Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 2 cited by

Language Driven Occupancy Prediction

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that text labels can be transferred from images to LiDAR points to voxels through a semantic transitive labeling pipeline, producing dense pseudo-labeled 3D language occupancy ground truth that trains open-vocabulary…

desk verdict A solid, well-ablated pseudo-labeling pipeline for open-vocabulary occupancy; the open-vocab claim is real but bounded by the LVLM teacher's vocabulary, and the paper should say so. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.16072 v3 pith:6H6T7PMG submitted 2024-11-25 cs.CV

Zhu Yu , Bowen Pang , Lizhe Liu , Runmin Zhang , Qiang Li , Si-Yuan Cao , Maochun Luo , Mingxia Chen
show 2 more authors
Sheng Yang Hui-Liang Shen
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.CV
keywords open-vocabularyoccupancypredictionsemantictransitivelabelingpseudo-labeledgroundtruthlargevision-languagemodelssegmentationLiDAR-to-voxellabeltransferautonomousdriving3DperceptionOcc3D-nuScenes
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

LOcc claims that the bottleneck in open-vocabulary 3D occupancy prediction is not the network but the supervision: previous methods align voxels to text through noisy image-feature intermediates or sparse voxel-based projection. The paper proposes a semantic transitive labeling pipeline that moves text labels from images to LiDAR points to voxels, using a large vision-language model to extract per-scene vocabularies, an open-vocabulary segmentation model to label pixels, depth-aware point projection to label LiDAR, and multi-frame merging with majority-voting voxelization to build dense pseudo-labeled 3D language ground truth. Training ordinary supervised occupancy backbones with this ground truth, using a geometry head and a language head, yields open-vocabulary occupancy prediction that beats prior zero-shot methods on Occ3D-nuScenes (e.g., mIoU 20.29 for LOcc-BEVDet and 23.84 for LOcc-BEVDet4D, versus 15.64 for POP-3D-BEVDet4D and 15.14 for VEON-L). The paper argues this matters because it diminishes the need for labor-intensive human 3D annotation while improving on prior pseudo-labeling pipelines.

What carries the argument

The semantic transitive labeling pipeline carries the argument. It consists of vocabulary extraction with a large vision-language model using chain-of-thought prompts, pixel-to-text association via an open-vocabulary segmentation model that assigns each pixel the highest-cosine text embedding, LiDAR text pseudo-label assignment by projecting points onto the nearest visible camera image, and scene reconstruction that merges multi-frame point clouds with majority-voting voxelization to produce the final pseudo-labeled 3D language occupancy ground truth. A language autoencoder compresses the 512-dimensional CLIP embeddings into a 128-dimensional latent space so that the language head of the occupancy model can align to them efficiently.

What would settle it

Compare the pseudo-labeled ground truth class-by-class against the human-annotated Occ3D ground truth on validation scenes; if categories such as 'others' and 'other flat' remain near zero IoU even though the 2D teachers are known to segment them, the claim that the pipeline produces dense and accurate language occupancy ground truth is not supported. Alternatively, rerun the pipeline with an oracle vocabulary containing all 16 human-annotated classes: a large mIoU jump would confirm the LVLM vocabulary step, not the projection, is the binding constraint.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that precise voxel-to-text correspondences can be generated without human 3D labels by using text labels, not raw image features, as the transfer medium. The pipeline first asks a large vision-language model to list the classes present in each surround image, merges these vocabularies across consecutive frames, and uses an open-vocabulary segmentation model to assign every pixel a text label by cosine similarity. LiDAR points are then projected onto the calibrated images, selecting the visible camera with the smallest depth, and each point inherits the pixel's text label. Multi-frame pseudo-labeled point clouds are transformed into a shared world frame and voxelized with majority voting, so each occupied voxel receives the most frequent text label among its points. This produces dense and fine-grained 3D language occupancy ground truth, and the paper shows that models trained on it reach higher zero-shot mIoU on Occ3D-nuScenes than prior methods that rely on image-feature intermediates or voxel-based model-view projection.

