Robust cross-chain surface interstitial electronic states and doping-enhanced superconductivity in monolayer $M_2$N ($M$= Ti, Zr, Hf) electrides

Da-Bao Zha; Hai-Qing Lin; Peng Jiang; Yan-Ling Li

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 56 references

Robust cross-chain surface interstitial electronic states and doping-enhanced superconductivity in monolayer $M_2$N ($M$= Ti, Zr, Hf) electrides

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Monolayer M2N materials with M = Ti, Zr, Hf are predicted to be cross-chain electrides whose two surface electron channels split in momentum space, and hole doping is predicted to raise Ti2N's superconducting transition temperature from…

desk verdict A plausible new class of cross-chain electrides with a solid symmetry argument, but the central splitting claim needs better documentation of the projection method before I'd bank on it. read the letter →

arxiv 2504.19263 v2 pith:64WY4URT submitted 2025-04-27 cond-mat.supr-con cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Da-Bao Zha , Peng Jiang , Yan-Ling Li , Hai-Qing Lin This is my paper · ORCID

classification cond-mat.supr-concond-mat.mtrl-sci

keywords cross-chainelectridesinterstitialanionicelectronsM2Nmonolayerstwo-dimensionalmomentum-dependentbandsplittingholedopingelectron-phononcouplingsuperconductivity

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper predicts that monolayer Ti2N, Zr2N, and Hf2N form a new class of 'cross-chain electrides': their excess electrons are not attached to atoms but occupy one-dimensional channels, with two distinct channels alternating above and below the atomic plane. The authors show that these two subchannels produce a momentum-dependent splitting in the projected electronic bands, and that the alternating arrangement persists from one layer to several layers and in the bulk surfaces. They further show that hole doping strengthens the electron-phonon coupling and raises the superconducting transition temperature: Ti2N goes from 0.8 K to 3.2 K at 0.6 hole per formula unit, while Hf2N, which is not superconducting when undoped, becomes superconducting under hole doping. These results matter because they tie the real-space arrangement of anionic electrons to band structure and superconductivity, giving a concrete knob—carrier concentration—for tuning electride properties.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the symmetry operation $\mathcal{O}=S_{4z}$ (equivalently $C_{4z}M_z$) of the P4m2 (D2d) lattice, together with the broken mirror symmetry $M_z$. The operation interchanges the upper and lower interstitial anionic electron subchannels while rotating momentum, so the projected band of the top subchannel at $\mathbf{k}$ is mapped to the bottom subchannel at $\mathbf{k}'=(k_y,k_x)$; the broken $M_z$ guarantees that the two subchannel bands are not degenerate at a fixed $\mathbf{k}$, producing the momentum-dependent splitting that is symmetric across the diagonal of the Brillouin zone. The analysis uses a pseudoatom projection—wave functions projected onto fictitious atoms placed in the channels—to extract the interstitial-anionic-electron bands and densities of states, and electron localization function maps to visualize the alternating chains; layer independence follows because the same $S_{4z}$ symmetry is enforced in every layer.

What would settle it

Recompute the projected band structure with explicitly stated pseudoatom positions and several convergence cutoffs: if the two channel bands become degenerate at every k-point, the central splitting claim is refuted. Alternatively, angle-resolved photoemission from a monolayer Ti2N sample should reveal the predicted pair of split surface bands that swap positions under reflection across the Brillouin-zone diagonal; their absence would contradict the cross-chain electronic state.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the three M2N monolayers are cross-chain electrides: the interstitial anionic electrons form two one-dimensional subchannels, one above the nitrogen plane and one below, running along perpendicular directions and alternating vertically in real space. This ordering is locked by the S4z-type symmetry operation $\mathcal{O}$ of the P4m2 (D2d) structure, which maps the top subchannel onto the bottom one while sending $\mathbf{k}=(k_x,k_y)$ to $\mathbf{k}'=(k_y,k_x)$. Because the out-of-plane mirror symmetry $M_z$ is broken, the projected bands of the two subchannels are nondegenerate at the same $\mathbf{k}$ and are instead exchanged by a diagonal mirror in momentum space. The paper claims this cross-chain surface state is robust to layer number, and that hole doping neutralizes the anionic electrons, weakens their Coulomb attraction to the host cations, increases the density of delocalized electrons near the Fermi level, and enhances the electron-phonon coupling from $\lambda=0.39$ to $\lambda=0.55$. The resulting McMillan-Allen-Dynes estimate puts the Ti2N monolayer at $T_c=0.8$ K undoped and 3.2 K at 0.6 hole per formula unit, with Zr2N at 0.6 K undoped and Hf2N turning superconducting only under hole doping.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the computational projection used to separate the two interstitial electron channels is physically faithful; the projection's details are not specified in the main text, so if the basis were arbitrary or not converged, the claimed momentum-dependent splitting could be an artifact of the analysis rather than a real electronic property.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Angle-resolved photoemission from a Ti2N monolayer should show two surface-derived bands crossing the Fermi level that are nondegenerate at a given momentum and swap under reflection across the Brillouin-zone diagonal.
The alternating subchannel order is set by $S_{4z}$ symmetry and should persist on the top and bottom surfaces of few-layer and bulk M2N samples, so the surface interstitial electronic state is a general feature of the material class, not a monolayer artifact.
Charge-carrier tuning by electrostatic gating should reproduce the predicted enhancement of electron-phonon coupling and roughly quadruple the transition temperature of Ti2N at a doping concentration near 0.6 hole per formula unit.
Hf2N should switch from a normal metal in the undoped monolayer to a superconductor once enough holes are introduced, demonstrating carrier-concentration-controlled superconductivity in an electride.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

