Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

DarkNESS: developing a skipper-CCD instrument to search for Dark Matter from Low Earth Orbit

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read DarkNESS claims that a 6U CubeSat carrying four skipper-CCDs will be the first space deployment of this sensor technology and can search for two dark-matter signatures from low Earth orbit: keV X-ray lines from decaying dark matter and…

desk verdict DarkNESS is a credible mission-status paper with real engineering progress; the DM sensitivity curves are borrowed and the in-orbit Cherenkov background is unquantified, but the mission case holds up well enough to merit full review. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.12084 v1 pith:5YEJNGFU submitted 2024-12-16 astro-ph.IM

Phoenix Alpine , Samriddhi Bhatia , Fernando Chierchie , Alex Drlica-Wagner , Rouven Essig , Juan Estrada , Erez Etzion , Roni Harnik
show 3 more authors
Michael Lembeck Nathan Saffold Sho Uemura
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.IM
keywords darkmatterskipper-CCDCubeSatlowEarthorbitsub-GeVX-rayspectroscopysingle-electronreadoutspace-baseddetector
topics Dark Matter
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper seeks to establish that a 6U CubeSat carrying four skipper-CCDs can operate as a dark-matter observatory from low Earth orbit, and that this will be the first space deployment of the sensor technology. Its central claim is that the instrument can reach unexplored parameter space in two dark-matter searches at once: O(keV) X-ray lines from decaying dark matter observed toward the Galactic Center, and electron recoils from strongly interacting sub-GeV dark matter observed toward Cygnus. The paper supports this with laboratory results, including sub-electron readout noise, Fano-limited X-ray energy resolution, and proton-irradiation tests, and with a mission design that fits the CubeSat platform. If correct, the mission would open space-based single-electron-counting imaging and set new constraints in two dark-matter regimes.

What carries the argument

The central object is the skipper-CCD, a silicon charge-coupled device whose amplifier reads each pixel's charge many times without destroying it, so the readout noise can be averaged below one electron. DarkNESS packages four such fully depleted sensors in a multi-chip module read by a compact space-LTA electronics stack, cooled to 170 K by a cryocooler, and shielded from stray light by only about 100 nm of aluminum. The payload's wide 20-degree-per-pixel field of view replaces X-ray optics, and the combination of sub-electron noise and Fano-limited energy resolution is what lets a single small CubeSat carry out both single-electron recoil searches and keV X-ray spectroscopy.

What would settle it

Measure the single-electron event rate in the four science CCDs during the first weeks of on-orbit operations, after applying the high-energy-hit masking and selection criteria, and compare it with the background model used for the sensitivity projections; if the residual rate exceeds that model, the 0.1 gram-month electron-recoil reach and the 25-hour X-ray line sensitivity will not be achieved.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

This paper reports the design, laboratory validation, and mission status of the DarkNESS CubeSat observatory, which it describes as the first planned space deployment of skipper-CCDs. It claims that four 1.35-megapixel skipper-CCDs with sub-electron readout noise can, from low Earth orbit, detect both X-ray lines from decaying dark matter in the 1-10 keV range and electron recoils from strongly interacting sub-GeV dark matter. The projected sensitivities are a 0.1 gram-month exposure for the electron-recoil search, using about 450 ten-minute Cygnus observations, and roughly 25 hours of Galactic-Center exposure for the X-ray line search, with a total of about 1 Ms of observations planned. The paper argues the design is feasible based on measured energy resolution near 50 eV at 6 keV, demonstration of single-electron peaks at 0.2 e- noise, and proton-irradiation tests at four times the expected one-year fluence that left the skipper amplifiers undamaged.

