Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 6 minor 85 references

Absence of hidden analytic conserved quantities in harmonically confined rods

T0 review · 1 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-01 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Trapped hard rods with finite length have no hidden analytic conserved quantity beyond energy and center-of-mass energy.

desk verdict Useful and mostly rigorous no-go result for trapped hard rods, but the advertised analyticity claim is broader than the proof supports. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.18872 v1 pith:6EM5TN5B submitted 2026-07-21 cond-mat.stat-mech math-phmath.MPnlin.CD

Sahil Kumar Singh , Abhishek Dhar , Sanjay Moudgalya This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.stat-mechmath-phmath.MPnlin.CD MSC 37J3037J3570H0682C22 PACS 05.20.-y05.45.-a
keywords hardrodsharmonictrapconservedquantitiesintegrabilitynon-ergodicityanalyticinvariantspermutationsymmetrycenter-of-massenergy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper asks why harmonically confined hard rods fail to thermalize despite having only two known conserved quantities: total energy $E$ and center-of-mass energy $E_{\mathrm{cm}}$. The authors prove that when at least one rod has nonzero length, any conserved quantity analytic in the positions and momenta must be a function of $E$ and $E_{\mathrm{cm}}$—so no hidden analytic integral explains the observed non-ergodicity. The proof combines a $U(1)$ rotation symmetry forced by free motion with a momentum-permutation symmetry forced by collisions, then shows via invariant theory that only the two quadratic invariants survive. For point particles (zero rod length) the situation is opposite: the paper constructs a full family of extra conserved quantities and shows the system is maximally superintegrable. A sympathetic reader would care because the result redirects the search for an explanation of the rods' anomalous dynamics away from exact conservation laws.

What carries the argument

The central machinery is a pair of symmetry constraints on any candidate conserved quantity $Q$. Free motion in the harmonic trap is a rotation in each $(x_i, p_i)$ plane, so conservation forces $Q$ to be $U(1)$-invariant; in complex coordinates $z_i = x_i + i p_i$ this means $Q \in \mathbb{C}[\{z_i \bar z_j\}]$. A collision between rods of nonzero length then forces $Q$ to be invariant under exchange of the two colliding momenta, which, together with the $U(1)$ action, generates the full permutation group $S_N$ on momenta (and then on positions). The final theorem applies the invariant theory of $SO(2) \times SO(2N-2)$ to show that the only functions invariant under all these symmetries are functions of the two quadratic forms

What would settle it

A conserved quantity $Q$ analytic on the physical phase space of a system with at least one nonzero-length rod that is not functionally dependent on $E$ and $E_{\mathrm{cm}}$ would refute the main theorem; numerically, one could integrate three unequal-length rods and test whether any smooth function beyond $E$ and $E_{\mathrm{cm}}$ remains constant along a trajectory.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

When at least one rod has nonzero length, the algebra of analytic conserved quantities of the harmonically confined hard-rod gas is exactly $\mathbb{C}[E, E_{\mathrm{cm}}]$: every conserved quantity that is analytic in phase space is functionally dependent on the total energy and the center-of-mass energy. This is shown by proving conservation under free motion forces $U(1)$ invariance under rotations of each rod's $(x_i, p_i)$ pair, and conservation under collisions forces invariance under arbitrary permutations of the momenta; these combined symmetries reduce the invariant theory to an $SO(2) \times SO(2N-2)$ problem whose only invariants are the two quadratic norms. The same treatment yields exhaustive results for relate

Load-bearing premise

The proof assumes the conserved quantity has a power-series expansion around the phase-space origin, while collisions of nonzero-length rods occur on hyperplanes that may lie outside that series' convergence domain; the conclusion is airtight for polynomial or globally analytic quantities, and for all analytic quantities only if the series converges on the collision hyperplanes.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The observed non-ergodicity and regular Poincaré sections of trapped hard rods cannot be explained by an exact analytic conserved quantity; its origin must lie in quasi-conserved or non-analytic structures.
  • The equal-length case is not special at the level of exact analytic conservation laws: the no-hidden-integral result holds for any set of rod lengths with at least one nonzero length.
  • Zero-length rods (point particles) in the same trap are maximally superintegrable, with 2N−1 functionally independent conserved quantities explicitly constructed from symmetric power sums.
  • For the Stochastic Momentum Exchange Dynamics variant, the same method yields the same conclusion: only E and E_cm survive.
  • The systematic proof technique—imposing free-motion U(1) and collision permutation symmetries—can be applied to other classical many-body systems to rule out or reveal hidden conserved quantities.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The result implies that the regular orbits and near-zero Lyapunov exponents seen in N=3 trapped rods must arise from quasi-conserved structures rather than exact analytic integrals; a KAM-like 'dressed' invariant that is only defined on part of phase space is a natural next thing to search for.
  • The same symmetry-imposition recipe—free-motion U(1) plus collision-induced permutation constraints—could be applied to other classical many-body systems with hard constraints, such as classical fractons or multipole-conserving models, to classify their conserved algebras.
  • For zero-length rods, the paper's explicit conserved quantities suggest a sharp numerical test: a point-particle gas in the same trap should exhibit non-thermalization to Gibbs ensembles, in contrast to finite-length rods.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper studies N hard rods of lengths a_i in a one-dimensional harmonic trap. Motivated by numerical non-ergodicity, it asks whether an additional integral of motion beyond total energy E and center-of-mass energy E_cm exists. The paper proves: (Thm 3.1) any quantity conserved under free harmonic motion is U(1)-invariant and generated by the quadratics z_i \bar z_j; (Thm 4.2) for point particles (a_i=0) the collision condition forces joint S_N label symmetry, giving an explicit algebra generated by balanced products of Z_{m,n}=Σ_j z_j^m \bar z_j^n, with 2N-1 independent invariants; (Thm 5.1) for stochastic momentum-exchange dynamics, U(1) invariance plus momentum-permutation invariance implies functional dependence on E and E_cm; (Thm 6.2, main) when at least one rod has non-zero length, collision invariance forces adjacent momentum exchanges and, via U(1), adjacent position exchanges, generating the full permutation group and hence functional dependence on E and E_cm. Numerical Poincaré sections and Lyapunov exponents are presented for equal and unequal rod lengths.

