pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.20031 · v1 · pith:62HAYEFEnew · submitted 2026-05-19 · 🧮 math-ph · cond-mat.mtrl-sci· math.MP

Concurrent enforcement of polyconvexity and true-stress-true-strain monotonicity in incompressible isotropic hyperelasticity: application to neural network constitutive models

Maximilian P. Wollner , Dominik K. Klein , Herbert Baaser , Gerhard A. Holzapfel , Patrizio Neff This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-20 03:43 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math-ph cond-mat.mtrl-scimath.MP
keywords polyconvexityhyperelasticitymonotonicityincompressible materialsneural network constitutive modelstrue stresstrue strainLegendre-Hadamard condition
0
0 comments X

The pith

Polyconvexity implies true-stress-true-strain monotonicity for a large class of incompressible isotropic hyperelastic strain-energy functions.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that polyconvexity of the strain-energy function ensures monotonicity between true stress and true strain for incompressible isotropic hyperelastic materials belonging to a broad class. This implication also secures satisfaction of the Legendre-Hadamard ellipticity condition together with the physical expectation that stress rises with strain. The authors then design four distinct physics-augmented neural network architectures that embed these constraints directly into the model structure. When calibrated to multiple experimental data sets, the networks fit comparably well inside the training regime yet diverge noticeably in their extrapolation behavior.

Core claim

We show that polyconvexity implies true-stress-true-strain monotonicity for a large class of incompressible strain-energy functions. The resulting elastic law obeys the physically reasonable Legendre-Hadamard (or ellipticity) condition as well as the notion of increasing stress with increasing strain. These results then inform the architecture of four distinct PANNs which are subsequently calibrated to three different sets of experimental data each, revealing varying approximation power and pronounced differences in extrapolation.

What carries the argument

The direct implication from polyconvexity of the strain-energy function to monotonicity between true stress and true strain, which automatically enforces ellipticity and physically increasing response in the incompressible isotropic case.

If this is right

  • The elastic constitutive law satisfies the Legendre-Hadamard ellipticity condition by construction.
  • Stress increases with increasing strain in the true-stress-true-strain sense.
  • Physics-augmented neural networks can be built to satisfy both polyconvexity and monotonicity a priori.
  • Different parametrizations of such networks, all obeying the same constraints, exhibit distinct approximation and extrapolation performance on experimental data.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same polyconvexity-to-monotonicity link could be investigated for compressible or anisotropic hyperelastic formulations.
  • Architectural choices in the neural networks may systematically influence long-term predictive reliability in engineering simulations.
  • The approach offers a template for embedding other classical constitutive inequalities into data-driven models of material behavior.

Load-bearing premise

The strain-energy functions must belong to a sufficiently broad class where the implication from polyconvexity to monotonicity holds without extra restrictions on the specific functional form.

