a one-to-one identification of the long modes with the massive BMN oscillators of AdS3×S3, and claim that the symmetric orbifold at k=1 contains all AdS3 and S3 excitations, not just torus modes.

Significance. If the central identification is correct, the paper resolves a long-standing question about the spacetime interpretation of symmetric-orbifold states at k=1: it shows that the AdS3×S3 excitations are present as collective long modes and are independent from the torus modes once the theory is deformed. The claim is supported by several independent numerical checks, including finite-w diagonalization, inclusion of higher-magnon intermediate states up to w=12, a physical three-fermion sector, L1-norm scaling diagnostics, and comparison with the exact higher-magnon calculation of the companion paper [29]. The ancillary Jupyter and Mathematica notebooks make the numerical evidence reproducible, and the paper is careful to distinguish checked statements from conjectured extrapolations. The main weakness is that the large-w limit is not controlled analytically: the long states are constructed from finite-w numerics, the truncation to low-magnon sectors is justified only by small-w comparisons, and one-sector prescription (the sum of anticommutators in Section 3.2) is explicitly admitted to be not understood.

major comments (3)

[§3.2, eq. (3.9) and surrounding text] The sum-of-anticommutators prescription is load-bearing for the Λ−, G−, and G′− long states, yet the paper states that the two anticommutators differ elementwise at O(1/w) and that 'we do not really understand why this prescription works'. Since a long state is a superposition of O(w) basis states, elementwise O(1/w) errors can in principle accumulate to O(1) corrections to overlaps and eigenvalues. The w=12 comparisons against the full higher-magnon calculation of [29] are encouraging but only probe a single small value of w and a restricted set of states. The claim in Section 5 that Λ−1+p corresponds to the AdS oscillator therefore needs either a quantitative bound on the accumulated error as w→∞, an analytic understanding of why the sum prescription selects the true eigenstate, or a more extensive finite-w scaling study in these sectors.
[§2.3 and §4.3] The higher-magnon checks are restricted to w=12 (and n=1 in the two-magnon case), where the number of states is only 892 and 1778, respectively. The paper's ultimate claim is formulated in the w→∞ limit, where the BMN dictionary applies. The observed agreement at w=12 does not by itself control the extrapolation: the coefficients ξ(n/w; a/w) show singular behavior near the boundaries, and the paper notes that these boundary values are ambiguous at infinite w. To make the central identification robust, the authors should show that the overlap between the truncated-state prediction and the exact eigenstate improves systematically with w, or give some argument that the O(1/w) corrections to the mixing matrix cannot reorganize the long-state structure at arbitrarily large w.
[§5, eqs. (5.5)–(5.6)] The identification with the BMN oscillators is based on a dispersion relation matched only to O(p²) in the small-momentum, small-g expansion, and the dictionary (5.5) is stated without derivation. At this order the Ξ− and Λ− modes have the same leading dispersion, so the assignment aS ↔ Ξ− versus aAdS ↔ Λ− is not distinguished by the energy alone; it relies on the symmetry charges and the reduction to integer modes. Since the one-to-one correspondence is the central claim, the paper should either extend the dispersion comparison to higher order in p (or to finite w/n) or present an independent quantum-number argument that fixes the assignment uniquely. As written, the O(p²) match is suggestive but does not uniquely pin down the proposed dictionary.

minor comments (4)

[§2.1] The 'inert boson' weighting factor δ(w)(m;n) is introduced as an ad hoc device for unphysical states. The paper notes that different choices (e.g. m=n versus m=n−1) give essentially the same results; it would be helpful to state explicitly which prescription was used for the figures and to quantify the sensitivity.
[§2.2, eq. (2.20)] The normalization prefactor 1/√(w+1−n) makes the ξ coefficients O(1), but the boundary behavior of ξ is stated to be ambiguous because of degeneracy with short states. The discussion would be clearer if the figure captions specified which boundary convention was used, and whether the higher-magnon corrections of §2.3 resolve the ambiguity.
[§4.2] The statement that 'the number of long states in the negative sector agrees with the expected number' is checked only for a few values of w up to 140 and for one energy cutoff. It would be useful to present a table of observed versus expected counts for several w and cutoffs.
[§6] The paper honestly lists open questions such as an analytic determination of ξ and the action of right-moving supercharges. These are appropriate for a conclusion, but some of them directly bear on the validity of the dictionary and could be previewed in the introduction.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the long eigenmodes are numerical outputs of an independently defined mixing matrix, and the BMN comparison is an external benchmark.