A direct database test of the cross-chain criterion would be to screen transition-metal nitrides and oxides with the same P4m2 space group: the paper's symmetry argument implies the alternating subchannel state and its momentum-dependent splitting should appear wherever $S_{4z}$ plus broken $M_z$ coexist with surface interstitial electrons.
Because the splitting couples real-space channel order to momentum, the cross-chain electride is a charge analogue of the spin-dependent splitting in altermagnets; one could look for transport or optical dichroism that distinguishes the two subchannels, something the paper does not calculate.
The $T_c$ values rely on the standard McMillan-Allen-Dynes approximation with $\mu^* = 0.11$; the robust prediction is the doping trend rather than the absolute temperature, and an anisotropic Eliashberg calculation would be a sharper numerical test.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Colleague,

The paper is worth a look. It proposes a new class of two-dimensional electrides—M2N monolayers (M = Ti, Zr, Hf)—where the interstitial anionic electrons form two distinct one-dimensional subchannels that alternate between the upper and lower surfaces, and it connects this real-space arrangement to a momentum-dependent splitting of the projected bands via a symmetry operation. The conceptual addition is meaningful: the "cross-chain" ordering of IAE channels is not something I've seen in the electride literature, and the M2N materials are concrete, dynamically stable prototypes. The superconductivity part is a nice extra, not the main event—Ti2N and Zr2N are predicted to be weak superconductors (Tc below 1 K), and hole doping raises Ti2N's Tc to 3.2 K at 0.6 hole/f.u. The trend is plausible and the mechanism (neutralizing anionic electrons, strengthening Ti vibrations) is explained clearly.

The paper does solid work on stability: phonons checked with both DFPT and frozen-phonon, AIMD at 300 K, HSE06 for electronic structure, QE and VASP band comparisons. The symmetry argument in Eq. (1) is straightforward and correct, and the ELF maps visually support the alternating subchannel picture.

Soft spots, in rough order of importance. The pseudoatom projection used to produce the IAE-projected bands is not documented in the main text—no positions, no radii, no convergence criteria. The caption just says black circles denote pseudoatom positions. That's a genuine reproducibility gap, and I'd want the authors to state that the centers are placed at the ELF maxima and to show that the splitting survives a change of the projection basis. The stress-test note that the splitting might be a projection artifact is a fair question, but I think it's more likely a documentation problem than a real flaw: the two channels are spatially distinct in the ELF, and the symmetry argument dictates a relation between the projected bands. Still, the authors should nail this down.

Second, the Tc values are McMillan-Allen-Dynes estimates with a single µ* = 0.11 and no error bars or convergence checks on k/q grids. For a prediction paper this is acceptable, but readers should treat 0.8 K and 3.2 K as semi-quantitative. Third, the claim of robustness with layer number is supported by ELF and band plots, but there's no quantitative analysis (e.g., no energies of stacking, no quantitative splitting). Minor wording: calling the splitting "protected" by symmetry overstates it—the symmetry enforces a relation, not a nonzero magnitude.

Who is it for? Anyone working on electrides, especially 2D electrides and electride superconductivity; also people interested in analogues of altermagnetism in charge-ordered systems. I'd bring it to a reading group. It deserves a serious referee; the concerns are addressable with additional detail and a couple of checks, not with a rewrite. I'd recommend sending to peer review and requesting the pseudoatom projection details plus a basis-invariance test.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper predicts that monolayer M2N (M = Ti, Zr, Hf) compounds form a new class of 'cross-chain electrides', in which interstitial anionic electrons (IAEs) reside in two distinct one-dimensional subchannels that alternate between the upper and lower surfaces of the buckled atomic layer. Using DFT (PBE, with HSE06 checks for Ti2N), the authors identify the structures as dynamically and thermally stable, and they use ELF maps and pseudoatom-projected band structures to argue that the two IAE subchannels show momentum-dependent splitting related by a symmetry operation O (S4z). They further report that the cross-chain IAE pattern persists in multilayers and at surfaces. Electron-phonon coupling calculations within DFPT and the McMillan-Allen-Dynes formula predict intrinsic superconductivity in Ti2N (Tc ≈ 0.8 K) and Zr2N (Tc ≈ 0.6 K), with hole doping enhancing Tc to 3.2 K in Ti2N at 0.6 hole/f.u. and inducing superconductivity in Hf2N. The central claims are the existence of the cross-chain IAE ordering and its role in doping-enhanced superconductivity.

