Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Do Flat Minima Improve Sparse Novel View Synthesis?

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2511.17918 v2 pith:64ECNEQZ submitted 2025-11-22 cs.CV

Do Flat Minima Improve Sparse Novel View Synthesis?

classification cs.CV
keywords generalizationlosssharpnessnovelviewminimasynthesisflat
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Despite the success of recent novel view synthesis methods, they tend to struggle in sparse-view settings. This poor generalization to unseen viewpoints is an inherent challenge when training with limited data. To address this, we investigate the relationship between loss sharpness and generalization in novel view synthesis-an underexplored direction. Interestingly, while pursuing flatter minima is widely known to improve generalization in deep learning, reducing loss sharpness is not always beneficial in novel view synthesis. We demonstrate that this difference arises because high-detail regions inherently require a sharp loss landscape for accurate reconstruction, whereas low-detail regions benefit from a flat loss landscape for improving generalization. Based on this insight, we introduce structure-aware sharpness, defined within structure-adaptive neighborhoods, and propose to adaptively adjust the sharpness regularization weight according to the local image structure. This strategy encourages flatter minima for generalization while preserving the loss sharpness necessary to reconstruct fine details. Across various datasets and configurations, our strategy consistently improves a wide range of baselines. Code is available at https://bbangsik13.github.io/FASR.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Mind the Gap: Standard 3DGS Evaluation Primarily Measures Near-Trajectory Interpolation

    cs.CV 2026-07 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Standard every-Nth-frame holdouts in 3D scene reconstruction primarily measure near-trajectory interpolation, with a consistent 3-12 dB gap to matched-count contiguous spatial holdouts that persists across Gaussian, n...