Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Evaluating Large Language Models on Controlled Generation Tasks

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2310.14542 v1 pith:673VRSFZ submitted 2023-10-23 cs.CL

Evaluating Large Language Models on Controlled Generation Tasks

classification cs.CL
keywords modelslanguagelargegenerationtasksbenchmarkincludingsmaller
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

While recent studies have looked into the abilities of large language models in various benchmark tasks, including question generation, reading comprehension, multilingual and etc, there have been few studies looking into the controllability of large language models on generation tasks. We present an extensive analysis of various benchmarks including a sentence planning benchmark with different granularities. After comparing large language models against state-of-the-start finetuned smaller models, we present a spectrum showing large language models falling behind, are comparable, or exceed the ability of smaller models. We conclude that **large language models struggle at meeting fine-grained hard constraints**.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Instruction-Following Evaluation for Large Language Models

    cs.CL 2023-11 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    IFEval is a new benchmark of 25 verifiable instruction types and ~500 prompts for objective, reproducible evaluation of LLMs' instruction-following abilities.