Significance. If the cross-chain IAE ordering is real and robust, the paper introduces a charge-order analogue of altermagnetism in electrides, with a symmetry-protected momentum-dependent splitting of interstitial electron states. This is conceptually novel and could motivate further studies of anisotropic electrides and their superconducting response. The work has clear strengths: standard DFT and DFPT methodology, phonon stability cross-checked by both DFPT and frozen-phonon calculations, HSE06 validation for the representative Ti2N case, Bader charge analysis supporting the electride picture, and a falsifiable prediction that hole doping raises Tc. However, the central evidence for 'two distinct IAE subchannels' rests on a pseudoatom projection method that is not specified in the main text or in the listed Supplementary Material items, and the symmetry argument in Eq. (1) conflates projected expectation values with intrinsic Kohn-Sham bands. These issues must be resolved before the conceptual claim is fully supported.

major comments (4)

[III.B, Fig. 3(a) and Fig. 3(c)] The pseudoatom projection method used to obtain the IAE-projected band structure is not described anywhere in the main text, and the Supplementary Material items listed in Ref. [43] (cleavage energy, frozen-phonon spectrum, and VASP/QE band comparison) do not include pseudoatom details. The paper must specify the pseudoatom positions, the radial shape or cutoff of the projection, the normalization convention, and the convergence criteria with respect to projection parameters. More importantly, the claim that the two subchannels exhibit an intrinsic momentum-dependent splitting requires a basis-invariance check: shifting the pseudoatom centers within the ELF lobes or using an alternative localization method (e.g., Wannier functions) should leave the qualitative splitting unchanged. Without this, the projected bands in Fig. 3(a) could be an artifact of the arbitrary projection basis, and the 'cross-chain electride' classification loses its microscopic foundation.
[III.B, Eq. (1)] Equation (1) is presented as a symmetry-protected relation between energies ε1n(k) and ε2n(k), but as defined in the text these are expectation values of the Hamiltonian restricted to the upper and lower half-spaces, not eigenvalues of the full Kohn-Sham Hamiltonian. The relation O†ε1n(k)O = ε2n(k′) follows directly from the definition of O and the spatial partition, so it does not by itself establish that the physical electronic structure contains two distinct, basis-independent subchannel bands. In addition, on the diagonal kx = ky (where k′ = k), the relation forces ε1n(k) = ε2n(k), which appears to contradict the sentence in Sec. III.B claiming that the two energy distributions are 'always de-degenerate at the same k path'. The authors should clarify whether the two projected bands are degenerate on the diagonal, and should rephrase the claim to avoid implying an eigenvalue splitting that the projection construction cannot prove.
[III.C, Fig. 6] The method used to simulate hole doping is not specified. The paper should state whether the doped calculations were performed with a rigid-band shift, a charged supercell with a compensating background, or an explicit change in electron number, and should give the corresponding k-mesh, q-mesh, and convergence parameters for the doped EPC calculations. This information is essential for reproducing the central quantitative result that Tc rises from 0.8 K to 3.2 K at 0.6 hole/f.u., and for evaluating the analogous claims for Zr2N and Hf2N in Fig. 7.
[III.C, paragraph on mechanism] The physical explanation for the Tc enhancement is stated qualitatively: hole doping is said to 'reduce the Coulomb attraction between IAEs and the host cationic lattice' and later to 'weaken Coulomb interactions between IAEs and host cations'. These statements are not quantitatively supported by the presented data (e.g., no change in effective screening, no decomposition of the EPC into IAE versus Ti/N contributions). Please either provide a quantitative analysis supporting the mechanism or soften the causal claim, since the superconducting enhancement itself is the main result and the mechanism is secondary.

minor comments (6)