Load-bearing premise

The projected dark-matter sensitivities assume the low-energy background in orbit can be reduced to the level of the modeled background, but the paper gives no measured residual rate after the imaging selection that would remove Cherenkov photons from ionizing radiation.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the sensitivities are achieved, DarkNESS will set the first space-based constraints on strongly interacting sub-GeV dark matter above the cross-section range accessible to underground detectors.
  • The same flight would demonstrate that sub-electron-noise skipper readout survives the radiation, thermal, and vibration environment of low Earth orbit, making the technology available for future X-ray and single-electron space imagers.
  • With roughly 1 Ms of Galactic-Center observations, DarkNESS would produce an independent 1-10 keV line search complementary to existing X-ray observatories, including a new look at the disputed 3.5 keV line region.
  • The mission's orbit-agnostic design and do-no-harm rideshare approach mean the payload can be launched without constraining the host mission.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the Cherenkov background proves higher than modeled, the dark-matter reach would degrade, but the mission would still qualify skipper-CCD readout in space, which is the enabling step for future single-electron-counting space observatories.
  • Because the payload uses passive apertures instead of X-ray optics, several identical CubeSats could be flown in a constellation, accumulating the large field-of-view exposure faster than one unit.
  • The residual-background question could be settled before launch with a ground test that places a prototype module in a beam or radioactive environment mimicking LEO ionizing radiation and measures the post-mask event rate.
  • An independent measurement of the 3.5 keV region by DarkNESS would add a new systematic to the ongoing debate, and even a null result would help distinguish astrophysical from dark-matter interpretations.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper reports the development and current status of the DarkNESS mission, a 6U CubeSat that will carry four skipper-CCDs to Low Earth Orbit to search for dark matter. The science case has two parts: (i) a search for electron recoils from strongly interacting sub-GeV dark matter toward Cygnus, using the sub-electron readout noise of skipper-CCDs, and (ii) a search for monoenergetic X-ray lines from decaying dark matter toward the Galactic Center. The paper describes the instrument design (Multi-Chip Module, space-LTA readout, Ricor cryocooler, 170 K thermal control, 6U CubeSat integration), the expected exposures (0.1 gram-month for the sub-GeV search and ~1 Ms for the X-ray line search), and the laboratory validation status, including 55Fe spectra with 0.2 e- noise, 50 eV Fano-limited resolution at 6 keV, proton irradiation at four times the expected one-year fluence, and thermal-vacuum tests demonstrating 15-minute umbral observations at 170 K. The paper also summarizes the mission architecture, orbit considerations, and the planned launch through the Firefly DREAM 2.0 program.

Significance. If the mission performs as projected, DarkNESS would be the first space deployment of skipper-CCDs and would demonstrate a path for future space-based single-electron-counting and X-ray imaging instruments. The paper's engineering claims are supported by concrete laboratory results: sub-electron noise, Fano-limited X-ray spectroscopy, radiation tolerance at four times the expected fluence, and thermal-vacuum testing with a realistic 15-minute umbral duty cycle. The mission design is requirements-driven and presents a credible CubeSat integration. The main weakness is that the scientific sensitivity projections are not fully secured by the manuscript: the low-energy background from Cherenkov radiation in LEO is not quantified, and the exposure used for the X-ray line search appears inconsistent between the text and the figure. These gaps affect the central scientific claims rather than the engineering readiness, and they are addressable in revision.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. 3.3 and Sec. 2.1] The low-energy dark-matter sensitivity relies on a 50% pixel-selection efficiency after masking, but the Cherenkov background from LEO radiation is not quantified. The text identifies Cherenkov photons from ionizing radiation (Refs. [49,50]) and refers to a SENSEI-style imaging mask, yet it gives no expected Cherenkov event rate, no masked pixel fraction for the DarkNESS orbit including South Atlantic Anomaly passages, and no residual few-electron rate after cuts. With the quoted trapped-proton fluence of 9e8 cm^-2 yr^-1 (about 28 cm^-2 s^-1), the transferability of the underground SENSEI mask is not demonstrated. Without such numbers, the '0.1 gram-month' exposure and the corresponding discovery reach in Fig. 1 are not secured.
  2. [Sec. 2.2 and Fig. 1 (right)] The exposure used for the projected decaying-dark-matter sensitivity is internally inconsistent. The text states that more than 1,200 Galactic-center observations of 15 min each accumulate about 1 Ms, while the figure caption and the text quote a 25 h exposure for the projected 90% C.L. limit. These differ by more than an order of magnitude (1 Ms = 277.8 h). The figure must be regenerated with the actual mission exposure, or the text corrected, before the projected limit can be interpreted.
  3. [Sec. 2.2] The X-ray line-search projection assumes the Galactic Center background model of Ref. [10] but does not demonstrate that DarkNESS in LEO can reach that background. The paper does not fold in Cherenkov emission from the LEO radiation environment, particle tracks, or any induced background in the 1-10 keV band. A quantitative background budget for the X-ray analysis should be provided; otherwise the comparison with XMM, NuSTAR, Suzaku, and CXO in Fig. 1 is not meaningful.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Sec. 3.1 and Fig. 2a] The CCD array is described both as '1.3 Mpix' and '1.35 Mpix'; please harmonize the values.
  2. [Table 1 and Sec. 2.1] MIR-7 notes one raw image downlinked per day, while Sec. 2.1 assumes about 450 Cygnus observations; clarify whether onboard histograms are sufficient for the dark-matter search or whether the raw-image downlink budget supports 450 images.
  3. [Fig. 10] The caption calls the assembly the 'Multi-Camera Module,' while the text defines it as the 'Multi-Chip Module'; please correct the caption.
  4. [References] Refs. [8] and [9] are the same paper (Emken, Essig, Kouvaris, Sholapurkar, JCAP 1909 (2019) 070); merge them to avoid duplication.
  5. [Sec. 2.1 and Sec. 3.1] The paper quotes '~100 nm Al' as minimal shielding in Sec. 2.1 but describes a 500 nm aluminum layer on the detector front in Sec. 3.1; clarify which layer is the relevant stopping material for the dark-matter interaction.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: DarkNESS sensitivity curves are taken from peer-reviewed external analyses and the central instrument-design claims are supported by direct laboratory measurements and engineering tests.

