Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 77 references

Damping of the Anderson-Bogolyubov mode by spin and mass imbalance in Fermi mixtures

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Fermi-surface mismatch damps the superfluid sound mode even at zero temperature, with a threshold set by Eq. (21).

desk verdict Clean analytic threshold for T=0 Landau damping in mass-imbalanced Fermi superfluids, with a localized prefactor error in the damping-rate formula that does not sink the central result. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.08559 v2 pith:65XA4XBW submitted 2019-08-22 cond-mat.quant-gas cond-mat.stat-mechcond-mat.str-elcond-mat.supr-con

Piotr Zdybel , Pawel Jakubczyk This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.quant-gascond-mat.stat-mechcond-mat.str-elcond-mat.supr-con
keywords Anderson-BogolyubovmodeLandaudampingFermimixturemassimbalancespinpairfluctuationpropagatorgradientexpansionzero-temperature
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

At low temperature the usual Landau-damping channel for the Anderson-Bogolyubov sound mode—phonon scattering off thermally excited fermionic quasiparticles—is exponentially suppressed because the quasiparticle spectrum is gapped. This paper argues that spin and mass imbalance open a second channel that survives at T=0. It derives the necessary condition, Eq. (21), for a nonzero damping rate, and explains it as the occupation of the upper quasiparticle branch caused by Fermi-surface mismatch. If correct, ultracold two-species Fermi mixtures with sufficient imbalance should show damped phonons at temperatures where thermal damping is frozen out. The analytical threshold agrees with numerically computed complex poles of the pair-fluctuation propagator.

What carries the argument

The central object is the inverse Gaussian pair-fluctuation propagator $F^{-1}_q$ of the two-component Fermi gas, whose determinant's complex root gives the collective mode frequency and damping rate. The load-bearing step is the low-momentum, low-frequency expansion of its matrix elements, in particular the temporally nonlocal term $$ -\frac{|q_m|}{|q|}\int d\varepsilon\, c_d D_d(\varepsilon) $u^{2}$_\varepsilon $v^{2}$_\varepsilon \sum_\$\sigma$ \frac{f'(E^\sigma_\varepsilon)}{|a_\$\sigma$(\varepsilon)|} = \frac{|q_m|}{\gamma_q}, $$ which is the same structure that produces Landau damping of spin fluctuations in itinerant magnets. At $T\to 0$ the Fermi function derivative becomes a delta function, so $\gamma_q^{-1}$ counts the density of zeros of $E^\sigma_\varepsilon$; demanding that those zeros occur at nonnegative kinetic energy $\varepsilon$ turns the analysis into the threshold inequality (21). The retained $\sigma=\sigma'$ contribution is what makes the pole of the Gaussian action complex, and hence what damps the mode.