Load-bearing premise

The whole pipeline assumes the 2D teacher stack — the vision-language model that lists classes and the open-vocabulary segmenter that labels pixels — correctly enumerates and segments every class that matters in each image; if a class is missed or mislabeled there, no later LiDAR projection or voting step can recover it.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Most existing supervised occupancy models can be adapted by replacing the prediction head with a geometry head and a language head; the paper demonstrates this on three backbones spanning both forward and backward 2D-to-3D projection.
  • Using text labels instead of image features as the transfer medium improves pseudo-ground-truth mIoU from 22.12 to 25.53 in the paper's ablation, and the improvement carries through to all downstream occupancy models.
  • Majority-voting voxelization over merged multi-frame LiDAR is more robust than nearest-point voxelization and much better than voxel-based model-view projection, which drops pseudo-ground-truth mIoU to 19.55.
  • Training on the generated ground truth transfers to open-vocabulary evaluation: with only four base classes seen, LOcc-BEVDet4D reaches 26.91 mIoU on Occ3D-nuScenes, including competitive IoUs on unseen classes.
  • The choice of open-vocabulary segmentation model is not critical: ODISE, CAT-Seg, and SAN all produce working pipelines, with the best full model reaching 23.84 mIoU.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper leaves implicit that the LVLM vocabulary step sets the ceiling on class coverage: the near-zero IoU for 'others' and 'other flat' is consistent with the teacher omitting or misnaming those classes, not with projection or voting failures.
  • A direct extension would be to replace the single LVLM vocabulary list with an ensemble of vision-language models or an open-vocabulary detector; the paper's ablation design already isolates this gain.
  • Because the geometry reconstruction and majority-voting steps do not depend on text, the same transitive pipeline could transfer other per-pixel labels (instance identities, attributes, or hand-annotated 2D masks) into dense 3D supervision.
  • The language autoencoder compresses CLIP embeddings to 128 dimensions; the fidelity of that compression is a tunable bottleneck that the paper does not sweep, so larger latent sizes are a natural next experiment.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper introduces LOcc, a framework for open-vocabulary 3D occupancy prediction. It constructs pseudo-labeled 3D language ground truth by using Qwen-VL to extract per-frame vocabularies from surround images, assigning pixel-level text labels with an open-vocabulary segmentation model (SAN), transferring those labels to LiDAR points via projection with smallest-depth selection, and then merging multiple frames with majority-voting voxelization. Standard occupancy backbones (BEVFormer, BEVDet, BEVDet4D) are trained with a geometry head and a language head that regresses compressed CLIP embeddings, and test-time semantics are obtained by cosine similarity against arbitrary text features. On Occ3D-nuScenes, LOcc reports mIoU gains over POP-3D and VEON in the zero-shot table, and ablations show the consecutive-frame vocabulary and majority-voting voxelization improve both pseudo-GT quality and downstream mIoU.

Significance. If the claims are taken as stated, the paper makes a useful contribution: it shows that text-based pseudo-labels from an LVLM/OV-Seg stack, transferred through LiDAR point clouds, provide denser and more semantically consistent 3D supervision than image-feature intermediates (Table 2, settings a vs c) and than voxel-based model-view projection (settings c vs e), across three different backbones. The systematic ablations, the pseudo-GT quality comparison in Table 3, and the experiments with three OV-Seg models in Table 5 are strengths that support the core pipeline. However, the 'open-vocabulary' framing is currently broader than the evidence: the vocabulary is inherited from the LVLM/OV-Seg stack, and Table 4 contains no baseline comparisons under the same protocol. The core derivation appears sound, but the paper needs to qualify its claims and supply missing protocol details before publication.

major comments (4)
  1. [§4.2, Table 4] The open-vocabulary protocol is underspecified to the point of ambiguity. The text defines the open-vocabulary setting as training on a subset of classes ('bicycle, motorcycle, traffic cone, sidewalk') and evaluating on seen and unseen classes, but Table 4 reports high IoUs on classes such as car (33.88 for LOcc-BEVFormer) and vegetation (29.58) that are classified as 'novel' under this split. If the pseudo-labeled ground truth generated in Section 3.1 contains these classes, then they are present in training and the evaluation is not open-vocabulary as defined; if they were removed from the pseudo-GT during training, the removal procedure is not described. The authors should state explicitly which classes appear in the pseudo-labeled training set for Table 4 and compare against POP-3D and VEON under the same protocol.
  2. [§3.1, Eq. (1); Table 1; Table 3] The vocabulary generated by Qwen-VL is an upper bound on what the pseudo-labeling pipeline can supervise, because Eq. (1) assigns every pixel the argmax over T_k only. A class omitted from T_k never receives a positive training signal in Eq. (5), so the language head cannot learn to output it at test time. The zero IoU for 'others' and the near-zero IoU for 'other flat' across all LOcc variants in Table 1, together with the 0.00/0.40 values in the pseudo-GT in Table 3, indicate that this is not merely theoretical. The paper should explicitly state that 'open-vocabulary' here means 'any class that the LVLM enumerates and the OV-Seg model can segment,' and should discuss how this bounds the practical scope of Table 4's novel-class generalization.
  3. [§3.1, Scene Reconstruction] The method is described as using unlabeled image-LiDAR data, but the reconstruction step states that 'we distinguish moving and static objects by leveraging the geometric information of 3D bounding boxes.' The origin of those bounding boxes is never stated. If they are nuScenes human-annotated 3D boxes, the pipeline is not unlabeled and its comparison with POP-3D and VEON needs to be reconsidered; if they come from an off-the-shelf detector, that detector should be identified and its effect on the pseudo-GT quality should be assessed. This is a load-bearing point for the claim of diminishing labor-intensive human annotation.
  4. [Table 4, §4.6] The open-vocabulary table reports only the proposed LOcc models, with no POP-3D or VEON results run under the same base/novel class split. Without those baseline numbers, the paper cannot support the conclusion that LOcc 'outperforms previous state-of-the-art zero-shot occupancy prediction approaches' in the open-vocabulary setting; the claims in Section 4.6 are descriptive rather than comparative. Please add the missing comparisons or soften the corresponding claim.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§4.2] The definition of the zero-shot setting ('none of the ground truth classes are seen during training') is inconsistent with Table 1, where LOcc models obtain high IoUs on classes such as car and bus without any human semantic labels; clarify whether 'seen' refers to manual labels or to pseudo-labels.
  2. [§3.3, Eq. (7)] It is unclear whether, at evaluation time, the text features are passed through the autoencoder before computing cosine similarity with the predicted language volume; if they are not, the training and evaluation feature spaces are not aligned and the evaluation metric may be inconsistent with the training loss.
  3. [§4.3] Hyperparameters such as the number of consecutive frames K and the exact vocabulary merging procedure for the temporal sequence are not specified; please provide these details for reproducibility.
  4. [Throughout] Several wording and typographical issues remain, including 'generablizability' in the contributions list and 'V oting voxelization' in the Table 2 header.
  5. [Table 5] No multi-seed variance is reported; given the small margins among the OV-Seg ablations (e.g., 20.68 vs 20.29 for BEVDet), error bars or additional seeds would strengthen the conclusions.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