What would settle it

Identification of one incompressible isotropic strain-energy function that is polyconvex yet produces non-monotonic true stress versus true strain response would disprove the central implication.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.20031 by Dominik K. Klein, Gerhard A. Holzapfel, Herbert Baaser, Maximilian P. Wollner, Patrizio Neff.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Overview of various constitutive constraints and their relation in isotropic incompressible hyperelasticity. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Interpolation capabilities of the PANN–𝑰 and PANN–𝜈. All deformation modes are used for calibration. Points label experi￾mental data and solid lines indicate model predictions. stress response. The former stress measure has been shown to provide good results when calibrating PANN models to such experimental data, cf. Dammaß et al. [20] and Klein et al. [45], while the latter is relevant for the TSTS-M cond… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Extrapolation for different constitutive models calibrated to Treloar’s data. All deformation modes are used for calibration. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Extrapolation behavior for the PANN–𝑰∕ √ 𝑰 models calibrated to Treloar’s data. The Cauchy stress response depends on 𝑐1,2 and 𝑑1,2 , cf. (5.3). Five differently calibrated instances of the same model due to random initialization are shown; all but the one with the smallest MSE is depicted transparently. The gray box indicates the calibration regime. 5.4 An open question: Do we need to constrain the curvat… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The Cauchy stress of the PANNs is monotonically increasing but partly with a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The design of physics-augmented neural networks (PANNs) for the purposes of constitutive modeling has received considerable attention as of late for a variety of material behaviors. Here, we revisit the classical framework of isotropic incompressible hyperelasticity in light of recent advances in the study of constitutive inequalities. We show that polyconvexity implies true-stress-true-strain monotonicity for a large class of incompressible strain-energy functions. The resulting elastic law obeys the physically reasonable Legendre-Hadamard (or ellipticity) condition as well as the notion of increasing stress with increasing strain. These results then inform the architecture of four distinct PANNs which are subsequently calibrated to three different sets of experimental data each. We show that different PANN parametrizations - satisfying the same constitutive constraints a priori - have varying approximation power for the description of material behavior. Moreover, even when distinct parametrizations perform comparatively well within the calibration regime, they show pronounced differences in extrapolation. This observation motivates a critical discussion about the predictive power of PANNs which also has implications for the modeling of more complex material behavior by virtue of neural networks.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript shows that polyconvexity of the strain-energy function W implies monotonicity of the true-stress response with respect to true strain for a large class of incompressible isotropic hyperelastic materials. This implication is used to construct four distinct physics-augmented neural network (PANN) architectures that enforce both polyconvexity and the monotonicity condition a priori. The PANNs are calibrated to three experimental datasets, and the resulting models are compared for approximation accuracy within the calibration regime and for differences in extrapolation behavior.

Significance. If the implication holds for a class broad enough to include the proposed PANN parametrizations, the work supplies a concrete route to concurrent a-priori enforcement of two physically motivated constitutive inequalities in data-driven hyperelastic modeling. The reported variation in extrapolation performance across architectures that satisfy identical constraints illustrates that enforcement alone does not guarantee uniform predictive quality, which is relevant for extending similar techniques to more complex constitutive models.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract, paragraph 2: the statement that polyconvexity implies true-stress-true-strain monotonicity for a 'large class' of incompressible strain-energy functions does not delimit the class. No growth conditions, restrictions on the dependence on the principal invariants, or other functional assumptions are stated. Without this characterization it is impossible to verify whether the four PANN parametrizations lie inside the class, which directly affects the validity of the claimed a-priori enforcement.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract refers to calibration 'to three different sets of experimental data each' without identifying the materials or the types of tests performed; adding this information would improve readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for the constructive comment. We address the point below and have revised the manuscript to improve clarity.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract, paragraph 2: the statement that polyconvexity implies true-stress-true-strain monotonicity for a 'large class' of incompressible strain-energy functions does not delimit the class. No growth conditions, restrictions on the dependence on the principal invariants, or other functional assumptions are stated. Without this characterization it is impossible to verify whether the four PANN parametrizations lie inside the class, which directly affects the validity of the claimed a-priori enforcement.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract would benefit from a more explicit delimitation of the class. The result applies to twice continuously differentiable, polyconvex strain-energy functions W(I1, I2) (with I3 fixed at 1) that satisfy standard growth conditions ensuring the Cauchy stress is well-defined and the principal stretches remain positive. These assumptions are stated and used in the derivation in Section 3, where monotonicity of the true-stress-true-strain response is obtained directly from the convexity of W with respect to the invariants. All four PANN architectures are constructed by representing W as a convex neural network in (I1, I2), which places them inside the class by design; the a-priori enforcement of both polyconvexity and monotonicity therefore holds. In the revised manuscript we will update the abstract to include this brief characterization together with a forward reference to Section 3. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Derivation is self-contained with no reduction to inputs by construction.

full rationale

The central result establishes that polyconvexity implies true-stress-true-strain monotonicity for a broad class of incompressible isotropic hyperelastic strain-energy functions via standard arguments from continuum mechanics (Legendre-Hadamard ellipticity and monotonicity conditions). This implication is derived from the definitions of polyconvexity and the specific functional forms considered, without any fitted parameters being relabeled as predictions or any self-referential definitions. The four PANN architectures enforce these constraints a priori through their parametrizations and are then calibrated to experimental data in the conventional supervised sense; no step equates a derived quantity to a fitted input by construction. Any self-citations to prior work on constitutive inequalities serve as external mathematical support rather than a load-bearing chain that collapses the claim. The paper remains self-contained against external benchmarks in hyperelasticity theory.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The work rests on classical assumptions of isotropic incompressible hyperelasticity and the definition of polyconvexity; no new free parameters or invented entities are introduced beyond standard neural-network weights.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The strain-energy function is polyconvex and defined on the space of incompressible deformations
    Invoked to establish the implication to monotonicity (abstract).