full rationale

The paper does not derive its sensitivity curves from first principles; it explicitly imports them from external work. The strongly-interacting sub-GeV reach is labeled 'See Ref. [9] for more details' (Sec. 2.1), and the X-ray decay limit assumes a Galactic Center background model from Ref. [10] (Fig. 1 caption). Ref. [9] (Emken, Essig, Kouvaris, Sholapurkar, JCAP 2019) shares an author with DarkNESS, but it is a published, parameter-free analysis that does not use DarkNESS data or parameters; the DarkNESS-specific input is only the exposure arithmetic (2 g active mass, 450 ten-minute Cygnus observations, 50% pixel retention, yielding 0.1 gram-month). That is an assumption, not a fitted quantity renamed as a prediction. The Cherenkov low-energy background in Sec. 3.3 is acknowledged qualitatively and mitigation via tunable imaging masks (Ref. [30]) is stated; no quantitative residual-rate or masking-fraction prediction is made, so there is no circular claim to reduce. The laboratory evidence for sub-electron noise, 50 eV Fano-limited X-ray resolution, proton-irradiation tolerance, and thermal performance is direct measurement, not derived from the scientific projections. Self-citations to SENSEI, Oscura, and the LTA electronics document prior collaboration work, but these results are experimentally grounded and are not used as the load-bearing justification for the mission's feasibility. The unquantified in-orbit Cherenkov background is a legitimate correctness/risk concern, not a circularity, and is explicitly flagged in Sec. 3.3.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The ledger is small because the paper makes no new physics claim. The three free parameters are exposure and selection assumptions that set the scale of the projected sensitivity curves. The model assumptions are imported from the cited literature, and the paper introduces no new particles, forces, or conserved quantities.

free parameters (3)
  • Assumed sub-GeV DM exposure = 0.1 gram-month
    Used to compute the projected reach in Fig. 1 (left); derived from 450 Cygnus observations of 10 minutes each and a 50% pixel selection efficiency, not from measured data.
  • Assumed X-ray line search exposure = 25 hours
    Used for the projected 90% C.L. upper limit in Fig. 1 (right); a subset of the 1 Ms total planned Galactic Center exposure.
  • Pixel selection efficiency after masking = 50%
    Assumed fraction of exposed pixels retained after masking high-energy hits; directly scales the 0.1 gram-month exposure.
assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption The projected sub-GeV reach assumes dark matter interacts with electrons via an ultralight dark photon mediator (Ref. [8,9]).
    The left panel of Fig. 1 and the quoted cross-section reach are computed within this model in the cited papers, not in this paper.
  • domain assumption The projected X-ray line limit assumes the Galactic Center X-ray background model of Ref. [10].
    The right panel of Fig. 1 uses this background model; a different background would change the limit.
  • domain assumption A sterile neutrino of O(keV) mass decaying to an X-ray photon and an active neutrino can constitute dark matter.
    Motivates the 1-10 keV X-ray line search (Sec. 2.2). Recent literature cited by the paper (Refs. [12,23-26]) disfavors the specific 3.5 keV line interpretation.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of DarkNESS: developing a skipper-CCD instrument to search for Dark Matter from Low Earth Orbit." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/5YEJNGFU

@misc{pith2026241212084,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: DarkNESS: developing a skipper-CCD instrument to search for Dark Matter from Low Earth Orbit},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/5YEJNGFU}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.12084}
}
read the original abstract