The 'open-vocabulary' novel-class evaluation re-labels pseudo-GT classes as unseen: classes enumerated by the LVLM are present in the training labels, so their test IoU is not evidence of zero-shot generalization.

  1. self definitional [Sec. 4.2 evaluation settings vs Sec. 3.1 (Eq. 1), Sec. 3.2 (Eq. 5), and Sec. 4.6]
    "In contrast, the open-vocabulary setting assumes that only a subset of classes is available during training, and the model is expected to recognize both seen and unseen classes during evaluation. ... We use bicycle, motorcycle, traffic cone, and sidewalk as base classes, while treating the remaining categories as novel classes."

    The pseudo-GT pipeline in Sec. 3.1 never filters the LVLM vocabulary to the four base classes. Eq. 1 labels every pixel by argmax over the full extracted set T_k (Fig. 3 lists car, pedestrian, truck, sidewalk, terrain, etc.), and Eq. 5 trains the language head on every occupied voxel of this pseudo-GT. Thus the classes called 'novel' in Sec. 4.6 are present in the training labels by construction; their positive IoU in Table 4 measures recognition of seen classes, not generalization to unseen ones. Consistent with this, the classes absent from the pseudo-GT ('others', 'other flat') score 0.00 in Table 4. The paper's own definition of the open-vocabulary setting is therefore contradicted by its training pipeline.

full rationale

The core LOcc pipeline is not circular in the fitted-parameter sense: it generates pseudo-GT from an external 2D teacher (Qwen-VL + SAN), trains standard occupancy backbones, and evaluates against human-annotated Occ3D labels, so the headline zero-shot mIoU comparisons in Table 1 are externally grounded. There is no self-citation chain or imported uniqueness theorem, and the CLIP-space alignment in Eqs. 5-6 is a conventional distillation objective rather than a tautology. However, the paper's open-vocabulary experiment (Sec. 4.6) is internally inconsistent with its own Sec. 4.2 definition: because Sec. 3.1 does not restrict the LVLM vocabulary to the declared base classes, the 'novel' classes are available in the pseudo-labeled training data. Their nonzero IoUs therefore do not demonstrate open-vocabulary generalization, and the truly absent classes score zero. This is a partial, experiment-level circularity; the external zero-shot benchmark remains independent.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the reliability of 2D foundation models (Qwen-VL, SAN) for vocabulary extraction and pixel labeling, the correctness of the minimal-depth point-to-camera projection for occlusion handling, the availability of nuScenes 3D bounding boxes for moving/static separation, and the use of CLIP text-embedding space as both training target and evaluation metric. There are no fitted numerical parameters in the method, aside from hand-set design choices such as the 128-dimensional language latent space and the unspecified merging window K.

