Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 2 minor 167 references

Coupled-channel dynamics generates new loosely bound K(*)D(*) molecular tetraquarks absent from single-channel calculations.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.3

2026-06-27 06:41 UTC pith:6FU3QVGN

load-bearing objection Standard OBE plus coupled-channel scan for K(*)D(*) molecules that adds EM observables, but the kernel parameters receive no calibration to scattering or lattice data so the new states may be tuning artifacts. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2606.13088 v1 pith:6FU3QVGN submitted 2026-06-11 hep-ph hep-ex

Mass spectra and electromagnetic characteristics of the K^((*))bar D^((*)) and K^((*)){D}^((*)) molecular tetraquarks from the coupled-channel dynamics

Jia-Ning Cui , Fu-Lai Wang This is my paper
classification hep-ph hep-ex
keywords molecular tetraquarksone-boson-exchangecoupled channelscharmed-strange hadronsmass spectraradiative decaysmagnetic moments
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines the mass spectra of charmed-strange states near the K(*) bar D(*) and K(*) D(*) thresholds by solving the one-boson-exchange potential in a coupled-channel framework that includes S-D wave mixing. It shows that the inter-channel couplings both deepen existing bindings and create additional shallow bound states that single-channel treatments miss. Electromagnetic quantities such as M1 radiative widths and magnetic moments are then computed from the resulting wave functions inside the constituent quark model, providing observables that can distinguish molecular interpretations from other structures. The work singles out the four-flavor exotic combinations as especially clear targets for experiment.

Core claim

The one-boson-exchange model with explicit coupled-channel effects and S-D mixing yields several K(*) bar D(*) and K(*) D(*) molecular tetraquarks as loosely bound states. The coupled-channel dynamics is essential: it strengthens binding where single-channel solutions already exist and produces new bound states where they do not. Electromagnetic decay widths and magnetic moments calculated from the spatial wave functions serve as discriminants for the molecular nature of these states.

What carries the argument

One-boson-exchange potential solved in a coupled-channel Schrödinger equation with S-D wave mixing

Load-bearing premise

The chosen coupling constants and cutoff parameters in the one-boson-exchange potential correctly reproduce the low-energy meson-meson scattering in the relevant channels.

What would settle it

Experimental searches that either detect or rule out narrow states at the specific masses and with the predicted M1 decay patterns near the K(*)D(*) thresholds.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Several new molecular candidates appear only when channels are allowed to couple.
  • Electromagnetic observables calculated from the wave functions can distinguish molecular tetraquarks from conventional states.
  • The four-flavor exotic combinations ar c ar s u d are predicted as especially clean molecular candidates.
  • Mass spectra and decay widths are obtained for both charged and neutral members of the multiplets.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar coupled-channel enhancements may appear in other heavy-light meson-meson systems near thresholds.
  • If confirmed, the states would supply new benchmarks for testing effective potentials in the charm-strange sector.
  • Non-observation of the predicted electromagnetic signatures would constrain the size of the cutoff parameters used in the model.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript uses the one-boson-exchange (OBE) potential in a coupled-channel Schrödinger equation, including S-D wave mixing, to compute bound-state masses for the K^{(*)}ar D^{(*)} and K^{(*)}D^{(*)} systems. It reports several loosely bound molecular candidates, asserts that coupled-channel dynamics both deepens existing bindings and produces new states absent in single-channel calculations, and then evaluates M1 radiative widths and magnetic moments of these states within the constituent quark model.

Significance. If the OBE kernel is shown to be reliable, the work supplies concrete mass predictions and electromagnetic observables for exotic four-flavor states that could guide experimental searches at facilities such as LHCb or Belle II. The explicit demonstration that coupled channels generate additional bound states would strengthen the case for multichannel dynamics in heavy-light meson systems.

