Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 105 references

Floquet Green's functions for lattice electrons driven by Gaussian quantum light

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper establishes a consistent Floquet Green's-function framework for lattice electrons driven by a prescribed Gaussian quantum light source, with both time arguments of every Green's function sharing one source history.

desk verdict A careful and internally consistent prescribed-source Floquet Green's-function framework; the squeezed-source predictions still need a backaction criterion, and the author openly flags this. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.11189 v1 pith:5ZLLAHZV submitted 2026-08-11 cond-mat.str-el cond-mat.mes-hallphysics.opticsquant-ph

Atsushi Ono This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.str-elcond-mat.mes-hallphysics.opticsquant-ph
keywords FloquetGreen'sfunctionsquantumlightGaussianstatessqueezedvacuumPeierlssubstitutionSambespacenonequilibriumengineering
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper sets out to give Floquet engineering of lattice electrons a formalism that works when the driving light is a quantum source rather than a classical field. It constructs Floquet Green's functions for a single-band lattice driven by a reservoir-stabilized Gaussian photon source—coherent, squeezed-vacuum, or squeezed-coherent—while keeping the full quantized Peierls coupling exponential and never expanding in the coupling strength. The defining move is shared history: the two time arguments of a Green's function are propagated on one source trajectory, with the lesser and greater components obtained by convolving a shared-history four-endpoint kernel with continuous bath kernels and the retarded and advanced components closed through the bath canonical anticommutation relation. In the joint limit $\lambda\to0$, $|\alpha_0|\to\infty$ at fixed classical Peierls phase, classical Floquet theory is recovered. On a minimal one-dimensional chain, the resulting spectra satisfy positivity and fermionic bounds, and the squeezing parameter and phase act as control knobs beyond classical amplitude modulation.

What carries the argument

The carrying object is the shared-history four-endpoint kernel $P^{\mathrm{SH}}_k(t,t';s,s')$ together with the equal-time covariance $W_k(t)$ that the bath canonical anticommutation relation produces. The kernel is assembled from four active-leg sectors $(0,L,R,LR)$ and six chronological orderings of the two bath-injection and two observation times; both legs are propagated on one shared Kraus sequence, so the two time arguments never factor into independent source averages. The bath CAR identity converts the contact parts of the wide-band lesser and greater self-energies into a first-order periodic equation for $W_k(t)$, and the retarded component is the one-leg evaluation $G^R_k(t,t')=-i\Theta(t-t')\langle\langle I_{\mathrm{ph}}|U_L(t,t')|W_k(t')\rangle\rangle$. The same sector resolvents are then represented in Sambe space, where the six orderings carry fixed resolvent frequencies and the observable spectra are read out from the $m=0$ harmonic blocks.

What would settle it

Solve the coupled electron-photon Lindblad problem for the same one-dimensional chain with electron-induced photon polarization retained, and compare the retarded spectrum, lesser spectrum, and equal-time occupancy with Eqs. (101)-(112); an observable discrepancy in a regime where the electron-induced photon self-energy is not small compared with the photon linewidth $\kappa$ would falsify the prescribed-source framework. A more direct experiment would be time-resolved photoemission of a squeezed-vacuum-driven chain searching for the predicted multitime satellite ridge near $\omega\approx +0.75\cos k$ at $\kappa=0.1$.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that Eqs. (101) and (112) define a consistent Floquet Green's-function framework for a prescribed Gaussian quantum light source. The lesser and greater components are obtained by convolving a shared-history four-endpoint kernel with the continuous reservoir kernels before the final source trace, while the bath canonical anticommutation relation supplies a periodic equal-time covariance $W_k(t)$ that seeds the retarded and advanced one-leg propagations. The source is prescribed externally—it is not updated by many-electron polarization—but the active probe still conditions the source evolution through the Peierls link, and the two Keldysh legs are driven by one shared Kraus sequence. The construction preserves positivity of the lesser and greater kernels, the Pauli bound $0\le n_k(t)\le 1$, and the fermionic CAR, and admits a quasifree CAR realization at the two-point level. In the joint classical limit $\lambda\to0$, $|\alpha_0|\to\infty$ at fixed $A_{\mathrm{cl}}=2\lambda|\alpha_0|$, it reduces to standard classical Floquet theory. Numerical calculations on a one-dimensional chain show finite-coupling coherent-source corrections, spectral reconstruction by squeezed vacuum, and squeezing-phase-dependent sideband and occupancy changes.

