Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Paraphrase and Solve: Exploring and Exploiting the Impact of Surface Form on Mathematical Reasoning in Large Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2404.11500 v1 pith:5Y77NGQW submitted 2024-04-17 cs.CL cs.AI

classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords reasoningsurfacelanguageformmathematicallargemodelsproblem
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

This paper studies the relationship between the surface form of a mathematical problem and its solvability by large language models. We find that subtle alterations in the surface form can significantly impact the answer distribution and the solve rate, exposing the language model's lack of robustness and sensitivity to the surface form in reasoning through complex problems. To improve mathematical reasoning performance, we propose Self-Consistency-over-Paraphrases (SCoP), which diversifies reasoning paths from specific surface forms of the problem. We evaluate our approach on four mathematics reasoning benchmarks over three large language models and show that SCoP improves mathematical reasoning performance over vanilla self-consistency, particularly for problems initially deemed unsolvable. Finally, we provide additional experiments and discussion regarding problem difficulty and surface forms, including cross-model difficulty agreement and paraphrasing transferability, and Variance of Variations (VOV) for language model evaluation.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Same Question, Different Answers: Evaluating LLM Reliability Beyond Accuracy

    cs.AI 2026-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Models flip between correct and incorrect answers on over 23% of questions under meaning-preserving paraphrases, so single-prompt accuracy overstates reliable knowledge.

  2. When to Vote, When to Rewrite: Disagreement-Guided Strategy Routing for Test-Time Scaling

    cs.AI 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    A disagreement-guided routing framework dynamically selects among resolution, voting, and rewriting strategies for test-time scaling, delivering 3-7% accuracy gains with lower sampling cost on mathematical benchmarks.

  3. Representation Robustness Under Executable Reasoning Constraints in Large Language Models for Mathematical Problem Solving

    cs.AI 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    LLM math accuracy varies across equivalent problem representations, and executable-reasoning scaffolding redistributes rather than removes the errors.

Pith tools