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5761 in / 1201 out tokens · 49731 ms · 2026-05-20T03:43:15.375820+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

100 extracted references · 100 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    K. P. Abdolazizi, R. C. Aydin, C. J. Cyron, and K. Linka. Constitutive Kolmogorov–Arnold networks (CKANs): Combining accuracy and interpretability in data-driven material modeling.J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 203:106212, 2025. doi:10.1016/j.jmps.2025.106212

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jmps.2025.106212 2025

  2. [2]

    L. H. Adams and R. E. Gibson. The compressibility of rubber.J. Wash. Acad. Sci., 20(12):213–223, 1930. URLhttps://www.jstor.org/ stable/24529237

    work page arXiv 1930

  3. [3]

    Aldakheel, E

    F. Aldakheel, E. S. Elsayed, Y. Heider, and O. Weeger. Physics-based machine learning for computational fracture mechanics.Mach. Learn. Comput. Sci. Eng., 1(18):1–18, 2025. doi:10.1007/s44379-025-00019-x

    work page doi:10.1007/s44379-025-00019-x 2025

  4. [4]

    COMMET:Orders-of-magnitudespeed-upinfiniteelementmethodviabatch-vectorizedneuralconstitutive updates.Comput

    B.Alheit,M.Peirlinck,andS.Kumar. COMMET:Orders-of-magnitudespeed-upinfiniteelementmethodviabatch-vectorizedneuralconstitutive updates.Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., 452:118728, 2026. doi:10.1016/j.cma.2026.118728

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cma.2026.118728 2026

  5. [5]

    B. Amos, L. Xu, and J. Z. Kolter. Input convex neural networks. InProceedings of the 34th International Conference on Machine Learning, volume 70 ofProceedings of Machine Learning Research, pages 146–155. PMLR, 2017. URLhttps://proceedings.mlr.press/v70/ amos17b.html

    work page 2017

  6. [6]

    Anssari-Benam, A

    A. Anssari-Benam, A. Goriely, and G. Saccomandi. Generalised invariants and pseudo-universal relationships for hyperelastic materials: A new approach to constitutive modelling.J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 193:105883, 2024. doi:10.1016/j.jmps.2024.105883

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jmps.2024.105883 2024

  7. [7]

    E. M. Arruda and M. C. Boyce. A three-dimensional constitutive model for the large stretch behavior of rubber elastic materials.J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 41(2):389–412, 1982. doi:10.1016/0022-5096(93)90013-6

    work page doi:10.1016/0022-5096(93)90013-6 1982

  8. [8]

    As’ad and C

    F. As’ad and C. Farhat. A mechanics-informed deep learning framework for data-driven nonlinear viscoelasticity.J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 417: 116463, 2023. doi:10.1016/j.cma.2023.116463

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cma.2023.116463 2023

  9. [9]

    G. Aubert. Quelques remarques sur les notions de 1-rang convexité et de polyconvexité en dimensions 2 et 3.ESAIM: M2AN, 22(1):5–28, 1988

    work page 1988

  10. [10]

    H. Baaser. Simulationsmodelle für elastomere.ATZ Automobiltech. Z., 112:364–369, 2026. doi:10.1007/BF03222170

    work page doi:10.1007/bf03222170 2026

  11. [11]

    H. Baaser. Hyperelastic stability landscape: A check for HILL stability of isotropic, incompressible hyperelasticity depending on material param- eters.J. Elast., 158(8):1–34, 2026. doi:10.1007/s10659-025-10183-z

    work page doi:10.1007/s10659-025-10183-z 2026

  12. [12]

    Baaser and S

    H. Baaser and S. Becker. Balloon inflation revisited.Polym. Test., 129:108273, 2023. doi:10.1016/j.polymertesting.2023.108273

    work page doi:10.1016/j.polymertesting.2023.108273 2023

  13. [13]

