Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Illuminating the Black Box: A Psychometric Investigation into the Multifaceted Nature of Large Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2312.14202 v1 pith:6ENCHCTL submitted 2023-12-21 cs.CL cs.AI

classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords llmsainalitypersonalitytestspatternsprojectivetypesdiverse
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

This study explores the idea of AI Personality or AInality suggesting that Large Language Models (LLMs) exhibit patterns similar to human personalities. Assuming that LLMs share these patterns with humans, we investigate using human-centered psychometric tests such as the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI), Big Five Inventory (BFI), and Short Dark Triad (SD3) to identify and confirm LLM personality types. By introducing role-play prompts, we demonstrate the adaptability of LLMs, showing their ability to switch dynamically between different personality types. Using projective tests, such as the Washington University Sentence Completion Test (WUSCT), we uncover hidden aspects of LLM personalities that are not easily accessible through direct questioning. Projective tests allowed for a deep exploration of LLMs cognitive processes and thought patterns and gave us a multidimensional view of AInality. Our machine learning analysis revealed that LLMs exhibit distinct AInality traits and manifest diverse personality types, demonstrating dynamic shifts in response to external instructions. This study pioneers the application of projective tests on LLMs, shedding light on their diverse and adaptable AInality traits.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Measure what Matters: Psychometric Evaluation of AI with Situational Judgment Tests

    cs.AI 2025-10 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    Proposes SJTs and MIRT to measure consistent latent behavioral tendencies in LLMs, showing stability and predictive validity on external benchmarks.

Pith tools