free parameters (3)
  • language autoencoder latent dimension = 128
    Hand-set compression of CLIP embeddings from 512 to 128 dimensions; affects capacity of the language head and memory footprint but is not fitted to optimize benchmark scores.
  • number of consecutive frames merged K = not specified
    The paper says multiple consecutive frames are treated as a unified sequence but does not report K; this choice controls point density and voting statistics, and it is a free design parameter of the pseudo-label pipeline.
  • loss weights (Lce and Lcos) = 1 and 1
    The final loss is the unweighted sum of cross-entropy and cosine losses; equal weighting is a hand-set choice that could be tuned.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption 2D open-vocabulary segmentation and LVLM vocabulary extraction provide reliable pixel-to-text labels for outdoor driving scenes.
    Eq. 1 assigns each pixel the highest-cosine text label; the entire pseudo-GT derives from these labels, so errors or omissions propagate directly to voxels.
  • domain assumption The minimal-depth camera selection in Eq. 3 correctly identifies the visible image for each LiDAR point, resolving occlusion.
    The method picks the camera projection with smallest depth inside image boundaries; this assumes that the nearest camera's view is the true visible surface, which can fail for points on occluded objects or at camera boundaries.
  • domain assumption nuScenes 3D bounding boxes are available and accurate enough to separate moving and static objects during scene reconstruction.
    Scene reconstruction explicitly uses 3D bounding box annotations, so the pipeline is not fully unlabeled as the abstract implies; incorrect or missing boxes would corrupt the merged point cloud before voxelization.
  • domain assumption CLIP text-embedding space is an appropriate semantic space for both supervision and evaluation.
    Eq. 5 supervises the language head with CLIP embeddings and evaluation selects labels by cosine similarity to CLIP text embeddings, coupling the metric to CLIP's inductive biases.
  • domain assumption Majority-voting voxelization and multi-frame merging reduce segmentation noise without introducing harmful temporal or ego-motion misalignment.
    Relies on accurate ego poses and consistency of labels across frames; voting can erase small or rare objects if they appear in few frames.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Language Driven Occupancy Prediction." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/6H6T7PMG

@misc{pith2026241116072,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Language Driven Occupancy Prediction},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/6H6T7PMG}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.16072}
}
read the original abstract

We introduce LOcc, an effective and generalizable framework for open-vocabulary occupancy (OVO) prediction. Previous approaches typically supervise the networks through coarse voxel-to-text correspondences via image features as intermediates or noisy and sparse correspondences from voxel-based model-view projections. To alleviate the inaccurate supervision, we propose a semantic transitive labeling pipeline to generate dense and fine-grained 3D language occupancy ground truth. Our pipeline presents a feasible way to dig into the valuable semantic information of images, transferring text labels from images to LiDAR point clouds and ultimately to voxels, to establish precise voxel-to-text correspondences. By replacing the original prediction head of supervised occupancy models with a geometry head for binary occupancy states and a language head for language features, LOcc effectively uses the generated language ground truth to guide the learning of 3D language volume. Through extensive experiments, we demonstrate that our transitive semantic labeling pipeline can produce more accurate pseudo-labeled ground truth, diminishing labor-intensive human annotations. Additionally, we validate LOcc across various architectures, where all models consistently outperform state-of-the-art zero-shot occupancy prediction approaches on the Occ3D-nuScenes dataset.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.16072 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Comparison of pseudo-Labeled 3D language occupancy [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Framework of our semantic transitive labeling pipeline for generating dense and fine-grained pseudo-labeled 3D language occu [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Framework of the autoencoder to map the language fea [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_5.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Quantitative visualization results on the Occ3D-nuScenes [ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. VISA: VLM-Guided Instance Semantic Auditing for 3D Occupancy World Models

    cs.CV 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    VISA improves closed-set 3D occupancy mIoU on nuScenes by using VLM instance audits as reliability-weighted semantic supervisors during training of existing world models.

  2. VoxDet: Rethinking 3D Semantic Occupancy Prediction as Dense Object Detection

    cs.GR 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    VoxDet reformulates 3D semantic occupancy prediction as dense object detection by deriving instance-boundary offsets from voxel class labels, and reports new state-of-the-art results on camera and LiDAR benchmarks.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

57 extracted references · 31 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Qwen technical report

    Jinze Bai, Shuai Bai, Yunfei Chu, Zeyu Cui, Kai Dang, Xi- aodong Deng, Yang Fan, and et al. Qwen technical report. arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.16609, 2023. 2, 3

    arXiv 2023

  2. [2]

    Qwen-vl: A versatile vision-language model for un- derstanding, localization, text reading, and beyond

    Jinze Bai, Shuai Bai, Shusheng Yang, Shijie Wang, Sinan Tan, Peng Wang, Junyang Lin, Chang Zhou, and Jingren Zhou. Qwen-vl: A versatile vision-language model for un- derstanding, localization, text reading, and beyond. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.12966, 2023. 2, 3, 4

    arXiv 2023

  3. [3]

    Se- mantickitti: A dataset for semantic scene understanding of lidar sequences

    Jens Behley, Martin Garbade, Andres Milioto, Jan Quen- zel, Sven Behnke, Cyrill Stachniss, and J ¨urgen Gall. Se- mantickitti: A dataset for semantic scene understanding of lidar sequences. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Interna- tional Conference on Computer Vision , pages 9297–9307,

    work page

  4. [4]