full rationale

The central identification (long eigenmodes with AdS3×S3 BMN oscillators) is not forced by construction. The long states Ξ, Γ, Γ′, and Λ in eqs. (2.20) and (3.9) are obtained by numerically diagonalizing anomalous-dimension matrices whose entries are built from the large-w commutation relations and three-point functions of [22]; their dispersion is then read off from the numerical eigenvalues (e.g., Figure 3), not imposed as an input. The BMN dispersion relation (5.2) is an external string-theory result, and the matching in Section 5 uses the momentum identification p(n) from [22], which was previously matched to integrability; the long-mode dispersion is not fitted to the BMN formula. The paper does rely heavily on [22] and [29], both by overlapping authors, and Section 3.2 explicitly states that the sum-of-anticommutators prescription is not understood and was checked only at small w (w=12) against [29]; Section 6 also notes that the analysis is numerical for simple cases. These are genuine load-bearing extrapolation and verification risks, but they are not circular: no equation is shown to equal its own input, no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, and the BMN result is not used to select or define the long eigenstates. Accordingly, no circular step can be exhibited, and the appropriate score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central claim is carried by the eigenvalue problem of [22] with two structural ad hoc choices: the inert-boson weighting for unphysical states and the sum-of-anticommutators prescription. No numerical constant is fitted to data in this paper; the wavefunction coefficients ξ are computed as eigenvectors, and the ansatz used to sketch them in Figure 2 is not load-bearing. The BMN comparison is an external benchmark, but the parameter dictionary comes from [22].

assumptions (7)

domain assumption Large-w integrability structure: supercharges act via eqs. (2.2)-(2.4) with exact momentum conservation only at infinite w, giving dispersion (2.6).
Taken from [22] (two authors are co-authors here); used as starting point for all mixing matrix computations.
domain assumption Truncation to the lowest magnon 'head' with only two-magnon (later three-magnon) intermediate states correctly gives the large-w limit.
Justified by [29] for ordinary quantities; checked here only up to w=12 for long states (Sections 2.3, 4.3).
ad hoc to paper Weighting factor δ(w)(m;n) models momentum conservation on unphysical states via an inert boson.
Introduced in Section 2.1 and footnote 6; authors state alternative prescriptions give essentially the same results, and the physical 3-magnon sector avoids the need for it.
ad hoc to paper In the G−, G′−, and L sectors, the sum of the two anticommutators {S1,Q1}+{S2,Q2} gives the correct eigenstates.
Section 3.2: authors state 'we do not really understand why this prescription works'; verified against [29] only for small w.
standard math Physical states must satisfy the orbifold invariance condition that total left and right momenta agree up to an integer.
Standard condition, imposed in Section 4; needed to show long eigenstates are not artifacts of unphysical states.
domain assumption The dictionary 2πg = g_s q_R and p(n) = n/(α' p_+) in eq. (5.5) connects orbifold momentum to BMN momentum.
Taken from [22]; essential for matching the BMN dispersion relation (5.2).
domain assumption Choice of chiral primary BPS state (K3_0 = j) selects which sectors contain long eigenstates.
Section 3.1 footnote 10: authors checked that alternative BPS states give the same qualitative results.

invented entities (1)

Long collective eigenmodes Ξ−_{n/w}, Γ−, Γ′−, Λ− (eqs. (2.20), (3.9)) independent evidence
purpose: CFT-side states proposed to represent the AdS3 × S3 BMN string excitations; they are superpositions of O(w) products of fractional torus modes with nontrivial profile ξ(n/w; a/w).
Not a new fundamental field but a new composite state or operator; it has external falsifiable handles: the dispersion relation matches BMN, the counting is one-to-one, and no analogous long mode appears in the positive K+ sector.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of AdS$_3\times$S$^3$ magnons in the symmetric orbifold." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/5WPYFGYR

