Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

A Survey on Deep Tabular Learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.12034 v1 pith:63FBEDIA submitted 2024-10-15 cs.LG cs.AI

classification cs.LGcs.AI
keywords datatabularmodelslikeattentionlearningarchitecturesdatasets
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Tabular data, widely used in industries like healthcare, finance, and transportation, presents unique challenges for deep learning due to its heterogeneous nature and lack of spatial structure. This survey reviews the evolution of deep learning models for tabular data, from early fully connected networks (FCNs) to advanced architectures like TabNet, SAINT, TabTranSELU, and MambaNet. These models incorporate attention mechanisms, feature embeddings, and hybrid architectures to address tabular data complexities. TabNet uses sequential attention for instance-wise feature selection, improving interpretability, while SAINT combines self-attention and intersample attention to capture complex interactions across features and data points, both advancing scalability and reducing computational overhead. Hybrid architectures such as TabTransformer and FT-Transformer integrate attention mechanisms with multi-layer perceptrons (MLPs) to handle categorical and numerical data, with FT-Transformer adapting transformers for tabular datasets. Research continues to balance performance and efficiency for large datasets. Graph-based models like GNN4TDL and GANDALF combine neural networks with decision trees or graph structures, enhancing feature representation and mitigating overfitting in small datasets through advanced regularization techniques. Diffusion-based models like the Tabular Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Model (TabDDPM) generate synthetic data to address data scarcity, improving model robustness. Similarly, models like TabPFN and Ptab leverage pre-trained language models, incorporating transfer learning and self-supervised techniques into tabular tasks. This survey highlights key advancements and outlines future research directions on scalability, generalization, and interpretability in diverse tabular data applications.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. City-Level Foreign Direct Investment Prediction with Tabular Learning on Judicial Data

    cs.AI 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A tabular learning model trained on 380 judicial-performance indicators from 12 million court documents predicts Chinese city-level FDI with R2 up to 0.92 on mixed-year and cross-time benchmarks.

  2. PECKER: A Precisely Efficient Critical Knowledge Erasure Recipe For Machine Unlearning in Diffusion Models

    cs.AI 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    Spline numerical encodings can match or beat standard scaling on tabular nets, but PLE is most robust for classification and learnable knots add substantial training cost.

  3. BINGO! Simple Optimizers Win Big if Problems Collapse to a Few Buckets

    cs.SE 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    SE optimization data clusters into a tiny fraction of possible buckets, so simple stochastic samplers can match DEHB with far less computation.

Pith tools