Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 32 references

The Infrared Phase of QCD and Anderson Localization

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper argues that thermal QCD, just above the chiral crossover, enters a distinct infrared phase whose deep Dirac modes follow a near-critical power law set by Anderson-like mobility edges.

desk verdict A clear proceedings summary of the IR-phase scenario, but it adds no new evidence and the phase classification rests on a power-law extrapolation that the paper never directly validates. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.04114 v1 pith:6JO6PSLC submitted 2025-06-04 hep-lat cond-mat.dis-nnhep-phnucl-th

Ivan Horváth This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-latcond-mat.dis-nnhep-phnucl-th
keywords IRphasethermalQCDAndersonlocalizationDiracspectraldensitymobilityedgemetal-to-criticaltransitionlatticedimension
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper argues that thermal QCD does not simply shed its infrared content upon heating; at a temperature $T_{\mathrm{IR}}$ with $200\ \mathrm{MeV} < T_{\mathrm{IR}} < 230\ \mathrm{MeV}$, just above the chiral crossover near $T_A \approx 155\ \mathrm{MeV}$, the theory enters a distinct IR phase. In that phase the Dirac spectral density grows toward zero eigenvalue as $\rho(\lambda) \sim \lambda^p$ with $p$ close to $-1$, meaning deep-infrared modes proliferate instead of being depleted. The phase is defined by four features: separation of the infrared component from the bulk, scale-invariant glue in that component, non-analytic spectral behavior that may make the transition a true phase transition, and infinite glue screening lengths. The author ties these features to Anderson localization through two mobility edges, $\lambda_A > 0$ and $\lambda_{\mathrm{IR}} = 0$, making the transition a metal-to-critical transition rather than a metal-to-insulator one. If the picture holds, hot QCD's long-range physics is controlled by critical near-zero Dirac modes, with possible connections to the near-perfect fluid behavior seen in heavy-ion experiments.

What carries the argument

The central object is the Dirac spectral density $\rho(\lambda)$, the average number of Dirac eigenmodes per unit four-volume and unit spectral interval, whose deep-infrared behavior supplies the phase classification. The argument is carried by Anderson-like mobility edges: $\lambda_A > 0$, already found in hot QCD, and $\lambda_{\mathrm{IR}} = 0$, proposed as a new critical point. These edges divide the spectrum into localized and critical regions, produce the non-analyticities that enforce IR-bulk separation, and shield the IR component from renormalization-group running. The newly introduced IR dimension, an effective spatial dimension obtained by counting how a mode's effective measure responds to an increasing infrared cutoff, provides the dimensional signal: discontinuities at the mobility edges and $d_{\mathrm{IR}} = 2$ for near-zero critical modes.

What would settle it

Compute the continuum-extrapolated deep-infrared spectral density for $N_f = 2+1$ QCD at physical quark masses at several temperatures between 200 and 230 MeV on lattices with $L \ge 5\ \mathrm{fm}$ and multiple lattice spacings, and fit the exponent $p$ from $\rho(\lambda)$ for $\lambda/T$ near zero; if $p$ tends to 0 or positive as the volume grows, or if the change across $T_{\mathrm{IR}}$ does not sharpen with volume, the proposed IR phase is a lattice artifact rather than a true transition.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that thermal SU(3) gauge theories with fundamental quarks are classified by the infrared exponent $p$ in $\rho(\lambda) \propto \lambda^p$: $p = 0$ is the IR-broken hadronic phase, $p < 0$ is the IR-symmetric phase (the IR phase), and $p > 0$ is the IR-trivial ultraviolet phase. For real-world $N_f = 2+1$ QCD at physical quark masses, the theory enters the IR phase at $T_{\mathrm{IR}}$ satisfying $200\ \mathrm{MeV} < T_{\mathrm{IR}} < 230\ \mathrm{MeV}$. The IR phase is characterized by proliferation of deep-IR Dirac modes, IR-bulk separation, scale-invariant IR glue, non-analyticity in spectral quantities, and infinite glue screening lengths. The metal-to-critical scenario adds a second Anderson-like mobility edge at $\lambda_{\mathrm{IR}} = 0$ alongside the known $\lambda_A > 0$, and the effective IR dimension of the lowest near-zero modes is $d_{\mathrm{IR}} = 2$ while exact zero modes have $d_{\mathrm{IR}} = 3$.