[Title and Abstract] The title contains 'interstitial electronic state s' and the abstract contains 'monoalyers'; these typos should be corrected.
[III.B, Eq. (1)] The notation in Eq. (1) is unclear: H1 and H2 are not defined, the integration variable changes from dk to dr without explanation, and the action of O†...O on a scalar quantity is not standard. Please rewrite the equation using explicit operators acting on projected densities or projected spectral functions.
[III.B] The phrase 'always de-degenerate at the same k path' is presumably intended to mean 'non-degenerate at the same k point' or 'symmetric through the diagonal mirror', but the current wording is confusing and should be corrected to match the actual behavior implied by Eq. (1).
[III.B, Fig. 3(c)] The caption states that black dashed circles denote pseudoatom positions, but the pseudoatom method is not introduced in the main text. Either define it in the Methods section or refer explicitly to the Supplementary Material section that describes it.
[III.B] The term 'nucleon-free-like IAE behavior' is not defined and is unclear; if it is meant to describe electrons delocalized in interlayer regions, that should be stated in standard language.
[III.B, layer dependence] The layer-number independence is demonstrated only for Ti2N in Fig. 4. The text implies a general conclusion for the M2N family; please state explicitly that Zr2N and Hf2N are expected to behave similarly by symmetry, or provide the corresponding data.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the central predictions are first-principles DFT/DFPT results with a standard Coulomb pseudopotential, and Eq. (1) is a symmetry identity rather than a fitted constraint.

full rationale

The paper's central claims—cross-chain interstitial anionic electron subchannels, momentum-dependent projected-band splitting, and doping-enhanced superconductivity—are not obtained by fitting the target quantities. The IAE-projected bands and PDOS are computed from DFT using a pseudoatom projection; this projection is an analysis tool, and the paper explicitly says it is used 'without altering the underlying electronic structure.' The pseudoatom positions are not fully specified in the main text, which is a reproducibility or robustness concern but not circularity, because there is no evidence that the projection parameters were tuned to produce the claimed splitting. The symmetry relation in Eq. (1), relating the upper- and lower-surface projected band energies via O, is derived from the definitions of the half-space charge densities and the crystal symmetry (S4z or C4zMz); it is an identity imposed by symmetry, not an input fitted to the band structure. The broken Mz statement is likewise a symmetry-based argument rather than an assumed result. For superconductivity, the electron-phonon coupling λ is obtained from DFPT and Tc is evaluated with the McMillan-Allen-Dynes formula using a standard literature value μ* = 0.11; no parameter is adjusted to reproduce a target Tc. The hole-doping trends follow from explicit DFPT calculations at different doping levels, not from a parametrized model. Self-citations appear in support of standard methods (e.g., the pseudoatom method and the value of μ*), but these are not load-bearing: the methods are widely used and the cited value is conventional. The analogy to altermagnetism is a comparison, not a derivation that imports a uniqueness theorem. Overall, the derivation chain is self-contained and no step reduces by construction to its own inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central claims rest on standard DFT and DFPT calculations, with a few hand-set parameters (mu*, ELF threshold, pseudoatom positions, doping concentration). No exotic physical entities are introduced beyond the new cross-chain electride ordering, which has a clear experimental fingerprint.

free parameters (4)

Coulomb pseudopotential mu* = 0.11
Set to a typical literature value in the McMillan-Allen-Dynes formula (Section II). It directly affects the calculated Tc values; no uncertainty is reported.
ELF isosurface value = 0.55
Used for all ELF maps (Figs. 3, 4, 6, 7). The visual identification of cross-chain IAE channels depends on this threshold; changing it could change the apparent connectivity.
Pseudoatom positions
Used for IAE-projected band structures (Fig. 3a). Positions are not given in the main text; they are chosen to match ELF maxima, which is a hand-set choice that affects the projection result.
Hole doping concentration nh = 0.6 hole/f.u. (maximum studied)
The superconducting enhancement claim for Ti2N is demonstrated at this specific concentration (Fig. 6a). It is a control parameter, not fitted, but the central prediction depends on it.

assumptions (4)

domain assumption DFT with the PBE exchange-correlation functional accurately describes the electronic structure and stability of M2N monolayers.
The entire structural and electronic analysis relies on PBE-DFT; HSE06 is used only for Ti2N as a check. This is a standard assumption in computational materials science.
ad hoc to paper The pseudoatom projection method faithfully represents the interstitial anionic electron states.
The momentum-dependent splitting is extracted by projecting onto pseudoatom orbitals placed in interstitial regions. This method is common in electride studies but is an ad hoc modeling choice for this paper.
domain assumption The McMillan-Allen-Dynes formula with mu* = 0.11 gives reliable superconducting transition temperatures for these systems.
Used in Section III.C to compute all Tc values. It is an approximate formula and the choice of mu* is from prior literature. No full Eliashberg or anharmonic treatment is performed.
domain assumption Hole doping can be modeled by removing electrons (or adding a background charge) while assuming the lattice and electronic structure respond appropriately.
The paper does not specify the exact doping method (rigid band vs. self-consistent with background). This is a common approximation but not validated against explicit gating simulations.

invented entities (1)