What would settle it

Take a mass-imbalanced parameter set used in the paper (e.g. $r=6.67$, $\mu=0.1$, $\Delta$ from the mean-field gap equation) and compute the complex pole of the full pair-fluctuation propagator without dropping any terms, at $h$ just below $\sqrt{\mu^2+\Delta^2}$. If the damping rate is not zero (or not orders of magnitude smaller than just above the threshold), or if any $\sigma\neq\sigma'$ term contributes to the $|q_m|/|q|$ coefficient at the same order, the central claim fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the gapless sound mode guaranteed by spontaneous breaking of the continuous U(1) symmetry—the Anderson-Bogolyubov phonon—is Landau-damped at T=0 once the Fermi surfaces of the two species are sufficiently mismatched. Within Gaussian pair-fluctuation theory, the authors expand the inverse propagator at small momentum $q$ and frequency $q_m$ and isolate a nonlocal contribution proportional to $|q_m|/|q|$. At zero temperature the coefficient of this term is nonzero precisely when the quasiparticle dispersion $E^\sigma_\varepsilon$ has a zero at a physically allowed kinetic energy $\varepsilon \ge 0$. This condition is Eq. (21): for $h-\zeta\mu\ge 0$, damping requires $h-\zeta\mu\ge \Delta\sqrt{1-\zeta^2}$ when $\mu\ge \zeta\Delta/\sqrt{1-\zeta^2}$, and $h\ge \sqrt{\mu^2+\Delta^2}$ otherwise, where $\zeta=(r-1)/(r+1)$ with $r=m_-/m_+$ measures mass imbalance and $h$ measures spin (chemical-potential) imbalance. Numerically locating the complex pole of the propagator confirms that damping switches on at the predicted $h$ for mass ratios $r=6.67$ and $r=3.47$, while the balanced case $r=1$ remains undamped.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that among all the scattering processes in the pair-fluctuation bubble, only the one with equal quasiparticle branch indices ($\sigma=\sigma'$) contributes the nonlocal term that causes damping at leading order; if any other process contributed at the same order, the damping rate and the threshold condition could be different.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • At T=0 a superfluid with enough Fermi-surface mismatch has a damped Anderson-Bogolyubov phonon; the damping rate is nonzero and increases as $h$ moves further beyond the threshold.
  • The activation of damping occurs well below the critical field for the superfluid-normal transition, so a large part of the superfluid phase diagram features damped sound modes (for the $r=6.67$ parameters used here, onset near $h\simeq 1.59$ versus $h_c\simeq 1.97$).
  • The zero-temperature damping is insensitive to the order of the superfluid-normal transition: numerical checks with a first-order transition ($r=3.47$) and a continuous one ($r=6.67$) both follow the same threshold condition.
  • For $r>3.01$, in the continuous phase-transition region, the analytical condition is automatically fulfilled for $h>\mu\ge 0$, so Landau damping is unavoidable in the proximity of the quantum critical point.
  • For equal masses ($r=1$) the threshold $h\ge \Delta$ is not reached for the studied parameters, recovering the undamped zero-temperature phonon of the balanced case.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: the derivation is at Gaussian (RPA) level; in low dimensions, where long-range order is reduced to algebraic order by fluctuations, the pole structure and the threshold could be modified, so Eq. (21) should be re-examined beyond Gaussian order there.
  • Editorial inference: because the threshold comes only from the requirement $\varepsilon_i\ge 0$, the same condition likely applies in two dimensions, while the magnitude of the damping rate changes through the density of states $D_d(\varepsilon)$.
  • Editorial inference: the same nonlocal mechanism should also damp the gapped amplitude mode; deriving the analogous condition by expanding the off-diagonal matrix element $M_{1,2}$ is a direct extension the paper leaves open.
  • Editorial inference: a cold-atom experiment with a $^6$Li-$^{40}$K mixture could test the sharp onset by measuring the phonon lifetime as the polarization $h$ is swept through $\sqrt{\mu^2+\Delta^2}$.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies the Anderson-Bogolyubov (Goldstone) phonon in a two-component Fermi superfluid with spin and mass imbalance, working in the Gaussian pair fluctuation (GPF) approximation. The authors isolate the temporally nonlocal |q_m|/|q| contribution to the inverse pair fluctuation propagator and relate it to Landau damping of the collective mode. Their central result is Eq. (21), a necessary condition for damping to be active at T=0, expressed in terms of the mismatch parameter h−ζμ, the mass-imbalance parameter ζ, the gap Δ, and the chemical potential μ. They complement the analytic derivation with a numerical solution of the complex pole of the GPF propagator for mass ratios r=1 and r=6.67, finding that damping activates at the predicted value of h in both a continuous and a first-order transition regime.

Significance. If the threshold condition (21) holds, the paper provides a simple, falsifiable criterion for zero-temperature Landau damping of the Anderson-Bogolyubov mode in imbalanced Fermi superfluids. This is a useful analytical result, especially since the numerics indicate that damping sets in for h substantially below the superfluid-normal transition value hc. The derivation is largely transparent, the numerical check is consistent with the threshold, and no free parameters are fitted apart from the UV cutoff. The central claim is defensible, but the analytical expression for the damping coefficient γ^{-1} in Eq. (19) contains a spin-summation error that overcounts the contribution; this does not affect the threshold but invalidates the literal rate formula and weakens the paper's quantitative claims.

major comments (2)
  1. [Eq. (19)] Equation (19) sums Σ_σ L^{-1}_σ(ε_i) at each root ε_i of the squared equation, but after squaring, only one spin branch satisfies the original equation E^σ_ε=0. For h−ζμ≥0, the case analyzed in Sec. III, both roots correspond to σ=+; the σ=− delta function vanishes identically. Summing over both spins therefore overcounts γ^{-1}, giving a factor of 2 in the mass-balanced limit ζ=0. This does not affect the threshold condition (21), which depends only on ε_i≥0, but it invalidates the literal expression for the damping coefficient and weakens the claim in Sec. V of 'full agreement' with numerically computed damping rates. The authors should replace the σ-sum by the single branch σ=sign(h−ζμ) and re-examine the quantitative comparison.
  2. [Sec. V] The concluding statement that analytical predictions are 'in full agreement with damping rates obtained numerically' is not supported by the presented analysis. The numerical study (Figs. 4–6) compares the activation value of h, not the magnitude of γ^{-1} from Eq. (19). Since Eq. (19) is erroneous (see the previous comment), the claim should be revised to state agreement only for the threshold condition, or the comparison should be repeated with the corrected expression.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Sec. III, after Eq. (21)] The text contains the typo 'Fiq. 1', which should read 'Fig. 1'.
  2. [Sec. III, Eq. (13)] The function f^{σ,σ'}_{k,q} is used in Eq. (13) before it is defined in Appendix A. Please define it in the main text or add an explicit pointer to the appendix.
  3. [Sec. IV] The numerical parameters include a hard UV cutoff Λ=10. A brief statement about the sensitivity of the threshold condition and of the reported damping rates to the cutoff would be helpful.
  4. [Sec. IV, Figs. 3 and 4] The extremely small damping rates (of order 10^{-10}–10^{-11}) are quoted without an estimate of numerical precision. A short note on how the analytic continuation and root-finding errors were controlled would be useful.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: Eq. (21) follows algebraically from the model; self-citations are side remarks.