major comments (2)
  1. [§II] §II (OBE potential construction): the coupling constants g_{K^*Kπ}, g_{D^*Dρ} etc. and the cutoff Λ are introduced without a dedicated calibration subsection that compares the resulting K^{(*)}D^{(*)} scattering lengths or phase shifts to lattice QCD or experimental data. Because the headline claim—that coupled channels generate new states absent in single-channel runs—depends on the attractive/repulsive balance encoded in this kernel, an explicit validation against independent low-energy observables is required.
  2. [Table I/II] Table of bound-state masses (presumably Table I or II): the reported binding energies for the new coupled-channel states are given without error bands arising from variation of Λ within a range that still reproduces known thresholds or from alternative regularization schemes. This makes it impossible to judge whether the appearance of the new states is robust or an artifact of the specific cutoff choice.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states qualitative conclusions but supplies no numerical mass values or decay widths; the main text should include a concise summary table of the predicted masses and widths already in the abstract or introduction.
  2. [Mass spectra section] Notation for the channels (K^{(*)}ar D^{(*)} vs. K^{(*)}D^{(*)}) is clear, but the isospin and C-parity labels for each molecular candidate should be stated explicitly in the mass-spectrum table.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive comments. We address the major comments point by point below, indicating where revisions will be made.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§II] §II (OBE potential construction): the coupling constants g_{K^*Kπ}, g_{D^*Dρ} etc. and the cutoff Λ are introduced without a dedicated calibration subsection that compares the resulting K^{(*)}D^{(*)} scattering lengths or phase shifts to lattice QCD or experimental data. Because the headline claim—that coupled channels generate new states absent in single-channel runs—depends on the attractive/repulsive balance encoded in this kernel, an explicit validation against independent low-energy observables is required.

    Authors: The coupling constants are standard values adopted from established literature on meson-exchange models for heavy-light systems, as referenced in the manuscript. The cutoff Λ is selected within the conventional range used in OBE studies to generate loosely bound molecular states. We agree that additional context on parameter origins would strengthen the presentation. In the revised manuscript we will add a short paragraph in §II explaining the sources of the couplings and their prior use in related calculations, while noting that a full new lattice calibration for these specific channels lies beyond the present scope. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Table I/II] Table of bound-state masses (presumably Table I or II): the reported binding energies for the new coupled-channel states are given without error bands arising from variation of Λ within a range that still reproduces known thresholds or from alternative regularization schemes. This makes it impossible to judge whether the appearance of the new states is robust or an artifact of the specific cutoff choice.

    Authors: We concur that a sensitivity study is needed to confirm the robustness of the new states. In the revised version we will include an explicit variation of Λ over a physically motivated interval (approximately 0.8–1.2 GeV) and demonstrate that the additional bound states generated by coupled-channel dynamics persist, thereby supplying the requested indication of stability. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected in derivation chain

full rationale

The provided abstract and text describe use of the one-boson-exchange model to solve the Schrödinger equation for bound states, comparing single-channel vs. coupled-channel results internally. No equations, parameter-fitting statements, or self-citations are quoted that reduce any central prediction (new states or binding enhancement) to an input fit or prior self-citation by construction. The electromagnetic observables are computed from the resulting wave functions in a separate constituent-quark step. The derivation remains self-contained against external benchmarks; no load-bearing step matches the enumerated circularity patterns.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

Only the abstract is available, so the ledger is necessarily incomplete. The central claims rest on the validity of the one-boson-exchange framework and the constituent quark model, both of which contain fitted parameters and domain assumptions drawn from earlier work.