Load-bearing premise

The argument rests on the assumption that the near-pure power law $\rho(\lambda) \sim \lambda^p$ with $p = -1 + \delta$, seen on finite lattices and extrapolated to the continuum in Fig. 6, is the true infinite-volume continuum behavior all the way down to $\lambda = 0$; if finite-volume or discretization effects contaminate that extrapolation, the phase classification in Eq. (1) and the inferred mobility edges collapse.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The chiral crossover at about 155 MeV is not the only thermal structure: QCD gains a second transition, possibly a true phase transition, at $T_{\mathrm{IR}}$ between 200 and 230 MeV.
  • In the IR phase, the deep infrared sector behaves as an autonomous component with scale-invariant glue and infinite screening lengths, so low-energy observables receive long-range contributions from near-zero Dirac modes.
  • The mobility edges $\lambda_A > 0$ and $\lambda_{\mathrm{IR}} = 0$ make the quark-gluon plasma a metal-to-critical system: modes between the edges are localized, while modes exactly at $\lambda_{\mathrm{IR}}$ are critical with $d_{\mathrm{IR}} = 2$.
  • The classification extends across the space of SU(3) theories with fundamental quarks: increasing temperature, increasing flavor number, or decreasing quark masses all drive the sequence B $\to$ IR $\to$ UV, linking the thermal IR phase to the conformal window.
  • Exact zero modes have $d_{\mathrm{IR}} = 3$ while the lowest near-zero modes have $d_{\mathrm{IR}} = 2$, so the $d_{\mathrm{IR}} = 2$ sector dominates the deep-IR action density and its temperature dependence.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If $\lambda_{\mathrm{IR}} = 0$ is a true mobility edge, then the IR phase transition is a realization of a zero-energy critical point in a chiral four-dimensional gauge theory; the same spectral diagnostic could be applied to other strongly coupled gauge theories to look for analogous phases.
  • The conjectured phase boundary in the mass-temperature plane predicts that $T_{\mathrm{IR}}$ decreases as light quark masses are lowered toward the chiral limit; this could be tested with $N_f = 2$ or $N_f = 2+1$ simulations at pion masses below the physical one.
  • The difference between exact zero modes ($d_{\mathrm{IR}} = 3$) and near-zero critical modes ($d_{\mathrm{IR}} = 2$) suggests two distinct universality classes coexist at $\lambda = 0$; a multifractal analysis of eigenmode intensities would test whether the topological zero-mode sector and the critical near-zero sector are truly independent.
  • If critical near-zero modes enhance long-range correlations, transport-like observables such as quark-number susceptibility or dilepton rates could show non-monotonic temperature dependence near 200-230 MeV; heavy-ion data at those temperatures might be reexamined for such a signal.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The manuscript, a proceedings contribution from QCHSC24, argues that thermal QCD possesses a previously unrecognized 'IR phase' between the hadronic/crossover regime and the weakly coupled QGP. The phase is defined by the infrared behavior of the Dirac spectral density, ρ(λ) ∝ λ^p with p < 0 (near p = −1), and is characterized by proliferation of deep-IR modes, IR-bulk separation, IR scale invariance, non-analyticity, and infinite glue screening lengths. The paper combines numerical lattice evidence from pure-glue and Nf = 2+1 QCD with an Anderson-localization picture in which two mobility edges, λ_A > 0 and λ_IR = 0, delimit the phase; it further appeals to an effective-dimension formalism to argue that near-zero modes have IR dimension d_IR = 2, leading to non-analytic behavior at T_IR. The paper explicitly states that the transition may be a true phase transition and gives the real-world estimate 200 MeV < T_IR < 230 MeV.

Significance. If established, the IR phase and the metal-to-critical scenario would substantially revise the standard picture of the QCD phase diagram: they predict a distinct thermal regime above the chiral crossover, an Anderson-like mobility edge at zero eigenvalue, a specific near-singular spectral shape ρ(λ) ∝ λ^{-1+δ}, and a non-trivial IR dimension d_IR = 2 for the deep-IR Dirac modes. The paper deserves credit for stating these claims in falsifiable form—Eq. (1) is a crisp classification, Eq. (2) gives a concrete temperature window, and Fig. 6 provides a continuum extrapolation of the IR peak strength—and for framing the phase diagram in a way that invites quantitative checks. However, the significance of the contribution as a standalone paper is limited by the fact that most of the load-bearing evidence is inherited from previous publications and from an unpublished reference [14]; the present manuscript does not itself contain the analysis needed to establish the power-law exponent.