@misc{pith2026241202741,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: AdS$_3\times$S$^3$ magnons in the symmetric orbifold},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/5WPYFGYR}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.02741}
}

abstract

The AdS$_3\times$S$^3$ excitations of string theory on AdS$_3\times$S$^3\times \mathbb{T}^4$ are identified with certain collective modes in the dual symmetric orbifold. Our identification follows from a careful study of the conformal eigenstates in the perturbed orbifold theory. We find that, in addition to the fractional torus modes (that correspond to the torus excitations in the dual AdS spacetime), there are `long' collective eigenmodes that involve a superposition of products of fractional torus modes, and that are in natural one-to-one correspondence with the expected AdS$_3\times$S$^3$ excitations. These collective modes are deformations of (fractional) $\mathcal{N}=4$ modes, to which they reduce for integer momentum.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

Demystifying the Massless Sector in AdS_3 Quantum Spectral Curve
hep-th 2024-12 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

Massless modes in the AdS3 x S3 x T4 quantum spectral curve are shown to emerge as zeros on the branch cut, yielding Bethe equations and uniquely constrained dressing phases.
Wilson loop in AdS$_3 \times S^3 \times T^4$ from quantum M2 brane
hep-th 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

The 1-loop M2-brane partition function for the Wilson loop in AdS3 x S3 x T4 equals kappa over sqrt(2 pi) with no higher-genus string corrections.
The Triplet Perturbation of the Symmetric Orbifold
hep-th 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

The triplet perturbation of the T4 symmetric orbifold is shown to preserve the same integrable structure as the singlet and is identified with the self-dual R-R 2-form modulus in AdS3/CFT2.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

30 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages · cited by 3 Pith papers

[29]

Anomalous dimensions in the symmetric orbifold,

M.R. Gaberdiel, F. Lichtner and B. Nairz, “Anomalous dimensions in the symmetric orbifold,” arXiv:2411.17612 [hep-th]

arXiv
[1]

Tensionless string spectra on AdS 3,

M.R. Gaberdiel and R. Gopakumar, “Tensionless string spectra on AdS 3,” JHEP 1805 (2018) 085 [arXiv:1803.04423 [hep-th]]

arXiv 2018
[2]

The Worldsheet Dual of the Symmetric Product CFT,

L. Eberhardt, M.R. Gaberdiel and R. Gopakumar, “The Worldsheet Dual of the Symmetric Product CFT,” JHEP 04 (2019) 103 [arXiv:1812.01007 [hep-th]]

arXiv 2019
[3]

Deriving the AdS 3/CFT2 correspondence,

L. Eberhardt, M.R. Gaberdiel and R. Gopakumar, “Deriving the AdS 3/CFT2 correspondence,” JHEP 02 (2020) 136 [arXiv:1911.00378 [hep-th]]

arXiv 2020
[4]

Microscopic formulation of black holes in string theory,

J.R. David, G. Mandal and S.R. Wadia, “Microscopic formulation of black holes in string theory,” Phys. Rept. 369 (2002) 549-686 [hep-th/0203048]

arXiv 2002
[5]

Rotating deformations of AdS 3 × S3, the orbifold CFT and strings in the pp wave limit,

O. Lunin and S. D. Mathur, “Rotating deformations of AdS 3 × S3, the orbifold CFT and strings in the pp wave limit,” Nucl. Phys. B 642 (2002) 91-113 [hep-th/0206107]

arXiv 2002
[6]

PP wave / CFT 2 duality,

J. Gomis, L. Motl and A. Strominger, “PP wave / CFT 2 duality,” JHEP 11 (2002) 016 [hep-th/0206166]

arXiv 2002
[7]

Proving the PP wave / CFT 2 duality,

E. Gava and K.S. Narain, “Proving the PP wave / CFT 2 duality,” JHEP 12 (2002) 023 [hep-th/0208081]

arXiv 2002

Show all 30 references

[8]

Giant magnons in the D1-D5 system,

J.R. David and B. Sahoo, “Giant magnons in the D1-D5 system,” JHEP 07 (2008) 033 [arXiv:0804.3267 [hep-th]]. – 25 –

2008 arXiv
[9]

Diagrams for Symmetric Product Orbifolds,

A. Pakman, L. Rastelli and S.S. Razamat, “Diagrams for Symmetric Product Orbifolds,” JHEP 10 (2009) 034 [arXiv:0905.3448 [hep-th]]

2009 arXiv
[10]

A Spin Chain for the Symmetric Product CFT2,

A. Pakman, L. Rastelli and S.S. Razamat, “A Spin Chain for the Symmetric Product CFT2,” JHEP 05 (2010) 099 [arXiv:0912.0959 [hep-th]]