The DarkNESS (Dark Matter Nano-satellite Equipped with Skipper Sensors) mission aims to deploy a skipper-CCD CubeSat Observatory to search for dark matter (DM) from Low Earth Orbit. This mission will employ novel skipper-CCDs to investigate O(keV) X-rays from decaying DM, as well as electron recoils from strongly-interacting sub-GeV DM. The DarkNESS mission will be the first space deployment of skipper-CCDs, and the DarkNESS team is developing a skipper-CCD instrument that is compatible with the CubeSat platform. DarkNESS has recently progressed from laboratory validation to a Critical Design Review (CDR) phase, with a launch opportunity anticipated in late 2025. The implementation of the DarkNESS skipper-CCD payload on the CubeSat platform will pave the way for future demonstrators of space-based imagers for X-ray and single-electron counting applications.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.12084 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2: A) The Multi-Chip Module (MCM) designed, built, and tested for DarkNESS features the four [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (9 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: Energy spectrum of 5.9 keV and 6.5 keV X-rays from a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: Four CCDs in the sample holder are presented for the proton beam exposure (left). The proton [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: DarkNESS concept of operations: The Launch Vehicle (A) delivers the Observatory to LEO, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7: Key CubeSat features include three body-mounted radiator panels, a dual-deployable solar array, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8: DarkNESS subsystem configuration proposed by KNA. Subsystems are shown with the key data [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9: Left: Design of the DarkNESS CubeSat configuration. The 6U CubeSat has dimensions 30 cm x [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10: The instrument assembly with the Ricor cryocooler interfaced to the Multi-Camera Module [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11: Results from TVAC tests at LASSI-UIUC. The chamber was maintained at 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12: Earth obstruction considerations for imaging the galactic center with DarkNESS with an initial [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_12.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Searching for Dark Matter with MeVCube

    hep-ph 2025-01 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Using Fisher forecasting, the author shows that a 2U to 12U MeVCube CubeSat could probe new dark matter parameter space for evaporating primordial black holes and MeV-scale decaying or annihilating dark matter.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

53 extracted references · 29 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Sunlit Orbit: Solar panel to sun tracking (primary) / Radiator to dark space (secondary)

    work page

  2. [2]

    Umbral Science: X-ray detector to inertial target (primary) / Radiator to dark space (secondary)

    work page

  3. [3]

    Do-No-Harm

    Ground Station T racking:S-band radio to GS (primary) / Instrument (+Z) to ram (secondary) Thermal MIR-10: Passive thermal system components shall include two frame-mounted ra- diator panels and thermal straps transporting heat from the active cryocooler. note: Ricor K508N cryocooler removes heat from the focal plane assembly for trans- port via passive e...

    work page

  4. [4]

    Aghanim et al., Planck 2018 results , Astronomy & Astrophysics 641 (2020) A6

    N. Aghanim et al., Planck 2018 results , Astronomy & Astrophysics 641 (2020) A6

    work page 2020

  5. [5]

    Arbey and F

    A. Arbey and F. Mahmoudi, Dark matter and the early Universe: A review , Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics 119 (2021) 103865

    work page 2021

  6. [6]

    Akerib, P.B

    D.S. Akerib, P.B. Cushman, C.E. Dahl, R. Ebadi, A. Fan, R.J. Gaitskell et al., Snowmass2021 cosmic frontier dark matter direct detection to the neutrino fog , 2022

    work page 2022

  7. [7]

    Clary, K.P

    M.C. Clary, K.P. Klaasen, L.M. Snyder and P.K. Wang, 800 x 800 Charge-Coupled Device (CCD) Camera For The Galileo Jupiter Orbiter Mission , in Recent Advances in TV Sensors and Systems , C. Freeman, ed., vol. 0203, pp. 98 – 108, International Society for Optics and Photonics, SPIE, 1979, DOI

    work page 1979

  8. [8]

    Trauger, Sensors for the Hubble Space Telescope Wide Field and Planetary Cameras (1 and 2)

    J.T. Trauger, Sensors for the Hubble Space Telescope Wide Field and Planetary Cameras (1 and 2). , in CCDs in astronomy, G.H. Jacoby, ed., vol. 8 of Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series , pp. 217–230, Jan., 1990

    work page 1990

Show all 53 references
  1. [9]

