REVIEW 1 cited by
Cost-effective multi-fidelity strategy for the optimization of high-Reynolds number turbine flows guided by LES
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
A cost-effective multi-objective shape optimization strategy is proposed for high-Reynolds number flows involving complex phenomena such as boundary layer transition, shock-wave interactions, and turbulent wakes. These processes are poorly captured by Reynolds-Averaged Navier--Stokes (RANS) models, necessitating higher-fidelity approaches like Large Eddy Simulation (LES). However, LES is computationally prohibitive at high Reynolds numbers, making its direct use in optimization impractical. To address this, we introduce a low-dimensional design space representation using Singular Value Decomposition (SVD) and construct a multi-fidelity co-Kriging (MFK) surrogate model combining wall-resolved LES (WRLES) and RANS. Adaptive infill criteria are employed to strategically enrich the surrogate model within a limited computational budget (fewer than 10 LES samples). The methodology is applied to optimize a supersonic turbine vane for Organic Rankine Cycles (ORC), operating at Reynolds numbers of $\sim 10^6$. While RANS-LES correlation weakens near the optimal region, the MFK model outperforms single-fidelity Kriging (SFK) trained on the same LES data, effectively leveraging both abundant low-fidelity and scarce high-fidelity data. RANS accurately predicts global objective function trends but fails to resolve key flow features, whereas the MFK model captures fine-detail geometry trends from LES. Loss analysis reveals that LES is essential for identifying performance-detrimental mechanisms, while RANS-only optimization yields sub-optimal designs.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Bayesian and non-Bayesian multi-fidelity surrogate models for multi-objective aerodynamic optimization under extreme cost imbalance
AR1 co-kriging with Bayesian infill outperforms multi-fidelity neural networks with non-Bayesian infill on an outlet guide vane problem under a 20-sample high-fidelity budget, and POD dimension reduction improves ever...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.