Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

The Impossibility Theorem of Machine Fairness -- A Causal Perspective

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2007.06024 v2 pith:5YR4HTWO submitted 2020-07-12 cs.LG cs.AIstat.ML

classification cs.LGcs.AIstat.ML
keywords fairnessmachinecausalbeencommunityimpossibilityperspectivethem
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

With the increasing pervasive use of machine learning in social and economic settings, there has been an interest in the notion of machine bias in the AI community. Models trained on historic data reflect biases that exist in society and propagated them to the future through their decisions. There are three prominent metrics of machine fairness used in the community, and it has been shown statistically that it is impossible to satisfy them all at the same time. This has led to an ambiguity with regards to the definition of fairness. In this report, a causal perspective to the impossibility theorem of fairness is presented along with a causal goal for machine fairness.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. SoK: What Makes Private Learning Unfair?

    cs.LG 2025-01 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A systematization of the literature showing that dataset size and group distance to the decision boundary, not the choice of DP algorithm, are likely the decisive factors in privacy-induced unfairness.

Pith tools