full rationale

The central damping condition Eq. (21) is derived self-containedly: the paper expands the Gaussian pair-fluctuation propagator, isolates the |q_m|/|q| nonlocal term (Eqs. (13)-(15)), takes T→0, and requires zeros of E^σ_ε = ζξ - (h-ζμ) + σE_ε to lie in ε≥0. The resulting inequality (21) is an algebraic consequence of the quasiparticle dispersion (9) and the physical-region condition; no parameter is fitted to the predicted threshold. The numerical section evaluates complex poles of the same propagator, so it is a consistency check rather than an independent benchmark, but that does not make the analytic prediction circular. The self-citations (Refs. 21, 22) appear only in side remarks about the phase diagram and QCP proximity, for example 'According to Ref. 22, the above condition is always fulfilled for r>3.01 and h>μ ≥ 0', and are not used to establish Eq. (21). The unproved dominance assertion after Eq. (13) and the possible double-counting of spin branches in Eq. (19) are correctness or rigor concerns, not circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim introduces no fitted parameters. Model inputs such as m+, r, μ, h, g, T, and Λ are chosen to represent ultracold mixtures; Λ is a hand-set ultraviolet cutoff. The main physical inputs are the mean-field gap Δ and the Gaussian pair fluctuation approximation. Several unproved technical assertions about which terms dominate the low-frequency expansion are listed as axioms.

free parameters (1)
  • Ultraviolet cutoff Λ = 10
    Hand-set momentum cutoff in the numerical solutions; not fitted to data, but numerical results depend on it.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The Gaussian pair fluctuation propagator with the mean-field gap Δ from Eq. (10) gives the collective mode pole.
    Sec. II expands the action to quadratic order in fluctuations; corrections beyond Gaussian order are neglected.
  • standard math At T=0, f′(E) approaches -δ(-E), so damping is controlled by zeros of the quasiparticle energy Eσ.
    Used in Eq. (16) to reduce the nonlocal term to a delta-function integral.
  • ad hoc to paper All nonlocal contributions in Eq. (13) except the σ=σ′ term are higher order or already contained in Eq. (11).
    Stated after Eq. (13) without a full proof; this selects the term that produces Eq. (15) and the damping rate.
  • ad hoc to paper The roots of Eσ=0 are the same for both σ and are given by Eq. (18), without an additional sign constraint.
    Used to derive Eq. (19); the missing sign constraint appears to double-count the unphysical spin branch in the mass-balanced limit.
  • domain assumption The ratio |q_m|/|q| is small for gapless modes, and the sound velocity satisfies v_s<1.
    Invoked in Sec. III following the Hertz-Millis-Moriya strategy and checked numerically in Sec. IV.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Damping of the Anderson-Bogolyubov mode by spin and mass imbalance in Fermi mixtures." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/65XA4XBW

@misc{pith2026190808559,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Damping of the Anderson-Bogolyubov mode by spin and mass imbalance in Fermi mixtures},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/65XA4XBW}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.08559}
}
read the original abstract

We study the temporally nonlocal contributions to the gradient expansion of the pair fluctuation propagator for spin- and mass-imbalanced Fermi mixtures. These terms are related to damping processes of sound-like (Anderson-Bogolyubov) collective modes and are relevant for the structure of the complex pole of the pair fluctuation propagator. We derive conditions under which damping occurs even at zero temperature for large enough mismatch of the Fermi surfaces. We compare our analytical results with numerically computed damping rates of the Anderson-Bogolyubov mode.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.08559 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Schematic illustration of the fermionic quasiparticle [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. The fermionic quasiparticle spectrum [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. (a) Dispersion relations [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: for |q|/ √ 2mµ = 4.24·10−3 . We see that the activa￾tion of damping occurs precisely for the predicted value [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png]
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: , this prediction is consistent with numerical re￾sults. Moreover, the dependence Γq/µ on h is shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Damping rates Γ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