2010 arXiv
[11]

Operator mixing for string states in the D1-D5 CFT near the orbifold point,

B.A. Burrington, A.W. Peet and I.G. Zadeh, “Operator mixing for string states in the D1-D5 CFT near the orbifold point,” Phys. Rev. D 87 (2013) no.10, 106001 [arXiv:1211.6699 [hep-th]]

2013 arXiv
[12]

Higgsing the stringy higher spin symmetry,

M.R. Gaberdiel, C. Peng and I.G. Zadeh, “Higgsing the stringy higher spin symmetry,” JHEP 10 (2015) 101 [arXiv:1506.02045 [hep-th]]

2015 arXiv
[13]

Lifting of D1-D5-P states,

S. Hampton, S.D. Mathur and I.G. Zadeh, “Lifting of D1-D5-P states,” JHEP 01 (2019) 075 [arXiv:1804.10097 [hep-th]]

2019 arXiv
[14]

Lifting of level-1 states in the D1-D5 CFT,

B. Guo and S.D. Mathur, “Lifting of level-1 states in the D1-D5 CFT,” JHEP 03 (2020) 028 [arXiv:1912.05567 [hep-th]]

2020 arXiv
[15]

Microstate Renormalization in Deformed D1-D5 SCFT,

A.A. Lima, G.M. Sotkov and M. Stanishkov, “Microstate Renormalization in Deformed D1-D5 SCFT,” Phys. Lett. B 808 (2020) 135630 [arXiv:2005.06702 [hep-th]]

2020 arXiv
[16]

Lifting at higher levels in the D1-D5 CFT,

B. Guo and S.D. Mathur, “Lifting at higher levels in the D1-D5 CFT,” JHEP 11 (2020) 145 [arXiv:2008.01274 [hep-th]]

2020 arXiv
[17]

Lifting 1/4-BPS states in AdS 3× S3× T4,

N. Benjamin, C.A. Keller and I.G. Zadeh, “Lifting 1/4-BPS states in AdS 3× S3× T4,” JHEP 10 (2021) 089 [arXiv:2107.00655 [hep-th]]

2021 arXiv
[18]

Deforming symmetric product orbifolds: a tale of moduli and higher spin currents,

L. Apolo, A. Belin, S. Bintanja, A. Castro and C.A. Keller, “Deforming symmetric product orbifolds: a tale of moduli and higher spin currents,” JHEP 08 (2022) 159 [arXiv:2204.07590 [hep-th]]

2022 arXiv
[19]

Universal lifting in the D1-D5 CFT,

B. Guo, M.R.R. Hughes, S.D. Mathur and M. Mehta, “Universal lifting in the D1-D5 CFT,” JHEP 10 (2022) 148 [arXiv:2208.07409 [hep-th]]

2022 arXiv
[20]

Lifting of superconformal descendants in the D1-D5 CFT,

M.R.R. Hughes, S.D. Mathur and M. Mehta, “Lifting of superconformal descendants in the D1-D5 CFT,” arXiv:2311.00052 [hep-th]

arXiv
[21]

Lifting 1 4 -BPS States on K3 and Mathieu Moonshine,

C.A. Keller and I.G. Zadeh, “Lifting 1 4 -BPS States on K3 and Mathieu Moonshine,” Commun. Math. Phys. 377 (2020) 225-257 [arXiv:1905.00035 [hep-th]]

2020 arXiv
[22]

Beyond the tensionless limit: integrability in the symmetric orbifold,

M.R. Gaberdiel, R. Gopakumar and B. Nairz, “Beyond the tensionless limit: integrability in the symmetric orbifold,” JHEP 06 (2024) 030 [arXiv:2312.13288 [hep-th]]

2024 arXiv
[23]

Strings in flat space and pp waves from N=4 superYang-Mills,

D.E. Berenstein, J.M. Maldacena and H.S. Nastase, “Strings in flat space and pp waves from N=4 superYang-Mills,” JHEP 04 (2002) 013 [hep-th/0202021]

2002 arXiv
[24]

Integrability and the AdS 3/CFT2 correspondence,

A. Babichenko, B. Stefanski, Jr. and K. Zarembo, “Integrability and the AdS 3/CFT2 correspondence,” JHEP 03 (2010) 058 [arXiv:0912.1723 [hep-th]]