Cross-chain IAE subchannel ordering independent evidence
purpose: A new structural classification of electrides in which two distinct 1D interstitial electron channels alternate vertically and produce momentum-dependent band splitting.
The paper predicts a specific momentum-dependent splitting of IAE-projected bands, which is a falsifiable signature measurable by angle-resolved photoemission. This is a concrete observable handle, even though it has not yet been tested.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Robust cross-chain surface interstitial electronic states and doping-enhanced superconductivity in monolayer $M_2$N ($M$= Ti, Zr, Hf) electrides." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/64WY4URT

@misc{pith2026250419263,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Robust cross-chain surface interstitial electronic states and doping-enhanced superconductivity in monolayer $M_2$N ($M$= Ti, Zr, Hf) electrides},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/64WY4URT}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2504.19263}
}

abstract

The exploration of electrides holds great promise for advancing both fundamental physics and chemistry, owing to their unique characteristics arising from loosely bound interstitial anionic electrons. Here we report a class of cross-chain electrides, distinguished by two distinct anionic electron subchannels forming alternating chains in real space. Through structural symmetry analysis and first-principles calculations, we identify two-dimensional $M_2$N ($M$ = Ti, Zr, Hf) materials as prototypical systems exhibiting these unique features. The anionic electron channels on the upper and lower surfaces of these materials display a vertically alternating pattern, with their projected bands revealing momentum-dependent splitting behavior in the reciprocal space, protected by a crystal symmetry operation $\mathcal{O}$. Notably, the cross-chain electride characteristic in the $M_2$N monoalyers is independent of the layer number and remains robust on the upper and lower surfaces of layered structures, presenting a pronounced and robust surface interstitial electronic state. Additionally, we have explored the superconductivity of these systems, and found that both Ti$_2$N and Zr$_2$N are intrinsic superconductors with superconducting transition temperatures below 1.0 K. Further results show that appropriate hole doping can significantly enhance their superconducting transition temperatures and can induce the Hf$_2$N monolayer to exhibit superconductivity. Our findings provide valuable insights into the design and tuning of novel electrides with enhanced superconducting properties, offering another pathway for deeply understanding the interplay between electride behavior and superconductivity in novel materials.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2504.19263 by the authors.

**Figure 2.** FIG. 2. Phonon spectra and AIMD simulation results at 300 K of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** FIG. 3. (a) IAE-projected band structure of the Ti [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (3 more)

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: FIG. 4. Layer-dependent (a) ELF maps with the isosurface val [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png]

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: FIG. 5. (a) Phonon spectrum with the EPC strength [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png]

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: FIG. 7. IAE-projected band structure and ELF maps of the (a), [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_7.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

56 extracted references · 43 canonical work pages

[43]

see Supplementary Material: the cleavage energy of the Ti 2N monolayer; the phonon spectrum of the Ti 2N monolayer calcu- lated by a ﬁnite displacement method in V ASP; Comparison of the electronic band structures of the Ti 2N monolayer calculated using V ASP with PAW pseudopotentials, and QE using ONCV pseudopotentials

work page
[1]

W. H. Meiklejohn and C. P . Bean, New Magnetic Anisotropy, Phys. Rev. 105, 904 (1957)

work page 1957
[2]

Dieny and M

B. Dieny and M. Chshiev, Perpendicular magnetic anisotropy at transition metal /oxide interfaces and applications, Rev. Mod. Phys. 89, 025008 (2017)

work page 2017
[3]

ˇSmejkal, J

L. ˇSmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Beyond conven- tional ferromagnetism and antiferromagnetism: A phase with nonrelativistic spin and crystal rotation symmetry, Phys. Rev. X 12, 031042 (2022)

2022
[4]

ˇSmejkal, J

L. ˇSmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Emerging research landscape of altermagnetism, Phys. Rev. X 12, 040501 (2022)

2022
[5]

J. Qiao, X. Kong, Z.-X. Hu, F. Yang, and W. Ji, High-mobility transport anisotropy and linear dichroism in few-layer bla ck phosphorus, Nat. Commun. 5, 4475 (2014)

work page 2014
[6]

C. Liu, X. Yan, D. Jin, Y . Ma, H.-W. Hsiao, Y . Lin, T. M. Bretz- Sullivan, X. Zhou, J. Pearson, B. Fisher, J. S. Jiang, W. Han, J.-M. Zuo, J. Wen, D. D. Fong, J. Sun, H. Zhou, and A. Bhat- tacharya, Two-dimensional superconductivity and anisotr opic transport at KTaO3 (111) interfaces, Science 371, 716 (2021)

work page 2021
[7]

H. Wang, Q. Chen, Y . Cao, W. Sang, F. Tan, H. Li, T. Wang, Y . Gan, D. Xiang, and T. Liu, Anisotropic strain- tailoring nonlinear optical response in van der Waals NbOI 2, Nano Lett. 24, 3413 (2024)

work page 2024

Show all 56 references

[8]