Significance. If proven in full, the main theorem would rule out hidden analytic integrals in trapped hard rods, making the observed non-ergodicity a dynamical (KAM-like) phenomenon rather than a conservation-law effect. The paper is self-contained and parameter-free; the algebraic cores of Theorems 3.1, 4.2, and 5.1 are clean, and the point-particle classification with explicit independent integrals is a useful, falsifiable result. The numerical data for unequal rod lengths are new. However, the central Theorem 6.2 relies on Lemma 6.1, which has a genuine analyticity-domain gap (see major comment 1); as written the result is rigorously established only for polynomial and globally analytic conserved quantities, not for all analytic ones as the abstract claims. The contribution is significant if the statement is corrected or the gap closed.

major comments (1)
  1. [Sec. 2.2; Lemma 6.1; Thm. 6.2] Lemma 6.1 (used in Thm. 6.2) expands Q in u_n,\bar u_n about u_n=0 (Eq. (59)) and enforces the collision condition (58) on u_n+\bar u_n=2b_n. This requires the origin-centered power series to converge on that hyperplane, at distance b_n>0 from u_n=0. For a quantity assumed only analytic at the origin (Sec. 2.2), the convergence radius R need not exceed b_n; moreover the origin is outside the physical domain {x_{i+1}-x_i>b_i}, so origin analyticity does not constrain Q on the collision hyperplane when R<=b_n. Hence Eqs. (60)-(61) are not generally justified. The proof is rigorous for polynomial Q and for globally analytic Q, but the abstract/title claim all quantities analytic in positions and momenta. A function analytic on the physical domain can be singular at the origin (e.g., 1/|z_{n+1}-z_n|^2 for a two-rod system), so the assumption is not implied by analyticity on phase space. The
minor comments (6)
  1. [Eq. (11); Thms. 3.1, 4.2, 5.1, 6.2] The notation C[{Q_α}] is defined in Eq. (11) via finite sums and products, but the theorems apply this to analytic functions that are not polynomials. For example, exp(E) is a conserved quantity for free motion but is not in the finite polynomial algebra C[E,E_cm]. The proofs actually establish a convergent power series in the generators, i.e., functional dependence, which is what the abstract states. Please define the power-series ring explicitly or phrase all conclusions in terms of functional dependence.
  2. [Sec. 1] Typo: 'large number of large number of rods' in the Introduction.
  3. [Abstract] Grammar: 'one of the rods have' should be 'has'.
  4. [Fig. 1 caption] The caption reads 'We have taken 100 different initial conditions used E_cm = 0'; please rephrase and state which parameters are held fixed for each panel.
  5. [References] Refs. [60] and [82] contain DOIs that appear to be placeholder strings (10.1103/8l6f-z1jm and 10.1103/b974-mpkc); please verify.
  6. [Eq. (31)] The generator set notation in Eq. (31) is hard to parse; restate as the algebra generated by all products Z_{m_1,n_1}...Z_{m_R,n_R} such that Σ m_α = Σ n_α.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the central theorem is derived from the dynamics and standard invariant theory; E and E_cm are benchmarks, not fitted inputs.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained. Free-motion conservation is reduced to U(1) invariance via Eq. (4) and the operator identity in Eq. (18)-(20), and this is proved rather than assumed. The collision conservation condition Eq. (7) is then used directly in Lemmas 4.1 and 6.1 to derive permutation symmetries; the rod lengths enter only through b_n, and the nonzero-length case is treated by explicit δ-degree and analyticity arguments. E and E_cm are defined in Eq. (8) and used only at the final invariant-theory step (Theorem 5.1), not as inputs to the analysis, so no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction and no quantity is defined in terms of the target conclusion. The paper's self-citations (e.g., [34] for SMED, [48,51-53] for quantum commutant algebras) are motivational or contextual; the load-bearing Theorem 5.1 is proved in the paper, and no uniqueness theorem is imported from the authors' prior work. The one substantive caveat is a mathematical limitation explicitly stated in Sec. 2.2: the proof treats quantities analytic at the origin, so the abstract's broader phrase 'analytic in the positions and momenta' is not fully established for real-analytic functions whose origin-centered series need not converge on the collision hyperplane u_n+bar u_n=2b_n. This is a logical gap or correctness risk, not circularity, because the theorem's conclusion is not assumed in its proof. Accordingly, the circularity score is low: 1, reflecting only minor non-load-bearing self-citation, not constructional circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters are fitted; the known conserved quantities E and E_cm are defined, not fitted. No new particles, forces, or entities are introduced. The proof leans on standard invariant theory and polynomial algebra, plus the physical modeling of hard rods. The main unstated premise is the analyticity-domain issue: the origin-centered power series must reach the collision hyperplanes, or Q must be polynomial/globally analytic, for Lemma 6.1 to be rigorous.