Load-bearing premise

The photon state is prescribed externally and electron-induced backaction on the source is neglected; the paper does not attempt to establish for concrete parameters when the photon linewidth is large enough for that neglect to be controlled.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Coherent Gaussian drives reproduce classical Floquet theory in the joint limit $\lambda\to0$, $|\alpha_0|\to\infty$ at fixed $A_{\mathrm{cl}}$, and finite-$\lambda$ coherent sources show quantum corrections that redistribute spectral weight among the Floquet sidebands.
  • Squeezed vacuum, with zero coherent amplitude, reconstructs the retarded spectrum; the relevant fluctuation scale is $\lambda e^r$ rather than the bare coupling $\lambda$, so a small bare coupling can still produce nonperturbative quantum-source effects.
  • The squeezing parameter $r$ and squeezing phase $\phi_0$ constitute control knobs beyond the classical amplitude: the phase distinguishes amplitude-squeezed from phase-squeezed coherent sources in both sideband structure and occupied weight.
  • The source damping rate $\kappa$, which enters only through multitime source correlations, changes the shared-history spectra even when the one-time mean link is fixed, so it is an experimentally accessible knob invisible to deterministic mean-link Floquet theory.
  • The constructed two-point functions satisfy positivity, the Pauli bound, the fermionic CAR, and a retarded sum rule within the reported numerical accuracy, and admit a quasifree CAR realization.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the framework is correct, cavity and circuit-QED platforms could use source-state engineering rather than drive amplitude alone: tuning the squeezing phase relative to the carrier phase and the photon linewidth should switch between nearly classical and strongly reconstructed electronic Floquet spectra.
  • The classical limit being a large-mode-volume limit rather than a large-photon-number limit suggests that bright cavity fields are not automatically classical; experiments that vary mode volume at fixed photon number could separate mean-link from multitime quantum-source effects.
  • A testable extension would be to benchmark the framework's small-$\lambda e^r$ limit against Born and self-consistent Born approximations: the shared-history and SCBA spectra should converge there, so any residual deviation would signal nonperturbative squeezed-fluctuation physics beyond weak-coupling self-energies.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. This manuscript develops a Floquet Green's-function framework for noninteracting single-band lattice electrons driven by a reservoir-stabilized single-mode Gaussian quantum light source. The source is prescribed externally, and the two time arguments of the electronic Green's function share one source history via a four-sector (0,L,R,LR) Liouville-space construction and six chronological orderings; the lesser and greater components are obtained by convolving the resulting shared-history kernel with wide-band fermionic bath kernels, while the bath CAR identity yields an equal-time covariance W_k that seeds the retarded and advanced one-leg propagators (Eqs. (101), (107), (112)). The paper proves positivity, Pauli bounds, and a quasifree CAR realization for the two-point data, recovers classical Floquet theory in the limit of Eq. (200), and implements the construction numerically on a one-dimensional chain, reporting spectral reconstruction and occupancy redistribution for coherent, squeezed-vacuum, and squeezed-coherent sources. Appendices provide Born/SCBA comparisons, a frequency-domain implementation of the six orderings, and extensive convergence tests.

Significance. The construction is careful and largely self-contained: the six-orderings decomposition, the CAR closure, the positivity proof via the Gram/Schur argument, and the classical-limit check are all detailed, and no parameters are fitted to the electronic output. The mean-link and classical Floquet benchmarks, together with the convergence sweeps in Appendix C, give confidence in the numerical implementation. If the central claims hold, this is a genuinely new nonperturbative tool for quantum-source Floquet engineering, extending beyond weak-coupling and phase-space approaches. The main caveat, acknowledged in the manuscript, is that the prescribed-source approximation is not assigned a quantitative domain of validity; this limits, but does not invalidate, the formalism as a model framework.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section II A and Section IV] The paper explicitly states that neglecting electron-induced source backaction is 'expected to be controlled when the photon linewidth kappa is large compared with the electron-induced photon self-energy, but establishing this criterion for concrete parameters is not attempted here' (Section II A). Because the reported spectra and occupancies for squeezed sources (Figs. 5-8 and 11-13) are computed at kappa=1 and kappa=0.1 without any estimate of the electron-induced photon self-energy for the 1D model, the central claim that these are physical quantum-source Floquet spectra is not yet tied to a known parameter regime. I ask the authors to provide an order-of-magnitude estimate for the model, or to explicitly reframe the results as a model study whose experimental applicability requires a separate backaction check.
  2. [Section IV] The Discussion correctly states that the computed Green's functions 'are not identified with Heisenberg correlators of an independently specified joint electron-photon Lindblad dynamics.' This leaves open what experimental observable the lesser and greater spectra correspond to. Since the framework is proposed as a tool for quantum Floquet engineering, the authors should either identify a concrete measurement protocol (for example, time-resolved photoemission from a weakly probed cavity-embedded sample) or explicitly limit the claim to the two-point process defined by the model. This concern is connected to the backaction issue: without such a protocol, the physical significance of the numerical spectral reconstruction cannot be fully assessed.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section III D, Fig. 7] The comparatively strong 'inverted ridge' is used as evidence of multitime source dynamics, but the text states its microscopic mechanism is not identified; I recommend either adding an explanation or presenting it as an open question in the main text.
  2. [Section II A] The phrase 'an active electronic probe still conditions the source density operator' could be clarified to mean conditioning through the shared Kraus sequence in the Liouville-space construction, not a measurement backaction.
  3. [Appendix C, Table II] The maximum sum-rule deviation is 8.6e-3, which is larger than the quoted quadrature residuals; please state explicitly whether this residual is due to the finite frequency window and, if so, estimate the window-truncation contribution.
  4. [Eq. (225)] Equation (225) uses both ordinary and modified Bessel functions; a sentence defining the arguments A_cl and zeta and commenting on the convergence of the series would improve readability.
  5. [Section II G] The term 'CAR reconstruction' might be confused with the analytical CAR identity; consider replacing it with 'CAR-based quadrature correction' to reflect that Eq. (B16) is a numerical correction that vanishes in the continuum limit.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the derivation is a self-contained prescribed-source construction with external inputs and independent limit checks.