major comments (4)
  1. [§2.1, Eq. (1), Figs. 5–7] The phase classification in Eq. (1) hinges on the infrared exponent p, but the manuscript does not demonstrate that the near-pure power law ρ(λ) ∝ λ^p with p = −1 + δ is stable under the uncontrolled systematic variations. Figure 7 shows cumulative spectral densities σ(λ,T) over a finite window without error bars or fit ranges: for pure glue the window covers about three orders of magnitude in T/λ, and for real-world QCD the window is shorter; neither volume dependence at fixed lattice spacing nor the dependence of the fitted δ on the lower-λ cutoff is shown. The continuum extrapolation in Fig. 6 addresses only the integrated strength of the IR peak at fixed small D, not the exponent p that defines the phase. Because p = −1 is the boundary between phases B and IR, a small finite-volume or discretization shift in δ could move the classification; this is the load-bearing assumption behind the existence of the IR phase and needs to be confronted directly.
  2. [§2.1, Ref. [14], Figs. 5–6] The pure-glue evidence for the IR phase at large volumes, shown in Fig. 5 (left), is taken from an unpublished work [14], and the continuum scaling shown in Fig. 6 (left) reproduces only the abundance at D = 4 MeV rather than the full spectral shape. As a result, the central spectral-density claim cannot be independently checked from the published record. The manuscript should either include the relevant numerical results (fitted p, δ, and their systematic errors) or make the unpublished data available and explain why the conclusions do not rest on that reference alone.
  3. [§3.3, §2.1] There is a circularity in the scale-invariance argument. In §2.1 the near-pure power-law spectral density is presented as evidence that the IR glue is scale invariant ('in the spirit of the inverse scattering problem'), while in §3.3 the metal-to-critical scenario explains that same power law as a consequence of the mobility edge λ_IR = 0. As written, the power law is both evidence for and consequence of the same phenomenon, so the explanatory claim is not falsifiable by the data shown. A discriminating test is needed, for example a prediction for the exponent δ or for a two-point correlation function that differs between the 'scale-invariant glue' and 'Anderson criticality at λ_IR' interpretations.
  4. [§2.2, Eq. (2), Fig. 4] The statement that the change at T_IR 'may be a true phase transition' is not supported by the evidence presented. The real-world estimate in Eq. (2) is based on finite lattices (L = 3.4–5.0 fm, a = 0.099–0.123 fm), and the manuscript shows no finite-size scaling of T_IR, no extrapolation of the transition sharpness to the thermodynamic limit, and no estimate of the systematic uncertainty in Eq. (2). If the phase-transition interpretation is to be retained, it needs at least a scaling analysis of the IR-regime onset with volume; otherwise the claim should be labeled as a conjecture distinct from the verified existence of a new regime.
minor comments (6)
  1. [§2.1, Fig. 7] In §2.1 the text compares T = 0.98 T_IR with T = 1.12 T_IR, while the top panels of Fig. 7 are labeled T = 0.98 T_c and T = 1.12 T_c; since the text also states that T_IR coincides with the Polyakov-line T_c, the notation should be made consistent to avoid confusion.
  2. [Fig. 7] Because the horizontal axis is log10(T/λ), the statement that 'approaching deeper IR means moving to the right' is correct but may confuse readers who expect λ to decrease from left to right; consider annotating the axis with λ as well.
  3. [Figs. 5, 7] Fig. 5 and Fig. 7 do not show error bars; for a quantity as central as the IR spectral density, at least representative error bars are necessary to judge the significance of the power-law behavior.
  4. [§3.4, Eq. (4)] The 'unique notion' of effective dimension from Refs. [26,27] is asserted without stating the axioms or the uniqueness theorem; a short summary or an explicit statement of the relevant result would help readers assess the d_IR = 2 claim.
  5. [Fig. 3 (right panel)] The axis label 'Nf' is missing its subscript and the 16.5 asymptotic-freedom boundary is not marked on the axis; please improve the figure labeling.
  6. [General] The paper repeatedly cites its own prior publications (Refs. [1]–[4], [15], [16]) for central results; while this is natural in a proceedings, the reader would benefit from explicit statements of which numerical results are new in the present work.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the IR-phase classification is an operational ordering of measured spectral exponents, not a prediction derived from the phase definition.