77 extracted references · 53 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Bloch , author J

    author author I. Bloch , author J. Dalibard , \ and\ author W. Zwerger ,\ 10.1103/RevModPhys.80.885 journal journal Rev. Mod. Phys. \ volume 80 ,\ pages 885 ( year 2008 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1103/revmodphys.80.885 2008

  2. [2]

    Giorgini , author L

    author author S. Giorgini , author L. P. Pitaevskii , \ and\ author S. Stringari ,\ 10.1103/RevModPhys.80.1215 journal journal Rev. Mod. Phys. \ volume 80 ,\ pages 1215 ( year 2008 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1103/revmodphys.80.1215 2008

  3. [3]

    Mukherjee , author Z

    author author B. Mukherjee , author Z. Yan , author P. B. \ Patel , author Z. Hadzibabic , author T. Yefsah , author J. Struck , \ and\ author M. W. \ Zwierlein ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.123401 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 118 ,\ pages 123401 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.118.123401

  4. [4]

    Hueck , author N

    author author K. Hueck , author N. Luick , author L. Sobirey , author J. Siegl , author T. Lompe , \ and\ author H. Moritz ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.060402 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 120 ,\ pages 060402 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.120.060402

  5. [5]

    Taglieber , author A

    author author M. Taglieber , author A. C. Voigt , author T. Aoki , author T. W. H\" a nsch , \ and\ author K. Dieckmann ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.010401 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 100 ,\ pages 010401 ( year 2008 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.100.010401

  6. [6]

    Wille , author F

    author author E. Wille , author F. M. Spiegelhalder , author G. Kerner , author D. Naik , author A. Trenkwalder , author G. Hendl , author F. Schreck , author R. Grimm , author T. G. Tiecke , author J. T. M. Walraven , author S. J. J. M. F. Kokkelmans , author E. Tiesinga , \ and\ author P. S. Julienne ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.053201 journal journal Phy...

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.100.053201

  7. [7]

    author author A. C. Voigt , author M. Taglieber , author L. Costa , author T. Aoki , author W. Wieser , author T. W. H\" a nsch , \ and\ author K. Dieckmann ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.020405 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 102 ,\ pages 020405 ( year 2009 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.102.020405

  8. [8]

    author author T. G. Tiecke , author M. R. Goosen , author A. Ludewig , author S. D. Gensemer , author S. Kraft , author S. J. J. M. F. Kokkelmans , \ and\ author J. T. M. Walraven ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.053202 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 104 ,\ pages 053202 ( year 2010 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.104.053202

Show all 77 references
  1. [9]

    author author M. W. \ Zwierlein , author A. Schirotzek , author C. H. \ Schunck , \ and\ author W. Ketterle ,\ 10.1126/science.1122318 journal journal Science \ volume 311 ,\ pages 492 ( year 2006 ) NoStop

    2006 doi

  2. [10]

    author author G. B. \ Partridge , author W. Li , author R. I. \ Kamar , author Y.-A. \ Liao , \ and\ author R. G. \ Hulet ,\ 10.1126/science.1122876 journal journal Science \ volume 311 ,\ pages 503 ( year 2006 ) NoStop

    2006 doi

  3. [11]

    Ketterle , author Y

    author author W. Ketterle , author Y. Shin , author A. Schirotzek , \ and\ author C. H. \ Schunk ,\ http://stacks.iop.org/0953-8984/21/i=16/a=164206 journal journal J. Phys.: Condens. Matter \ volume 21 ,\ pages 164206 ( year 2009 ) NoStop

    2009

  4. [12]

    Ong , author C

    author author W. Ong , author C. Cheng , author I. Arakelyan , \ and\ author J. E. Thomas ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.110403 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 114 ,\ pages 110403 ( year 2015 ) NoStop

    2015 doi

  5. [13]

    Mitra , author P

    author author D. Mitra , author P. T. \ Brown , author P. Schauss , author S. S. \ Kondov , \ and\ author W. S. \ Bakr ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.093601 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 117 ,\ pages 093601 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

    doi

  6. [14]

    Sarma ,\ 10.1016/0022-3697(63)90007-6 journal journal J

    author author G. Sarma ,\ 10.1016/0022-3697(63)90007-6 journal journal J. Phys. Chem. Solids \ volume 24 ,\ pages 1029 ( year 1963 ) NoStop

