REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 36 references
Edge superconductivity in Multilayer WTe2 Josephson junction
T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash
Pith's one-line read This paper reports that in thin multilayer WTe2 Josephson junctions the supercurrent is confined to edge channels up to 1.4 μm wide, while thick flakes carry it uniformly through the bulk.
desk verdict A believable qualitative edge-vs-bulk supercurrent result in multilayer WTe2, whose quantitative extraction is model-dependent and should be read with caution. read the letter →
The pith
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
The reading
What carries the argument
The central object is the superconducting-quantum-interference relation $I_c^{\max}(B) = \left|\int J_c(x) \cos(2\pi L_{\mathrm{eff}} B x / \Phi_0)\, dx\right|$, which converts the magnetic-field dependence of the critical current into a real-space map of supercurrent density, given an effective junction length $L_{\mathrm{eff}}$ that accounts for flux focusing and London penetration. The paper uses the uniform-density limit (Fraunhofer formula) for thick flakes and an edge-stepped current-density model for thin flakes; this transform-type machinery is what lets a transport measurement claim spatial localization.
What would settle it
A scanning SQUID microscope image of the magnetic field above a thin (≈10 nm) device biased near its critical current would show two localized current filaments near the physical edges if edge superconductivity is real; a uniform or central distribution would falsify the claim. Alternatively, chemically etching away the mesa edges of a thin device should remove the SQUID-like side lobes from $I_c(B)$ if edge channels carry the supercurrent.
Extended reading notes
Core claim
On the paper's own terms, the central discovery is that a lateral Nb/WTe2/Nb Josephson junction made from a thin (about 10 nm) WTe2 flake carries its supercurrent predominantly through regions near the two mesa edges, not through the interior, and that this edge domination disappears when the flake is thick (about 60 nm). The evidence comes from the magnetic-field dependence of the critical current: thick flakes show symmetric Fraunhofer oscillations consistent with uniform $J_c$, while thin flakes show a mixture of Fraunhofer and SQUID-like lobes, which the authors fit with an edge-stepped supercurrent model to extract edge channels 1.3–1.4 μm wide. The paper further shows that a 16 nm junction with two electrode pairs conducts only when the electrodes cross the edge, and that the critical current in thin devices is asymmetric in the swept current direction ($|I_c^+(B)| \neq |I_c^-(B)|$), which they attribute to the two edges having different Fermi velocities under inversion-symmetry breaking. Finally, they explicitly state that the edge superconductivity is not equivalent to topological edge-mode superconductivity and is not evidence of a topological superconducting phase.
Load-bearing premise
The result rests on the assumption that the measured critical-current oscillations are accurately described by the cosine-transform integral with a reliably known effective junction length $L_{\mathrm{eff}}$, so that the edge widths extracted from the fit reflect the true supercurrent distribution; incorrect $L_{\mathrm{eff}}$, flux-focusing artifacts, or inhomogeneous interfaces would undermine the edge-localization conclusion.
Editorial extensions
If this is right
- Thickness is a control knob: the edge/bulk supercurrent ratio rises as WTe2 is thinned, with the estimated crossover from bulk- to edge-dominated superconductivity at 16–20 nm.
- Edge-crossing electrode pairs show Josephson coupling while edge-untouched pairs on the same flake do not, so junction geometry can be used to couple selectively to edge channels.
- The asymmetric critical-current response $|I_c^+(B)| \neq |I_c^-(B)|$ in thin samples is an observable signature of inversion-symmetry breaking at the edges, and the bulk contribution to this asymmetry is excluded by the symmetric response of thick flakes.
- The same SQI mapping method can be applied to other layered semimetals with surface or edge states to search for analogous edge superconductivity.
- If the edge channels are eventually tied to topological boundary states, Josephson junctions on thin WTe2 become a candidate platform for topological superconductivity and Majorana bound states; the present work does not itself establish that.
