Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

ChatGPT versus Traditional Question Answering for Knowledge Graphs: Current Status and Future Directions Towards Knowledge Graph Chatbots

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2302.06466 v1 pith:62TYF6FG submitted 2023-02-08 cs.CL cs.AIcs.IR

classification cs.CLcs.AIcs.IR
keywords conversationalcurrentknowledgeqasschatbotschatgptempowergraphs
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Conversational AI and Question-Answering systems (QASs) for knowledge graphs (KGs) are both emerging research areas: they empower users with natural language interfaces for extracting information easily and effectively. Conversational AI simulates conversations with humans; however, it is limited by the data captured in the training datasets. In contrast, QASs retrieve the most recent information from a KG by understanding and translating the natural language question into a formal query supported by the database engine. In this paper, we present a comprehensive study of the characteristics of the existing alternatives towards combining both worlds into novel KG chatbots. Our framework compares two representative conversational models, ChatGPT and Galactica, against KGQAN, the current state-of-the-art QAS. We conduct a thorough evaluation using four real KGs across various application domains to identify the current limitations of each category of systems. Based on our findings, we propose open research opportunities to empower QASs with chatbot capabilities for KGs. All benchmarks and all raw results are available1 for further analysis.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. OpenAlex reports about 38 citations worldwide. Full citation record

  1. NeuroSymActive: Differentiable Neural-Symbolic Reasoning with Active Exploration for Knowledge Graph Question Answering

    cs.CL 2026-02 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    NeuroSymActive combines soft-unification symbolic modules, a neural path evaluator, and Monte-Carlo-style active exploration to reach strong answer accuracy on KGQA benchmarks while cutting graph lookups and model cal...

Pith tools