    Lan- gocc: Self-supervised open vocabulary occupancy estima- tion via volume rendering.arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.17310,

    Simon Boeder, Fabian Gigengack, and Benjamin Risse. Lan- gocc: Self-supervised open vocabulary occupancy estima- tion via volume rendering.arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.17310,

    arXiv

  5. [5]

    nuscenes: A multi- modal dataset for autonomous driving

    Holger Caesar, Varun Bankiti, Alex H Lang, Sourabh V ora, Venice Erin Liong, Qiang Xu, Anush Krishnan, Yu Pan, Gi- ancarlo Baldan, and Oscar Beijbom. nuscenes: A multi- modal dataset for autonomous driving. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 11621–11631, 2020. 5

    work page 2020

  6. [6]

    Monoscene: Monoc- ular 3d semantic scene completion

    Anh-Quan Cao and Raoul De Charette. Monoscene: Monoc- ular 3d semantic scene completion. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 3991–4001, 2022. 2, 6

    work page 2022

  7. [7]

    Yolo-world: Real-time open-vocabulary object detection

    Tianheng Cheng, Lin Song, Yixiao Ge, Wenyu Liu, Xing- gang Wang, and Ying Shan. Yolo-world: Real-time open-vocabulary object detection. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 16901–16911, 2024. 2

    2024

  8. [8]

    Cat- seg: Cost aggregation for open-vocabulary semantic seg- mentation

    Seokju Cho, Heeseong Shin, Sunghwan Hong, Anurag Arnab, Paul Hongsuck Seo, and Seungryong Kim. Cat- seg: Cost aggregation for open-vocabulary semantic seg- mentation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages 4113– 4123, 2024. 2, 3, 8

    work page 2024

Show all 57 references
  1. [9]

    Deep residual learning for image recognition

    Kaiming He, Xiangyu Zhang, Shaoqing Ren, and Jian Sun. Deep residual learning for image recognition. In Proceed- ings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 770–778, 2016. 5, 6

    2016

  2. [10]

    Planning-oriented autonomous driving

    Yihan Hu, Jiazhi Yang, Li Chen, Keyu Li, Chonghao Sima, Xizhou Zhu, Siqi Chai, Senyao Du, Tianwei Lin, Wenhai Wang, et al. Planning-oriented autonomous driving. In Pro- ceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 17853–17862, 2023. 1

    2023

  3. [11]

    Bevdet4d: Exploit tempo- ral cues in multi-camera 3d object detection

    Junjie Huang and Guan Huang. Bevdet4d: Exploit tempo- ral cues in multi-camera 3d object detection. arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.17054, 2022. 2, 5, 6, 7

    2022 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Bevdet: High-performance multi-camera 3d object de- tection in bird-eye-view

    Junjie Huang, Guan Huang, Zheng Zhu, Yun Ye, and Dalong Du. Bevdet: High-performance multi-camera 3d object de- tection in bird-eye-view. arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.11790,

    arXiv

  5. [13]

    Tri-perspective view for vision-based 3d semantic occupancy prediction

    Yuanhui Huang, Wenzhao Zheng, Yunpeng Zhang, Jie Zhou, and Jiwen Lu. Tri-perspective view for vision-based 3d semantic occupancy prediction. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 9223–9232, 2023. 2, 6

    2023

  6. [14]

    Selfocc: Self-supervised vision-based 3d oc- cupancy prediction

    Yuanhui Huang, Wenzhao Zheng, Borui Zhang, Jie Zhou, and Jiwen Lu. Selfocc: Self-supervised vision-based 3d oc- cupancy prediction. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Con- ference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 19946–19956, 2024. 6, 7

    2024

  7. [15]

    Tod3cap: Towards 3d dense captioning in outdoor scenes

    Bu Jin, Yupeng Zheng, Pengfei Li, Weize Li, Yuhang Zheng, Sujie Hu, Xinyu Liu, Jinwei Zhu, Zhijie Yan, Haiyang Sun, et al. Tod3cap: Towards 3d dense captioning in outdoor scenes. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Com- puter Vision, pages 367–384, 2025. 1

    2025

  8. [16]

    Lerf: Language embedded radiance fields

    Justin Kerr, Chung Min Kim, Ken Goldberg, Angjoo Kanazawa, and Matthew Tancik. Lerf: Language embedded radiance fields. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Interna- tional Conference on Computer Vision, pages 19729–19739,

  9. [17]

    Segment any- thing

    Alexander Kirillov, Eric Mintun, Nikhila Ravi, Hanzi Mao, Chloe Rolland, Laura Gustafson, Tete Xiao, Spencer White- head, Alexander C Berg, Wan-Yen Lo, et al. Segment any- thing. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Con- ference on Computer Vision, pages 4015–4026, 2023. 3, 8