full rationale

The paper's central equations are constitutive definitions and algebraic consequences, not fitted inputs renamed as predictions. Equation (101) defines the lesser/greater Green's functions as a convolution of the shared-history kernel P_SH (Eq. (91)) with the external wide-band bath kernels; P_SH is itself built from the prescribed CPTP source sectors in Eqs. (83)-(86), with all source, bath, and coupling parameters supplied externally (alpha0, r, phi0, kappa, lambda, Gamma, beta). Equation (112) follows by substituting Eq. (106) into the standard component identity Eq. (42), and Eq. (220) is the same identity used as a numerical reconstruction of G>, with an independent direct assembly of G> cross-checked in Appendix C. The classical Floquet limit of Eq. (200) is a parameter limit of the model (lambda->0, |alpha0|->infinity at fixed A_cl) and is verified numerically against an independent classical Floquet calculation, not imposed to match data. The positivity, Pauli-bound, and CAR statements are proven from the Gram property of the shared-Kraus kernel and the positivity of the bath kernels, rather than assumed. Self-citations (Refs. 22, 24, 83-85) appear only as contextual comparisons to phase-space and prior Floquet methods and do not carry any load-bearing step of the derivation. The explicit caveat that the backaction-control criterion kappa >> electron-induced photon self-energy is not established for concrete parameters is a domain-of-validity limitation, not a circular step. No equation in the paper reduces to its own input by construction, and no fitted parameter is presented as a prediction.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No output-dependent fitting: the source and bath parameters in Table I and figure captions are prescribed physical inputs, not constants fitted to the electronic spectra. The source and squeezing parameters are the control knobs under study, not hidden fit parameters. The main modeling commitments are the Markovian Gaussian source with unique Bogoliubov vacuum, the wide-band fermionic bath, the absence of electronic backaction, the spatially uniform Peierls link, and a finite Fock truncation whose convergence is numerical.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The photon source is a Markovian Lindblad channel L_ph = kappa L_diss[b] whose unique steady state is the Bogoliubov vacuum |0_b><0_b|, with dissipation rate kappa.
    Sec. II B, Eq. (21): this defines the Gaussian source dynamics and the correlation time; all numerical states are steady states of this channel.
  • domain assumption The electron bath is wide-band with constant hybridization Gamma, local retarded self-energy -iGamma/2, and Fermi-Dirac lesser and greater kernels, with the Lamb shift absorbed.
    Sec. II D 2, Eqs. (50)-(53): this gives the contact and noncontact bath kernels used in the convolution and CAR closure.
  • domain assumption The electronic probe does not feed back onto the photon source; the shared-history Green's function is the defined two-point process, not the Heisenberg correlator of a joint closed dynamics.
    Sec. II A and Sec. II D 8 explicitly state the prescribed-source approximation and that the result is not the quantum-regression correlator of a joint Lindblad dynamics.
  • domain assumption The photon field is spatially uniform, and the Peierls coupling keeps the full exponential exp(i lambda X_lab) without momentum transfer between Bloch states.
    Sec. II C, Eqs. (24)-(36): this is the gauge-covariant single-mode lattice Hamiltonian used throughout.
  • ad hoc to paper Finite photon Fock truncation with projected displacement operators approximates the unitary link, with convergence established numerically.
    Sec. II G, Eq. (217): the truncated link is not exactly unitary, so this is a numerical axiom validated only by the cutoff sweeps in Appendix C.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Floquet Green's functions for lattice electrons driven by Gaussian quantum light." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/5ZLLAHZV

@misc{pith2026260811189,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Floquet Green's functions for lattice electrons driven by Gaussian quantum light},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/5ZLLAHZV}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.11189}
}
read the original abstract

We formulate Floquet Green's functions for noninteracting single-band lattice electrons driven by a reservoir-stabilized single-mode Gaussian quantum light source. The source is prescribed externally and is not updated by the many-electron polarization, while an active electronic probe still conditions the source evolution through the Peierls coupling. The two time arguments of a Green's function share one source history: the lesser and greater components are obtained by convolving a shared-history four-endpoint kernel with the continuous bath kernels before the final source trace, while the bath canonical anticommutation relation yields an equal-time covariance that seeds the retarded and advanced one-leg propagations. The Peierls coupling is treated nonperturbatively within the prescribed-source model, and classical Floquet theory is recovered in the appropriate limit. Numerical calculations on a minimal one-dimensional model show finite-coupling quantum-source corrections beyond a prescribed classical drive, together with spectral reconstruction and occupancy redistribution for squeezed vacuum and squeezed coherent sources. The squeezing parameter and phase provide additional control knobs, beyond classical amplitude modulation, for both sideband structure and occupied weight. This work provides a theoretical framework for quantum Floquet engineering of condensed matter with an externally prescribed quantum light source.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.11189 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Overview of the prescribed-source framework. The total system consists of the electron–photon system coupled to a fermionic electron [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Schwinger–Keldysh representation of the shared-history two-leg kernel. (a) Contour for the four-endpoint kernel [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Period-averaged spectral function, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (11 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Period-averaged retarded and occupied spectral weights for a finite- [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Period-averaged retarded and occupied spectral weights for squeezed vacuum with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Same squeezed-vacuum comparison as Fig. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Shared-history period-averaged retarded spectral weight for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Period-averaged occupation and distribution quantities for squeezed vacuum with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Absolute value of the harmonic-resolved retarded Green’s function, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. Time-resolved Gaussian-probe spectra [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11. Period-averaged retarded and occupied spectral weights for (left) a coherent source with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12. Momentum- and frequency-resolved ASC–PSC spectral contrasts on a common diverging color scale. (a) Deterministic mean-link [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13. Period-averaged occupation and distribution quantities for a coherent source with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_13.png]
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: FIG. 14. Cutoff convergence of the shared-history spectra for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p031_14.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