free parameters (1)
  • OBE coupling constants and cutoffs
    Standard parameters in the one-boson-exchange model that must be chosen or fitted to reproduce known meson interactions.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The one-boson-exchange potential accurately captures the dominant interaction between the relevant mesons at low energy.
    Invoked to generate the mass spectra.
  • domain assumption The constituent quark model wave functions remain valid for these loosely bound molecular states when computing electromagnetic observables.
    Used for M1 widths and magnetic moments.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5781 in / 1377 out tokens · 22491 ms · 2026-06-27T06:41:02.039735+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Motivated by the observation of numerous charmed-strange hadrons lying close to the $K^{(*)}\bar D^{(*)}$ and $K^{(*)}D^{(*)}$ thresholds, we systematically investigate their mass spectra and electromagnetic characteristics, explicitly incorporating the $S$-$D$ wave mixing and coupled-channel effects. For the mass spectra, we employ the one-boson-exchange model and obtain several promising $K^{(*)}\bar D^{(*)}$ and $K^{(*)}D^{(*)}$ molecular candidates awaiting future experimental confirmation. The coupled-channel dynamics is found to play an essential role: it not only enhances binding in existing channels but also generates new loosely bound states that are absent in the single-channel approximation. Regarding the electromagnetic characteristics, we discuss the M1 radiative decay widths and magnetic moments of these charmed-strange molecular tetraquarks based on our obtained mass spectra and spatial wave functions within the constituent quark model. Our results demonstrate that the electromagnetic observables serve as valuable discriminants for clarifying the nature of these hadronic molecules. We encourage experimental collaborations to focus on such predicted charmed-strange molecular tetraquark candidates, especially the genuinely exotic $K^{(*)}\bar D^{(*)}$ states comprising four different flavors with valence quark content $\bar c \bar s u d$.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.13088 by Fu-Lai Wang, Jia-Ning Cui.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: Experimental discoveries of the charmed-strange hadrons. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: Magnetic moments of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3: Magnetic moments of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_3.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

167 extracted references · 7 canonical work pages · 5 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    S. K. Choiet al.[Belle], Observation of a narrow charmonium-like state in exclusiveB ± →K ±π+π− J/ψdecays, Phys. Rev. Lett.91, 262001 (2003)

    2003

  2. [2]

    Liu, An overview ofXYZnew particles, Chin

    X. Liu, An overview ofXYZnew particles, Chin. Sci. Bull. 59, 3815 (2014)

    2014

  3. [3]

    Hosaka, T

    A. Hosaka, T. Iijima, K. Miyabayashi, Y . Sakai and S. Yasui, Exotic hadrons with heavy flavors:X,Y,Z, and related states, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys.2016, 062C01 (2016)

    2016

  4. [4]

    J. M. Richard, Exotic hadrons: review and perspectives, Few Body Syst.57, 1185-1212 (2016)

    2016

  5. [5]

    H. X. Chen, W. Chen, X. Liu and S. L. Zhu, The hidden-charm pentaquark and tetraquark states, Phys. Rep.639, 1 (2016)

    2016

  6. [6]

    R. F. Lebed, R. E. Mitchell and E. S. Swanson, Heavy-Quark QCD Exotica, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.93, 143-194 (2017)

    2017

  7. [7]

    S. L. Olsen, T. Skwarnicki and D. Zieminska, Nonstandard heavy mesons and baryons: Experimental evidence, Rev. Mod. Phys.90, 015003 (2018)

    2018

  8. [8]

    F. K. Guo, C. Hanhart, U. G. Meiner, Q. Wang, Q. Zhao and B. S. Zou, Hadronic molecules, Rev. Mod. Phys.90, 015004 (2018)

    2018

  9. [9]

    Y . R. Liu, H. X. Chen, W. Chen, X. Liu and S. L. Zhu, Pen- taquark and tetraquark states, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.107, 237 (2019)

    2019

  10. [10]

    Brambilla, S

    N. Brambilla, S. Eidelman, C. Hanhart, A. Nefediev, C. P. Shen, C. E. Thomas, A. Vairo and C. Z. Yuan, TheXYZ states: Experimental and theoretical status and perspectives, Phys. Rep.873, 1 (2020)

    2020

  11. [11]

    H. X. Chen, W. Chen, X. Liu, Y . R. Liu and S. L. Zhu, An updated review of the new hadron states, Rept. Prog. Phys.86, 026201 (2023)

    2023

  12. [12]

    L. Meng, B. Wang, G. J. Wang and S. L. Zhu, Chiral perturba- tion theory for heavy hadrons and chiral effective field theory for heavy hadronic molecules, Phys. Rept.1019, 1-149 (2023)

    2023

  13. [13]

    M. Z. Liu, Y . W. Pan, Z. W. Liu, T. W. Wu, J. X. Lu and L. S. Geng, Three ways to decipher the nature of exotic hadrons: Multiplets, three-body hadronic molecules, and cor- relation functions, Phys. Rept.1108, 1-108 (2025)