Huang, Y

S. Huang, Y . Tatsumi, X. Ling, H. Guo, Z. Wang, G. Wat- son, A. A. Puretzky, D. B. Geohegan, J. Kong, J. Li, T. Yang, R. Saito, and M. S. Dresselhaus, In-plane optical anisotrop y of layered gallium telluride, ACS Nano 10, 8964 (2016)

2016
[9]

J. Zhao, D. Ma, C. Wang, Z. Guo, B. Zhang, J. Li, G. Nie, N. Xie, and H. Zhang, Recent advances in anisotropic two-dimensional materials and device applica tions, Nano Res. 14, 897 (2021)

2021
[10]

J. L. Lado and J. Fern´ andez-Rossier, On the ori- gin of magnetic anisotropy in two dimensional CrI 3, 2D Mater. 4, 035002 (2017)

2017
[11]

W. Wang, M. W. Daniels, Z. Liao, Y . Zhao, J. Wang, G. Koster, G. Rijnders, C.-Z. Chang, D. Xiao, and W. Wu, Spin chirality ﬂuctuation in two-dimensional ferromagnets with perpendi cu- lar magnetic anisotropy, Nat. Mater. 18, 1054 (2019)

2019
[12]

L.-Y . Xu, P . Jiang, L. Liu, H.-M. Huang, and Y .-L. Li, Strain- tunable magnetic phase transition and magnetocaloric e ﬀect in the CrS 2 monolayer with bipolar magnetic semiconducting characteristics, Phys. Rev. B 111, 205407 (2025)

2025
[13]

Gr¨ uner, The dynamics of charge-density waves, Rev

G. Gr¨ uner, The dynamics of charge-density waves, Rev. Mod. Phys. 60, 1129 (1988)

1988
[14]

Kiraly, E

B. Kiraly, E. J. Knol, K. V olckaert, D. Biswas, A. N. Rudenko, D. A. Prishchenko, V . G. Mazurenko, M. I. Katsnelson, P . Hof- mann, D. Wegner, and A. A. Khajetoorians, Anisotropic Two- Dimensional Screening at the Surface of Black Phosphorus, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 216403 (2019)

2019
[15]

J. L. Dye, Electrons as anions, Science 301, 607 (2003)

2003
[16]

Zhang, Z.-A

S.-S. Zhang, Z.-A. Wang, B. Li, Y .-Y . Jiang, S.-H. Zhang, R.- C. Xiao, L.-X. Liu, X. Luo, W.-J. Lu, M. Tian, Y .-P . Sun, E. Y . Tsymbal, H. Du, and D.-F. Shao, X-type stacking in cross-chain antiferromagnets, Newton 1, 100068 (2025)

2025
[17]

X. Yang, K. Parrish, Y .-L. Li, B. Sa, H. Zhan, and Q. Zhu, Switchable two-dimensional electrides: A ﬁrst-principle s study, Phys. Rev. B 103, 125103 (2021)

2021
[18]

Z. Liu, Q. Zhuang, F. Tian, D. Duan, H. Song, Z. Zhang, F. Li, H. Li, D. Li, and T. Cui, Proposed superconducting elec - tride Li 6C by sp-hybridized cage states at moderate pressures, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 157002 (2021)

2021
[19]

Z. Zhao, S. Zhang, T. Y u, H. Xu, A. Bergara, and G. Yang, Pre- dicted pressure-induced superconducting transition in el ectride Li6P, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 097002 (2019)

2019
[20]

X. Wang, Y . Wang, J. Wang, S. Pan, Q. Lu, H.-T. Wang, D. Xing, and J. Sun, Pressure stabilized lithium-aluminum com- pounds with both superconducting and superionic behaviors , Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 246403 (2022)

2022
[21]

J. Wang, X. Sui, S. Gao, W. Duan, F. Liu, and B. Huang, Anomalous Dirac plasmons in 1D topological electrides, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 206402 (2019)

2019
[22]

T.-N. Ye, Y . Lu, J. Li, T. Nakao, H. Yang, T. Tada, M. Kitano, and H. Hosono, Copper-based intermetallic elec- tride catalyst for chemoselective hydrogenation reaction s, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139, 17089 (2017)

2017
[23]

K. Lee, S. W. Kim, Y . Toda, S. Matsuishi, and H. Hosono, Di- calcium nitride as a two-dimensional electride with an anio nic electron layer, Nature 494, 336 (2013)

2013
[24]

Inoshita, S

T. Inoshita, S. Jeong, N. Hamada, and H. Hosono, Exploration for two-dimensional electrides via database screening and ab initio calculation, Phys. Rev. X 4, 031023 (2014)

2014
[25]

