REVIEW 2 cited by
Scaffolding Coordinates to Promote Vision-Language Coordination in Large Multi-Modal Models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
State-of-the-art Large Multi-Modal Models (LMMs) have demonstrated exceptional capabilities in vision-language tasks. Despite their advanced functionalities, the performances of LMMs are still limited in challenging scenarios that require complex reasoning with multiple levels of visual information. Existing prompting techniques for LMMs focus on either improving textual reasoning or leveraging tools for image preprocessing, lacking a simple and general visual prompting scheme to promote vision-language coordination in LMMs. In this work, we propose Scaffold prompting that scaffolds coordinates to promote vision-language coordination. Specifically, Scaffold overlays a dot matrix within the image as visual information anchors and leverages multi-dimensional coordinates as textual positional references. Extensive experiments on a wide range of challenging vision-language tasks demonstrate the superiority of Scaffold over GPT-4V with the textual CoT prompting. Our code is released in https://github.com/leixy20/Scaffold.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
ST-Veto: Spatio-Temporal Token Veto for Diffusion MLLMs via Taylor Prediction and Visual Grounding
ST-Veto improves reasoning in diffusion MLLMs by vetoing temporally unstable tokens and tokens with weak image grounding, swapping in safer near-boundary candidates.
-
Multi-Step Visual Reasoning with Visual Tokens Scaling and Verification
An iterative, verifier-guided visual token scaling framework improves multi-step visual reasoning in both closed and open multimodal models on BLINK and related benchmarks.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.