Reading between the lines
- A natural extension is to use Shapiro-step measurements on edge-dominated junctions: a topological edge supercurrent should produce a 4π-periodic a.c. Josephson response, whereas a trivial edge channel would not; the paper mentions this as a future direction, so the test is concrete.
- The extracted edge width of 1.3–1.4 μm is much larger than an atomic one-dimensional channel, suggesting the 'edge' is a mesoscopic region—possibly Fermi-arc surface states, a finite proximity coherence length, or bulk states weakly coupled to the edge. Experiments on narrower junctions or with gate-defined edges could disentangle these.
- The asymmetry in $I_c(B)$ could be made a quantitative probe of inversion breaking: reversing the crystal orientation or applying an in-plane magnetic field should swap or modify the $I_1$ vs $I_2$ imbalance in the two-edge Josephson formula.
- One could test the crossover thickness prediction (16–20 nm) by fabricating a thickness-gradient device and mapping the supercurrent distribution continuously with SQI, avoiding sample-to-sample variation.
Signed reviews
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. The paper reports superconducting quantum interference (SQI) measurements on Nb/WTe2/Nb Josephson junctions made from multilayer WTe2 flakes of different thicknesses. In thick flakes (~60 nm), the critical-current modulation is a Fraunhofer-like pattern and the inferred supercurrent density is approximately uniform across the junction. In thin flakes (10–16 nm), the pattern becomes a mixture of Fraunhofer and SQUID-like oscillations with a narrower central lobe, which the authors interpret as supercurrent confined to edge channels of width 1.3–1.4 μm, with an edge/bulk supercurrent density ratio up to 2.76. The authors also report an asymmetry |Ic+(B)| ≠ |Ic−(B)| in thin devices, and an R1/R2 comparison where an edge-crossing junction is superconducting while an edge-untouched junction is not. The paper is careful to state that the observed edge superconductivity is not evidence of topological edge modes or a topological superconducting phase.
Significance. If the central claim holds, the paper provides a clear thickness-controlled crossover from bulk-dominated to edge-dominated supercurrent in a type-II Weyl semimetal, which is of genuine interest for proposals to realize topological superconductivity in WTe2. The study benefits from several strengths: SQI data are shown for multiple devices of different thicknesses; the Fraunhofer-to-SQUID-like crossover is read directly from the interference patterns and does not depend on the fitted model; devices #1, #2, and #3 reproduce the edge-dominated pattern; the R1/R2 control junction in Fig. 3 is a useful additional comparison; and the authors explicitly disclaim any inference about topological edge modes. The quantitative edge width and edge/bulk amplitude ratio, however, depend on an assumed current-density profile and are not supported by uncertainty estimates or model comparison, which limits the strength of the quantitative claims.
major comments (3)
- [The superconducting quantum interference measurements; SI Section VI] Equation (1) records only the modulus of a Fourier transform of J_c(x), so many different spatial profiles produce the same I_c(B) envelope. The extracted edge widths of 1.3–1.4 μm and the edge/bulk ratio of 2.76 in Fig. 4 are obtained by fitting the edge-stepped model of SI Section VI to device #2, and no error bars, raw data residuals, or comparison with alternative J_c(x) profiles are provided. The Discussion itself concedes that trivial edge states and inhomogeneous interfaces can also produce a similar non-uniform supercurrent. Since the quantitative edge-confinement claims rest on this model, the authors should either provide model comparison and uncertainties or explicitly relegate the quantitative widths and ratios to illustrative status.
- [Figure 3 and accompanying text] The R1/R2 comparison confounds edge-crossing geometry with junction length: the edge-crossing channel R1 has L_b~0.4 μm, while the edge-untouched channel R2 has L_s~4 μm on the edge side. The stronger coupling of R1 is therefore expected from its shorter electrode separation even without any edge-specific conduction. To support the edge-specific claim, the authors need a control with comparable junction lengths or quantitative modeling that accounts for the geometric difference.