    1963 doi

  7. [15]

    author author W. V. \ Liu \ and\ author F. Wilczek ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.047002 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 90 ,\ pages 047002 ( year 2003 ) NoStop

    2003 doi

  8. [16]

    Fulde \ and\ author R

    author author P. Fulde \ and\ author R. A. \ Ferrell ,\ 10.1103/PhysRev.135.A550 journal journal Phys. Rev. \ volume 135 ,\ pages A550 ( year 1964 ) NoStop

    1964 doi

  9. [17]

    author author A. I. \ Larkin \ and\ author Y. N. \ Ovchinnikov ,\ @noop journal journal Sov. Phys. JETP \ volume 20 ,\ pages 762 ( year 1965 ) NoStop

    1965

  10. [18]

    author author M. M. \ Parish , author F. M. \ Marchetti , author A. Lamacraft , \ and\ author B. D. \ Simons ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.160402 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 98 ,\ pages 160402 ( year 2007 b ) NoStop

    2007 doi

  11. [19]

    author author J. E. \ Baarsma , author K. B. \ Gubbels , \ and\ author H. T. C. \ Stoof ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevA.82.013624 journal journal Phys. Rev. A \ volume 82 ,\ pages 013624 ( year 2010 ) NoStop

    2010 doi

  12. [20]

    Radzihovsky \ and\ author D

    author author L. Radzihovsky \ and\ author D. E. \ Sheehy ,\ 10.1088/0034-4885/73/7/076501 journal journal Rep. Prog. Phys. \ volume 73 ,\ pages 076501 ( year 2010 ) NoStop

    2010 doi

  13. [21]

    Strack \ and\ author P

    author author P. Strack \ and\ author P. Jakubczyk ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevX.4.021012 journal journal Phys. Rev. X \ volume 4 ,\ pages 021012 ( year 2014 ) NoStop

    2014 doi

  14. [22]

    \ Zdybel \ and\ author P

    author author P. \ Zdybel \ and\ author P. Jakubczyk ,\ 10.1088/1361-648X/aacc00 journal journal J. Phys.: Condens. Matter \ volume 30 ,\ pages 305604 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

    2018 doi

  15. [23]

    Piazza , author W

    author author F. Piazza , author W. Zwerger , \ and\ author P. Strack ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.93.085112 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 93 ,\ pages 085112 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

    2016 doi

  16. [24]

    Pimenov , author I

    author author D. Pimenov , author I. Mandal , author F. Piazza , \ and\ author M. Punk ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.98.024510 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 98 ,\ pages 024510 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

    2018 doi

  17. [25]

    \ Iskin \ and\ author C

    author author M. \ Iskin \ and\ author C. A. R. S\'a de Melo ,\ 10.1103/physrevb.72.024512 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 72 ,\ pages 024512 ( year 2005 ) NoStop

    2005 doi

  18. [26]

    \ Iskin \ and\ author C

    author author M. \ Iskin \ and\ author C. A. R. S\'a de Melo ,\ 10.1007/s10909-007-9494-7 journal journal J. Low Temp. Phys. \ volume 149 ,\ pages 29 ( year 2007 ) NoStop

    2007 doi

  19. [27]

    author author S. N. \ Klimin , author J. \ Tempere , author G. \ Lombardi , \ and\ author J. P. A. Devreese ,\ 10.1140/epjb/e2015-60213-4 journal journal Eur. Phys. J. B \ volume 88 ,\ pages 122 ( year 2015 ) NoStop

    2015 doi

  20. [28]

    author author S. N. \ Klimin , author J. \ Tempere , \ and\ author H. Kurkjian ,\ https://arxiv.org/abs/1908.11795v1 journal journal arXiv: 1908.11795v1 \ ( year 2019 ) NoStop

    1908 arXiv

  21. [29]

    \ Iskin \ and\ author A

    author author M. \ Iskin \ and\ author A. L. Suba s ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevA.84.043621 journal journal Phys. Rev. A \ volume 84 ,\ pages 043621 ( year 2011 ) NoStop

    2011 doi

  22. [30]

    \ Liao , author Y

    author author R. \ Liao , author Y. \ Yi-Xiang , \ and\ author W.-M. \ Liu ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.080406 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 108 ,\ pages 080406 ( year 2012 b ) NoStop

    2012 doi

  23. [31]

    \ Seo , author L

    author author K. \ Seo , author L. \ Han \ and\ author C. A. R. S\'a de Melo ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevA.85.033601 journal journal Phys. Rev. A \ volume 85 ,\ pages 033601 ( year 2012 ) NoStop

    2012 doi

  24. [32]

