REVIEW 1 cited by
A Sequential Framework Towards an Exact SDP Verification of Neural Networks
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Although neural networks have been applied to several systems in recent years, they still cannot be used in safety-critical systems due to the lack of efficient techniques to certify their robustness. A number of techniques based on convex optimization have been proposed in the literature to study the robustness of neural networks, and the semidefinite programming (SDP) approach has emerged as a leading contender for the robust certification of neural networks. The major challenge to the SDP approach is that it is prone to a large relaxation gap. In this work, we address this issue by developing a sequential framework to shrink this gap to zero by adding non-convex cuts to the optimization problem via disjunctive programming. We analyze the performance of this sequential SDP method both theoretically and empirically, and show that it bridges the gap as the number of cuts increases.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
SDP-CROWN: Efficient Bound Propagation for Neural Network Verification with Tightness of Semidefinite Programming
SDP-CROWN's deep-network integration is unsound: the per-layer L2 ball is centered at the linear network's preactivation instead of the actual forward preactivation, allowing invalid robustness certificates.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.