    J. M. Ball. Convexity conditions and existence theorems in nonlinear elasticity.Arch. Rational Mech. Anal., 63:337–403, 1976. doi:10.1007/BF00279992

    work page doi:10.1007/bf00279992 1976

  14. [14]

    J. M. Ball. Constitutive inequalities and existence theorems in nonlinear elastostatics. In R. J. Knops, editor,Nonlinear analysis and mechanics: Heriot-Watt Symposium, volume 1, pages 187–241. Pitman Publishing, 1977

    work page 1977

  15. [15]

    Birkhoff

    G. Birkhoff. Tres observaciones sobre el algebra lineal.Univ. Nac. Tucumán Rev. Ser. A, 5:147–151, 1946

    work page 1946

  16. [16]

    Bonet, A

    J. Bonet, A. J. Gil, and R. Ortigosa. A computational framework for polyconvex large strain elasticity.Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., 283: 1061–1094, 2015. doi:10.1016/j.cma.2014.10.002

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cma.2014.10.002 2015

  17. [17]

    M. M. Carroll. A strain energy function for vulcanized rubbers.J. Elast., 103(2):173–187, 2011. doi:10.1007/s10659-010-9279-0

    work page doi:10.1007/s10659-010-9279-0 2011

  18. [18]

    P. G. Ciarlet.Mathematical Elasticity Volume I: Three-Dimensional Elasticity. Studies in Mathematics and its Applications. North-Holland Publishing Company, 1988

    work page 1988

  19. [19]

    M. V. d’Agostino, S. Holthausen, D. Bernardini, A. Sky, I.-D. Ghiba, R. J. Martin, and P. Neff. A constitutive condition for idealized isotropic Cauchy elasticity involving the logarithmic strain.J. Elast., 157(23):1–44, 2025. doi:10.1007/s10659-024-10097-2

    work page doi:10.1007/s10659-024-10097-2 2025

  20. [20]

    F.Dammaß,K.A.Kalina,andM.Kästner.Wheninvariantsmatter: TheroleofI1andI2inneuralnetworkmodelsofincompressiblehyperelasticity. Mech. Mater., 210:105443, 2025. doi:10.1016/j.mechmat.2025.105443. 22

    work page doi:10.1016/j.mechmat.2025.105443 2025

  21. [21]

    Ebbing.Design of Polyconvex Energy Functions for All Anisotropy Classes

    V. Ebbing.Design of Polyconvex Energy Functions for All Anisotropy Classes. PhD thesis, Universität Duisburg-Essen, 2010. URLhttps: //www.uni-due.de/imperia/md/content/mathematik/ag_neff/phd_vera_ebbing.pdf

    work page 2010

  22. [22]

    Fernández, F

    M. Fernández, F. Fritzen, and O. Weeger. Material modeling for parametric, anisotropic finite strain hyperelasticity based on machine learning with application in optimization of metamaterials.Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., 123(2):577–609, 2022. doi:10.1002/nme.6869

    work page doi:10.1002/nme.6869 2022

  23. [23]

    Franke, D

    M. Franke, D. K. Klein, O. Weeger, and P. Betsch. Advanced discretization techniques for hyperelastic physics-augmented neural networks. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., 416:116333, 2023. doi:10.1016/j.cma.2023.116333

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cma.2023.116333 2023

  24. [24]

    Computat

    J.N.Fuhg,G.A.Padmanabha,N.Bouklas,B.Bahmani,W.Sun,N.N.Vlassis,M.Flaschel,P.Carrara,andL.DeLorenzis.Areviewondata-driven constitutive laws for solids.Arch. Computat. Methods Eng., 32:1841–1883, 2025. doi:10.1007/s11831-024-10196-2

    work page doi:10.1007/s11831-024-10196-2 2025

  25. [25]

    A.N. Gent. A new constitutive relation for rubber.Rubber Chem. Technol., 69(1):59–61, 1996. doi:10.5254/1.3538357

    work page doi:10.5254/1.3538357 1996

  26. [26]

