Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Scalable Diverse Model Selection for Accessible Transfer Learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2111.06977 v2 pith:63QHP7JI submitted 2021-11-12 cs.LG cs.CV

classification cs.LGcs.CV
keywords modelselectionlearningmethodsdiversemodelstransferaccessible
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

With the preponderance of pretrained deep learning models available off-the-shelf from model banks today, finding the best weights to fine-tune to your use-case can be a daunting task. Several methods have recently been proposed to find good models for transfer learning, but they either don't scale well to large model banks or don't perform well on the diversity of off-the-shelf models. Ideally the question we want to answer is, "given some data and a source model, can you quickly predict the model's accuracy after fine-tuning?" In this paper, we formalize this setting as "Scalable Diverse Model Selection" and propose several benchmarks for evaluating on this task. We find that existing model selection and transferability estimation methods perform poorly here and analyze why this is the case. We then introduce simple techniques to improve the performance and speed of these algorithms. Finally, we iterate on existing methods to create PARC, which outperforms all other methods on diverse model selection. We have released the benchmarks and method code in hope to inspire future work in model selection for accessible transfer learning.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Robustness of transferability estimation metrics for medical imaging

    eess.IV 2026-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Transferability estimation metric rankings in medical imaging are unstable to target resampling and to the evaluation metric used for the reference ranking.

Pith tools