Z. Li, J. Yang, J. Hou, and Q. Zhu, Inorganic elec- tride: theoretical study on structural and electronic prop erties, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 125, 6050 (2003)

2003
[26]

W. Ming, M. Y oon, M.-H. Du, K. Lee, and S. W. Kim, First-principles prediction of thermodynamically stable two- dimensional electrides, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138, 15336 (2016)

2016
[27]

Zhang, B

Y . Zhang, B. Wang, Z. Xiao, Y . Lu, T. Kamiya, Y . Uwatoko, H. Kageyama, and H. Hosono, Electride and superconductivity behaviors in Mn 5Si3-type intermetallics, npj Quantum Mater. 2, 45 (2017)

2017
[28]

B. Sa, R. Xiong, C. Wen, Y .-L. Li, P . Lin, Q. Lin, M. Anpo, and Z. Sun, Electronic anisotropy and su- perconductivity in one-dimensional electride Ca 3Si, J. Phys. Chem. C 124, 7683 (2020)

2020
[29]

C. Park, S. W. Kim, and M. Y oon, First-principles prediction of new electrides with nontrivial band topology based on one-dimensional building blocks, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 026401 (2018)

2018
[30]

X. Sui, J. Wang, and W. Duan, Prediction of stoner-type magnetism in low-dimensional electrides, J. Phys. Chem. C 123, 5003 (2019)

2019
[31]

S. Liu, C. Wang, B. Wang, Y . Jia, and J. Cho, Flat-band fer- romagnetism in the quasi-one-dimensional electride Y 2Cl3 in- duced by hole doping, Phys. Rev. B 110, 024413 (2024)

2024
[32]

Kresse and J

G. Kresse and J. Furthm¨ uller, E ﬃcient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave bas is set, Phys. Rev. B 54, 11169 (1996)

1996
[33]

Kresse and D

G. Kresse and D. Joubert, From ultrasoft pseudopo- tentials to the projector augmented-wave method, Phys. Rev. B 59, 1758 (1999)

1999
[34]

P . E. Bl¨ ochl, Projector augmented-wave method, Phys. Rev. B 50, 17953 (1994)

1994
[35]

J. P . Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Gen- eralized Gradient Approximation Made Simple, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865 (1996)

1996
[36]

Grimme, J

S. Grimme, J. Antony, S. Ehrlich, and H. Krieg, A consis- tent and accurate ab initio parametrization of density func - tional dispersion correction (DFT-D) for the 94 elements H- Pu, J. Chem. Phys. 132, 154104 (2010)

2010
[37]

A. D. Becke and K. E. Edgecombe, A simple measure of electron localization in atomic and molecular systems, 8 J. Chem. Phys. 92, 5397 (1990)

1990
[38]

Giannozzi, S

P . Giannozzi, S. Baroni, N. Bonini, M. Calandra, R. Car, C. Cavazzoni, D. Ceresoli, G. L. Chiarotti, M. Cococ- cioni, I. Dabo, A. D. Corso, S. de Gironcoli, S. Fab- ris, G. Fratesi, R. Gebauer, U. Gerstmann, C. Gougoussis, A. Kokalj, M. Lazzeri, L. Martin-Samos, N. Marzari, F...

2009
[39]

D. R. Hamann, Optimized norm-conserving V anderbilt pseu- dopotentials, Phys. Rev. B 88, 085117 (2013)

2013
[40]

P . B. Allen and R. C. Dynes, Transition tempera- ture of strong-coupled superconductors reanalyzed, Phys. Rev. B 12, 905 (1975)

1975
[41]

Y .-L. Li, E. Stavrou, Q. Zhu, S. M. Clarke, Y . Li, and H.-M. Huang, Superconductivity in the van der Waals layered com- pound PS2, Phys. Rev. B 99, 220503 (2019)

2019
[42]

Jiang, L

P . Jiang, L. Kang, X. Zheng, Z. Zeng, and S. Sanvito, Compu- tational prediction of a two-dimensional semiconductor Sn O2 with negative Poisson’s ratio and tunable magnetism by dop- ing, Phys. Rev. B 102, 195408 (2020)

2020
[44]

W. Wang, S. Dai, X. Li, J. Yang, D. J. Srolovitz, and Q. Zheng, Measurement of the cleavage energy of graphite, Nat. Commun. 6, 7853 (2015)

2015
[45]

Jiang, J

K. Jiang, J. Ji, W. Gong, L. Ding, J. Li, P . Li, B. Li, and F. Geng, Mechanical cleavage of non-van der Waals structures toward s two-dimensional crystals, Nat. Synth. 2, 58 (2023)

2023
[46]

Jiang, L

P . Jiang, L. Kang, Y .-L. Li, X. Zheng, Z. Zeng, and S. San- vito, Prediction of the two-dimensional Janus ferrovalley mate- rial LaBrI, Phys. Rev. B 104, 035430 (2021)