- [Discussion, paragraph on |Ic+(B)| ≠ |Ic−(B)|] The claim that the non-symmetric critical current is an intrinsic property of inversion-symmetry-broken edges, expressed through Eq. (2) with I1 ≠ I2, is presented as the likely explanation, but the authors list vortex trapping and vortex motion as alternative possibilities. The observation of symmetric behavior in the thick sample reduces but does not eliminate these alternatives for the thin junctions, because flux trapping and vortex configurations depend on junction dimensions and edge properties. This point should be framed as a conjecture rather than a conclusion, or supported by additional measurements such as repeated field sweeps or a systematic comparison of symmetric and asymmetric devices.
minor comments (4)
- [Discussion] The sentence 'we need to point out that the edge superconductivity we observed is not equivalent to the superconductivity in the edge modes nor any evidence of toplogical super conducting phase' contains a typo ('toplogical') and should be rephrased for clarity.
- [Discussion, paragraph on trivial effects] The phrase 'the affection by the SiO2 substrate and the capping layer' should be changed to 'the effect of the SiO2 substrate and the capping layer'.
- [Figure 2 caption] In subpanel (e), the text says the supercurrent is carried by the helical edge states, but the Discussion later states that the observed edge superconductivity is not evidence of topological edge modes. The caption should use language consistent with that caveat, e.g., 'putative edge states' or 'edge channels'.
- [Introduction, paragraph 2] The phrase 'It is then necessary to make them distinct from the coexisting bulk ones' is awkward; consider 'It is therefore necessary to distinguish them from the coexisting bulk states'.
Circularity Check
No circularity: the edge/bulk distinction is read from the measured Fraunhofer-to-SQUID crossover, and the fitted edge parameters are model-dependent extractions, not predictions defined by the data.
full rationale
Walk of the derivation chain: the two central observational claims are (i) a Fraunhofer pattern in ~60 nm WTe2, indicating uniform bulk supercurrent, and (ii) a mixed Fraunhofer/SQUID pattern in ~10 nm WTe2, indicating edge-dominated supercurrent. Claim (i) is read directly from the single-slit envelope and its inverse Fourier transform. Claim (ii)'s qualitative content, the sub-2-Phi0 central lobe with Phi0 side lobes, is likewise read directly from the measured interference map in Fig. 2f; the edge-stepped nonuniform supercurrent model is then used to reproduce that pattern and extract the edge widths (1.3-1.4 um) and later the edge/bulk ratio (2.76). Those quantitative outputs are obtained by fitting an assumed current profile to the same Ic(B) data, so they inherit the model's assumptions and are not independently tested, but this is ordinary parameter extraction rather than circularity: the edge-step parameters are not defined in terms of the measured pattern, and the extracted profile is not used to predict the same pattern from which it was fitted. The paper also explicitly concedes the model non-uniqueness: 'it is difficult to exclude other trivial effects such as trivial edge states. Moreover, the other trivial mechanisms can also lead to a similar non-uniform supercurrent such as an inhomogeneous interface,' and it disclaims the stronger topological interpretation: 'the edge superconductivity we observed is not equivalent to the superconductivity in the edge modes nor any evidence of toplogical super conducting phase.' The self-citations (refs. 13 and 36) concern crystal growth and proximity-effect studies and are not load-bearing for the SQI inference; no uniqueness theorem is imported from the authors' prior work, and no fitted parameter is relabeled as an independent prediction. The only minor factor is the presence of non-load-bearing self-citations, so the score is 2 rather than 0.