105 extracted references · 59 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Bukov, L

    M. Bukov, L. D’ Alessio, and A. Polkovnikov, Universal high- frequency behavior of periodically driven systems: from dy- namical stabilization to Floquet engineering, Adv. Phys.64, 139 (2015)

    2015

  2. [2]

    Oka and S

    T. Oka and S. Kitamura, Floquet Engineering of Quantum Materials, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys.10, 387 (2019)

    2019

  3. [3]

    M. S. Rudner and N. H. Lindner, Band structure engineering and non-equilibrium dynamics in Floquet topological insula- tors, Nat. Rev. Phys.2, 229 (2020)

    2020

  4. [4]

    J. H. Shirley, Solution of the Schr ¨odinger Equation with a Hamiltonian Periodic in Time, Phys. Rev.138, B979 (1965)

    1965

  5. [5]

    Sambe, Steady States and Quasienergies of a Quantum- Mechanical System in an Oscillating Field, Phys

    H. Sambe, Steady States and Quasienergies of a Quantum- Mechanical System in an Oscillating Field, Phys. Rev. A7, 2203 (1973)

    1973

  6. [6]

    D. F. Martinez, Floquet–Green function formalism for harmon- ically driven Hamiltonians, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen.36, 9827 (2003)

    2003

  7. [7]

    Kohler, J

    S. Kohler, J. Lehmann, and P. H ¨anggi, Driven quantum trans- port on the nanoscale, Phys. Rep.406, 379 (2005)

    2005

  8. [8]

    Schmidt and H

    P. Schmidt and H. Monien, Nonequilibrium dynamical mean- field theory of a strongly correlated system, arXiv:cond- mat/0202046

    arXiv

Show all 105 references
  1. [9]

    A. V. Joura, J. K. Freericks, and T. Pruschke, Steady-State Nonequilibrium Density of States of Driven Strongly Corre- lated Lattice Models in Infinite Dimensions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 196401 (2008)

    2008

  2. [10]

    Tsuji, T

    N. Tsuji, T. Oka, and H. Aoki, Correlated electron systems periodically driven out of equilibrium: Floquet + DMFT for- malism, Phys. Rev. B78, 235124 (2008)

    2008

  3. [11]

    Tsuji, T

    N. Tsuji, T. Oka, and H. Aoki, Nonequilibrium Steady State of Photoexcited Correlated Electrons in the Presence of Dissipa- tion, Phys. Rev. Lett.103, 047403 (2009)

    2009

  4. [12]

    H. Aoki, N. Tsuji, M. Eckstein, M. Kollar, T. Oka, and P. Werner, Nonequilibrium dynamical mean-field theory and its applications, Rev. Mod. Phys.86, 779 (2014)

    2014

  5. [13]

    Oka and H

    T. Oka and H. Aoki, Photovoltaic Hall effect in graphene, Phys. Rev. B79, 081406(R) (2009)

    2009

  6. [14]

    Kitagawa, T

    T. Kitagawa, T. Oka, A. Brataas, L. Fu, and E. Demler, Trans- port properties of nonequilibrium systems under the applica- tion of light: Photoinduced quantum Hall insulators without Landau levels, Phys. Rev. B84, 235108 (2011)

    2011

  7. [15]

    Mikami, S

    T. Mikami, S. Kitamura, K. Yasuda, N. Tsuji, T. Oka, and H. Aoki, Brillouin-Wigner theory for high-frequency expan- sion in periodically driven systems: Application to Floquet topological insulators, Phys. Rev. B93, 144307 (2016)

    2016

  8. [16]

    Lee and W.-K

    W.-R. Lee and W.-K. Tse, Dynamical quantum anomalous Hall effect in strong optical fields, Phys. Rev. B95, 201411(R) (2017)

    2017

  9. [17]

    Qin and W

    T. Qin and W. Hofstetter, Spectral functions of a time- periodically driven Falicov-Kimball model: Real-space Flo- quet dynamical mean-field theory study, Phys. Rev. B96, 075134 (2017)

    2017

  10. [18]

    Peronaci, M

    F. Peronaci, M. Schir ´o, and O. Parcollet, Resonant Thermal- ization of Periodically Driven Strongly Correlated Electrons, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 197601 (2018)

    2018

  11. [19]

    M. E. Sorantin, A. Dorda, K. Held, and E. Arrigoni, Impact ion- ization processes in the steady state of a driven Mott-insulating layer coupled to metallic leads, Phys. Rev. B97, 115113 (2018)

    2018

  12. [20]

    Murakami and P

    Y. Murakami and P. Werner, Nonequilibrium steady states of electric field driven Mott insulators, Phys. Rev. B98, 075102 (2018)

    2018

  13. [21]

    Murakami, M

    Y. Murakami, M. Eckstein, and P. Werner, High-Harmonic Generation in Mott Insulators, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 057405 (2018)