    \ Zhang , author X.-L

    author author S.-S. \ Zhang , author X.-L. \ Yu , author J. \ Ye , \ and\ author W.-M. \ Liu ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevA.87.063623 journal journal Phys. Rev. A \ volume 87 ,\ pages 063623 ( year 2013 b ) NoStop

    2013 doi

  25. [33]

    Iskin ,\ https://arxiv.org/abs/1908.00818v1 journal journal arXiv:1908.00818v1 \ ( year 2019 ) NoStop

    author author M. Iskin ,\ https://arxiv.org/abs/1908.00818v1 journal journal arXiv:1908.00818v1 \ ( year 2019 ) NoStop

    1908 arXiv

  26. [34]

    author author P. W. Anderson ,\ 10.1103/PhysRev.112.1900 journal journal Phys. Rev. \ volume 112 ,\ pages 1900 ( year 1958 ) NoStop

    1900 doi

  27. [35]

    author author N. N. \ Bogolyubov , author V. V. \ Tolmachev , \ and\ author D. V. Shirkov ,\ 10.1002/prop.19580061102 title A New Method in the Theory of Superconductivity \ ( publisher Izd. Akad. Nauk SSSR [Engl. translation published by Consultants Bureau] ,\ year 1958 ) NoStop

    doi

  28. [36]

    Nambu ,\ 10.1103/PhysRev.117.648 journal journal Phys

    author author Y. Nambu ,\ 10.1103/PhysRev.117.648 journal journal Phys. Rev. \ volume 117 ,\ pages 648 ( year 1960 ) NoStop

    1960 doi

  29. [37]

    Goldstone ,\ 10.1007/BF02812722 journal journal Il Nuovo Cimento \ volume 19 ,\ pages 154 ( year 1961 ) NoStop

    author author J. Goldstone ,\ 10.1007/BF02812722 journal journal Il Nuovo Cimento \ volume 19 ,\ pages 154 ( year 1961 ) NoStop

    1961 doi

  30. [38]

    \ Goldstone , author A

    author author J. \ Goldstone , author A. \ Salam , \ and\ author S. Weinberg ,\ 10.1103/PhysRev.127.965 journal journal Phys. Rev. \ volume 127 ,\ pages 965 ( year 1962 ) NoStop

    1962 doi

  31. [39]

    \ Bartenstein , author A

    author author M. \ Bartenstein , author A. \ Altmeyer , author S. \ Riedl , author S. \ Jochim , author C. \ Chin , author J. H. \ Denschlag , \ and\ author R. Grimm ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.203201 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 92 ,\ pages 203201 ( year 2004 ) NoStop

    doi

  32. [40]

    \ Altmeyer , author S

    author author A. \ Altmeyer , author S. \ Riedl , author C. \ Kohstall , author M. J. \ Wright , author R. \ Geursen , author M. \ Bartenstein , author C. \ Chin , author J. H. \ Denschlag , \ and\ author R. Grimm ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.040401 journal journal Phys. Rev. Let...

    doi

  33. [41]

    author author M. K. \ Tey , author L. A. \ Sidorenkov , author Edmundo R. Sanchez \ Guajardo , author R. \ Grimm , author M. J. H. \ Ku , author M. W. \ Zwierlein , author Y.-H. \ Hou , author L. \ Pitaevskii , \ and\ author S. Stringari ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.055303 journ...

    doi

  34. [43]

    \ Hoinka , author P

    author author S. \ Hoinka , author P. \ Dyke , author M. G. \ Lingham , author J. J. \ Kinnunen , author G. M. \ Bruun , \ and\ author C. J. Vale ,\ 10.1038/nature12136 journal journal Nature Phys. \ volume 13 ,\ pages 943 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

    doi

  35. [44]

    author author J. R. \ Engelbrecht , author M. \ Randeria , \ and\ author C. A. R. S\' a de Melo ,\ 10.1103/physrevb.55.15153 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 55 ,\ pages 15153 ( year 1997 ) NoStop

    1997 doi

  36. [45]

    \ Marini , author F

    author author M. \ Marini , author F. \ Pistolesi , \ and\ author G. C. Strinati ,\ 10.1007/s100510050165 journal journal Eur. Phys. J. B \ volume 1 ,\ pages 151 ( year 1998 ) NoStop

    1998 doi

  37. [46]

    \ Ohashi \ and\ author A

    author author Y. \ Ohashi \ and\ author A. Griffin ,\ 10.1103/physreva.67.063612 journal journal Phys. Rev. A \ volume 67 ,\ pages 063612 ( year 2003 ) NoStop

    2003 doi

  38. [47]