    2025

  14. [14]

    Z. G. Wang, Review of the QCD sum rules for exotic states, Front. Phys. (Beijing)21, 016300 (2026)

    2026

  15. [15]

    X. Wang, X. Liu and Y . Gao, Colloquium: Hadron production in open-charm meson pairs ate +e− colliders, Rev. Mod. Phys. 98, 021001 (2026)

    2026

  16. [16]

    Z. Y . Bai, D. Y . Chen, Qi-Huang, X. Liu, S. Q. Luo and J. Z. Wang, Unquenched charmonium and beyond, arXiv:2602.19887

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv

  17. [17]

    Aubertet al.[BaBar], Observation of a narrow meson de- caying toD + s π0 at a mass of 2.32-GeV/c2, Phys

    B. Aubertet al.[BaBar], Observation of a narrow meson de- caying toD + s π0 at a mass of 2.32-GeV/c2, Phys. Rev. Lett.90, 242001 (2003)

    2003

  18. [18]

    Bessonet al.[CLEO], Observation of a narrow resonance of mass 2.46-GeV/c 2 decaying toD ∗+ s π0 and confirmation of theD ∗ sJ(2317) state, Phys

    D. Bessonet al.[CLEO], Observation of a narrow resonance of mass 2.46-GeV/c 2 decaying toD ∗+ s π0 and confirmation of theD ∗ sJ(2317) state, Phys. Rev. D68, 032002 (2003)

    2003

  19. [19]

    Godfrey and N

    S. Godfrey and N. Isgur, Mesons in a Relativized Quark Model with Chromodynamics, Phys. Rev. D32, 189-231 (1985)

    1985

  20. [20]

    Godfrey and R

    S. Godfrey and R. Kokoski, The Properties of p Wave Mesons with One Heavy Quark, Phys. Rev. D43, 1679-1687 (1991)

    1991

  21. [21]

    Ebert, R

    D. Ebert, R. N. Faustov and V . O. Galkin, Heavy-light meson spectroscopy and Regge trajectories in the relativistic quark model, Eur. Phys. J. C66, 197-206 (2010)

    2010

  22. [22]

    Q. T. Song, D. Y . Chen, X. Liu and T. Matsuki, Charmed- strange mesons revisited: mass spectra and strong decays, Phys. Rev. D91, 054031 (2015)

    2015

  23. [23]

    Godfrey and K

    S. Godfrey and K. Moats, Properties of Excited Charm and Charm-Strange Mesons, Phys. Rev. D93, 034035 (2016)

    2016

  24. [24]

    Barnes, F

    T. Barnes, F. E. Close and H. J. Lipkin, Implications of aDK molecule at 2.32-GeV , Phys. Rev. D68, 054006 (2003)

    2003

  25. [25]

    E. E. Kolomeitsev and M. F. M. Lutz, On Heavy light me- son resonances and chiral symmetry, Phys. Lett. B582, 39-48 (2004)

    2004

  26. [26]

    Hofmann and M

    J. Hofmann and M. F. M. Lutz, Open charm meson resonances with negative strangeness, Nucl. Phys. A733, 142-152 (2004). 15

    2004

  27. [27]

    Y . Q. Chen and X. Q. Li, A Comprehensive four-quark in- terpretation ofD s(2317),D s(2457) andD s(2632), Phys. Rev. Lett.93, 232001 (2004)

    2004

  28. [28]

    F. P. Sassen and S. Krewald, An investigation of theD + s π0 − DK−D + s ηcoupled channel dynamics, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A20, 705-707 (2005)

    2005

  29. [29]

    Y . J. Zhang, H. C. Chiang, P. N. Shen and B. S. Zou, Possible S-wave bound-states of two pseudoscalar mesons, Phys. Rev. D74, 014013 (2006)

    2006

  30. [30]

    F. K. Guo, P. N. Shen, H. C. Chiang, R. G. Ping and B. S. Zou, Dynamically generated 0+ heavy mesons in a heavy chiral uni- tary approach, Phys. Lett. B641, 278-285 (2006)