assumptions (6)
  • standard math Factor theorem for polynomials over C: if a polynomial vanishes on a hyperplane L=0, it is divisible by L.
    Used in Lemma 4.1 to conclude g_n = L_n · U from g_n vanishing when x_n = x_{n+1}.
  • standard math First fundamental theorem of invariant theory for SO(n): the invariant ring of the standard representation is generated by the quadratic norm.
    Used in Theorem 5.1 to conclude the only invariants of SO(2) ⊕ SO(2N-2) on the phase space are I0 and I1, hence functions of E and E_cm.
  • standard math Birkhoff-von Neumann theorem / spanning of doubly stochastic matrices by permutation matrices (as in Ref. [76]).
    Used in Theorem 5.1 to show span of permutation matrices includes all doubly stochastic matrices, leading to the Lie algebra decomposition so(2) ⊕ so(2N-2).
  • domain assumption Hard rods with elastic collisions are modeled as instantaneous momentum exchange between adjacent rods (Eq. 3).
    This is the standard physical model of equal-mass hard rods; the conservation conditions (4) and (5) follow from it.
  • domain assumption Conserved quantities are analytic in positions and momenta, and are assumed to admit a power-series expansion around the origin of phase space (Sec. 2.2).
    This is the stated scope of the proof. It is weaker than global analyticity, but the collision hyperplanes for nonzero rod lengths may lie outside the convergence domain of the origin-centered series, creating a gap.
  • ad hoc to paper The power-series expansion of Q around the origin is assumed to remain valid on the collision hyperplanes x_{n+1}-x_n = b_n (b_n > 0).
    Lemma 6.1 implicitly requires the Taylor expansion in u_n around u_n=0 to be evaluable on the hyperplane u_n + \bar u_n = 2b_n. This is not justified for merely local power series; it holds for globally analytic or polynomial Q. The paper does not flag this implicit assumption.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Absence of hidden analytic conserved quantities in harmonically confined rods." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/6EM5TN5B

@misc{pith2026260718872,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Absence of hidden analytic conserved quantities in harmonically confined rods},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/6EM5TN5B}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.18872}
}
abstract

Systems of hard rods of equal length in a one-dimensional harmonic trap have been observed to exhibit peculiar non-ergodic behavior that might suggest the existence of a novel hidden conserved quantity beyond the two well known ones, i.e., the total energy and the center-of-mass energy. In this work, we investigate this possibility by systematically constraining the forms of the conserved quantities, and we rigorously rule out the existence of any extra hidden conserved quantity that is analytic in the positions and momenta of the rods involved. We do so by showing two key results: conservation during free motion demands the $U(1)$ invariance of these quantities under rotations of the position and momenta of each rod, and conservation during collisions demand an $S_N$ invariance under the permutation of the momenta of the rods as long as one of the rods have non-zero length. We then show that these conditions imply that any conserved quantity is functionally dependent on the two known conserved quantities. In addition, we show that in the special case where all rods have zero length (i.e., when they are point particles), conservation under collisions only requires invariance under a smaller $S_N$ group of permutations of the labels of the rods, which leads to a much larger set of analytic conserved quantities that we explicitly write down. In all, this rigorously clarifies the structure of conserved quantities in the hard rod problem, and motivates the application of such systematic methods to other classical systems.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.18872 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Poincar´e section for equal length hard rods: (a) E = 2.6, (b) E = 4, (c) E = 6. We have taken 100 different initial conditions used Ecm = 0 with rod lengths a = 1 in each of the plots. when rods 1 and 2 collide. Since these conditions altogether impose four constraints on the six-dimensional phase space, the resulting Poincar´e section is two-dimensional. The full Poincare section for the equal length rod case is r… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Chaotic trajectory: (a) Poincare section for a single initial condition (x1, x2, x3, p1, p2, p3) ≈ (−1.002, 0.001, 1.001, 0, −0.545, 0.545) showing scattered points, as evident when zoomed-in on the square region as shown in (b). This is shown for a system of three rods of equal length a1 = a2 = a3 = 1, and the system has total energy E = 2.6, and center-of-mass energy Ecm = 0. (c) Time dependent Lyapunov exponent λ… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Poincar´e section for unequal length hard rods: (a) b1 = 1, b2 = 3.2, E = 13, Ecm = 0 (b) b1 = 0.5, b2 = 1.6, E = 7, Ecm = 0, (c) b1 = 1, b2 = 1.5, E = 2.1, Ecm = 0. The regularity of these Poincar´e sections appears to increase when the ratios of the rod lengths approaches unity. unequal length rods appear to produce more visibly scattered sections in some parameter regimes. The Poincar´e section for equal-length r… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

85 extracted references · 33 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Lebowitz

    Joel L. Lebowitz. Statistical mechanics: A selective review of two central issues. Rev. Mod. Phys., 71:S346–S357, Mar

  2. [2]

    Lectures on Phase Transitions and the Renormalization Group

    Nigel Goldenfeld. Lectures on Phase Transitions and the Renormalization Group. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1992