    Adari, I.M

    SENSEI Collaboration, P. Adari, I.M. Bloch, A.M. Botti, M. Cababie, G. Cancelo et al., SENSEI: First Direct-Detection Results on sub-GeV Dark Matter from SENSEI at SNOLAB , arXiv e-prints (2023) arXiv:2312.13342 [2312.13342]

    2023 arXiv

  2. [11]

    Emken, R

    T. Emken, R. Essig, C. Kouvaris and M. Sholapurkar, Direct detection of strongly interacting sub-gev dark matter via electron recoils, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2019 (2019) 070

    2019

  3. [12]

    Emken, R

    T. Emken, R. Essig, C. Kouvaris and M. Sholapurkar, Direct Detection of Strongly Interacting Sub-Gev Dark Matter via Electron Recoils, JCAP 1909 (2019) 070 [ 1905.06348]

    2019 arXiv

  4. [13]

    Figueroa-Feliciano, A.J

    E. Figueroa-Feliciano, A.J. Anderson, D. Castro, D.C. Goldfinger, J. Rutherford, M.E. Eckart et al., Searching for keV Sterile Neutrino Dark Matter with X-Ray Microcalorimeter Sounding Rockets , Astrophys. J. 814 (2015) 82 [1506.05519]

    2015 arXiv

  5. [14]

    Foster, M

    J.W. Foster, M. Kongsore, C. Dessert, Y. Park, N.L. Rodd, K. Cranmer et al., Deep Search for Decaying Dark Matter with XMM-Newton Blank-Sky Observations , Phys. Rev. Lett. 127 (2021) 051101

    2021

  6. [15]

    Dessert, N.L

    C. Dessert, N.L. Rodd and B.R. Safdi, The dark matter interpretation of the 3.5-keV line is inconsistent with blank-sky observations , Science 367 (2020) 1465

    2020

  7. [16]

    Roach, S

    B.M. Roach, S. Rossland, K.C.Y. Ng, K. Perez, J.F. Beacom, B.W. Grefenstette et al., Long-exposure NuSTAR constraints on decaying dark matter in the Galactic halo , Phys. Rev. D 107 (2023) 023009 [ 2207.04572]

    2023 arXiv

  8. [17]

    Tamura, R

    T. Tamura, R. Iizuka, Y. Maeda, K. Mitsuda and N.Y. Yamasaki, An x-ray spectroscopic search for dark matter in the perseus cluster with suzaku , Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan 67 (2015)

    2015

  9. [18]

    Sicilian, N

    D. Sicilian, N. Cappelluti, E. Bulbul, F. Civano, M. Moscetti and C.S. Reynolds, Probing the milky way’s dark matter halo for the 3.5 kev line , The Astrophysical Journal 905 (2020) 146

    2020

  10. [19]

    Kouvaris and I.M

    C. Kouvaris and I.M. Shoemaker, Daily modulation as a smoking gun of dark matter with significant stopping rate, Physical Review D 90 (2014)

    2014

  11. [20]

    Boddy, M

    K.K. Boddy, M. Lisanti, S.D. McDermott, N.L. Rodd, C. Weniger, Y. Ali-Ha ¨ ımoud et al.,Astrophysical and cosmological probes of dark matter , 2022

    2022

  12. [21]

    Bulbul et al., Detection of an Unidentified Emission Line in the Stacked x-Ray Spectrum of Galaxy Clusters , The Astrophysical Journal 789 (2014) 13

    E. Bulbul et al., Detection of an Unidentified Emission Line in the Stacked x-Ray Spectrum of Galaxy Clusters , The Astrophysical Journal 789 (2014) 13

    2014

  13. [22]

    Boyarsky, O

    A. Boyarsky, O. Ruchayskiy, D. Iakubovskyi and J. Franse, Unidentified Line in X-Ray Spectra of the Andromeda Galaxy and Perseus Galaxy Cluster , Phys. Rev. Lett. 113 (2014) 251301 [ 1402.4119]

    2014 arXiv

  14. [23]

    Abazajian, G.M

    K. Abazajian, G.M. Fuller and W.H. Tucker, Direct detection of warm dark matter in the X-ray , Astrophys. J. 562 (2001) 593 [ astro-ph/0106002]

    2001 arXiv

  15. [24]

    Abazajian, Resonantly Produced 7 keV Sterile Neutrino Dark Matter Models and the Properties of Milky Way Satellites , Phys