2010 arXiv
[25]

Giant magnon solution and dispersion relation in string theory in AdS 3 × S3 × T4 with mixed flux,

B. Hoare, A. Stepanchuk and A.A. Tseytlin, “Giant magnon solution and dispersion relation in string theory in AdS 3 × S3 × T4 with mixed flux,” Nucl. Phys. B 879 (2014) 318-347 [arXiv:1311.1794 [hep-th]]

2014 arXiv
[26]

The all-loop integrable spin-chain for strings on AdS 3 × S3 × T4: the massive sector,

R. Borsato, O. Ohlsson Sax, A. Sfondrini, B. Stefa´ nski and A. Torrielli, “The all-loop integrable spin-chain for strings on AdS 3 × S3 × T4: the massive sector,” JHEP 08 (2013) 043 [arXiv:1303.5995 [hep-th]]. – 26 –

2013 arXiv
[27]

The complete worldsheet S matrix of superstrings on AdS 3× S3× T4 with mixed three-form flux,

T. Lloyd, O. Ohlsson Sax, A. Sfondrini and B. Stefa´ nski, Jr., “The complete worldsheet S matrix of superstrings on AdS 3× S3× T4 with mixed three-form flux,” Nucl. Phys. B 891 (2015) 570-612 [arXiv:1410.0866 [hep-th]]

2015 arXiv
[28]

Comments on integrability in the symmetric orbifold,

S. Frolov and A. Sfondrini, “Comments on integrability in the symmetric orbifold,” JHEP 08 (2024) 179 [arXiv:2312.14114 [hep-th]]

2024 arXiv
[30]

On string theory on AdS 3 × S3 × T4 with mixed 3-form flux: tree-level S-matrix,

B. Hoare and A.A. Tseytlin, “On string theory on AdS 3 × S3 × T4 with mixed 3-form flux: tree-level S-matrix,” Nucl. Phys. B 873 (2013) 682 [arXiv:1303.1037 [hep-th]]. – 27 –

2013 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [29]

Anomalous dimensions in the symmetric orbifold,

M.R. Gaberdiel, F. Lichtner and B. Nairz, “Anomalous dimensions in the symmetric orbifold,” arXiv:2411.17612 [hep-th]

arXiv

[2] [1]

Tensionless string spectra on AdS 3,

M.R. Gaberdiel and R. Gopakumar, “Tensionless string spectra on AdS 3,” JHEP 1805 (2018) 085 [arXiv:1803.04423 [hep-th]]

arXiv 2018

[3] [2]

The Worldsheet Dual of the Symmetric Product CFT,

L. Eberhardt, M.R. Gaberdiel and R. Gopakumar, “The Worldsheet Dual of the Symmetric Product CFT,” JHEP 04 (2019) 103 [arXiv:1812.01007 [hep-th]]

arXiv 2019

[4] [3]

Deriving the AdS 3/CFT2 correspondence,

L. Eberhardt, M.R. Gaberdiel and R. Gopakumar, “Deriving the AdS 3/CFT2 correspondence,” JHEP 02 (2020) 136 [arXiv:1911.00378 [hep-th]]

arXiv 2020

[5] [4]

Microscopic formulation of black holes in string theory,

J.R. David, G. Mandal and S.R. Wadia, “Microscopic formulation of black holes in string theory,” Phys. Rept. 369 (2002) 549-686 [hep-th/0203048]

arXiv 2002

[6] [5]

Rotating deformations of AdS 3 × S3, the orbifold CFT and strings in the pp wave limit,

O. Lunin and S. D. Mathur, “Rotating deformations of AdS 3 × S3, the orbifold CFT and strings in the pp wave limit,” Nucl. Phys. B 642 (2002) 91-113 [hep-th/0206107]

arXiv 2002

[7] [6]

PP wave / CFT 2 duality,

J. Gomis, L. Motl and A. Strominger, “PP wave / CFT 2 duality,” JHEP 11 (2002) 016 [hep-th/0206166]

arXiv 2002

[8] [7]

Proving the PP wave / CFT 2 duality,

E. Gava and K.S. Narain, “Proving the PP wave / CFT 2 duality,” JHEP 12 (2002) 023 [hep-th/0208081]

arXiv 2002