Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

MetaPhysiCa: OOD Robustness in Physics-informed Machine Learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2303.03181 v1 pith:6IVXJEVB submitted 2023-03-06 cs.LG stat.ML

MetaPhysiCa: OOD Robustness in Physics-informed Machine Learning

classification cs.LG stat.ML
keywords taskslearningpimldifferentmachinemethodsout-of-supportparameters
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

A fundamental challenge in physics-informed machine learning (PIML) is the design of robust PIML methods for out-of-distribution (OOD) forecasting tasks. These OOD tasks require learning-to-learn from observations of the same (ODE) dynamical system with different unknown ODE parameters, and demand accurate forecasts even under out-of-support initial conditions and out-of-support ODE parameters. In this work we propose a solution for such tasks, which we define as a meta-learning procedure for causal structure discovery (including invariant risk minimization). Using three different OOD tasks, we empirically observe that the proposed approach significantly outperforms existing state-of-the-art PIML and deep learning methods.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Data-driven Discovery of Digital Twins in Biomedical Research

    q-bio.QM 2025-08 conditional novelty 2.0

    Sparse regression, especially Bayesian approaches, generally outperform symbolic regression for ODE-based digital twin discovery in biology, though the evidence is qualitative and non-systematic.