    1992

  3. [3]

    Thermodynamics and an introduction to thermostatistics

    Herbert B Callen. Thermodynamics and an introduction to thermostatistics. Wiley, New York, NY, 1985. URL:https: //cds.cern.ch/record/450289

    1985

  4. [4]

    Introduction to classical integrable systems

    Olivier Babelon, Denis Bernard, and Michel Talon. Introduction to classical integrable systems. Cambridge University Press, 2003

    2003

  5. [5]

    Elements of Classical and Quantum Integrable Systems

    Gleb Arutyunov. Elements of Classical and Quantum Integrable Systems. Springer, 2019

    2019

  6. [6]

    Integrable Systems of Classical Mechanics and Lie Algebras: Volume I

    Askol’d Mikhailovich Perelomov. Integrable Systems of Classical Mechanics and Lie Algebras: Volume I. Springer, 1990

    1990

  7. [7]

    Ergodicity: a historical perspective

    Giovanni Gallavotti. Ergodicity: a historical perspective. Equilibrium and Nonequilibrium. The European Physical Journal H, 41:181–259, 2016.doi:10.1140/epjh/e2016-70030-8

    work page doi:10.1140/epjh/e2016-70030-8 2016

  8. [8]

    Chaos and Coarse Graining in Statistical Mechanics

    Patrizia Castiglione, Massimo Falcioni, Annick Lesne, and Angelo Vulpiani. Chaos and Coarse Graining in Statistical Mechanics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2008.doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511535291

    work page doi:10.1017/cbo9780511535291 2008

Show all 85 references
  1. [9]

    Relaxation in a completely integrable many-body quantum system: An ab initio study of the dynamics of the highly excited states of 1D lattice hard-core bosons

    Marcos Rigol, Vanja Dunjko, Vladimir Yurovsky, and Maxim Olshanii. Relaxation in a completely integrable many-body quantum system: An ab initio study of the dynamics of the highly excited states of 1D lattice hard-core bosons. Phys. Rev. Lett., 98(5):050405, 2007

    2007

  2. [10]

    Generalized Gibbs ensemble in integrable lattice models

    Lev Vidmar and Marcos Rigol. Generalized Gibbs ensemble in integrable lattice models. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, 2016(6):064007, 2016.doi:10.1088/1742-5468/2016/06/064007

    2016 doi

  3. [11]

    Castro-Alvaredo, Benjamin Doyon, and Takato Yoshimura

    Olalla A. Castro-Alvaredo, Benjamin Doyon, and Takato Yoshimura. Emergent Hydrodynamics in Integrable Quantum Systems Out of Equilibrium. Phys. Rev. X, 6:041065, Dec 2016. URL:https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevX.6. 041065,doi:10.1103/PhysRevX.6.041065

    2016 doi

  4. [12]

    Transport in Out-of-Equilibrium XXZ Chains: Exact Profiles of Charges and Currents

    Bruno Bertini, Mario Collura, Jacopo De Nardis, and Maurizio Fagotti. Transport in Out-of-Equilibrium XXZ Chains: Exact Profiles of Charges and Currents. Phys. Rev. Lett., 117:207201, Nov 2016. URL:https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.117.207201,doi:10.1103/PhysRevLet...

    2016 doi

  5. [13]

    Lecture notes on Generalised Hydrodynamics

    Benjamin Doyon. Lecture notes on Generalised Hydrodynamics. SciPost Phys. Lect. Notes, page 18, 2020. URL: https://scipost.org/10.21468/SciPostPhysLectNotes.18,doi:10.21468/SciPostPhysLectNotes.18

    2020 doi

  6. [14]

    Large Scale Dynamics of Interacting Particles

    Herbert Spohn. Large Scale Dynamics of Interacting Particles. Theoretical and Mathematical Physics. Springer- Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1991. URL:https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-642-84371-6,doi:10.1007/ 978-3-642-84371-6

    1991 doi

  7. [15]

    Generalized Gibbs Ensembles of the Classical Toda Chain

    Herbert Spohn. Generalized Gibbs Ensembles of the Classical Toda Chain. Journal of Statistical Physics, 180:4–22, 2020.doi:10.1007/s10955-019-02320-5

    2020 doi

  8. [16]

    Generalized hydrodynamics of the classical Toda system

    Benjamin Doyon. Generalized hydrodynamics of the classical Toda system. Journal of Mathematical Physics, 60(7):073302, 2019.doi:10.1063/1.5096892

    2019 doi

  9. [17]

    Pasta, and S

    Enrico Fermi, John R. Pasta, and S. M. Ulam. Studies of nonlinear problems I. 1955. URL:https://api.semanticscholar. org/CorpusID:117035863

    1955

  10. [18]

    Fermi, Pasta, Ulam, and a Mysterious Lady

    Thierry Dauxois. Fermi, Pasta, Ulam, and a Mysterious Lady. Physics Today, 61(1):55–57, January 2008. URL: https://physicstoday.aip.org/features/fermi-pasta-ulam-and-a-mysterious-lady,doi:10.1063/1.2835154

    2008 doi

  11. [19]

    Time scale for energy equipartition in a two-dimensional FPU model

    Giancarlo Benettin. Time scale for energy equipartition in a two-dimensional FPU model. Chaos, 15(1):015108, 2005. doi:10.1063/1.1854278