full rationale

The paper is a conference proceedings summarizing the author's prior lattice-QCD analyses. The central classification Eq. (1) defines phases by the measured exponent p in rho(lambda) ~ lambda^p, and p is extracted from lattice data (Figs. 5 and 7) with continuum extrapolations (Fig. 6); the paper does not fit a parameter to a subset and then predict that same quantity, nor does it derive p from scale invariance. Section 3.3 explicitly labels the power-law-to-scale-invariance inference as a 'motivation' in the spirit of the inverse scattering problem, and the metal-to-critical scenario is presented as an explanatory framework, not as a calculation whose output is the input. The heavy reliance on the author's own previous papers (Refs. [1]-[4], [15], [16], [26]-[28]) is real, but those citations supply the data and the effective-dimension formalism; the phase classification itself is not forced by a self-citation chain. The 'unique notion of effective dimension' in Sec. 3.4 is imported from the author's prior work, but it is a tool for characterizing non-analyticity, not the evidence for the existence of the IR phase. No equation reduces to another by construction, and no fitted input is renamed as a prediction.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 2 invented entities

The central claim rests on fitted spectral exponents and transition temperatures, on domain assumptions about lattice QCD and Anderson localization, and on analytic tools developed by the same author. The IR phase and the zero-mode mobility edge are newly postulated structures, each with some falsifiable evidence but no external confirmation.

free parameters (2)
  • IR spectral exponent p = p = -1 + delta, delta >= 0 very small
    The phase classification in Eq. (1) depends on p, which is extracted from lattice data in Fig. 7; the near-pure -1 value is an empirical fit, not derived.
  • T_IR (real-world QCD) = 200 MeV < T_IR < 230 MeV
    The location of the IR phase transition is obtained from lattice studies [1,15,16]; this is a fitted scale.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Lattice QCD with overlap or staggered fermions provides a valid regularized definition of QCD whose continuum limit exists and is approached by the extrapolations shown.
    Sec. 2.1 relies on a -> 0 extrapolations (Fig. 6) to conclude the IR peak persists in the continuum.
  • domain assumption The Dirac spectral density rho(lambda) in the deep IR reflects thermodynamic long-distance physics of QCD.
    The phase definition (Eq. 1) and the interpretation of IR modes as physical degrees of freedom assume spectral density encodes bulk physics.
  • domain assumption Anderson localization concepts, such as mobility edges and critical exponents, apply to the Euclidean Dirac operator spectrum in thermal QCD.
    The metal-to-critical scenario in Secs. 1 and 3 maps QCD Dirac modes to an Anderson model without deriving this mapping.
  • ad hoc to paper The Effective Number Theory and Effective Dimension Theory of Refs. [26,27] yield a unique and physically meaningful notion of IR dimension.
    Sec. 3.4 relies on d_IR computed with this framework, which was developed by the same author; no independent derivation is given in this paper.
  • domain assumption Finite-volume lattice data at volumes up to about 5 fm and a few lattice spacings are representative of the thermodynamic limit.
    Claims of a genuine phase transition assume that volume and cutoff dependences observed in Figs. 5-7 do not change the qualitative picture.
invented entities (2)
  • IR phase (IR-Symmetric phase) independent evidence
    purpose: A new thermal phase of QCD characterized by p < 0 spectral density, IR-bulk separation, IR scale invariance, and criticality at lambda = 0.
    The phase is defined by observable power-law behavior and effective dimensions; it predicts long-range gluonic correlations measurable in lattice simulations and possibly in heavy-ion data, though not yet independently confirmed outside the author's collaborations.
  • IR Anderson-like mobility edge lambda_IR = 0 independent evidence
    purpose: To separate deep-IR critical modes from localized modes and provide the non-analyticity that drives the IR phase transition.
    Evidence comes from discontinuities in IR dimension at lambda = 0 (Figs. 10-11) and is a falsifiable spectral feature, but it is inferred from the same lattice data used to define the phase.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The Infrared Phase of QCD and Anderson Localization." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/6JO6PSLC

@misc{pith2026250604114,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The Infrared Phase of QCD and Anderson Localization},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/6JO6PSLC}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.04114}
}
read the original abstract