    2018

  14. [22]

    Ono and S

    A. Ono and S. Ishihara, Photocontrol of magnetic structure in an itinerant magnet, Phys. Rev. B98, 214408 (2018)

    2018

  15. [23]

    Qin and W

    T. Qin and W. Hofstetter, Nonequilibrium steady states and resonant tunneling in time-periodically driven systems with 33 interactions, Phys. Rev. B97, 125115 (2018)

    2018

  16. [24]

    Ono and S

    A. Ono and S. Ishihara, Nonequilibrium susceptibility in pho- toinduced Floquet states, Phys. Rev. B100, 075127 (2019)

    2019

  17. [25]

    M. M. Asmar and W.-k. Tse, Floquet control of indirect ex- change interaction in periodically driven two-dimensional elec- tron systems, New J. Phys.23, 123031 (2021)

    2021

  18. [26]

    M. Ke, M. M. Asmar, and W.-K. Tse, Nonequilibrium RKKY interaction in irradiated graphene, Phys. Rev. Research2, 033228 (2020)

    2020

  19. [27]

    Ke and W.-K

    M. Ke and W.-K. Tse, Impurity states and indirect exchange interaction in irradiated graphene, Phys. Rev. B106, 075424 (2022)

    2022

  20. [28]

    T. D. Honeychurch and D. S. Kosov, Floquet nonequilibrium Green’s functions with fluctuation-exchange approximation: Application to periodically driven capacitively coupled quan- tum dots, Phys. Rev. B110, 165420 (2024)

    2024

  21. [29]

    Herre, T

    J.-N. Herre, T. Okugawa, A. Fischer, C. Karrasch, and D. M. Kennes, Floquet engineering magnetism and superconductiv- ity in the square-lattice Hubbard model, Phys. Rev. B113, L121103 (2026)

    2026

  22. [30]

    Okugawa, J

    T. Okugawa, J. Paaske, M. Eckstein, M. A. Sentef, A. Rubio, and A. J. Millis, Dynamical instability in a Floquet-driven dissipative system, arXiv:2601.04451

  23. [31]

    D. H. Dunlap and V. M. Kenkre, Dynamic localization of a charged particle moving under the influence of an electric field, Phys. Rev. B34, 3625 (1986)

    1986

  24. [32]

    N. H. Lindner, G. Refael, and V. Galitski, Floquet topological insulator in semiconductor quantum wells, Nat. Phys.7, 490 (2011)

    2011

  25. [33]

    Y. H. Wang, H. Steinberg, P. Jarillo-Herrero, and N. Gedik, Observation of Floquet–Bloch States on the Surface of a Topo- logical Insulator, Science342, 453 (2013)

    2013

  26. [34]

    J. W. McIver, B. Schulte, F.-U. Stein, T. Matsuyama, G. Jotzu, G. Meier, and A. Cavalleri, Light-induced anomalous Hall effect in graphene, Nat. Phys.16, 38 (2020)

    2020

  27. [35]

    Kirilyuk, A

    A. Kirilyuk, A. V. Kimel, and T. Rasing, Ultrafast optical manipulation of magnetic order, Rev. Mod. Phys.82, 2731 (2010)

    2010

  28. [36]

    de la Torre, D

    A. de la Torre, D. M. Kennes, M. Claassen, S. Gerber, J. W. McIver, and M. A. Sentef, Colloquium: Nonthermal pathways to ultrafast control in quantum materials, Rev. Mod. Phys.93, 041002 (2021)

    2021

  29. [37]

    Koshihara, T

    S.-y. Koshihara, T. Ishikawa, Y. Okimoto, K. Onda, R. Fukaya, M. Hada, Y. Hayashi, S. Ishihara, and T. Luty, Challenges for developing photo-induced phase transition (PIPT) systems: From classical (incoherent) to quantum (coherent) control of PIPT dynamics, Phys. Rep.942, 1 (2022)

    2022

  30. [38]

    A. F. Kockum, A. Miranowicz, S. De Liberato, S. Savasta, and F. Nori, Ultrastrong coupling between light and matter, Nat. Rev. Phys.1, 19 (2019)

    2019

  31. [39]

    Burkard, M

    G. Burkard, M. J. Gullans, X. Mi, and J. R. Petta, Superconductor–semiconductor hybrid-circuit quantum elec- trodynamics, Nat. Rev. Phys.2, 129 (2020)

    2020

  32. [40]

    Haroche, M

    S. Haroche, M. Brune, and J.-M. Raimond, From cavity to circuit quantum electrodynamics, Nat. Phys.16, 243 (2020)

    2020

  33. [41]

    Zare Rameshti, S

    B. Zare Rameshti, S. Viola Kusminskiy, J. A. Haigh, K. Usami, D. Lachance-Quirion, Y. Nakamura, C.-M. Hu, H. X. Tang, G. E. W. Bauer, and Y. M. Blanter, Cavity magnonics, Phys. Rep.979, 1 (2022)

    2022

  34. [42]

    D. F. Walls and G. J. Milburn,Quantum Optics, 2nd ed. (Springer, Berlin, 2008)

    2008

  35. [43]

    J. F. Poyatos, J. I. Cirac, and P. Zoller, Quantum Reservoir Engineering with Laser Cooled Trapped Ions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 4728 (1996)