    2005 doi

  12. [20]

    Carati, L

    A. Carati, L. Galgani, and A. Giorgilli. The Fermi-Pasta-Ulam problem as a challenge for the foundations of physics. Chaos, 15(1):015105, 2005.doi:10.1063/1.1861264

    2005 doi

  13. [21]

    The Fermi-Pasta-Ulam Problem: A Status Report, volume 728 of Lecture Notes in Physics

    Giovanni Gallavotti, editor. The Fermi-Pasta-Ulam Problem: A Status Report, volume 728 of Lecture Notes in Physics. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2008.doi:10.1007/978-3-540-72995-2

    2008 doi

  14. [22]

    Time-Scales to Equipartition in the Fermi-Pasta-Ulam Problem: Finite-Size Ef- fects and Thermodynamic Limit

    Giancarlo Benettin and Antonio Ponno. Time-Scales to Equipartition in the Fermi-Pasta-Ulam Problem: Finite-Size Ef- fects and Thermodynamic Limit. Journal of Statistical Physics, 144:793–812, 2011.doi:10.1007/s10955-011-0277-9

    2011 doi

  15. [23]

    The two-stage dynamics in the Fermi- Pasta-Ulam problem: From regular to diffusive behavior

    Antonio Ponno, Helen Christodoulidi, Charalampos Skokos, and Sergej Flach. The two-stage dynamics in the Fermi- Pasta-Ulam problem: From regular to diffusive behavior. Chaos, 21(4):043127, 2011.doi:10.1063/1.3658620

    2011 doi

  16. [24]

    Miguel Onorato, Lara Vozella, Davide Proment, and Yuri V. Lvov. Route to thermalization in theα-Fermi-Pasta-Ulam system. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 112(14):4208–4213, 2015. doi:10.1073/pnas.1404397112

    2015 doi

  17. [25]

    Transport in perturbed classical integrable systems: The pinned Toda chain

    Pierfrancesco Di Cintio, Stefano Iubini, Stefano Lepri, and Roberto Livi. Transport in perturbed classical integrable systems: The pinned Toda chain. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 117:249–254, 2018.doi:10.1016/j.chaos.2018.11.003

    2018 doi

  18. [26]

    Lebowitz, and Jasen A

    Abhishek Dhar, Aritra Kundu, Joel L. Lebowitz, and Jasen A. Scaramazza. Transport Properties of the Classical Toda Chain: Effect of a Pinning Potential. Journal of Statistical Physics, 175(6):1298–1310, 2019.doi:10.1007/ s10955-019-02284-6

    2019

  19. [27]

    Universal law of thermalization for one-dimensional perturbed Toda lattices

    Weicheng Fu, Yong Zhang, and Hong Zhao. Universal law of thermalization for one-dimensional perturbed Toda lattices. New Journal of Physics, 21(4):043009, apr 2019.doi:10.1088/1367-2630/ab115a

    2019 doi

  20. [28]

    Campbell, and Sergej Flach

    Carlo Danieli, Thudiyangal Mithun, Yagmur Kati, David K. Campbell, and Sergej Flach. Dynamical glass in weakly non- integrable Klein-Gordon chains. Phys. Rev. E, 100:032217, Sep 2019. URL:https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevE. 100.032217,doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.100.032217

    2019 doi

  21. [29]

    Dynamical Glass and Ergodization Times in Classical Josephson Junction Chains

    Thudiyangal Mithun, Carlo Danieli, Yagmur Kati, and Sergej Flach. Dynamical Glass and Ergodization Times in Classical Josephson Junction Chains. Phys. Rev. Lett., 122:054102, Feb 2019. URL:https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.122.054102,doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.054102

    2019 doi

  22. [30]

    Thudiyangal Mithun, Carlo Danieli, M. V. Fistul, B. L. Altshuler, and Sergej Flach. Fragile many-body ergodicity from action diffusion. Phys. Rev. E, 104:014218, Jul 2021. URL:https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevE.104.014218, doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.104.014218. 17

    2021 doi

  23. [31]

    Lyapunov Spectrum Scaling for Classical Many-Body Dynamics Close to In- tegrability

    Merab Malishava and Sergej Flach. Lyapunov Spectrum Scaling for Classical Many-Body Dynamics Close to In- tegrability. Phys. Rev. Lett., 128:134102, Mar 2022. URL:https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.134102, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.134102

    2022 doi

  24. [32]

    Motrunich

    Sara Vanovac, Catherine McCarthy, Federica Maria Surace, and Olexei I. Motrunich. Weak integrability breaking perturbations in classical integrable models on the lattice, 2026. URL:https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.11712,arXiv:2603. 11712

    2026

  25. [33]

    Bulchandani, and Joel E

    Xiangyu Cao, Vir B. Bulchandani, and Joel E. Moore. Incomplete Thermalization from Trap-Induced Integrability Breaking: Lessons from Classical Hard Rods. Phys. Rev. Lett., 120:164101, Apr 2018. URL:https://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevLett.120.164101,doi:10.1103/PhysRevLet...

    2018 doi

  26. [34]

    Bulchandani, Abhishek Dhar, David A

    Debarshee Bagchi, Jitendra Kethepalli, Vir B. Bulchandani, Abhishek Dhar, David A. Huse, Manas Kulkarni, and Anupam Kundu. Unusual ergodic and chaotic properties of trapped hard rods. Phys. Rev. E, 108:064130, Dec 2023. URL:https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevE.108.064130,...