    Geuken, P

    G.-L. Geuken, P. Kurzeja, D. Wiedemann, and J. Mosler. A novel neural network for isotropic polyconvex hyperelasticity satisfying the universal approximation theorem.J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 203:106209, 2025. doi:10.1016/j.jmps.2025.106209

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jmps.2025.106209 2025

  27. [27]

    Modeling isotropic polyconvex hyperelasticity by neural networks -- sufficient and necessary criteria for compressible and incompressible materials

    G.-L.Geuken,P.Kurzeja,D.Wiedemann,M.Zlatić,M.Čanađija,andJ.Mosler. Modelingisotropicpolyconvexhyperelasticitybyneuralnetworks –sufficientandnecessarycriteriaforcompressibleandincompressiblematerials.arXiv,2603.27351:1–39,2026. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2603.27351

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2603.27351 2026

  28. [28]

    Ghiba, M

    I.-D. Ghiba, M. P. Wollner, and P. Neff. Polyconvexity implies Hill’s inequality in SL(2). (in preparation)

    work page

  29. [29]

    Ghiba, R

    I.-D. Ghiba, R. J. Martin, M. Apetrii, and P. Neff. Constitutive properties for isotropic energies in ideal nonlinear elasticity for solid ma- terials: Numerical evidences for invertibility and monotonicity in different stress–strain pairs.Math. Mech. Solids, 31(3):641–672, 2026. doi:10.1177/10812865251411977

    work page doi:10.1177/10812865251411977 2026

  30. [30]

    Gärtner, M

    T. Gärtner, M. Fernández, and O. Weeger. Nonlinear multiscale simulation of elastic beam lattices with anisotropic homogenized constitutive models based on artificial neural networks.Comput. Mech., 68:1111–1130, 2021. doi:10.1007/s00466-021-02061-x

    work page doi:10.1007/s00466-021-02061-x 2021

  31. [31]

    Hartmann and P

    S. Hartmann and P. Neff. Polyconvexity of generalized polynomial-type hyperelastic strain energy functions for near-incompressibility.Int. J. Solids Struct., 40(11):2767–2791, 2003. doi:10.1016/S0020-7683(03)00086-6

    work page doi:10.1016/s0020-7683(03)00086-6 2003

  32. [32]

    Herrmann, M

    L. Herrmann, M. Jokeit, O. Weeger, and S. Kollmannsberger.Deep Learning in Computational Mechanics - An Introductory Course. 2nd ed., Springer Cham, 2025. doi:10.1007/978-3-031-89529-6

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-031-89529-6 2025

  33. [33]

    R. Hill. On constitutive inequalities for simple materials—I.J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 16(4):229–242, 1968. doi:10.1016/0022-5096(68)90031-8

    work page doi:10.1016/0022-5096(68)90031-8 1968

  34. [34]

    R. Hill. Constitutive inequalities for isotropic elastic solids under finite strain.J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 314:457–472, 1970. doi:10.1098/rspa.1970.0018

    work page doi:10.1098/rspa.1970.0018 1970

  35. [35]

    Changeofvolumeofrubberonstretching: Effectsoftime,elongation,andtemperature.J.Res.Natl.Bur.Stand., 17(5):657–678, 1936

    W.L.HoltandA.T.McPherson. Changeofvolumeofrubberonstretching: Effectsoftime,elongation,andtemperature.J.Res.Natl.Bur.Stand., 17(5):657–678, 1936

    work page 1936

  36. [36]

    R. A. Horn and C. R. Johnson.Matrix Analysis. Cambridge University Press, 1985. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511810817

    work page doi:10.1017/cbo9780511810817 1985

  37. [37]

    Hossain and P

    M. Hossain and P. Steinmann. More hyperelastic models for rubber-like materials: consistent tangent operators and comparative study.J. Mech. Behav. Mater., 22(1–2):27–50, 2013. doi:10.1515/jmbm-2012-0007

    work page doi:10.1515/jmbm-2012-0007 2013

  38. [38]

    K. A. Kalina, L. Linden, J. Brummund, and M. Kästner. Automated constitutive modeling of isotropic hyperelasticity based on artificial neural networks.Comput. Mech., 69:213–232, 2022. doi:10.1007/s00466-021-02090-6

    work page doi:10.1007/s00466-021-02090-6 2022

  39. [39]

