Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Finding Syntactic Representations in Neural Stacks

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1906.01594 v1 pith:6K5LHGNZ submitted 2019-06-04 cs.CL cs.LGcs.NE

classification cs.CLcs.LGcs.NE
keywords stackstructuresyntacticbiasdifferentiablehierarchicallanguagelearning
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Neural network architectures have been augmented with differentiable stacks in order to introduce a bias toward learning hierarchy-sensitive regularities. It has, however, proven difficult to assess the degree to which such a bias is effective, as the operation of the differentiable stack is not always interpretable. In this paper, we attempt to detect the presence of latent representations of hierarchical structure through an exploration of the unsupervised learning of constituency structure. Using a technique due to Shen et al. (2018a,b), we extract syntactic trees from the pushing behavior of stack RNNs trained on language modeling and classification objectives. We find that our models produce parses that reflect natural language syntactic constituencies, demonstrating that stack RNNs do indeed infer linguistically relevant hierarchical structure.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Why Are Parsing Actions for Understanding Message Hierarchies Not Random?

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Random-branching parsing agents lose their communication-accuracy advantage on Dyck-k hierarchical meaning spaces and show high surprisal on unseen messages, suggesting they are poor models of human language understanding.

Pith tools