    2023 doi

  27. [35]

    Thermalization and its mechanism for generic isolated quantum systems

    Marcos Rigol, Vanja Dunjko, and Maxim Olshanii. Thermalization and its mechanism for generic isolated quantum systems. Nature, 452(7189):854–858, 2008.doi:10.1038/nature06838

    2008 doi

  28. [36]

    From quantum chaos and eigenstate ther- malization to statistical mechanics and thermodynamics

    Luca D’Alessio, Yariv Kafri, Anatoli Polkovnikov, and Marcos Rigol. From quantum chaos and eigenstate ther- malization to statistical mechanics and thermodynamics. Advances in Physics, 65(3):239–362, 2016. URL:https: //www-tandfonline-com.proxy.bnl.lu/doi/full/10.1080/00018732...

    2016

  29. [37]

    Thermalization and prethermalization in isolated quantum systems: a theoretical overview

    Takashi Mori, Tatsuhiko N Ikeda, Eriko Kaminishi, and Masahito Ueda. Thermalization and prethermalization in isolated quantum systems: a theoretical overview. Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics, 51(11):112001, may 2018.doi:10.1088/1361-6455/aabcdf

    2018 doi

  30. [38]

    Smith, Eugene Demler, and J¨ org Schmiedmayer

    Michael Gring, Maximilian Kuhnert, Tim Langen, Takuya Kitagawa, Bernhard Rauer, Matthias Schreitl, Igor Mazets, David A. Smith, Eugene Demler, and J¨ org Schmiedmayer. Relaxation and Prethermalization in an Isolated Quantum System. Science, 337(6100):1224953, 2012.doi:10.1126/...

    2012 doi

  31. [39]

    Prethermalization and Thermalization in Isolated Quantum Systems

    Krishnanand Mallayya, Marcos Rigol, and Wojciech De Roeck. Prethermalization and Thermalization in Isolated Quantum Systems. Physical Review X, 9(2):021027, 2019.doi:10.1103/PhysRevX.9.021027

    2019 doi

  32. [40]

    Bruno Bertini, Fabian H. L. Essler, Stefan Groha, and Neil J. Robinson. Prethermalization and Thermalization in Models with Weak Integrability Breaking. Physical Review Letters, 115(18):180601, 2015.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett. 115.180601

    2015 doi

  33. [41]

    Weak Integrability Breaking Perturbations of Integrable Models

    Federica Maria Surace and Olexei Motrunich. Weak Integrability Breaking Perturbations of Integrable Models. Physical Review Research, 5:043019, 2023.doi:10.1103/PhysRevResearch.5.043019

    2023 doi

  34. [42]

    Motrunich

    Cheng-Ju Lin and Olexei I. Motrunich. Quasiparticle Explanation of the Weak-Thermalization Regime under Quench in a Nonintegrable Quantum Spin Chain. Physical Review A, 95(2):023621, 2017.doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.95.023621

    2017 doi

  35. [43]

    Motrunich

    Cheng-Ju Lin and Olexei I. Motrunich. Explicit Construction of Quasiconserved Local Operator of Translationally Invariant Nonintegrable Quantum Spin Chain in Prethermalization. Physical Review B, 96:214301, 2017.doi:10.1103/ PhysRevB.96.214301

    2017

  36. [44]

    Motrunich

    Cheng-Ju Lin, Anushya Chandran, and Olexei I. Motrunich. Slow Thermalization of Exact Quantum Many-Body Scar States under Perturbations. Physical Review Research, 2:033044, 2020.doi:10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.033044

    2020 doi

  37. [45]

    Sheng-Wen Li and C. P. Sun. Hierarchy Recurrences in Local Relaxation. Physical Review A, 103(4):042201, 2021. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.103.042201

    2021 doi

  38. [46]

    Long, Philip J

    David M. Long, Philip J. D. Crowley, Vedika Khemani, and Anushya Chandran. Phenomenology of the Prethermal Many-Body Localized Regime. Physical Review Letters, 131(10):106301, 2023.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.131.106301

    2023 doi

  39. [47]

    Luitz, Roderich Moessner, S

    David J. Luitz, Roderich Moessner, S. L. Sondhi, and Vedika Khemani. Prethermalization without Temperature.Physical Review X, 10(2):021046, 2020.doi:10.1103/PhysRevX.10.021046. 18

    2020 doi

  40. [48]

    Quantum many-body scars and Hilbert space fragmenta- tion: a review of exact results

    Sanjay Moudgalya, B Andrei Bernevig, and Nicolas Regnault. Quantum many-body scars and Hilbert space fragmenta- tion: a review of exact results. Reports on Progress in Physics, 85(8):086501, Jul 2022.doi:10.1088/1361-6633/ac73a0

    2022 doi

  41. [49]

    Abanin, and Zlatko Papi´ c

    Maksym Serbyn, Dmitry A. Abanin, and Zlatko Papi´ c. Quantum many-body scars and weak breaking of ergodicity. Nature Physics, 17(6):675–685, May 2021.doi:10.1038/s41567-021-01230-2

    2021 doi

  42. [50]