2021
[47]

Xiong, P

S.-Y . Xiong, P . Jiang, Y . Wang, and Y .-L. Li, Two- dimensional non-van der Waals niobium nitride nanosheets with high-temperature two-gap superconductivity, Phys. Rev. B 111, 205426 (2025)

2025
[48]

A. V . Krukau, O. A. Vydrov, A. F. Izmaylov, and G. E. Scuseria, Inﬂuence of the exchange screening pa- rameter on the performance of screened hybrid functionals, J. Chem. Phys. 125, 224106 (2006)

2006
[49]

Z. Wan, W. Xu, T. Yang, and R. Zhang, As-Li electrides under high pressure: Superconductivity, plastic, and superionic states, Phys. Rev. B 106, L060506 (2022)

2022
[50]

K. Li, Y . Gong, J. Wang, and H. Hosono, Electron-deﬁcient- type electride Ca 5Pb3: Extension of electride chemical space, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 143, 8821 (2021)

2021
[51]

Miao and R

M.-S. Miao and R. Ho ﬀmann, High-pressure elec- trides: the chemical nature of interstitial quasiatoms, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137, 3631 (2015)

2015
[52]

D.-B. Zha, P . Jiang, H.-M. Huang, and Y .-L. Li, Reﬁned phase diagram and kagome-lattice superconductivity in Mg-Si sys - tem, Phys. Rev. Mater. 7, 114805 (2023)

2023
[53]

Huang, P

F.-F. Huang, P . Jiang, X. Zheng, H.-M. Huang, and Y .- L. Li, Emerging two-dimensional half-metal with high Curie temperature and strain-tunable altermagnetism, Phys. Rev. B 110, 174429 (2024)

2024
[54]

Q. Yang, X. Jiang, and J. Zhao, Coexistence of zero- dimensional electride state and superconductivity in AlH2 monolayer, Chin. Phys. Lett. 40, 107401 (2023)

2023
[55]

Jiang, L

S. Jiang, L. Li, Z. Wang, K. F. Mak, and J. Shan, Controlling magnetism in 2D CrI 3 by electrostatic doping, Nat. Nanotech. 13, 549 (2018)

2018
[56]

Y . Wu, D. Li, C.-L. Wu, H. Y . Hwang, and Y . Cui, Electrostatic gating and intercalation in 2d materials, Nat. Rev. Mater. 8, 41 (2023)

2023

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [43]

see Supplementary Material: the cleavage energy of the Ti 2N monolayer; the phonon spectrum of the Ti 2N monolayer calcu- lated by a ﬁnite displacement method in V ASP; Comparison of the electronic band structures of the Ti 2N monolayer calculated using V ASP with PAW pseudopotentials, and QE using ONCV pseudopotentials

work page

[2] [1]

W. H. Meiklejohn and C. P . Bean, New Magnetic Anisotropy, Phys. Rev. 105, 904 (1957)

work page 1957

[3] [2]

Dieny and M

B. Dieny and M. Chshiev, Perpendicular magnetic anisotropy at transition metal /oxide interfaces and applications, Rev. Mod. Phys. 89, 025008 (2017)

work page 2017

[4] [3]

ˇSmejkal, J

L. ˇSmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Beyond conven- tional ferromagnetism and antiferromagnetism: A phase with nonrelativistic spin and crystal rotation symmetry, Phys. Rev. X 12, 031042 (2022)

2022

[5] [4]

ˇSmejkal, J

L. ˇSmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Emerging research landscape of altermagnetism, Phys. Rev. X 12, 040501 (2022)

2022

[6] [5]

J. Qiao, X. Kong, Z.-X. Hu, F. Yang, and W. Ji, High-mobility transport anisotropy and linear dichroism in few-layer bla ck phosphorus, Nat. Commun. 5, 4475 (2014)

work page 2014

[7] [6]

C. Liu, X. Yan, D. Jin, Y . Ma, H.-W. Hsiao, Y . Lin, T. M. Bretz- Sullivan, X. Zhou, J. Pearson, B. Fisher, J. S. Jiang, W. Han, J.-M. Zuo, J. Wen, D. D. Fong, J. Sun, H. Zhou, and A. Bhat- tacharya, Two-dimensional superconductivity and anisotr opic transport at KTaO3 (111) interfaces, Science 371, 716 (2021)

work page 2021

[8] [7]

H. Wang, Q. Chen, Y . Cao, W. Sang, F. Tan, H. Li, T. Wang, Y . Gan, D. Xiang, and T. Liu, Anisotropic strain- tailoring nonlinear optical response in van der Waals NbOI 2, Nano Lett. 24, 3413 (2024)

work page 2024