    \ Combescot , author M

    author author R. \ Combescot , author M. Y. \ Kagan , \ and\ author S. Stringari ,\ 10.1103/physreva.74.042717 journal journal Phys. Rev. A \ volume 74 ,\ pages 042717 ( year 2006 ) NoStop

    2006 doi

  39. [48]

    \ Iskin \ and\ author C

    author author M. \ Iskin \ and\ author C. A. R. S\'a de Melo ,\ 10.1103/physreva.76.013601 journal journal Phys. Rev. A \ volume 76 ,\ pages 013601 ( year 2007 ) NoStop

    2007 doi

  40. [49]

    \ Hu , author P

    author author H. \ Hu , author P. D. \ Drummond , \ and\ author X.-J. Liu ,\ 10.1038/nphys598 journal journal Nature Phys. \ volume 3 ,\ pages 469 ( year 2007 ) NoStop

    2007 doi

  41. [50]

    author author R. B. \ Diener , author R. \ Sensarma , \ and\ author M. Randeria ,\ 10.1103/physreva.77.023626 journal journal Phys. Rev. A \ volume 77 ,\ pages 023626 ( year 2008 ) NoStop

    2008 doi

  42. [51]

    author author S. N. \ Klimin , author J. \ Tempere , \ and\ author J. P. A. Devreese ,\ 10.1007/s10909-011-0397-2 journal journal J. Low Temp. Phys. \ volume 165 ,\ pages 261 ( year 2011 ) NoStop

    2011 doi

  43. [52]

    \ Kurkjian , author Y

    author author H. \ Kurkjian , author Y. \ Castin , \ and\ author A. Sinatra ,\ 10.1103/physreva.93.013623 journal journal Phys. Rev. A \ volume 93 ,\ pages 013623 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

    2016 doi

  44. [53]

    author author S. N. \ Klimin , author H. \ Kurkjian , \ and\ author J. Tempere ,\ 10.1007/s10909-019-02160-3 journal journal J. Low Temp. Phys. \ ( year 2019 ) NoStop

    2019 doi

  45. [54]

    author author S. N. \ Klimin , author J. \ Tempere , \ and\ author H. Kurkjian ,\ https://arxiv.org/abs/1811.07796v2 journal journal arXiv: 1811.07796v2 \ ( year 2019 ) NoStop

    2019 arXiv

  46. [55]

    \ Zou , author H

    author author P. \ Zou , author H. \ Hu , \ and\ author X.-J. Liu ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevA.98.011602 journal journal Phys. Rev. A \ volume 98 ,\ pages 011602(R) ( year 2018 ) NoStop

    2018 doi

  47. [56]

    \ Shen \ and\ author W

    author author H. \ Shen \ and\ author W. Zheng ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevA.92.033620 journal journal Phys. Rev. A \ volume 92 ,\ pages 033620 ( year 2015 ) NoStop

    2015 doi

  48. [57]

    \ Zhang \ and\ author W

    author author Z. \ Zhang \ and\ author W. V. Liu ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevA.83.023617 journal journal Phys. Rev. A \ volume 83 ,\ pages 023617 ( year 2011 ) NoStop

    2011 doi

  49. [58]

    \ Kurkjian \ and\ author J

    author author H. \ Kurkjian \ and\ author J. Tempere ,\ 10.1088/1367-2630/aa969b journal journal New J. Phys. \ volume 19 ,\ pages 113045 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

    2017 doi

  50. [59]

    Bruus \ and\ author K

    author author H. Bruus \ and\ author K. Flensberg ,\ title Many-Body Quantum Theory in Condensed Matter Physics: An Introduction \ ( publisher Oxford University Press ,\ year 2016 ) NoStop

    2016

  51. [60]

    \ Matera \ and\ author M

    author author F. \ Matera \ and\ author M. F. Wagner ,\ 10.1140/epjd/e2017-80156-0 journal journal Eur. Phys. J. D \ volume 71 ,\ pages 293 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

    2017 doi

  52. [61]

    Altland \ and\ author B

    author author A. Altland \ and\ author B. Simons ,\ title Condensed Matter Field Theory \ ( publisher Cambridge University Press ,\ year 2010 ) NoStop

    2010

  53. [62]

    \ Nozi\'eres \ and\ author S

    author author P. \ Nozi\'eres \ and\ author S. Schmitt-Rink ,\ 10.1007/bf00683774 journal journal J. Low Temp. Phys. \ volume 59 ,\ pages 195 ( year 1985 ) NoStop

    1985 doi

  54. [63]