    1996

  36. [44]

    Kienzler, H.-Y

    D. Kienzler, H.-Y. Lo, B. Keitch, L. de Clercq, F. Leupold, F. Lindenfelser, M. Marinelli, V. Negnevitsky, and J. P. Home, Quantum harmonic oscillator state synthesis by reservoir en- gineering, Science347, 53 (2015)

    2015

  37. [45]

    Dassonneville, R

    R. Dassonneville, R. Assouly, T. Peronnin, A. A. Clerk, A. Bi- enfait, and B. Huard, Dissipative Stabilization of Squeezing Beyond 3 dB in a Microwave Mode, PRX Quantum2, 020323 (2021)

    2021

  38. [46]

    Kiffner, J

    M. Kiffner, J. R. Coulthard, F. Schlawin, A. Ardavan, and D. Jaksch, Manipulating quantum materials with quantum light, Phys. Rev. B99, 085116 (2019)

    2019

  39. [47]

    H¨ ubener, U

    H. H¨ ubener, U. De Giovannini, C. Sch ¨afer, J. Andberger, M. Ruggenthaler, J. Faist, and A. Rubio, Engineering quan- tum materials with chiral optical cavities, Nat. Mater.20, 438 (2021)

    2021

  40. [48]

    Schlawin, D

    F. Schlawin, D. M. Kennes, and M. A. Sentef, Cavity quantum materials, Appl. Phys. Rev.9, 011312 (2022)

    2022

  41. [49]

    Bloch, A

    J. Bloch, A. Cavalleri, V. Galitski, M. Hafezi, and A. Rubio, Strongly correlated electron–photon systems, Nature606, 41 (2022)

    2022

  42. [50]

    I.-T. Lu, D. Shin, M. K. Svendsen, S. Latini, H. H¨ ubener, M. Ruggenthaler, and ´A. Rubio, Cavity engineering of solid- state materials without external driving, Adv. Opt. Photonics 17, 441 (2025)

    2025

  43. [51]

    H. M. Bretscher, L. Graziotto, M. H. Michael, A. Montanaro, I.-T. Lu, A. Grankin, J. W. McIver, J. Faist, D. Fausti, M. Eck- stein, M. Ruggenthaler, A. Rubio, D. N. Basov, M. Hafezi, M. Claassen, D. M. Kennes, and M. A. Sentef, Fluctuation engineering in cavity quantum materia...

    arXiv

  44. [52]

    M. A. Sentef, J. Li, F. K¨ unzel, and M. Eckstein, Quantum to classical crossover of Floquet engineering in correlated quan- tum systems, Phys. Rev. Res.2, 033033 (2020)

    2020

  45. [53]

    Li and M

    J. Li and M. Eckstein, Manipulating Intertwined Orders in Solids with Quantum Light, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 217402 (2020)

    2020

  46. [54]

    Sueiro, G

    J. Sueiro, G. M. Andolina, and M. Schir `o, Floquet The- ory of lattice electrons coupled to an off-resonant cavity, arXiv:2507.22715

    arXiv

  47. [55]

    C. J. Eckhardt, G. Passetti, M. Othman, C. Karrasch, F. Cav- aliere, M. A. Sentef, and D. M. Kennes, Quantum Floquet engineering with an exactly solvable tight-binding chain in a cavity, Commun. Phys.5, 122 (2022)

    2022

  48. [56]

    Nguyen, G

    D.-P. Nguyen, G. Arwas, and C. Ciuti, Electron conductance and many-body marker of a cavity-embedded topological one- dimensional chain, Phys. Rev. B110, 195416 (2024)

    2024

  49. [57]

    Harbola and S

    U. Harbola and S. Mukamel, Superoperator nonequilibrium Green’s function theory of many-body systems; applications to charge transfer and transport in open junctions, Phys. Rep. 465, 191 (2008)

    2008

  50. [58]

    Arrigoni, M

    E. Arrigoni, M. Knap, and W. von der Linden, Nonequilibrium Dynamical Mean-Field Theory: An Auxiliary Quantum Mas- ter Equation Approach, Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 086403 (2013)

    2013

  51. [59]

    Dorda, M

    A. Dorda, M. Nuss, W. von der Linden, and E. Arrigoni, Aux- iliary master equation approach to nonequilibrium correlated impurities, Phys. Rev. B89, 165105 (2014)

    2014

  52. [60]

    K. E. Dorfman, F. Schlawin, and S. Mukamel, Nonlinear op- tical signals and spectroscopy with quantum light, Rev. Mod. Phys.88, 045008 (2016)

    2016

  53. [61]

    Keliri and M

    A. Keliri and M. Schir`o, Sambe Approach to Floquet-Lindblad Open Quantum Systems, arXiv:2606.09727

    arXiv

  54. [62]

    Souquet, M

    J.-R. Souquet, M. J. Woolley, J. Gabelli, P. Simon, and A. A. Clerk, Photon-assisted tunnelling with nonclassical light, Nat. Commun.5, 5562 (2014)

    2014

  55. [63]

    M. X. Bi, X. H. Yan, Y. Xiao, and H. Guo, Time-dependent 34 Green’s function approach to spin transport assisted by non- classical light, Phys. Rev. B100, 235432 (2019)

    2019

  56. [64]