    2023

  10. [18]

    Language-driven semantic seg- mentation

    Boyi Li, Kilian Q Weinberger, Serge Belongie, Vladlen Koltun, and Rene Ranftl. Language-driven semantic seg- mentation. In International Conference on Learning Rep- resentations, 2023. 1, 2, 3, 7

    2023

  11. [19]

    Dfa3d: 3d deformable attention for 2d-to-3d feature lifting

    Hongyang Li, Hao Zhang, Zhaoyang Zeng, Shilong Liu, Feng Li, Tianhe Ren, and Lei Zhang. Dfa3d: 3d deformable attention for 2d-to-3d feature lifting. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision , pages 6684–6693, 2023. 2

    2023

  12. [20]

    Ovtrack: Open-vocabulary mul- tiple object tracking

    Siyuan Li, Tobias Fischer, Lei Ke, Henghui Ding, Martin Danelljan, and Fisher Yu. Ovtrack: Open-vocabulary mul- tiple object tracking. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF con- ference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pages 5567–5577, 2023. 2

    2023

  13. [21]

    V oxdet: Rethink- ing 3d semantic occupancy prediction as dense object detec- tion

    Wuyang Li, Zhu Yu, and Alexandre Alahi. V oxdet: Rethink- ing 3d semantic occupancy prediction as dense object detec- tion. arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.04623, 2025. 2

    2025 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Choy, Chaowei Xiao, Jos ´e M

    Yiming Li, Zhiding Yu, Christopher B. Choy, Chaowei Xiao, Jos ´e M. ´Alvarez, Sanja Fidler, Chen Feng, and An- ima Anandkumar. V oxformer: Sparse voxel transformer for camera-based 3d semantic scene completion. In Proceed- ings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and...

    2023

  15. [23]

    Bevformer: Learning bird’s-eye-view representation from multi-camera images via spatiotemporal transformers

    Zhiqi Li, Wenhai Wang, Hongyang Li, Enze Xie, Chong- hao Sima, Tong Lu, Yu Qiao, and Jifeng Dai. Bevformer: Learning bird’s-eye-view representation from multi-camera images via spatiotemporal transformers. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision , pages 1–18,

  16. [24]

    Visual instruction tuning

    Haotian Liu, Chunyuan Li, Qingyang Wu, and Yong Jae Lee. Visual instruction tuning. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36, 2024. 2, 3

    2024

  17. [25]

    Decoupled weight decay regularization

    I Loshchilov. Decoupled weight decay regularization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1711.05101, 2017. 7

    2017 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Cotr: Compact occupancy transformer for vision-based 3d occupancy prediction

    Qihang Ma, Xin Tan, Yanyun Qu, Lizhuang Ma, Zhizhong Zhang, and Yuan Xie. Cotr: Compact occupancy transformer for vision-based 3d occupancy prediction. arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.01919, 2023. 1, 2

    2023 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Renderocc: Vision-centric 3d occupancy prediction with 2d rendering supervision

    Mingjie Pan, Jiaming Liu, Renrui Zhang, Peixiang Huang, Xiaoqi Li, Hongwei Xie, Bing Wang, Li Liu, and Shanghang Zhang. Renderocc: Vision-centric 3d occupancy prediction with 2d rendering supervision. In IEEE International Con- ference on Robotics and Automation , pages 12404–12411,

  20. [28]

    Openscene: 3d scene understanding with open vocabularies

    Songyou Peng, Kyle Genova, Chiyu Jiang, Andrea Tagliasacchi, Marc Pollefeys, Thomas Funkhouser, et al. Openscene: 3d scene understanding with open vocabularies. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 815–824, 2023. 2

    2023

  21. [29]

    Lift, splat, shoot: Encoding images from arbitrary camera rigs by implicitly unproject- ing to 3d

    Jonah Philion and Sanja Fidler. Lift, splat, shoot: Encoding images from arbitrary camera rigs by implicitly unproject- ing to 3d. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision, pages 194–210, 2020. 2, 5

    2020

  22. [30]

    Langsplat: 3d language gaussian splatting

    Minghan Qin, Wanhua Li, Jiawei Zhou, Haoqian Wang, and Hanspeter Pfister. Langsplat: 3d language gaussian splatting. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 20051–20060, 2024. 3

    2024

  23. [31]

    Learn- ing transferable visual models from natural language super- vision

    Alec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Chris Hallacy, Aditya Ramesh, Gabriel Goh, Sandhini Agarwal, Girish Sastry, Amanda Askell, Pamela Mishkin, Jack Clark, et al. Learn- ing transferable visual models from natural language super- vision. In Proceedings of the International Conference ...