When Anderson localization entered the QCD landscape, it was almost immediately thought about in connection with thermal phases, namely as a factor in the chiral transition. However, recent developments revealed an additional structure that made Anderson-like features central to the genesis of the entirely new thermal phase: the IR phase. I will explain these developments.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.04114 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Phase diagram for Anderson-like properties in the Dirac spectrum of thermal QCD [4]. See the explanation in the text. Temperature 𝑇A is the crossover point for Dirac spectral properties [1] and thin dashed lines represent the Matsubara scales. namely for 𝑇IR < 𝑇 < 𝑇UV, there are critical points ±𝜆A and 𝜆IR in the Dirac spectrum, yielding the modes in the range (−𝜆A, 𝜆IR) ∪ (𝜆IR, 𝜆A) (the blue region) localized with … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Types of phases in SU(3) gauge theories with fundamental quarks based on the abundance of deep-IR degrees of freedom and IR scale invariance. See the discussion in the text. low temperatures.3 IR refers to the IR-Symmetric phase which is synonymous to the IR phase and for which a possible connection to near-perfect fluid medium observed at RHIC and LHC was raised [1]. UV dubs “IR-Trivial” since IR degrees of freedom… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Left: schematic phase diagram of SU(3) gauge theories with fundamental quarks (set T) based on the abundance of deep-IR degrees of freedom and IR scale invariance. Right: the case of near-massless quarks. The asymptotic freedom (AF) boundary is at 𝑁𝑓 =16.5. See the discussion in the text. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (9 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The conjectured 𝑁𝑓 = 2 (or 𝑁𝑓 = 2 + 1) thermal QCD phase diagram including the IR phase [1]. See e.g. the talk by I. Horváth at FunQCD22 workshop for one of the explicit mentions of this structure: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1vZ0AY0WsZAfF9iV7-Br-E_2NiwaZzRGp/view.…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Dirac spectral densities for pure-glue QCD (left, [14]) and “real-world" (𝑁𝑓 = 2 + 1) QCD (right, [15]) in IR phase. The parameters of regularized systems in question are specified in the plots. (𝜆, 𝑇). Approaching deeper IR means moving to the right on the plots. Noti…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Scaling of the strength of IR peak in Dirac spectral densities for pure-glue QCD (left, overlap, [2]) and “real-world" QCD (right, staggered, [16]). The latter uses staggered dynamical lattice quarks. 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Transitions to IR phase in pure-glue (top) and “real-world” QCD (bottom) [1]. See the explanation in the text. Real-world QCD refers to 𝑁𝑓 = 2 + 1 at the physical point. (i) IR-Bulk Separation. The system becomes multicomponent with the IR segment decoupling and becomi…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Generic schematics of Anderson transitions: phase diagram, density of states and the mobility edge. Courtesy of Peter Markoš and Ref. [20]. 8 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Left: Instead of the fixed subset Ω and its measure, Effective-Number Theory shows how to define the effective subset Ωeff from the underlying probability distribution 𝑃(𝑥). Right: IR dimension quantifies the change in the measure of the set Ω (or Ωeff) in response to …
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: IR dimensions of QCD Dirac modes in the B phase (left) and in the IR phase (right) [28]. 9 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: IR dimensions of near-zero (critical) modes in IR phase. On the x-axis is the width of the near-zero region. Left [3]: pure-glue QCD at 𝑇 = 0.12𝑇IR. Right [15]: 𝑁𝑓 = 2 + 1 real-world QCD at 𝑇 =234 MeV (red) and at 𝑇 =187 MeV (green, outside of IR phase). Full symbols …
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: T-dependence of 𝑑IR for deep-IR Dirac modes which is also the spatial dimension of IR part in 𝐹 2 . [3] Andrei Alexandru and Ivan Horváth. Unusual Features of QCD Low-Energy Modes in the Infrared Phase. Phys. Rev. Lett., 127(5):052303, 2021. [4] Andrei Alexandru and I…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

32 extracted references · 29 canonical work pages

  1. [14]

    2023, unpublished

    Andrei Alexandru and Ivan Horváth. 2023, unpublished

    work page 2023

  2. [1]

    Possible New Phase of Thermal QCD.Phys

    Andrei Alexandru and Ivan Horváth. Possible New Phase of Thermal QCD.Phys. Rev. D, 100(9):094507, 2019

    work page 2019

  3. [2]

    Phases of SU(3) Gauge Theories with Fundamental Quarks via Dirac Spectral Density.Phys