    K.N. Abazajian, Resonantly Produced 7 keV Sterile Neutrino Dark Matter Models and the Properties of Milky Way Satellites , Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 (2014) 161303 [ 1403.0954]

    2014 arXiv

  16. [25]

    Boyarsky, D

    A. Boyarsky, D. Iakubovskyi, O. Ruchayskiy and D. Savchenko, Surface brightness profile of the 3.5 keV line in the Milky Way halo , 1812.10488

    arXiv

  17. [26]

    Dessert, J.W

    C. Dessert, J.W. Foster, Y. Park and B.R. Safdi, Was There a 3.5 keV Line? , Astrophys. J. 964 (2024) 185 [2309.03254]

    2024 arXiv

  18. [27]

    Boyarsky, D

    A. Boyarsky, D. Malyshev, O. Ruchayskiy and D. Savchenko, Technical comment on the paper of dessert et al. ”the dark matter interpretation of the 3.5 kev line is inconsistent with blank-sky observations” , 2020. 10.48550/ARXIV.2004.06601

    2020 doi arXiv

  19. [28]

    Sicilian, D

    D. Sicilian, D. Lopez, M. Moscetti, E. Bulbul and N. Cappelluti, Constraining Sterile Neutrino Dark Matter in the Milky Way Halo with Swift-XRT , Astrophys. J. 941 (2022) 2 [ 2208.12271]. 16

    2022 arXiv

  20. [29]

    C.Y. Tan, A. Dekker and A. Drlica-Wagner, Mixed Warm Dark Matter Constraints using Milky Way Satellite Galaxy Counts , arXiv e-prints (2024) arXiv:2409.18917 [ 2409.18917]

    2024 arXiv

  21. [30]

    SENSEI collaboration, Single-e and single-photon sensitivity with a silicon Skipper CCD , PRL 119 (2017) [1706.00028]

    2017 arXiv

  22. [31]

    SENSEI collaboration, SENSEI: First Direct-Detection Constraints on sub-GeV DM from a Surface Run , PRL 121 (2018) [ 1804.00088]

    2018 arXiv

  23. [32]

    SENSEI collaboration, SENSEI: Direct-Detection Constraints on Sub-GeV Dark Matter from a Shallow Underground Run Using a Prototype Skipper-CCD , Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 (2019) 161801 [ 1901.10478]

    2019 arXiv

  24. [33]

    SENSEI collaboration, SENSEI: Direct-Detection Results on sub-GeV Dark Matter from a New Skipper-CCD , Phys. Rev. Lett. 125 (2020) 171802 [ 2004.11378]

    2020 arXiv

  25. [34]

    Barak, I.M

    L. Barak, I.M. Bloch, A.M. Botti, M. Cababie, G. Cancelo, L. Chaplinsky et al., SENSEI: Search for Millicharged Particles produced in the NuMI Beam , arXiv e-prints (2023) arXiv:2305.04964 [ 2305.04964]

    2023 arXiv

  26. [35]

    Aguilar-Arevalo, F

    A. Aguilar-Arevalo, F. Alcalde Bessia, N. Avalos, D. Baxter, X. Bertou, C. Bonifazi et al., The Oscura Experiment, arXiv e-prints (2022) arXiv:2202.10518 [ 2202.10518]

    2022 arXiv

  27. [36]

    Cervantes-Vergara, S

    B.A. Cervantes-Vergara, S. Perez, J. Estrada, A. Botti, C.R. Chavez, F. Chierchie et al., Skipper-CCD Sensors for the Oscura Experiment: Requirements and Preliminary Tests , arXiv e-prints (2023) arXiv:2304.04401 [2304.04401]

    2023 arXiv

  28. [37]

    Perez, D

    S. Perez, D. Rodrigues, J. Estrada, R. Harnik, Z. Liu, B.A. Cervantes-Vergara et al., Early Science with the Oscura Integration Test, arXiv e-prints (2023) arXiv:2304.08625 [ 2304.08625]

    2023 arXiv

  29. [38]

    Botti, B.A

    A.M. Botti, B.A. Cervantes-Vergara, C.R. Chavez, F. Chierchie, A. Drlica-Wagner, J. Estrada et al., Single-quantum measurement with a multiple-amplifier sensing charge-coupled device , IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices 71 (2024) 3732–3738

    2024

  30. [39]

    Sofo-Haro, K

    M. Sofo-Haro, K. Donlon, J. Estrada, S. Holland, F. Fahim and C. Leitz, Achieving single-electron sensitivity at enhanced speed in fully depleted ccds with double-gate mosfets , Physical Review Letters 133 (2024)

