The Dataset Nutrition Label (2nd Gen): Leveraging Context to Mitigate Harms in Artificial Intelligence
read the original abstract
As the production of and reliance on datasets to produce automated decision-making systems (ADS) increases, so does the need for processes for evaluating and interrogating the underlying data. After launching the Dataset Nutrition Label in 2018, the Data Nutrition Project has made significant updates to the design and purpose of the Label, and is launching an updated Label in late 2020, which is previewed in this paper. The new Label includes context-specific Use Cases &Alerts presented through an updated design and user interface targeted towards the data scientist profile. This paper discusses the harm and bias from underlying training data that the Label is intended to mitigate, the current state of the work including new datasets being labeled, new and existing challenges, and further directions of the work, as well as Figures previewing the new label.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Evaluating Structured Documentation as a Tool for Reflexivity in Dataset Development
Structured dataset documentation shows little engagement with major reflexivity themes from FAccT literature, leading to a new codebook and extended datasheet questions.
-
Evaluation of AI Ethics Tools in Language Models: A Developers' Perspective Case Study
Evaluation of Model Cards, ALTAI, FactSheets, and Harms Modeling on Portuguese language models shows they provide broad ethical guidance but overlook unique language features and negative impacts.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.