    Andrei Alexandru and Ivan Horváth. Phases of SU(3) Gauge Theories with Fundamental Quarks via Dirac Spectral Density.Phys. Rev., D92(4):045038, 2015. 4I wish to acknowledge few additional works [29–32] related in various ways to the developments described here. 10 The Infrared Phase of QCD and Anderson Localization Ivan Horváth B IR UV TUV0 dIR 1 2 3 TTIR...

    work page 2015

  4. [3]

    Unusual Features of QCD Low-Energy Modes in the Infrared Phase.Phys

    Andrei Alexandru and Ivan Horváth. Unusual Features of QCD Low-Energy Modes in the Infrared Phase.Phys. Rev. Lett., 127(5):052303, 2021

    work page 2021

  5. [4]

    Anderson metal-to-critical transition in QCD.Phys

    Andrei Alexandru and Ivan Horváth. Anderson metal-to-critical transition in QCD.Phys. Lett. B, 833:137370, 2022

    work page 2022

  6. [5]

    P. W. Anderson. Absence of diffusion in certain random lattices.Phys. Rev., 109:1492–1505, Mar 1958

    1958

  7. [6]

    WORLD SCIENTIFIC, 2010

    Elihu Abrahams.50 Years of Anderson Localization. WORLD SCIENTIFIC, 2010

    work page 2010

  8. [7]

    Universalfluctuationsinspectraofthelattice Dirac operator.Phys

    AdamMiklosHalaszandJ.J.M.Verbaarschot. Universalfluctuationsinspectraofthelattice Dirac operator.Phys. Rev. Lett., 74:3920–3923, 1995

    work page 1995

Show all 32 references
  1. [8]

    Garcia-Garcia and James C

    Antonio M. Garcia-Garcia and James C. Osborn. Chiral phase transition in lattice QCD as a metal-insulator transition.Phys. Rev. D, 75:034503, 2007

    2007

  2. [9]

    Kovacs and Ferenc Pittler

    Tamas G. Kovacs and Ferenc Pittler. Anderson Localization in Quark-Gluon Plasma.Phys. Rev. Lett., 105:192001, 2010

    2010

  3. [10]

    Kovacs, and Ferenc Pittler

    Matteo Giordano, Tamas G. Kovacs, and Ferenc Pittler. Universality and the QCD Anderson Transition. Phys. Rev. Lett., 112(10):102002, 2014

    2014

  4. [11]

    Chiral Symmetry Breaking and Chiral Polarization: Tests for Finite Temperature and Many Flavors.Nucl.Phys., B891:1–41, 2015

    Andrei Alexandru and Ivan Horváth. Chiral Symmetry Breaking and Chiral Polarization: Tests for Finite Temperature and Many Flavors.Nucl.Phys., B891:1–41, 2015

    2015

  5. [12]

    J. C. Osborn, D. Toublan, and J. J. M. Verbaarschot. From chiral random matrix theory to chiral perturbation theory.Nucl. Phys., B540:317–344, 1999

    1999

  6. [13]

    OnthePhaseStructureofVector-LikeGaugeTheorieswithMassless Fermions

    TomBanksandA.Zaks. OnthePhaseStructureofVector-LikeGaugeTheorieswithMassless Fermions. Nucl. Phys., B196:189–204, 1982

    1982

  7. [15]

    Separation of Infrared and Bulk in Thermal QCD.JHEP, 2024(12):101, 2024

    Xiao-Lan Meng, Peng Sun, Andrei Alexandru, Ivan Horváth, Keh-Fei Liu, Gen Wang, and Yi-Bo Yang. Separation of Infrared and Bulk in Thermal QCD.JHEP, 2024(12):101, 2024

    2024

  8. [16]

    Dirac spectral density in Nf=2+1 QCD at T=230 MeV.Phys

    Andrei Alexandru, Claudio Bonanno, Massimo D’Elia, and Ivan Horváth. Dirac spectral density in Nf=2+1 QCD at T=230 MeV.Phys. Rev. D, 110(7):074515, 2024. 11 The Infrared Phase of QCD and Anderson Localization Ivan Horváth

    2024

  9. [17]

    Y. Aoki, G. Endrodi, Z. Fodor, S.D. Katz, and K.K. Szabo. The Order of the quantum chromodynamics transition predicted by the standard model of particle physics.Nature, 443:675–678, 2006

    2006

  10. [18]