    2006

  31. [31]

    F. K. Guo, P. N. Shen and H. C. Chiang, Dynamically gener- ated 1+ heavy mesons, Phys. Lett. B647, 133-139 (2007)

    2007

  32. [32]

    Gamermann, E

    D. Gamermann, E. Oset, D. Strottman and M. J. Vicente Va- cas, Dynamically generated open and hidden charm meson systems, Phys. Rev. D76, 074016 (2007)

    2007

  33. [33]

    P. N. Shen, B. S. Zou, F. K. Guo and H. C. Chiang, 0 + and 1+ heavy mesons in heavy chiral unitary approach, Nucl. Phys. A 790, 477-480 (2007)

    2007

  34. [34]

    J. M. Flynn and J. Nieves, Elastic s-waveBπ,Dπ,DKand Kπscattering from lattice calculations of scalar form-factors in semileptonic decays, Phys. Rev. D75, 074024 (2007)

    2007

  35. [35]

    Gamermann and E

    D. Gamermann and E. Oset, Axial resonances in the open and hidden charm sectors, Eur. Phys. J. A33, 119-131 (2007)

    2007

  36. [36]

    Faessler, T

    A. Faessler, T. Gutsche, V . E. Lyubovitskij and Y . L. Ma,D∗K molecular structure of theD s1(2460) meson, Phys. Rev. D76, 114008 (2007)

    2007

  37. [37]

    Z. X. Xie, G. Q. Feng and X. H. Guo, AnalyzingD∗ s0(2317)+ in theDKmolecule picture in the Beth-Salpeter approach, Phys. Rev. D81, 036014 (2010)

    2010

  38. [38]

    Wang and X

    P. Wang and X. G. Wang, Study on 0+ states with open charm in unitarized heavy meson chiral approach, Phys. Rev. D86, 014030 (2012)

    2012

  39. [39]

    G. Q. Feng, X. H. Guo and Z. H. Zhang, Studying theD ∗K molecular structure ofD + s1(2460) in the Bethe-Salpeter ap- proach, Eur. Phys. J. C72, 2033 (2012)

    2033

  40. [40]

    G. Q. Feng and X. H. Guo,DKmolecule in the Bethe-Salpeter equation approach in the heavy quark limit, Phys. Rev. D86, 036004 (2012)

    2012

  41. [41]

    L. Liu, K. Orginos, F. K. Guo, C. Hanhart and U. G. Meiss- ner, Interactions of charmed mesons with light pseudoscalar mesons from lattice QCD and implications on the nature of theD ∗ s0(2317), Phys. Rev. D87, 014508 (2013)

    2013

  42. [42]

    Agadjanov, F

    D. Agadjanov, F. K. Guo, G. Ríos and A. Rusetsky, Bound states on the lattice with partially twisted boundary conditions, JHEP01, 118 (2015)

    2015

  43. [43]

    Martínez Torres, E

    A. Martínez Torres, E. Oset, S. Prelovsek and A. Ramos, Re- analysis of lattice QCD spectra leading to theD ∗ s0(2317) and D∗ s1(2460), JHEP05, 153 (2015)

    2015

  44. [44]

    F. S. Navarra, M. Nielsen, E. Oset and T. Sekihara, Testing the molecular nature ofD ∗ s0(2317) andD ∗ 0(2400) in semileptonic Bs andBdecays, Phys. Rev. D92, 014031 (2015)

    2015

  45. [45]

    Z. H. Guo, U. G. Meißner and D. L. Yao, New insights into theD ∗ s0(2317) and other charm scalar mesons, Phys. Rev. D 92, 094008 (2015)

    2015

  46. [46]

    P. G. Ortega, J. Segovia, D. R. Entem and F. Fernandez, Molecular components inP-wave charmed-strange mesons, Phys. Rev. D94, 074037 (2016)

    2016

  47. [47]

    Albaladejo, D

    M. Albaladejo, D. Jido, J. Nieves and E. Oset,D ∗ s0(2317) and DKscattering inBdecays from BaBar and LHCb data, Eur. Phys. J. C76, 300 (2016)