Assumptions & free parameters
free parameters (3)
- edge supercurrent channel width =
1.3 - 1.4 um
- edge/bulk supercurrent density amplitude ratio =
up to 2.76 in 10 nm WTe2
- effective junction length L_eff =
about 1.0 um for device #8 with a 240 nm physical length
assumptions (4)
- domain assumption The critical current interference pattern is governed by Ic_max(B) = |integral Jc(x) cos(2 pi L_eff B x / Phi0) dx|
- domain assumption Supercurrent density in thick WTe2 is approximately uniform across the junction width
- domain assumption Bulk resistance of WTe2 in the control device is isotropic and inversely proportional to junction width
- ad hoc to paper The non-uniform supercurrent can be modeled by an edge-stepped profile with two edge channels and a bulk plateau
Cite this review
Pith. "Pith review of Edge superconductivity in Multilayer WTe2 Josephson junction." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/6CJ5LPR3
@misc{pith2026190902433,
author = {Pith},
title = {Pith review of: Edge superconductivity in Multilayer WTe2 Josephson junction},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/6CJ5LPR3}},
note = {Machine review of arXiv:1909.02433}
}
abstract
WTe2, as a type-II Weyl semimetal, has 2D Fermi arcs on the (001) surface in the bulk and 1D helical edge states in its monolayer. These features have recently attracted wide attention in condensed matter physics. However, in the intermediate regime between the bulk and monolayer, the edge states have not been resolved owing to its closed band gap which makes the bulk states dominant. Here, we report the signatures of the edge superconductivity by superconducting quantum interference measurements in multilayer WTe2 Josephson junctions and we directly map the localized supercurrent. In thick WTe2 (~60 nm), the supercurrent is uniformly distributed by bulk states with symmetric Josephson effect ($\left|I_c^+(B)\right|=\left|I_c^-(B)\right|$). In thin WTe2 (10 nm), however, the supercurrent becomes confined to the edge and its width reaches up to 1.4 um and exhibits non-symmetric behavior $\left|I_c^+(B)\right|\neq \left|I_c^-(B)\right|$. The ability to tune the edge domination by changing thickness and the edge superconductivity establishes WTe2 as a promising topological system with exotic quantum phases and a rich physics.
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[1]
Soluyanov AA, Gresch D, Wang Z, et al. Type-II Weyl semimetals. Nature. 2015; 495-498: 495
work page 2015
-
[2]
Evidence for topological type -II Weyl semimetal WTe2
Li P, Wen Y , He X, et al. Evidence for topological type -II Weyl semimetal WTe2. Nat Commun. 2017; 8(1): 2150
work page 2017
-
[3]
Custodial glide symmetry of quantum spin Hall edge modes in monolayer WTe2
Ok S, Muechler L, Di Sante D , et al. Custodial glide symmetry of quantum spin Hall edge modes in monolayer WTe2. Phys Rev B. 2019; 99(12): 121105
work page 2019
-
[4]
Edge conduction in monolayer WTe2
Fei Z, Palomaki T, Wu S, et al. Edge conduction in monolayer WTe2. Nat Phys. 2017; 13: 677-82
work page 2017
-
[5]
Observation of the quantum spin Hall effect up to 100 kelvin in a monolayer crystal
Wu S, Fatemi V , Gibson QD, et al. Observation of the quantum spin Hall effect up to 100 kelvin in a monolayer crystal. Science. 2018; 359(6371): 76-9
work page 2018
-
[6]
Discovery of a Weyl Fermion Semimetal and Topological Fermi Arcs
Xu S-Y , Belopolski I, Alidoust N, et al. Discovery of a Weyl Fermion Semimetal and Topological Fermi Arcs. Science. 2015; 349(6248): 613-7