    K. A. Kalina, L. Linden, J. Brummund, and M. Kästner. FEANN: an efficient data-driven multiscale approach based on physics-constrained neural networks and automated data mining.Comput. Mech., 71(5):827–851, 2023. doi:10.1007/s00466-022-02260-0

    work page doi:10.1007/s00466-022-02260-0 2023

  40. [40]

    K. A. Kalina, P. Gebhart, J. Brummund, L. Linden, W. Sun, and M. Kästner. Neural network-based multiscale modeling of finite strain magneto- elasticity with relaxed convexity criteria.Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., 421:116739, 2024. doi:10.1016/j.cma.2023.116739

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cma.2023.116739 2024

  41. [41]

    K. A. Kalina, J. Brummund, W. Sun, and M. Kästner. Neural networks meet anisotropic hyperelasticity: A framework based on generalized structure tensors and isotropic tensor functions.Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., 437:117725, 2025. doi:10.1016/j.cma.2024.117725

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cma.2024.117725 2025

  42. [42]

    E. A. Kearsley. Note: Strain invariants expressed as average stretches.J. Rheol., 33:757–760, 1989. doi:10.1122/1.550063

    work page doi:10.1122/1.550063 1989

  43. [43]

    D. K. Klein, M. Fernández, R. J. Martin, P. Neff, and O. Weeger. Polyconvex anisotropic hyperelasticity with neural networks.J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 159:104703, 2022. doi:10.1016/j.jmps.2021.104703

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jmps.2021.104703 2022

  44. [44]

    D. K. Klein, R. Ortigosa, J. Martínez-Frutos, and O. Weeger. Nonlinear electro-elastic finite element analysis with neural network constitutive models.Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., 425:116910, 2024. doi:10.1016/j.cma.2024.116910

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cma.2024.116910 2024

  45. [45]

    D. K. Klein, H. Mokarram, K. Kikinov, M. Kannapinn, S. Rudykh, and A. J. Gil. Neural networks meet hyperelasticity: A monotonic approach. Eur. J. Mech., A/Solids, 116:105900, 2026. doi:10.1016/j.euromechsol.2025.105900

    work page doi:10.1016/j.euromechsol.2025.105900 2026

  46. [46]

    Krawietz

    A. Krawietz. A comprehensive constitutive inequality in finite elastic strain.Arch. Rational Mech. Anal., 58:127–149, 1975. doi:10.1007/BF00275784

    work page doi:10.1007/bf00275784 1975

  47. [47]

    Krawietz.Materialtheorie

    A. Krawietz.Materialtheorie. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 1986. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-82512-5

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-642-82512-5 1986

  48. [48]

    Kuhn and F

    W. Kuhn and F. Grün. Beziehungen zwischen elastischen Konstanten und Dehnungsdoppelbrechung hochelastischer Stoffe.Kolloid-Zeitschrift, 101:248–271, 1942. doi:10.1007/BF01793684. 23

    work page doi:10.1007/bf01793684 1942

  49. [49]

    Lankeit, P

    J. Lankeit, P. Neff, and Y. Nakatsukasa. The minimization of matrix logarithms: On a fundamental property of the unitary polar factor.Linear Algebra Appl., 449:28–42, 2014. doi:10.1016/j.laa.2014.02.012

    work page doi:10.1016/j.laa.2014.02.012 2014

  50. [50]

    J. B. Leblond. A constitutive inequality for hyperelastic materials in finite strain.Eur. J. Mech., A/Solids, 11(4):447–466, 1992

    work page 1992

  51. [51]

    Linden, D

    L. Linden, D. K. Klein, K. A. Kalina, J. Brummund, O. Weeger, and M. Kästner. Neural networks meet hyperelasticity: A guide to enforcing physics.J. Mech. Phys. Solids, page 105363, 2023. doi:10.1016/j.jmps.2023.105363

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jmps.2023.105363 2023

  52. [52]

    Linka, M

    K. Linka, M. Hillgärtner, K. P. Abdolazizi, R. C. Aydin, M. Itskov, and C. J. Cyron. Constitutive artificial neural networks: A fast and general approachtopredictivedata-drivenconstitutivemodelingbydeeplearning.J.Comput.Phys.,429(8):110010,2021. doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2020.110010