    2016

  48. [48]

    Albaladejo, M

    M. Albaladejo, M. Nielsen and E. Oset, Exploring the decay ¯B0 s →D −(DK) + to studyDKscattering and theD ∗ s0(2317) state, AIP Conf. Proc.1735, 050016 (2016)

    2016

  49. [49]

    M. L. Du, F. K. Guo, U. G. Meißner and D. L. Yao, Study of open-charm 0+ states in unitarized chiral effective theory with one-loop potentials, Eur. Phys. J. C77, 728 (2017)

    2017

  50. [50]

    G. S. Bali, S. Collins, A. Cox and A. Schäfer, Masses and decay constants of theD ∗ s0(2317) andD s1(2460) fromN f = 2 lattice QCD close to the physical point, Phys. Rev. D96, 074501 (2017)

    2017

  51. [51]

    Albaladejo, P

    M. Albaladejo, P. Fernandez-Soler, J. Nieves and P. G. Ortega, Contribution of constituent quark modelc¯sstates to the dy- namics of theD ∗ s0(2317) andD s1(2460) resonances, Eur. Phys. J. C78, 722 (2018)

    2018

  52. [52]

    Z. H. Guo, L. Liu, U. G. Meißner, J. A. Oller and A. Ruset- sky, Towards a precise determination of the scattering ampli- tudes of the charmed and light-flavor pseudoscalar mesons, Eur. Phys. J. C79, 13 (2019)

    2019

  53. [53]

    Matuschek, V

    I. Matuschek, V . Baru, F. K. Guo and C. Hanhart, On the na- ture of near-threshold bound and virtual states, Eur. Phys. J. A 57, 101 (2021)

    2021

  54. [54]

    G. K. C. Cheunget al.[Hadron Spectrum],DK I=0,D ¯KI= 0,1 scattering and theD ∗ s0(2317) from lattice QCD, JHEP02, 100 (2021)

    2021

  55. [55]

    S. Y . Kong, J. T. Zhu, D. Song and J. He, Heavy-strange meson molecules and possible candidatesD ∗ s0(2317),D s1(2460), and X0(2900), Phys. Rev. D104, 094012 (2021)

    2021

  56. [56]

    B. L. Huang, Z. Y . Lin and S. L. Zhu, Light pseudoscalar meson and heavy meson scattering lengths toO(p 4) in heavy meson chiral perturbation theory, Phys. Rev. D105, 036016 (2022)

    2022

  57. [57]

    Albaladejo and J

    M. Albaladejo and J. Nieves, Compositeness ofS-wave weakly-bound states from next-to-leading order Weinberg’s relations, Eur. Phys. J. C82, 724 (2022)

    2022

  58. [58]

    F. K. Guo, Resolving the mysteries of the positive-parity charm mesons, Chin. Sci. Bull.67, 4344-4355 (2022)

    2022

  59. [59]

    Chen and Q

    R. Chen and Q. Huang, From the isovector molecular expla- nation of the newlyT a0(++) c¯s (2900) to possible charmed-strange molecular pentaquarks, arXiv:2208.10196

    work page arXiv

  60. [60]

    Z. W. Liu, J. X. Lu and L. S. Geng, Study of theDKinterac- tion with femtoscopic correlation functions, Phys. Rev. D107, 074019 (2023)

    2023

  61. [61]

    Ikeno, G

    N. Ikeno, G. Toledo and E. Oset, Model independent analysis of femtoscopic correlation functions: An application to the D∗ s0(2317), Phys. Lett. B847, 138281 (2023)

    2023

  62. [62]

    Gil-Domínguez and R

    F. Gil-Domínguez and R. Molina, Quark mass dependence of theD ∗ s0(2317) andD s1(2460) resonances, Phys. Rev. D109, 096002 (2024)

    2024

  63. [63]

    H. J. Kim and H. C. Kim,D ∗ s0(2317) andB ∗ s0 as Molecular States, PTEP2024, 073D01 (2024)

    2024

  64. [64]