    Gao and M

    Y. Gao and M. Galperin, Optical spectroscopy of molecular junctions: Nonequilibrium Green’s functions perspective, J. Chem. Phys.144, 174113 (2016)

    2016

  57. [65]

    B. K. Agarwalla, M. Kulkarni, S. Mukamel, and D. Segal, Tunable photonic cavity coupled to a voltage-biased double quantum dot system: Diagrammatic nonequilibrium Green’s function approach, Phys. Rev. B94, 035434 (2016)

    2016

  58. [66]

    Schwinger, Brownian Motion of a Quantum Oscillator, J

    J. Schwinger, Brownian Motion of a Quantum Oscillator, J. Math. Phys.2, 407 (1961)

    1961

  59. [67]

    R. P. Feynman and F. L. Vernon, The theory of a general quantum system interacting with a linear dissipative system, Ann. Phys.24, 118 (1963)

    1963

  60. [68]

    L. V. Keldysh, Diagram Technique for Nonequilibrium Pro- cesses, Sov. Phys. JETP20, 1018 (1965)

    1965

  61. [69]

    F. A. Pollock, C. Rodr ´ıguez-Rosario, T. Frauenheim, M. Pa- ternostro, and K. Modi, Non-Markovian quantum processes: Complete framework and efficient characterization, Phys. Rev. A97, 012127 (2018)

    2018

  62. [70]

    Lewenstein, M

    M. Lewenstein, M. F. Ciappina, E. Pisanty, J. Rivera-Dean, P. Stammer, T. Lamprou, and P. Tzallas, Generation of optical Schr¨odinger cat states in intense laser–matter interactions, Nat. Phys.17, 1104 (2021)

    2021

  63. [71]

    Stammer, J

    P. Stammer, J. Rivera-Dean, A. Maxwell, T. Lamprou, A. Ord ´o˜nez, M. F. Ciappina, P. Tzallas, and M. Lewenstein, Quantum Electrodynamics of Intense Laser-Matter Interac- tions: A Tool for Quantum State Engineering, PRX Quantum 4, 010201 (2023)

    2023

  64. [72]

    Bhattacharya, T

    U. Bhattacharya, T. Lamprou, A. S. Maxwell, A. F. Ord ´o˜nez, E. Pisanty, J. Rivera-Dean, P. Stammer, M. F. Ciappina, M. Lewenstein, and P. Tzallas, Strong-laser-field physics, non- classical light states and quantum information science, Rep. Prog. Phys.86, 094401 (2023)

    2023

  65. [73]

    C. S. Lange, T. Hansen, and L. B. Madsen, Electron- correlation-induced nonclassicality of light from high-order harmonic generation, Phys. Rev. A109, 033110 (2024)

    2024

  66. [74]

    Theidel, V

    D. Theidel, V. Cotte, R. Sondenheimer, V. Shiriaeva, M. Froidevaux, V. Severin, A. Merdji-Larue, P. Mosel, S. Fr¨ohlich, K.-A. Weber, U. Morgner, M. Kovacev, J. Biegert, and H. Merdji, Evidence of the Quantum Optical Nature of High-Harmonic Generation, PRX Quantum5, 040319 (2024)

    2024

  67. [75]

    Theidel, V

    D. Theidel, V. Cotte, P. Heinzel, H. Griguer, M. Weis, R. Son- denheimer, and H. Merdji, Observation of a displaced squeezed state in high-harmonic generation, Phys. Rev. Res.7, 033223 (2025)

    2025

  68. [76]

    Gorlach, M

    A. Gorlach, M. Even Tzur, M. Birk, M. Kr¨ uger, N. Rivera, O. Cohen, and I. Kaminer, High-harmonic generation driven by quantum light, Nat. Phys.19, 1689 (2023)

    2023

  69. [77]

    Even Tzur, M

    M. Even Tzur, M. Birk, A. Gorlach, M. Kr¨ uger, I. Kaminer, and O. Cohen, Photon-statistics force in ultrafast electron dy- namics, Nat. Photonics17, 501 (2023)

    2023

  70. [78]

    Rasputnyi, Z

    A. Rasputnyi, Z. Chen, M. Birk, O. Cohen, I. Kaminer, M. Kr¨ uger, D. Seletskiy, M. Chekhova, and F. Tani, High- harmonic generation by a bright squeezed vacuum, Nat. Phys. 20, 1960 (2024)

    2024

  71. [79]

    R. V. Gothelf, C. S. Lange, and L. B. Madsen, High-order harmonic generation in a crystal driven by quantum light, Phys. Rev. A111, 063105 (2025)

    2025

  72. [80]

    J. Li, Z. Lyu, H. Liu, and Y. Liu, Quantum-optical signatures of solid-state high-harmonic generation driven by squeezed coherent states, Phys. Rev. A112, 033507 (2025)

    2025

  73. [81]

    S.-W. Li, Z. Liao, and M.-X. Liu, An efficient frame- work for quantum dynamics driven by nonclassical light, arXiv:2604.22303

    arXiv

  74. [82]

    Rivera-Dean, D

    J. Rivera-Dean, D. Kanti, P. Stammer, S. Carlstr ¨om, N. Tsatrafyllis, M. Y. Ivanov, M. Lewenstein, and P. Tza- llas, Propagation effects in high harmonic generation me- dia driven by bright squeezed vacuum light, Nat. Commun. 10.1038/s41467-026-75173-8 (2026)