work page 2015
-
[7]
Quantum spin Hall state in monolayer 1T'-WTe2
Tang S, Zhang C, Wong D, et al. Quantum spin Hall state in monolayer 1T'-WTe2. Nat Phys. 2017; 13: 683-7
work page 2017
-
[8]
Electric-field-tuned topological phase transition in ultrathin Na3Bi
Collins JL, Tadich A, Wu W , et al. Electric-field-tuned topological phase transition in ultrathin Na3Bi. Nature. 2018; 564(7736): 390-4
work page 2018
Show all 36 references
-
[9]
Imaging quantum spin Hall ed ges in monolayer WTe2
Shi Y , Kahn J, Niu B, et al. Imaging quantum spin Hall ed ges in monolayer WTe2. Sci Adv. 2019; 5(2): eaat8799
2019
-
[10]
Higher-Order Topology, Monopole Nodal Lines, and the Origin of Large Fermi Arcs in Transition Metal Dichalcogenides XTe2(X=Mo,W)
Wang Z, Wieder BJ, Li J, et al. Higher-Order Topology, Monopole Nodal Lines, and the Origin of Large Fermi Arcs in Transition Metal Dichalcogenides XTe2(X=Mo,W). Phys Rev Lett. 2019; 123(18): 186401
2019
-
[11]
Realization of a Double-Slit SQUID Geometry by Fermi Arc Surface States in a WTe2 Weyl Semimetal
Shvetsov OO, Kononov A, Timonina A V, et al. Realization of a Double-Slit SQUID Geometry by Fermi Arc Surface States in a WTe2 Weyl Semimetal. JETP Letters. 2018; 107(12): 774-9
2018
-
[12]
Subharmonic Shapiro steps in the a.c
Shvetsov OO, Kononov A, Timonina A V, et al. Subharmonic Shapiro steps in the a.c. Josephson effect for a three-dimensional Weyl semimetal WTe2. EPL (Europhysics Letters). 2018; 124(4): 47003
2018
-
[13]
Proximity-induced surface superconductivity in Dirac semimetal Cd3As2
Huang C, Zhou BT, Zhang H , et al. Proximity-induced surface superconductivity in Dirac semimetal Cd3As2. Nat Commun. 2019; 10(1): 2217
2019
-
[14]
Josephson supercurrent through a topological insulator surface state
Veldhorst M, Snelder M, Hoek M , et al. Josephson supercurrent through a topological insulator surface state. Nat Mater. 2012; 11: 417-21
2012
-
[15]
Induced superconductivity in the quantum spin Hall edge
Hart S, Ren H, Wagner T, et al. Induced superconductivity in the quantum spin Hall edge. Nat Phys. 2014; 10: 638-43
2014
-
[16]
Local and Nonlocal Fraunhofer-like Pattern from an Edge-Stepped Topological Surface Josephson Current Distribution
Lee JH, Lee G-H, Park J, et al. Local and Nonlocal Fraunhofer-like Pattern from an Edge-Stepped Topological Surface Josephson Current Distribution. Nano Lett. 2014; 14(9): 5029-34
2014
-
[17]
Supercurrent in the quantum Hall regime
Amet F, Ke CT, Borzenets IV , et al. Supercurrent in the quantum Hall regime. Science. 2016; 352(6288): 966-9
2016
-
[18]
Josephson critical current in a long mesoscopic S -N-S junction
Dubos P, Courtois H, Pannetier B , et al. Josephson critical current in a long mesoscopic S -N-S junction. Physical Review B. 2001; 63(6): 064502
2001
-
[19]
Quantum oscillations of the critical current and high-field superconducting proximity in ballistic graphene
Ben Shalom M, Zhu MJ, Fal’ko VI, et al. Quantum oscillations of the critical current and high-field superconducting proximity in ballistic graphene. Nat Phys. 2015; 12: 318-22
2015
-
[20]
Josephson Currents through Junctions with Normal Metal Barriers
Ishii C. Josephson Currents through Junctions with Normal Metal Barriers. Progress of Theoretical Physics. 1970; 44(6): 1525-47
1970
-
[21]
Introduction to superconductivity
Tinkham M. Introduction to superconductivity. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1975
1975
-
[22]