    2021

  24. [32]

    Sam 2: Segment anything in images and videos

    Nikhila Ravi, Valentin Gabeur, Yuan-Ting Hu, Ronghang Hu, Chaitanya Ryali, Tengyu Ma, Haitham Khedr, Roman R¨adle, Chloe Rolland, Laura Gustafson, et al. Sam 2: Segment anything in images and videos. arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.00714, 2024. 8

    2024 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Occ3d: A large-scale 3d occupancy prediction benchmark for autonomous driving

    Xiaoyu Tian, Tao Jiang, Longfei Yun, Yucheng Mao, Huitong Yang, Yue Wang, Yilun Wang, and Hang Zhao. Occ3d: A large-scale 3d occupancy prediction benchmark for autonomous driving. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pages 64318–64330, 2023. 1, 2, 5, 6, 8

    2023

  26. [34]

    Scene as occupancy

    Wenwen Tong, Chonghao Sima, Tai Wang, Li Chen, Silei Wu, Hanming Deng, Yi Gu, Lewei Lu, Ping Luo, Dahua Lin, et al. Scene as occupancy. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 8406– 8415, 2023. 1, 2

    2023

  27. [35]

    Pop-3d: Open-vocabulary 3d occupancy prediction from im- ages

    Antonin V obecky, Oriane Sim ´eoni, David Hurych, Spyri- don Gidaris, Andrei Bursuc, Patrick P ´erez, and Josef Sivic. Pop-3d: Open-vocabulary 3d occupancy prediction from im- ages. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Sys- tems, 2024. 1, 2, 3, 6, 7

    2024

  28. [36]

    Embodiedscan: A holistic multi- modal 3d perception suite towards embodied ai

    Tai Wang, Xiaohan Mao, Chenming Zhu, Runsen Xu, Ruiyuan Lyu, Peisen Li, Xiao Chen, Wenwei Zhang, Kai Chen, Tianfan Xue, et al. Embodiedscan: A holistic multi- modal 3d perception suite towards embodied ai. In Proceed- ings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Patt...

    2024

  29. [37]

    Openoccupancy: A large scale benchmark for surrounding semantic occupancy perception

    Xiaofeng Wang, Zheng Zhu, Wenbo Xu, Yunpeng Zhang, Yi Wei, Xu Chi, Yun Ye, Dalong Du, Jiwen Lu, and Xin- gang Wang. Openoccupancy: A large scale benchmark for surrounding semantic occupancy perception. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vi- sio...

    2023

  30. [38]

    Chain-of-thought prompting elicits reasoning in large lan- guage models

    Jason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma, Fei Xia, Ed Chi, Quoc V Le, Denny Zhou, et al. Chain-of-thought prompting elicits reasoning in large lan- guage models. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35:24824–24837, 2022. 3

    2022

  31. [39]

    Surroundocc: Multi-camera 3d occu- pancy prediction for autonomous driving

    Yi Wei, Linqing Zhao, Wenzhao Zheng, Zheng Zhu, Jie Zhou, and Jiwen Lu. Surroundocc: Multi-camera 3d occu- pancy prediction for autonomous driving. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vi- sion, pages 21729–21740, 2023. 1, 2

    2023

  32. [40]

    Deep height decoupling for pre- cise vision-based 3d occupancy prediction

    Yuan Wu, Zhiqiang Yan, Zhengxue Wang, Xiang Li, Le Hui, and Jian Yang. Deep height decoupling for pre- cise vision-based 3d occupancy prediction. arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.07972, 2024. 2

    2024 arXiv

  33. [41]

    See through the dark: Learning illumination-affined representations for nighttime occupancy prediction

    Yuan Wu, Zhiqiang Yan, Yigong Zhang, Xiang Li, and Jian Yang. See through the dark: Learning illumination-affined representations for nighttime occupancy prediction. arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.20641, 2025. 2

    2025

  34. [42]

    A survey on occupancy perception for au- tonomous driving: The information fusion perspective.arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.05173, 2024

    Huaiyuan Xu, Junliang Chen, Shiyu Meng, Yi Wang, and Lap-Pui Chau. A survey on occupancy perception for au- tonomous driving: The information fusion perspective.arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.05173, 2024. 1

    2024 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Open-vocabulary panop- tic segmentation with text-to-image diffusion models

    Jiarui Xu, Sifei Liu, Arash Vahdat, Wonmin Byeon, Xiao- long Wang, and Shalini De Mello. Open-vocabulary panop- tic segmentation with text-to-image diffusion models. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vi- sion and Pattern Recognition, pages 2955–2966, 2023. 2, 3, 8

    2023

  36. [44]