    \ Pieri , author L

    author author P. \ Pieri , author L. \ Pisani , \ and\ author G. C. Strinati ,\ 10.1103/physrevb.70.094508 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 70 ,\ pages 094508 ( year 2004 ) NoStop

    2004 doi

  55. [64]

    author author A. A. Abrikosov , author L. P. Gorkov , \ and\ author I. E. Dzyaloshinski ,\ title Methods of Quantum Field Theory in Statistical Physics \ ( publisher Dover Publ. ,\ year 2016 ) NoStop

    2016

  56. [65]

    author author J. A. \ Hertz \ 10.1103/PhysRevB.14.1165 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 14 ,\ pages 1165 ( year 1976 ) NoStop

    1976 doi

  57. [66]

    Nagaosa ,\ title Quantum Field Theory in Strongly Correlated Electronic Systems \ ( publisher Springer ,\ year 1998 ) NoStop

    author author N. Nagaosa ,\ title Quantum Field Theory in Strongly Correlated Electronic Systems \ ( publisher Springer ,\ year 1998 ) NoStop

    1998

  58. [67]

    ohneysen , author A. Rosch , author M. Vojta , \ and\ author P. W\

    author author H. v. L\"ohneysen , author A. Rosch , author M. Vojta , \ and\ author P. W\"olfle ,\ 10.1103/revmodphys.79.1015 journal journal Rev. Mod. Phys. \ volume 79 ,\ pages 1015 ( year 2007 ) NoStop

    2007 doi

  59. [68]

    Continentino ,\ title Quantum Scaling in Many-Body Systems

    author author M. Continentino ,\ title Quantum Scaling in Many-Body Systems. An Approach to Quantum Phase Transitions \ ( publisher Cambridge University Press ,\ year 2017 ) NoStop

    2017

  60. [69]

    Nozi\`eres ,\ title Theory of Interacting Fermi Systems \ ( publisher CRC Press ,\ year 2018 ) NoStop

    author author P. Nozi\`eres ,\ title Theory of Interacting Fermi Systems \ ( publisher CRC Press ,\ year 2018 ) NoStop

    2018

  61. [70]

    Shimahara ,\ 10.1143/JPSJ.67.1872 journal journal J

    author author H. Shimahara ,\ 10.1143/JPSJ.67.1872 journal journal J. Phys. Soc. Jpn \ volume 67 ,\ pages 1872 ( year 1998 ) NoStop

    1998 doi

  62. [71]

    Radzihovsky ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevA.84.023611 journal journal Phys

    author author L. Radzihovsky ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevA.84.023611 journal journal Phys. Rev. A \ volume 84 ,\ pages 023611 ( year 2011 ) NoStop

    2011 doi

  63. [72]

    \ Yin , author J.-P

    author author S. \ Yin , author J.-P. Martikainen , \ and\ author P. \ T\"orm\"a ,\ 10.1103/physrevb.89.014507 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 89 ,\ pages 014507 ( year 2014 b ) NoStop

    2014 doi

  64. [73]

    Jakubczyk ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevA.95.063626 journal journal Phys

    author author P. Jakubczyk ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevA.95.063626 journal journal Phys. Rev. A \ volume 95 ,\ pages 063626 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

    2017 doi

  65. [74]

    \ Wang , author Y

    author author J. \ Wang , author Y. Che , author L. Zhang , \ and\ author Q. \ Chen ,\ 10.1103/physrevb.97.134513 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 97 ,\ pages 134513 ( year 2018 b ) NoStop

    2018 doi

  66. [75]

    \ Behrle , author T

    author author A. \ Behrle , author T. \ Harrison , author J. \ Kombe , author K. \ Gao , author M. \ Link , author J.-S \ Bernier , author C. \ Kollath ,\ and\ author M. K\"ohl ,\ 10.1038/s41567-018-0128-6 journal journal Nature Phys. \ volume 14 ,\ pages 781 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

    doi

  67. [76]

    Liu , author H

    author author B. Liu , author H. Zhai , \ and\ author S. Zhang ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevA.93.033641 journal journal Phys. Rev. A \ volume 93 ,\ pages 033641 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

    2016 doi

  68. [77]

    Salasnich ,\ 10.3390/condmat2020022 journal journal Condens

    author author L. Salasnich ,\ 10.3390/condmat2020022 journal journal Condens. Matter \ volume 2 ,\ pages 22 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

    2017 doi

  69. [78]

    \ Kurkjian , author S

    author author H. \ Kurkjian , author S. N. \ Klimin , author J. Tempere , \ and\ author Y. \ Castin ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.093403 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 122 ,\ pages 093403 ( year 2019 b ) NoStop

    2019 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.