Anomalous Fraunhofer interference in epitaxial superconductor-semiconductor Josephson junctions
Suominen HJ, Danon J, Kjaergaard M , et al. Anomalous Fraunhofer interference in epitaxial superconductor-semiconductor Josephson junctions. Phys Rev B. 2017; 95(3): 035307
2017
-
[23]
Pb/InAs Nanowire Josephson Junction with High Critical Current and Magnetic Flux Focusing
Paajaste J, Amado M, Roddaro S , et al. Pb/InAs Nanowire Josephson Junction with High Critical Current and Magnetic Flux Focusing. Nano Lett. 2015; 15(3): 1803-8
2015
-
[24]
h/e Superconducting Quantum Interference through Trivial Edge States in InAs
de Vries FK, Timmerman T, Ostroukh VP, et al. h/e Superconducting Quantum Interference through Trivial Edge States in InAs. Phys Rev Lett. 2018; 120(4): 047702
2018
-
[25]
Edge-mode superconductivity in a two -dimensional topological insulator
Pribiag VS, Beukman AJA, Qu F , et al. Edge-mode superconductivity in a two -dimensional topological insulator. Nature Nanotechnology. 2015; 10(7): 593-7
2015
-
[26]
Superconductor/Semiconductor Junctions
Schä pers T. Superconductor/Semiconductor Junctions. Julich, Germany: Springer; 2001
2001
-
[27]
Asymmetric Josephson effect in inversion symmetry breaking topological materials
Chen C, He JJ, Ali MN , et al. Asymmetric Josephson effect in inversion symmetry breaking topological materials. Phys Rev B. 2018; 98(7): 075430
2018
-
[28]
Josephson current in s -wave-superconductor Sr2RuO4 junctions
Asano Y , Tanaka Y , Sigrist M , et al. Josephson current in s -wave-superconductor Sr2RuO4 junctions. Phys Rev B. 2003; 67(18): 184505
2003
-
[29]
Evidence of higher -order topology in multil ayer WTe2 from Josephson coupling through anisotropic hinge states
Choi Y-B, Xie Y , Chen C-Z, et al. Evidence of higher -order topology in multil ayer WTe2 from Josephson coupling through anisotropic hinge states. Nat Mater. 2020; 19(9): 974-9
2020
-
[30]
One-Dimensional Edge Transport in Few -Layer WTe2
Kononov A, Abulizi G, Qu K, et al. One-Dimensional Edge Transport in Few -Layer WTe2. Nano Lett. 2020; 20(6): 4228-33
2020
-
[31]
Observation of Weyl nodes in TaAs
Lv BQ, Xu N, Weng HM, et al. Observation of Weyl nodes in TaAs. Nat Phys. 2015; 11: 724-7
2015
-
[32]
Experimental observation of topological Fermi arcs in type-II Weyl 13 / 13 semimetal MoTe2
Deng K, Wan G, Deng P, et al. Experimental observation of topological Fermi arcs in type-II Weyl 13 / 13 semimetal MoTe2. Nat Phys. 2016; 12: 1105-10
2016
-
[33]
Correlation effects and quantum oscillations in topological nodal-loop semimetals
Liu J, Balents L. Correlation effects and quantum oscillations in topological nodal-loop semimetals. Phys Rev B. 2017; 95(7): 075426
2017
-
[34]
Josephson current and noise at a superconductor/quantum -spin-Hall- insulator/superconductor junction
Fu L, Kane CL. Josephson current and noise at a superconductor/quantum -spin-Hall- insulator/superconductor junction. Phys Rev B. 2009; 79(16): 161408
2009
-
[35]
Josephson current signatures of Majorana flat bands on the surface of time-reversal-invariant Weyl and Dirac semimetals
Chen A, Pikulin DI, Franz M. Josephson current signatures of Majorana flat bands on the surface of time-reversal-invariant Weyl and Dirac semimetals. Phys Rev B. 2017; 95(17): 174505
2017
-
[36]
Inducing Strong Superconductivity in W Te2 by a Proximity Effect
Huang C, Narayan A, Zhang E , et al. Inducing Strong Superconductivity in W Te2 by a Proximity Effect. ACS Nano. 2018; 12(7): 7185-96
2018
Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.