    Quantum many-body scars: A quasiparticle perspective

    Anushya Chandran, Thomas Iadecola, Vedika Khemani, and Roderich Moessner. Quantum many-body scars: A quasiparticle perspective. Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics, 14(Volume 14, 2023):443–469,

    2023

  43. [51]

    Motrunich

    Sanjay Moudgalya and Olexei I. Motrunich. Hilbert Space Fragmentation and Commutant Algebras. Phys. Rev. X, 12:011050, Mar 2022. URL:https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevX.12.011050,doi:10.1103/PhysRevX.12.011050

    2022 doi

  44. [52]

    Motrunich

    Sanjay Moudgalya and Olexei I. Motrunich. Exhaustive Characterization of Quantum Many-Body Scars Using Com- mutant Algebras. Phys. Rev. X, 14:041069, Dec 2024. URL:https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevX.14.041069, doi:10.1103/PhysRevX.14.041069

    2024 doi

  45. [53]

    Motrunich

    Sanjay Moudgalya and Olexei I. Motrunich. Numerical methods for detecting symmetries and commutant algebras.Phys. Rev. B, 107:224312, Jun 2023. URL:https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.107.224312,doi:10.1103/PhysRevB. 107.224312

    2023 doi

  46. [54]

    Conservation laws in stochastic deposition-evaporation models in one dimension

    Deepak Dhar and Mustansir Barma. Conservation laws in stochastic deposition-evaporation models in one dimension. Pramana, 41(2):L193–L198, 1993.doi:10.1007/BF02847591

    1993 doi

  47. [55]

    Slow Relaxation in a Model with Many Conservation Laws: Deposition and Evaporation of Trimers on a Line

    Mustansir Barma and Deepak Dhar. Slow Relaxation in a Model with Many Conservation Laws: Deposition and Evaporation of Trimers on a Line. Phys. Rev. Lett., 73:2135–2138, Oct 1994. URL:https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.73.2135,doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.73.2135

    1994 doi

  48. [56]

    The irreducible string and an infinity of additional constants of motion in a deposition- evaporation model on a line

    M K Hari Menon and D Dhar. The irreducible string and an infinity of additional constants of motion in a deposition- evaporation model on a line. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General, 28(23):6517, dec 1995.doi:10.1088/ 0305-4470/28/23/008

    1995

  49. [57]

    Menon, Mustansir Barma, and Deepak Dhar

    Gautam I. Menon, Mustansir Barma, and Deepak Dhar. Conservation laws and integrability of a one-dimensional model of diffusing dimers. Journal of Statistical Physics, 86(5-6):1237–1263, 1997.doi:10.1007/bf02183622

    1997 doi

  50. [58]

    Proof of the absence of local conserved quantities in the XYZ chain with a magnetic field

    Naoto Shiraishi. Proof of the absence of local conserved quantities in the XYZ chain with a magnetic field. Europhysics Letters, 128(1):17002, Nov 2019.doi:10.1209/0295-5075/128/17002

    2019 doi

  51. [59]

    Absence of Local Conserved Quantity in the Heisenberg Model with Next-Nearest-Neighbor Interaction

    Naoto Shiraishi. Absence of Local Conserved Quantity in the Heisenberg Model with Next-Nearest-Neighbor Interaction. Journal of Statistical Physics, 191, 2024.doi:10.1007/s10955-024-03326-4

    2024 doi

  52. [60]

    Proof of the absence of local conserved quantities in general spin- 1 2 chains with symmetric nearest-neighbor interaction

    Mizuki Yamaguchi, Yuuya Chiba, and Naoto Shiraishi. Proof of the absence of local conserved quantities in general spin- 1 2 chains with symmetric nearest-neighbor interaction. Phys. Rev. B, Jun 2026. URL:https://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/8l6f-z1jm,doi:10.1103/8l6f-z1jm

    2026 doi

  53. [61]

    Complete Classification of Integrability and Non-Integrability of S=1/2 Spin Chains with Symmetric Next-Nearest-Neighbor Interaction

    Naoto Shiraishi. Complete Classification of Integrability and Non-Integrability of S=1/2 Spin Chains with Symmetric Next-Nearest-Neighbor Interaction. Journal of Statistical Physics, 192:170, 2025.doi:10.1007/s10955-025-03551-5

    2025 doi

  54. [62]

    TheS= 1 2 XY and XYZ Models on the Two- or Higher-Dimensional Hypercu- bic Lattice Do Not Possess Nontrivial Local Conserved Quantities

    Naoto Shiraishi and Hal Tasaki. TheS= 1 2 XY and XYZ Models on the Two- or Higher-Dimensional Hypercu- bic Lattice Do Not Possess Nontrivial Local Conserved Quantities. Annales Henri Poincar´ e, 2026.doi:10.1007/ s00023-026-01699-8

    2026

  55. [63]

    V. I. Arnold. Mathematical Methods of Classical Mechanics, volume 60 of Graduate Texts in Mathematics. Springer, New York, 2 edition, 1989

    1989

  56. [64]

    Peter D. Lax. Integrals of nonlinear equations of evolution and solitary waves. Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics, 21(5):467–490, 1968.doi:10.1002/cpa.3160210503

    1968 doi

  57. [65]

    H. Bruns. ¨Uber die Integrale des Vielk¨ orper-Problems.Acta Mathematica, 11:25–96, 1887. 19

  58. [66]