    2024

  31. [40]

    A.J. Lapi, M. Sofo-Haro, B.C. Parpillon, A. Birman, G. Fernandez-Moroni, L. Rota et al., Skipper-in-cmos: Nondestructive readout with subelectron noise performance for pixel detectors , IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices 71 (2024) 6843–6849

    2024

  32. [41]

    Cancelo, C

    G. Cancelo, C. Chavez, F. Chierchie, J. Estrada, G.F. Moroni, E. Paolini et al., Low threshold acquisition controller for Skipper charge-coupled devices , Journal of Astronomical Telescopes, Instruments, and Systems 7 (2021) 015001 [ 2004.07599]

    2021 arXiv

  33. [42]

    Holland, D

    S. Holland, D. Groom, N. Palaio, R. Stover and M. Wei, Fully depleted, back-illuminated charge-coupled devices fabricated on high-resistivity silicon , IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices 50 (2003) 225

    2003

  34. [43]

    Rodrigues, M

    D. Rodrigues, M. Cababie, I. Gomez Florenciano, A. Botti, J. Estrada, G. Fernandez-Moroni et al., Unraveling Fano noise and partial charge collection effect in X-ray spectra below 1 keV , arXiv e-prints (2023) arXiv:2305.09005 [2305.09005]

    2023 arXiv

  35. [44]

    Rodrigues, K

    D. Rodrigues, K. Andersson, M. Cababie, A. Donadon, A. Botti, G. Cancelo et al., Absolute measurement of the fano factor using a skipper-ccd , Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment 1010 (2...

    2021

  36. [45]

    M. Mok, I. McKinley and A. Mastropietro, Thermal and exported vibration characterization of ricor k508n cryocooler, IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering 755 (2020) 012010

    2020

  37. [46]

    Fano, Ionization yield of radiations

    U. Fano, Ionization yield of radiations. ii. the fluctuations of the number of ions , Phys. Rev. 72 (1947) 26

    1947

  38. [47]

    Dawson, C

    K. Dawson, C. Bebek, J. Emes, S. Holland, S. Jelinsky, A. Karcher et al., Radiation Tolerance of Fully-Depleted P-Channel CCDs Designed for the SNAP Satellite , IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science 55 (2008) 1725 [ 0711.2105]

    2008 arXiv

  39. [48]

    Janesick, Scientific Charge Coupled Devices , SPIE Publications (2001), 10.1117/3.374903

    J.R. Janesick, Scientific Charge Coupled Devices , SPIE Publications (2001), 10.1117/3.374903

    2001 doi

  40. [49]

    Roach, B.A.C

    B. Roach, B.A.C. Vergara, S. Perez, A. Drlica-Wagner, J. Estrada and A. Bakshi, Effects of proton irradiation on the performance of skipper ccds , 2024

    2024

  41. [50]

    Bebek, D

    C. Bebek, D. Groom, S. Holland, A. Karcher, W. Kolbe, J. Lee et al., Proton radiation damage in p-channel CCDs fabricated on high-resistivity silicon , IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science 49 (2002) 1221

    2002

  42. [51]

    D. Hall, D. Wood, N. Murray, J. Gow, A. Chroneos and A. Holland, In situ trap properties in ccds: the donor level of the silicon divacancy , Journal of Instrumentation 12 (2017) P01025

    2017

  43. [52]

    Gaido, J

    M.E. Gaido, J. Tiffenberg, A. Drlica-Wagner, G. Fernandez-Moroni, B.J. Rauscher, F. Chierche et al., Cherenkov photon background for low-noise silicon detectors in space , in X-Ray, Optical, and Infrared Detectors for Astronomy XI , A.D. Holland and K. Minoglou, eds., p. 97, S...

    2024

  44. [53]

    P. Du, D. Egana-Ugrinovic, R. Essig and M. Sholapurkar, Sources of low-energy events in low-threshold dark-matter and neutrino detectors , Phys. Rev. X 12 (2022) 011009

    2022

  45. [54]

    P. Alpine et al, Thermal Risk Mitigation Testing of the DarkNESS Observatory, Small Satellite Conference 2023

    “P. Alpine et al, Thermal Risk Mitigation Testing of the DarkNESS Observatory, Small Satellite Conference 2023.” https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/smallsat/2023/all2023/266/

    2023

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.