    Side adapter network for open-vocabulary semantic segmentation

    Mengde Xu, Zheng Zhang, Fangyun Wei, Han Hu, and Xi- ang Bai. Side adapter network for open-vocabulary semantic segmentation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages 2945– 2954, 2023. 2, 3, 7, 8

    2023

  37. [45]

    Second: Sparsely embed- ded convolutional detection

    Yan Yan, Yuxing Mao, and Bo Li. Second: Sparsely embed- ded convolutional detection. Sensors, 18(10):3337, 2018. 5

    2018

  38. [46]

    Tri- perspective view decomposition for geometry-aware depth completion

    Zhiqiang Yan, Yuankai Lin, Kun Wang, Yupeng Zheng, Yufei Wang, Zhenyu Zhang, Jun Li, and Jian Yang. Tri- perspective view decomposition for geometry-aware depth completion. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages 4874– 4884, 2024. 2

    2024

  39. [47]

    Bevformer v2: Adapting modern image backbones to bird’s-eye-view recognition via perspective su- pervision

    Chenyu Yang, Yuntao Chen, Hao Tian, Chenxin Tao, Xizhou Zhu, Zhaoxiang Zhang, Gao Huang, Hongyang Li, Yu Qiao, Lewei Lu, et al. Bevformer v2: Adapting modern image backbones to bird’s-eye-view recognition via perspective su- pervision. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference...

    2023

  40. [48]

    Depth anything: Unleashing the power of large-scale unlabeled data

    Lihe Yang, Bingyi Kang, Zilong Huang, Xiaogang Xu, Jiashi Feng, and Hengshuang Zhao. Depth anything: Unleashing the power of large-scale unlabeled data. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 10371–10381, 2024. 8

    2024

  41. [49]

    Cvt-occ: Cost volume temporal fusion for 3d oc- cupancy prediction

    Zhangchen Ye, Tao Jiang, Chenfeng Xu, Yiming Li, and Hang Zhao. Cvt-occ: Cost volume temporal fusion for 3d oc- cupancy prediction. arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.13430, 2024. 2, 6

    2024 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Aggregating feature point cloud for depth completion

    Zhu Yu, Zehua Sheng, Zili Zhou, Lun Luo, Si-Yuan Cao, Hong Gu, Huaqi Zhang, and Hui-Liang Shen. Aggregating feature point cloud for depth completion. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision, pages 8732–8743, 2023. 2

    2023

  43. [51]

    Flashocc: Fast and memory-efficient occupancy prediction via channel-to-height plugin

    Zichen Yu, Changyong Shu, Jiajun Deng, Kangjie Lu, Zong- dai Liu, Jiangyong Yu, Dawei Yang, Hui Li, and Yan Chen. Flashocc: Fast and memory-efficient occupancy prediction via channel-to-height plugin. arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.12058, 2023. 2

    2023 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Context and geometry aware voxel transformer for semantic scene completion

    Zhu Yu, Runmin Zhang, Jiacheng Ying, Junchen Yu, Xiaohai Hu, Lun Luo, Si-Yuan Cao, and Hui-Liang Shen. Context and geometry aware voxel transformer for semantic scene completion. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2024. 2

    2024

  45. [53]

    Open-vocabulary object detection using captions

    Alireza Zareian, Kevin Dela Rosa, Derek Hao Hu, and Shih- Fu Chang. Open-vocabulary object detection using captions. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 14393–14402, 2021. 2

    2021

  46. [54]

    Occnerf: Self- supervised multi-camera occupancy prediction with neural radiance fields

    Chubin Zhang, Juncheng Yan, Yi Wei, Jiaxin Li, Li Liu, Yansong Tang, Yueqi Duan, and Jiwen Lu. Occnerf: Self- supervised multi-camera occupancy prediction with neural radiance fields. arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.09243, 2023. 6, 7

    2023 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Occformer: Dual-path transformer for vision-based 3d semantic occu- pancy prediction

    Yunpeng Zhang, Zheng Zhu, and Dalong Du. Occformer: Dual-path transformer for vision-based 3d semantic occu- pancy prediction. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Inter- national Conference on Computer Vision, pages 9433–9443,

  48. [56]

    Veon: V ocabulary-enhanced occupancy prediction

    Jilai Zheng, Pin Tang, Zhongdao Wang, Guoqing Wang, Xiangxuan Ren, Bailan Feng, and Chao Ma. Veon: V ocabulary-enhanced occupancy prediction. arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.12294, 2024. 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8

    2024 arXiv

  49. [57]

    Monoocc: Digging into monocular semantic occu- pancy prediction

    Yupeng Zheng, Xiang Li, Pengfei Li, Yuhang Zheng, Bu Jin, Chengliang Zhong, Xiaoxiao Long, Hao Zhao, and Qichao Zhang. Monoocc: Digging into monocular semantic occu- pancy prediction. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.08766 , 2024. 2

    2024 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.