REVIEW 2 cited by
A Survey of Uncertainty Estimation Methods on Large Language Models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities across various tasks. However, these models could offer biased, hallucinated, or non-factual responses camouflaged by their fluency and realistic appearance. Uncertainty estimation is the key method to address this challenge. While research efforts in uncertainty estimation are ramping up, there is a lack of comprehensive and dedicated surveys on LLM uncertainty estimation. This survey presents four major avenues of LLM uncertainty estimation. Furthermore, we perform extensive experimental evaluations across multiple methods and datasets. At last, we provide critical and promising future directions for LLM uncertainty estimation.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Verbalizing LLM's Higher-order Uncertainty via Imprecise Probabilities
Prompting LLMs to report imprecise probability intervals (lower/upper confidence) instead of a single point value yields higher-order uncertainty scores that track prediction error and question ambiguity more coherent...
-
Bridging Subjective and Objective QoE: Operator-Level Aggregation Using LLM-Based Comment Analysis and Network MOS Comparison
A comment-scoring and per-provider aggregation pipeline for QoE is proposed, but its outage-detection test injects the low scores by hand and its ISP labels are random, so the claimed detection capability is not demonstrated.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.