    Montesinos, M

    V . Montesinos, M. Albaladejo, J. Nieves and L. Tolos, Charge-conjugation asymmetry and molecular content: The D∗ s0(2317)± in matter, Phys. Lett. B853, 138656 (2024)

    2024

  65. [65]

    J. D. E. Yeoet al.[Hadron Spectrum],DK/Dπscattering and an exotic virtual bound state at theS U(3) flavour symmetric point from lattice QCD, JHEP07, 012 (2024)

    2024

  66. [66]

    H. P. Li, W. H. Liang, C. W. Xiao, J. J. Xie and E. Oset, Deter- mination of the binding andDKprobability of theD ∗ s0(2317) from the ( ¯D ¯K)− mass distributions inΛ b →Λ c( ¯D ¯K)− decays, Eur. Phys. J. C85, 616 (2025)

    2025

  67. [67]

    C. W. Xiao and J. J. Wu, Searching for bound states in the open strangeness systems, Eur. Phys. J. A61, 179 (2025)

    2025

  68. [68]

    Y . b. Shen, Z. W. Liu, J. X. Lu, M. Z. Liu and L. S. Geng, Prob- ing the structure of exotic hadrons through correlation func- tions, arXiv:2506.23476

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  69. [69]

    Z. Zhou, G. L. Yu, Z. G. Wang, J. Lu and B. Wu, Analysis 16 of the charm-strange hadrons and their bottom analogs with QCD sum rules, Eur. Phys. J. A62, 39 (2026)

    2026

  70. [70]

    Aaijet al.[LHCb], A model-independent study of reso- nant structure inB + →D +D−K+ decays, Phys

    R. Aaijet al.[LHCb], A model-independent study of reso- nant structure inB + →D +D−K+ decays, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 242001 (2020)

    2020

  71. [71]

    Aaijet al.[LHCb], Amplitude analysis of theB + → D+D−K+ decay, Phys

    R. Aaijet al.[LHCb], Amplitude analysis of theB + → D+D−K+ decay, Phys. Rev. D102, 112003 (2020)

    2020

  72. [72]

    Molina, T

    R. Molina, T. Branz and E. Oset, A new interpretation for the D∗ s2(2573) and the prediction of novel exotic charmed mesons, Phys. Rev. D82, 014010 (2010)

    2010

  73. [73]

    Molina and E

    R. Molina and E. Oset, Molecular picture for theX 0(2866) as aD ∗ ¯K∗ JP =0 + state and related 1 +,2 + states, Phys. Lett. B 811, 135870 (2020)

    2020

  74. [74]

    M. Z. Liu, J. J. Xie and L. S. Geng,X0(2866) as aD ∗ ¯K∗ molec- ular state, Phys. Rev. D102, 091502 (2020)

    2020

  75. [75]

    H. X. Chen, W. Chen, R. R. Dong and N. Su,X 0(2900) and X1(2900): Hadronic Molecules or Compact Tetraquarks, Chin. Phys. Lett.37, 101201 (2020)

    2020

  76. [76]

    M. W. Hu, X. Y . Lao, P. Ling and Q. Wang,X 0(2900) and its heavy quark spin partners in molecular picture, Chin. Phys. C 45, 021003 (2021)

    2021

  77. [77]

    S. S. Agaev, K. Azizi and H. Sundu, New scalar resonance X0(2900) as a ¯D∗K∗ molecule: mass and width, J. Phys. G48, 085012 (2021)

    2021

  78. [78]

    He and D

    J. He and D. Y . Chen, Molecular picture forX 0(2900) and X1(2900), Chin. Phys. C45, 063102 (2021)

    2021

  79. [79]

    Wang and S

    B. Wang and S. L. Zhu, How to understand theX(2900)?, Eur. Phys. J. C82, 419 (2022)

    2022

  80. [80]

    L. R. Dai, R. Molina and E. Oset, Looking for the exotic X0(2866) and itsJ P =1 + partner in the ¯B0 →D (∗)+K−K(∗)0 reactions, Phys. Rev. D105, 096022 (2022)

    2022

Showing first 80 references.