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2020.110010 2021

  53. [53]

    Linka, G

    K. Linka, G. A. Holzapfel, and E. Kuhl. Discovering uncertainty: Bayesian constitutive artificial neural networks.Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg., 433:117517, 2025. doi:10.1016/j.cma.2024.117517

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cma.2024.117517 2025

  54. [54]

    A. W. Marshall, I. Olkin, and B. C. Arnold.Inequalities: Theory of Majorization and Its Applications. Springer Series in Statistics. 2nd ed., Springer New York, 2011. doi:10.1007/978-0-387-68276-1

    work page doi:10.1007/978-0-387-68276-1 2011

  55. [55]

    R. J. Martin and P. Neff. The corotational stability postulate is equivalent to the true-stress-true-strain monotonicity condition. (in preparation)

    work page

  56. [56]

    Masi and I

    F. Masi and I. Stefanou. Multiscale modeling of inelastic materials with thermodynamics-based artificial neural networks (TANN).Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., 398:115190, 2022. doi:10.1016/j.cma.2022.115190

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cma.2022.115190 2022

  57. [57]

    A. Mielke. Necessary and sufficient conditions for polyconvexity of isotropic functions.J. Convex Anal., 12(2):291–314, 2005

    work page 2005

  58. [58]

    L. A. Mihai and A. Goriely. How to characterize a nonlinear elastic material? A review on nonlinear constitutive parameters in isotropic finite elasticity.Proc. R. Soc. A, 473:20170607, 2017. doi:10.1098/rspa.2017.0607

    work page doi:10.1098/rspa.2017.0607 2017

  59. [59]

    M. Mooney. A theory of large elastic deformation.J. Appl. Phys., 11:582–592, 1940. doi:10.1063/1.1712836

    work page doi:10.1063/1.1712836 1940

  60. [60]

    C. B. Morrey. Quasi-convexity and the lower semicontinuity of multiple integrals.Pacific J. Math., 2(1):25–53, 1952

    work page 1952

  61. [61]

    F. D. Murnaghan. The compressibility of solids under extreme pressures.Theodore v. Kármán Anniv. Vol., pages 121–136, 1941

    work page 1941

  62. [62]

    Neff, I-D

    P. Neff, I-D. Ghiba, and J. Lankeit. The exponentiated Hencky-logarithmic strain energy. Part I: Constitutive issues and rank-one convexity.J. Elast., 121:143–234, 2015. doi:10.1007/s10659-015-9524-7

    work page doi:10.1007/s10659-015-9524-7 2015

  63. [63]

    P. Neff, B. Eidel, and R. J. Martin. Geometry of logarithmic strain measures in solid mechanics.Arch. Rational Mech. Anal., 222:507–572, 2016. doi:10.1007/s00205-016-1007-x

    work page doi:10.1007/s00205-016-1007-x 2016

  64. [64]

    P. Neff, S. Holthausen, M. V. d’Agostino, D. Bernardini, A. Sky, I.-D. Ghiba, and R. J. Martin. Hypo-elasticity, Cauchy-elasticity, corotational stability and monotonicity in the logarithmic strain.J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 202:106074, 2025. doi:10.1016/j.jmps.2025.106074

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jmps.2025.106074 2025

  65. [65]

    P. Neff, N. J. Husemann, S. Holthausen, M. V. d’Agostino, D. Bernardini, A. Sky, A. S. Tchakoutio Nguetcho, I.-D. Ghiba, R. J. Martin, F. Gmeineder, S. N. Korobeynikov, and T. Blesgen. Truesdell’s Hauptproblem: On constitutive stability in idealized isotropic nonlinear elas- ticity and a 500€challenge, 2025

    work page 2025

  66. [66]

    P. Neff, N. J. Husemann, S. N. Korobeynikov, I.-D. Ghiba, and R. J. Martin. A natural requirement for objective corotational rates—on structure- preserving corotational rates.Acta. Mech., 236:2657–2689, 2025. doi:10.1007/s00707-025-04249-1

    work page doi:10.1007/s00707-025-04249-1 2025

  67. [67]