    Aoki, Szabolcs Borsanyi, Stephan Durr, Zoltan Fodor, Sandor D

    Y. Aoki, Szabolcs Borsanyi, Stephan Durr, Zoltan Fodor, Sandor D. Katz, Stefan Krieg, and Kalman K. Szabo. The QCD transition temperature: results with physical masses in the continuum limit II.JHEP, 06:088, 2009

    2009

  11. [19]

    Bazavov et al

    A. Bazavov et al. Chiral crossover in QCD at zero and non-zero chemical potentials.Phys. Lett. B, 795:15–21, 2019

    2019

  12. [20]

    Numericalanalysisoftheandersonlocalization

    P.Markoš. Numericalanalysisoftheandersonlocalization. ActaPhysicaSlovaca ,56(5):561– 685, Oct 2006

    2006

  13. [21]

    Andersontransitions

    FerdinandEversandAlexanderD.Mirlin. Andersontransitions. ReviewsofModernPhysics , 80(4):1355–1417, Oct 2008

    2008

  14. [22]

    BrokenValenceChiralSymmetryandChiralPolarizationof DiracSpectruminN 𝑓=12QCDatSmallQuarkMass

    AndreiAlexandru,IvanHorváth. BrokenValenceChiralSymmetryandChiralPolarizationof DiracSpectruminN 𝑓=12QCDatSmallQuarkMass. AIPConf.Proc. ,1701(1):030008,2016

    2016

  15. [23]

    Coherent lattice QCD.PoS, LAT2006:053, 2006

    Ivan Horváth. Coherent lattice QCD.PoS, LAT2006:053, 2006

    2006

  16. [24]

    A Framework for Systematic Study of QCD Vacuum Structure II: Coherent Lattice QCD

    Ivan Horváth. A Framework for Systematic Study of QCD Vacuum Structure II: Coherent Lattice QCD. arXiv:hep-lat/0607031, 2006

    2006 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Classical Limits of Scalar and Tensor Gauge Operators Based on the Overlap Dirac Matrix.Phys.Rev., D78:085002, 2008

    Andrei Alexandru, Ivan Horváth, and Keh-Fei Liu. Classical Limits of Scalar and Tensor Gauge Operators Based on the Overlap Dirac Matrix.Phys.Rev., D78:085002, 2008

    2008

  18. [26]

    Effective Number Theory: Counting the Identities of a Quantum State.Entropy, 22:1273, 2020

    Ivan Horváth and Robert Mendris. Effective Number Theory: Counting the Identities of a Quantum State.Entropy, 22:1273, 2020

    2020

  19. [27]

    Counting-Based Effective Dimension and Discrete Regularizations.Entropy, 25(3):482, 2023

    Ivan Horváth, Peter Markoš, and Robert Mendris. Counting-Based Effective Dimension and Discrete Regularizations.Entropy, 25(3):482, 2023

    2023

  20. [28]

    Localized modes in the IR phase of QCD.Phys

    Andrei Alexandru, Ivan Horváth, and Neel Bhattacharyya. Localized modes in the IR phase of QCD.Phys. Rev. D, 109(1):014501, 2024

    2024

  21. [29]

    Chiralcondensate in the deconfined phase of quenched gauge theories.Phys.Rev., D61:074504, 2000

    RobertG.Edwards,UrsM.Heller,JoeE.Kiskis,andRajamaniNarayanan. Chiralcondensate in the deconfined phase of quenched gauge theories.Phys.Rev., D61:074504, 2000

    2000

  22. [30]

    Microscopicoriginof 𝑈𝐴(1)symmetryviolationinthehightemperaturephaseofQCD

    Viktor Dick, Frithjof Karsch, Edwin Laermann, Swagato Mukherjee, and Sayantan Sharma. Microscopicoriginof 𝑈𝐴(1)symmetryviolationinthehightemperaturephaseofQCD. Phys. Rev., D91(9):094504, 2015

    2015

  23. [31]

    QCDAndersontransitionwithoverlap valence quarks on a twisted-mass sea.Phys

    RobinKehr,DominikSmith,andLorenzvonSmekal. QCDAndersontransitionwithoverlap valence quarks on a twisted-mass sea.Phys. Rev. D, 109(7):074512, 2024

    2024

  24. [32]

    Tamas G. Kovacs. Fate of Chiral Symmetries in the Quark-Gluon Plasma from an Instanton- Based Random Matrix Model of QCD.Phys. Rev. Lett., 132(13):131902, 2024. 12

    2024

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.