    2026 doi

  75. [83]

    S. Imai, A. Ono, and N. Tsuji, Electron dynamics induced by quantum cat-state light, Phys. Rev. A114, L011102 (2026)

    2026

  76. [84]

    Imai, Macroscopic Schr¨odinger-cat states of nonequilibrium electrons induced by cat-state optical driving and projective measurements on the light field, Phys

    S. Imai, Macroscopic Schr¨odinger-cat states of nonequilibrium electrons induced by cat-state optical driving and projective measurements on the light field, Phys. Rev. A113, 023702 (2026)

    2026

  77. [85]

    Imai, Heralded ultrafast generation of macroscopic quantum states in matter with bright squeezed vacuum light, New J

    S. Imai, Heralded ultrafast generation of macroscopic quantum states in matter with bright squeezed vacuum light, New J. Phys.28, 074506 (2026)

    2026

  78. [86]

    E. C. G. Sudarshan, Equivalence of Semiclassical and Quantum Mechanical Descriptions of Statistical Light Beams, Phys. Rev. Lett.10, 277 (1963)

    1963

  79. [87]

    R. J. Glauber, Coherent and Incoherent States of the Radiation Field, Phys. Rev.131, 2766 (1963)

    1963

  80. [88]

    P. D. Drummond and C. W. Gardiner, Generalised𝑃- representations in quantum optics, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen.13, 2353 (1980)

    1980

  81. [89]

    Gorini, A

    V. Gorini, A. Kossakowski, and E. C. G. Sudarshan, Com- pletely positive dynamical semigroups of𝑁-level systems, J. Math. Phys.17, 821 (1976)

    1976

  82. [90]

    Lindblad, On the generators of quantum dynamical semi- groups, Commun

    G. Lindblad, On the generators of quantum dynamical semi- groups, Commun. Math. Phys.48, 119 (1976)

    1976

  83. [91]

    Kraus, General state changes in quantum theory, Ann

    K. Kraus, General state changes in quantum theory, Ann. Phys. 64, 311 (1971)

    1971

  84. [92]

    Choi, Completely positive linear maps on complex ma- trices, Linear Algebra Appl.10, 285 (1975)

    M.-D. Choi, Completely positive linear maps on complex ma- trices, Linear Algebra Appl.10, 285 (1975)

    1975

  85. [93]

    G. S. Uhrig, M. H. Kalthoff, and J. K. Freericks, Positivity of the Spectral Densities of Retarded Floquet Green Functions, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 130604 (2019)

    2019

  86. [94]

    Araki and W

    H. Araki and W. Wyss, Representations of canonical anticom- mutation relations, Helv. Phys. Acta37, 136 (1964)

    1964

  87. [95]

    Araki, On Quasifree States of CAR and Bogoliubov Auto- morphisms, Publ

    H. Araki, On Quasifree States of CAR and Bogoliubov Auto- morphisms, Publ. Res. Inst. Math. Sci.6, 385 (1970)

    1970

  88. [96]

    Eckstein and M

    M. Eckstein and M. Kollar, Measuring correlated electron dy- namics with time-resolved photoemission spectroscopy, Phys. Rev. B78, 245113 (2008)

    2008

  89. [97]

    J. K. Freericks, H. R. Krishnamurthy, and T. Pruschke, The- oretical Description of Time-Resolved Photoemission Spec- troscopy: Application to Pump-Probe Experiments, Phys. Rev. Lett.102, 136401 (2009)

    2009

  90. [98]

    M. A. Sentef, M. Claassen, A. F. Kemper, B. Moritz, T. Oka, J. K. Freericks, and T. P. Devereaux, Theory of Floquet band formation and local pseudospin textures in pump-probe pho- toemission of graphene, Nat. Commun.6, 7047 (2015)

    2015

  91. [99]

    Randi, D

    F. Randi, D. Fausti, and M. Eckstein, Bypassing the energy- time uncertainty in time-resolved photoemission, Phys. Rev. B 95, 115132 (2017)

    2017

  92. [100]

    J. K. Freericks, H. R. Krishnamurthy, M. A. Sentef, and T. P. Devereaux, Gauge invariance in the theoretical description of time-resolved angle-resolved pump/probe photoemission spec- troscopy, Phys. Scr.2015, 014012 (2015)

    2015

  93. [101]

    Bertoncini and A

    R. Bertoncini and A. P. Jauho, Gauge-invariant formulation of the intracollisional field effect including collisional broaden- ing, Phys. Rev. B44, 3655 (1991)

    1991

  94. [102]

    A. B. Migdal, Interaction between Electrons and Lattice Vi- brations in a Normal Metal, Sov. Phys. JETP7, 996 (1958)

    1958

  95. [103]

    G. M. Eliashberg, Interactions between Electrons and Lat- tice Vibrations in a Superconductor, Sov. Phys. JETP11, 696 35 (1960)

    1960

  96. [104]

    See Supplemental Material for movies of the time-resolved Gaussian-probe spectra for squeezed vacuum

  97. [105]

    Lax, Formal Theory of Quantum Fluctuations from a Driven State, Phys

    M. Lax, Formal Theory of Quantum Fluctuations from a Driven State, Phys. Rev.129, 2342 (1963)

    1963

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.