    P. Neff, N. J. Husemann, S. Holthausen, F. Gmeineder, and T. Blesgen. Rate-form equilibrium for an isotropic Cauchy-elastic formulation. Part I: Modeling.J. Nonlinear Sci., 36(8):1–46, 2026. doi:10.1007/s00332-025-10214-y

    work page doi:10.1007/s00332-025-10214-y 2026

  68. [68]

    R. W. Ogden. Large deformation isotropic elasticity – On the correlation of theory and experiment for incompressible rubberlike solids.Proc. R. Soc. Lond., 326(1567):565–584, 1972. doi:10.1098/rspa.1972.0026

    work page doi:10.1098/rspa.1972.0026 1972

  69. [69]

    R. W. Ogden.Non-Linear Elastic Deformations. Dover Publications, Inc., 1997

    work page 1997

  70. [70]

    Pelliciari, S

    M. Pelliciari, S. Sirotti, and A. M. Tarantino. On rubber elasticity from a microscale structural mechanics representation of polymer chains.J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 214:106663, 2026. doi:10.1016/j.jmps.2026.106663

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jmps.2026.106663 2026

  71. [71]

    Aphysicallybasedmodelofstresssofteningandhysteresisoffilledrubberincludingrate-andtemperaturedependency

    J.PlaggeandM.Klüppel. Aphysicallybasedmodelofstresssofteningandhysteresisoffilledrubberincludingrate-andtemperaturedependency. Int. J. Plast., 89:173–196, 2017. doi:10.1016/j.ijplas.2016.11.010

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ijplas.2016.11.010 2017

  72. [72]

    AlocalexistenceanduniquenesstheoremforaK-BKZ-fluid.Arch.RationalMech.Anal.,88:83–94,1985

    M.Renardy. AlocalexistenceanduniquenesstheoremforaK-BKZ-fluid.Arch.RationalMech.Anal.,88:83–94,1985. doi:10.1007/BF00250683

    work page doi:10.1007/bf00250683 1985

  73. [73]

    H. Richter. Das isotrope Elastizitätsgesetz.Z. angew. Math. Mech., 29(3):65–96, 1948. doi:10.1002/zamm.19490290301

    work page doi:10.1002/zamm.19490290301 1948

  74. [74]

    Ricker and P

    A. Ricker and P. Wriggers. Systematic fitting and comparison of hyperelastic continuum models for elastomers.Arch. Comput. Methods Eng., 30 (3):2257–2288, 2023. doi:10.1007/s11831-022-09865-x

    work page doi:10.1007/s11831-022-09865-x 2023

  75. [75]

    R. S. Rivlin. Large elastic deformations of isotropic materials IV. Further developments of the general theory.Philos. Trans. Royal Soc. A, 241 (835):379–397, 1948. doi:10.1098/rsta.1948.0024

    work page doi:10.1098/rsta.1948.0024 1948

  76. [76]

    R. S. Rivlin. Restrictions on the strain-energy function for an elastic material.Math. Mech. Solids, 9(2):131–139, 2004. doi:10.1177/1081286504042589

    work page doi:10.1177/1081286504042589 2004

  77. [77]

    R. S. Rivlin. The relation between the Valanis–Landel and classical strain-energy functions.Int. J. Non-Linear Mech., 41(1):141–145, 2006. doi:10.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2005.05.010

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2005.05.010 2006

  78. [78]

    P. Rosakis. Characterization of convex isotropic functions.J. Elast., 49:257–267, 1997. doi:10.1023/A:1007468902439. 24

    work page doi:10.1023/a:1007468902439 1997

  79. [79]

    Onthephysicalassumptionsunderlyingthevolumetric-isochoricsplitandthecaseofanisotropy.Eur.J.Mech.ASolids,27(1):28–39,

    C.Sansour. Onthephysicalassumptionsunderlyingthevolumetric-isochoricsplitandthecaseofanisotropy.Eur.J.Mech.ASolids,27(1):28–39,

    work page

  80. [80]

    doi:10.1016/j.euromechsol.2007.04.001

    work page doi:10.1016/j.euromechsol.2007.04.001 2007

Showing first 80 references.