    Bruns’ Theorem: The Proof and Some Generalizations

    Emmanuelle Julliard-Tosel. Bruns’ Theorem: The Proof and Some Generalizations. Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy, 76:241–281, 2000.doi:10.1023/A:1008346516349

    doi

  59. [67]

    Sur le probl` eme des trois corps et les ´ equations de la dynamique.Acta Mathematica, 13:1–270, 1890

    Henri Poincar´ e. Sur le probl` eme des trois corps et les ´ equations de la dynamique.Acta Mathematica, 13:1–270, 1890

  60. [68]

    Gauthier-Villars, Paris, 1892

    Henri Poincar´ e.Les m´ ethodes nouvelles de la m´ ecanique c´ eleste, Volume 1. Gauthier-Villars, Paris, 1892

  61. [70]

    A list of all integrable two-dimensional homogeneous polynomial potentials with a polynomial integral of order at most four in the momenta

    Katsuya Nakagawa and Haruo Yoshida. A list of all integrable two-dimensional homogeneous polynomial potentials with a polynomial integral of order at most four in the momenta. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General, 34(41):8611, oct 2001.doi:10.1088/0305-4470/34/41/316

    2001 doi

  62. [71]

    Configurational invariants of hamiltonian systems

    Giuseppe Pucacco and Kjell Rosquist. Configurational invariants of hamiltonian systems. Journal of Mathematical Physics, 46(5), 2005.doi:10.1063/1.1888565

    2005 doi

  63. [72]

    Maciejewski and Maria Przybylska

    Andrzej J. Maciejewski and Maria Przybylska. Darboux points and integrability of Hamiltonian systems with homoge- neous polynomial potential. Journal of Mathematical Physics, 46(6):062901, 05 2005.doi:10.1063/1.1917311

    2005 doi

  64. [73]

    Przybylska

    M. Przybylska. Darboux points and integrability of homogeneous hamiltonian systems with three and more degrees of freedom. Regular and Chaotic Dynamics, 14(2):263–311, 2009.doi:10.1134/s1560354709020063

    2009 doi

  65. [74]

    The Classical Groups: Their Invariants and Representations

    Hermann Weyl. The Classical Groups: Their Invariants and Representations. Princeton Landmarks in Mathematics and Physics. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, reprint edition, 1997

    1997

  66. [75]

    Rodr ´ ıguez, Piergiulio Tempesta, and Pavel Winternitz

    Miguel A. Rodr ´ ıguez, Piergiulio Tempesta, and Pavel Winternitz. Reduction of superintegrable systems: The anisotropic harmonic oscillator. Physical Review E, 78(4):046608, 2008.doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.78.046608

    2008 doi

  67. [76]

    Positional voting and doubly stochastic matrices

    Jacqueline Anderson, Brian Camara, and John Pike. Positional voting and doubly stochastic matrices. The American Mathematical Monthly, 128(4):337–351, 2021.arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1080/00029890.2020.1865065,doi:10. 1080/00029890.2020.1865065

    2021

  68. [77]

    Kolmogorov entropy and numerical experiments

    Giancarlo Benettin, Luigi Galgani, and Jean-Marie Strelcyn. Kolmogorov entropy and numerical experiments. Phys. Rev. A, 14:2338–2345, Dec 1976. URL:https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.14.2338,doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.14.2338

    1976 doi

  69. [78]

    A universal instability of many-dimensional oscillator systems

    Boris V Chirikov. A universal instability of many-dimensional oscillator systems. Physics Reports, 52(5):263–379, 1979. URL:https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0370157379900231,doi:10.1016/0370-1573(79)90023-1

    1979

  70. [79]

    Givental, Boris A

    Alexander B. Givental, Boris A. Khesin, Jerrold E. Marsden, Alexander N. Varchenko, Victor A. Vassiliev, Oleg Ya. Viro, and Vladimir M. Zakalyukin, editors. Proof of a theorem of A. N. Kolmogorov on the invariance of quasi-periodic motions under small perturbations of the Hami...

    2009 doi

  71. [80]

    Abhishodh Prakash, Alain Goriely, and S. L. Sondhi. Classical nonrelativistic fractons. Phys. Rev. B, 109:054313, Feb

  72. [81]

    Abhishodh Prakash, Ylias Sadki, and S. L. Sondhi. Machian fractons, Hamiltonian attractors, and nonequilibrium steady states. Phys. Rev. B, 110:024305, Jul 2024. URL:https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.110.024305,doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.110.024305

    2024 doi

  73. [82]

    Ylias Sadki, Abhishodh Prakash, S. L. Sondhi, and Daniel P. Arovas. Phase Space Fractons.Phys. Rev. Lett., 136:126504, Mar 2026. URL:https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/b974-mpkc,doi:10.1103/b974-mpkc

    2026 doi

  74. [83]

    Motrunich

    Sanjay Moudgalya and Olexei I. Motrunich. From symmetries to commutant algebras in standard Hamiltonians. Annals of Physics, 455:169384, 2023. URL:https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003491623001707,doi:10.1016/ j.aop.2023.169384. 20

    2023

  75. [1999]

    URL:https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/RevModPhys.71.S346,doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.71.S346

    doi

  76. [2023]

    URL:https://www.annualreviews.org/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-031620-101617,doi:10.1146/ annurev-conmatphys-031620-101617

    doi

  77. [2024]

    URL:https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.109.054313,doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.109.054313

    doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 1, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.