Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Confirmation of the ${\rm \it Gaia}$ DR2 parallax zero-point offset using asteroseismology and spectroscopy in the ${\rm \it Kepler}$ field

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1805.02650 v2 pith:6FAJZQJ6 submitted 2018-05-07 astro-ph.SR

classification astro-ph.SR
keywords gaiaoffsetparallaxstarserrorsfieldkeplerzero-point
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
abstract

We present an independent confirmation of the zero-point offset of ${\rm \it Gaia}$ Data Release 2 (DR2) parallaxes using asteroseismic data of evolved stars in the ${\rm \it Kepler}$ field. Using well-characterized red giant branch (RGB) stars from the APOKASC-2 catalogue we identify a ${\rm \it Gaia}$ astrometric pseudo-color ($\nu_{\rm eff}$)- and ${\rm \it Gaia}$ $G$-band magnitude-dependent zero-point offset of $\varpi_{\rm seis} - \varpi_{Gaia} = 52.8 \pm 2.4 {\rm\ (rand.)} \pm 8.6 {\rm\ (syst.)} - (150.7 \pm 22.7)(\nu_{\rm eff} - 1.5) - (4.21 \pm 0.77)(G - 12.2) \mu{\rm as}$, in the sense that ${\rm \it Gaia}$ parallaxes are too small. The offset is found in high and low-extinction samples, as well as among both shell H-burning red giant stars and core He-burning red clump stars. We show that errors in the asteroseismic radius and temperature scales may be distinguished from errors in the ${\rm \it Gaia}$ parallax scale. We estimate systematic effects on the inferred global ${\rm \it Gaia}$ parallax offset, $c$, due to radius and temperature systematics, as well as choices in bolometric correction and the adopted form for ${\rm \it Gaia}$ parallax spatial correlations. Because of possible spatially-correlated parallax errors, as discussed by the ${\rm \it Gaia}$ team, our ${\rm \it Gaia}$ parallax offset model is specific to the ${\rm \it Kepler}$ field, but broadly compatible with the magnitude- and color-dependent offset inferred by the ${\rm \it Gaia}$ team and several subsequent investigations using independent methods.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. The subgiant HR 7322 as an asteroseismic benchmark star

    astro-ph.SR 2019-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    HR 7322's precise interferometric radius agrees with asteroseismic scaling relations, while standard stellar models underpredict the radius unless a sub-solar mixing length is adopted.

  2. The Gaia-ESO Survey: The inner disc, intermediate-age open cluster Pismis 18

    astro-ph.SR 2019-06 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    Pismis 18 is an intermediate-age (~700 Myr) inner-disc open cluster at ~7 kpc Galactocentric distance with [Fe/H] = +0.23, slightly super-solar [α/Fe] and s-process elements, and updated parameters from high-confidenc...

  3. Galactic Rotation Based on OB Stars from the Gaia DR2 Catalogue

    astro-ph.GA 2019-06 unverdicted novelty 4.0 of 10

    Gaia DR2 OB star data yield Ω₀=29.70±0.11 km s⁻¹ kpc⁻¹, Ω'₀=-4.035±0.031 km s⁻¹ kpc⁻², Ω''₀=0.620±0.014 km s⁻¹ kpc⁻³, V₀=238±5 km s⁻¹ at R₀=8.0 kpc, plus spiral wave amplitudes f_θ=4.4±1.4 km s⁻¹, f_R=5.1±1.2 km s⁻¹ a...

Pith tools